significantlyincreased during the study. This shows that the students gain more confidence as they advance inthe curriculum. On the other hand, the anxiety of students decreased. Lower anxiety may be dueto an increase in confidence, experience from completed coursework, and internship or full-timejob offers. However, the motivation of students remained constant, which means that theyexperience similar motivation levels when performing projects. This may be due to the fact thatfreshmen start school with a high level of motivation, which remains high throughout theireducation. This study has discovered that an engineering program is able to produce valuableengineers by increasing their self-efficacy and creativity.The bio-inspired design methods study examined
treat the airway dehydration present in patients with Cystic Fibrosis through mathematical modeling and systems engineering principles.Dr. Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Renee Clark has 23 years of experience as an engineer and analyst. She currently serves as the Direc- tor of Assessment for the University of Pittsburgh’s Swanson School of Engineering and its Engineering Education Research Center (EERC), where her research focuses on assessment and evaluation of engi- neering education research projects and initiatives. She has most recently worked for Walgreens as a Sr. Data Analyst and General Motors/Delphi Automotive as a Sr. Applications Programmer and Manufactur- ing Quality Engineer. She received
and the ways in which this identity is influenced by students’ academic relationships, events, and expe- riences. Dr. McCall holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures
graduate student population.In [18], programs at different universities that aim to support veterans in STEM were examined.With one exception, these programs focused exclusively on undergraduate students. Similarly, in[19] there was a focus on policies and support services for veterans in STEM. This work diddelve somewhat into the assets that veterans have as students, including persistence or “grit”,adaptability, and levels of motivation and maturity. The authors found that these students weresuccessful particularly in teamwork-based class projects. The examination of assets of militaryservice was further examined in [20], where it was found that while age itself did not appear tobe an asset, veteran status was; it was associated with
. Active learning strategies canpromote higher order thinking11-13, hence project-, or problem-, or case studies-based learning,have been developed and applied in engineering courses.Observation is critical in learning; starting from childhood, humans learn via observation,especially from peers24-26. Learning in peer-led, problem-based learning settings27-28 can be ahighly effective means to encourage student engagement in more profound learning29-31.Meaningful learning emphasizes active, constructive, intentional, authentic and cooperativelearning32. Peer learning encourages meaningful learning that involves students teaching andlearning from each other as well as sharing of ideas, knowledge and experiences, and emphasizesinterdependent as
, research and industry. He earned his Bachelor’s Degree in Chemical Engineering from Panjab University in 1971, and Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi in 1986.Prof. Clark Henson Vangilder, Central Arizona College Prior to obtaining a BS in Mathematics in 1995, I served in the US Navy as a Submarine Nuclear Propul- sion Plant Operator from 1985 – 1991. Subsequent to the BS degree, I obtained employment with DeVry University from 1998 – 2008; during which, I completed a Master’s degree in Physics, with an empha- sis on Physics Education. Since 2008, I have been the Professor of Physics at Central Arizona College. Current projects include the development of engineering AS degree
number of scientific research papers to the various reputed peer review journals and conferences. He has strong experimental and computational background with more than 14 years of experience. He has funded projects from NASA, DOE, NNSA, NSF, and various small businesses supporting DoD, MDA, and NASA-related research. He serves as scientific reviewer for a number of national and international journals publications on nuclear science and engineering.Dr. M. Golam Faruk, Prairie View A&M University M. Golam Faruk* earned his M.S. degree in the Nuclear Engineering program from the University of Texas, Austin in 2000. He also earned another M.S. and a Ph.D. degree in electrical and computer engi- neering (ECE) from
community are aware of uranium in the ground water, as the area has beenplagued with water quality problems. This legacy cycle will give the students information needto become informed citizens.Summer ResearchWith a summer experience at Texas A&M University-Kingsville’s Research Experience forTeachers (RET) project, the teacher conducted research on baseline water quality prior to in siturecovery (ISR) mining for uranium. This research was instrumental to the understanding ofwater quality in our community, both personally and professionally. The teacher moved to anarea that has been riddled with ground water quality and uranium mining controversy. Prior tothis research, the teacher knew nothing of the importance water quality. The teacher was
. It provides avisual aid for students to solve problems and it is able to guide (tutor) them through the processof solving a truss design by providing immediate and intelligent feedback and guidance.The objective of this project is to evaluate and improve on the Mechanix program whilemeasuring its effectiveness for student learning. This will be done through both quantitative andqualitative means with freshmen students at Texas A&M University. An experiment will analyze Page 23.894.2the effects of Mechanix on both short-term impact and longer-term retention measured throughhomework assignments, exam questions and pre/post concept
complementary disciplines. At the beginning of eachacademic year, social events were hosted to help new HAIS students assimilate into the learningcommunity. At the end of each semester, research teams met to present progress and findings fortheir projects in a mini research conference-style session. HAIS scholars across all five years ofdata reported high levels of satisfaction with the HAIS program in general, with the researchteam and mentoring rated higher than study halls. SOC was consistently rated as high, andSTEM Affinity as measured by the STEM Affinity Scale, was also consistently high.I. Introduction There are well-known and widespread issues that come with recruiting and retaining adiverse group of students into STEM (science
trainingreceived by engineers.ConclusionTo be a self-regulated learner, students must make proper and accurate judgments of theirlearning. Students must also use that information to make meaningful decisions about how toproceed when they are solving problems. This project shows that it is possible to improvestudents’ metacognitive monitoring and performance during problem-solving and, in particular,in their work with open and complex problems. It also demonstrates the potential for curriculafocused on engineering reasoning to promote stronger perceptions of efficacy in bothengineering and mathematics, particularly among students who may be under-prepared for andare often under-represented in engineering.AcknowledgementsThis project was funded by the
participants,as well as an audio recording of their verbalizations and the resulting transcript of the interview.These data were analyzed using thematic analysis with a provisionally determined rubric [31,32]based on the chosen knowledge transfer framework. Multiple investigators conducted theinterviews and analyzed the resulting data before peer debriefing within the project team wasused to develop and integrate the resulting themes and discuss patterns in the data.Findings and DiscussionThe initial interview protocol and data (n=11) that was analyzed to examine expert and noviceapproaches to problem solving were highly useful in demonstrating where student participantsfaced difficulties in transferring their knowledge and understanding. Findings
(such as static equivalent of distributed loads, moments and couples, determining the axial and torsional stress components, etc.) „came back‟ quickly to their memory than drawing free body diagrams, finding centroid and moment of composite sections such a T-Section, internal loads, etc. Few help sessions were conducted by the instructor with poor attendance (due to various reasons). The majority of these students‟ performance on the two tests and three to five number of quizzes has improved slightly, but not significantly. However, their performance on the final project was significantly higher due to the fact that the instructor gave them time to correct the mistakes (to redo wrong work), and also due to the group effort
or using modeling projects, particularly in the first years of theengineering curriculum [1-3]. There are some well-developed pedagogies that demonstrate thesuccesses of doing this. Model-eliciting activities (MEAs) are an impactful example of apedagogical approach used in first-year engineering to teach mathematical modeling skills [3].Even though there are some established approaches, there is still a need for more meaningfulways to teach modeling throughout the engineering curricula and especially in first-yearengineering courses [1].Developing computational thinking skills is something that has been emphasized in engineeringeducation more recently and aligns with this call for curriculum that explicitly teachesmathematical and
University of Texas at Austin and BA in Psychology from Bard College. She is currently Assistant Professor of Education and Department Chair of Core Education at Landmark College in Putney, VT. She consults as a researcher and program evaluator for STEM education programs.Dr. Michelle Batchelder Burd , Dr. Michelle Burd, is Principal/Owner of Burd’s Eye View, an independent consulting firm in Austin, TX, which conducts program evaluation for educational institutions and nonprofits. Current projects examine experiential and active learning, culturally relevant pedagogy, faculty development and systemic reform in STEM. Michelle has a B.A. in psychology with a concentration in mathematics from the University of North
, Washington State University Charles (Chuck) Pezeshki is the Director of the Industrial Design Clinic in the School of MME at Wash- ington State University. The Industrial Design Clinic is the primary capstone vehicle for the School and focuses on industrially sponsored projects with hard deliverables that students must complete for gradua- tion. His research area is in knowledge construction as a function of social/relational organization. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Measuring the Factors Associated with Student Persistence in the Washington State STARS ProgramAbstractAs the state of Washington continues to face a shortage of qualified workers needed to fill
-structured problem is included in Figure 1. This ill-structured problem was developed by research team members, along with other problems, and sent to the project advisory board members for feedback. Participants were asked to read the problem first and then formulate a solution in 30 minutes. They were instructed to think aloud while they worked on the problem. When they fell silent for more than 20 seconds, an interviewer reminded them to think aloud. The participants were not allowed to use the Internet during the problem solving process. Problem solving processes of participants were audio and video recorded for transcription purposes. Each participant also filled out a demographics survey. Gum Removal in Central
Adolescence, Contemporary Educational Psychology, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27418and Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. She received a Spencer Foundation Grant in 2007to examine academic prospects, interpersonal relationships, and social well-being of students in schooldistricts with a high concentration of students of Arab and Chaldean origins. Recently, she received in-ternal grants from the University of Toledo to conduct mindfulness intervention projects with elementaryschool students and preservice teachers. She is also the recipient of the Fulbright Specialist Fellowship
graduate or simply drop out1, and thenation seeks one million additional STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics)graduates2, the competence of these STEM graduates is still paramount over quantity ofgraduates in the global competitive market. As much as traditional assessment tools ofexaminations and projects address the procedural and hopefully higher-order thinking in aparticular course, we also need tools to assess the level of conceptual thinking of our students.One such tool is the concept inventory (CI) instrument that allows instructors to not onlymeasure a student’s conceptual understanding but also the misconceptions they may havedeveloped. The instrument is typically a multiple-choice question test. The questions focus
class, which we currently administer using BlackBoard. Infuture work, we will interface this system to our circuit generation, solution generation, andgraphics generation software in VB6 (running on a web server) so that it can fully control thestructure of tutorial sequences.3. Classroom Usage and Survey ResultsA major recent focus of our project has been expanding usage of our software to a large numberof students in a variety of institutions of different types. The use of the software is generallymade mandatory (e.g., as a required homework assignment whose completion forms part of theirgrade), as busy students do not tend to use it very often if is purely optional for them. The web-based interface described above has greatly facilitated
minorities and women to UWM’s College of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Jablonski is focusing her dissertation on sustainable oxidation of textile wastewater and is working to create small-scale wastewater treatment units for cottage textile industries. She trained at the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) in Nagpur, India where she worked on biodegra- dation of azo dye intermediates. Jablonski served as Co-chair of UWM’s student chapter of Engineers Without Borders for two years since its inception in 2007 and continues to help design and implement water distribution projects in Guatemala. Jablonski was a 2008 recipient of the NSF Graduate Fellow- ship Honorable Mention, the 2008 Wisconsin
during model development. A few images from the dataset are shown below. Note that theimage size or quality does not bring down the accuracy of a model. A model trained on highquality images will need more computational resources. Figure 3: Examples of images with 'Neutral', ‘Happy’, ‘Sad’, ‘Surprise’ labels respectively. (Retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/msambare/fer2013)3.5.1.3 Data PreprocessingThe data was next preprocessed to be prepared for the model that will be used for classificationin this project, MobileNetV2. MobileNetV2 is an efficient convolutional neural networkarchitecture used in various computer vision tasks such as image classification, object detection,and facial
then builds up to line and planar charges and the movement of test charges launchedwith initial velocities. Students that work in pairs have their augmented reality experiencessynchronized. Advancing slides, selecting predictions, and launching test charges advances theexperience for both students simultaneously. The slides can be moved within the screen duringthe experience by dragging it with the touchscreen. Dragging and dropping slides to newlocations within the environment affects the screen of the individual student only. Research Context and Participants. This project took place within a large, four-year researchinstitution in the southwest US during the Fall 2023 semester. Students from an introductoryelectricity and magnetism physics
while doing research. Competence now centers on understanding, positivefeedback from experiences, confidence levels, and experiences where others ask for helpregarding research projects and work. To avoid potential order effects, the order of the items inthe actual survey was randomized such that recognition, interest, and competence items areinterspersed with one another rather than occurring sequentially. However, the items are groupedtogether in Table 1 below for greater clarity.As discussed above, the complementary work of Perkins et al.2 used a different approach toadapting Godwin’s scales,1 including the generation and testing of several new items. It is notedthat, following the process of independently adapting Godwin’s survey in the
engineers and engineering.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2004.[7] S. Carreño, E. Palou, A. López-Malo. (2010, June), “Eliciting P 12 Mexican Teachers’ Images Of Engineering: What Do Engineers Do?” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2010.[8] V. Pizziconi, S. Haag, T. Ganesh, L. Cozort, S. Krause, A. Tasooji, B.L. Ramakrishna, D. Meldrum, B. Lunt, A. Valdez, and V. Yarbrough (2010). “The P3E2 project: The introduction, implementation and evaluation of engineering design integrated across the middle school curriculum.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2010.[9] S.Y. Yoon, M.G. Evans, J. Strobel. “Validation of the
-funded project studies whether providing students with training and practicewriting questions about their confusions in an undergraduate engineering statics course supportsimproved course performance and metacognitive awareness. Data collection for the projectincludes assessing multiple measures of students’ metacognition, including metacognitivemonitoring during statics exams. In this current study, we focus exclusively on the monitoringdata collected thus far.Metacognitive monitoring is the process of observing one’s understanding and approach whilecompleting a learning task [1]. One way to assess students’ metacognitive monitoring is tomeasure students’ ability to accurately either predict or postdict their score on an assessment oftheir
prototype for a series ofactivities, to be developed in the EIM2 project. Our next steps include articulating a set of designprinciples that can be used to guide our own task development work and our co-design work withparticipating teachers.ReferencesAguirre, J. M., Anhalt, C. O., Cortez, R., Turner, E. E., & Simic-Muller, K. (2019). Engaging teachers in the powerful combination of mathematical modeling and social justice: The Flint Water Task. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 7(2), 7-26.Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing. In, J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning, (pp. 171-200) Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Cirillo, M., Bartell, T. G., &
STEM teacher preparation and professional development.Prof. Chelsey Simmons, University of Florida Chelsey S. Simmons, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. She joined UF in Fall 2013 following a visiting research position at the Swiss Federal Insti- tute of Technology (ETH) Zurich. Her research lab investigates the relationship between cell biology and tissue mechanics, and their projects are funded by the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and American Heart Association. She has received numerous fellowships and awards, including NIH’s Maximizing Investigators’ Research Award for Early Stage Investigators (2018), BMES-CMBE’s Rising Star
skills. To this end, threeanchor chemistry concepts were selected for the summer sessions, and five additional conceptswere selected for the academic year support sessions (see figure 4). Figure 4: Chemistry content included in the course design.As previously mentioned, the bridge course was originally designed to be an in-person course,with the activities and sessions for chemistry involving learning spaces like active learningclassrooms and laboratories in the Department of Chemistry. However, the first implementationforced us to do the course via remote instruction, impacting our planned activities. The originaldesign included hands-on experimentation, laboratory data collection, group work, cooperativelearning projects, and
experience working with several diversity and inclusion initiatives at her university, and is currently in her second year as the graduate assistant for this paper’s program.Dr. Marianna Savoca, Stony Brook University Marianna Savoca is both an administrator and faculty member. She teaches career development, leader- ship, and external relations, collaborates with faculty on research and programmatic initiatives, as well as oversees internships and practicum experiences for graduate and undergraduate students. She leads campus-wide efforts to scale career development and access to high-impact experiential education for students in all majors and degree levels. She is Co-PI on two NSF-funded projects with a focus on STEM