questions for this project: 1. How consistent are the three EM frameworks, measured through the similarity of results when used to analyze EM engineering courses? 2. How clear are the three EM frameworks, measured by challenges identified when attempting to utilize ambiguous or overly-specific EM learning objectives when measuring the EM content of courses?To answer these questions, three curricula were identified: first-year engineering laboratorycoursework, a third-year technical project designed with EM in mind, and a multidisciplinarysenior capstone course. These courses were chosen to span the entire career of an engineeringstudent, from first-year to senior capstone, to give a more complete dataset. Each curriculumthen
Science (CS) department got together and proposed a focused10-week long funded summer camp for two local high schools with the following objectives: 1. Provide graduate students to instruct in the areas of` mobile application development, forensics and cyber Security. 2. Provide CS one-on-one mentors for students while conducting their work-based learning experience in Computer Science. 3. Assign hands-on interdisciplinary projects that emphasize the importance of STEM fields when using and developing software applications. 4. Promote and develop soft skills among participants including leadership, communications skills, and teamwork.The proposal was funded, by DOE and the summer camps were conducted in the summer of
ofthe ABET a-k outcomes. We frame developing the required engineering skills from thefoundation of their individual strengths. Our “One-Minute Engineer” assignment requiresstudents to describe why they are pursuing engineering as a career path. Again, the frameworkof StrengthsFinder helps students clearly express their motivations.Team projects form the framework for ItE course sequence. We sort students into teams withdiverse Strengths [2]. Students utilize team contracts in which they develop team roles based onindividual Strengths [3]. A team mapping exercise reveals that our engineering students tend tooverpopulate the executing and strategic thinking domains of Strengths. Less stereotypicalengineering students with Strengths in
proper skills to operateand manage their networks. Broadband wireless networks and big data systems are twoimportant technologies that current STEM students need to learn, comprehend and master tosatisfy the market needs. Design and implementation of an academic big-data system andbroadband wireless testbed for instruction and research purposes is a difficult task. In this work,challenges facing the design and implementation of a mobile networks and big-data lab areevaluated. This work aims at providing a comprehensive reporting about an experience gainedfrom designing and implementing an academic lab of big-data system used for broadbandwireless networks traffic analysis and management. Challenges facing the project team duringthe
separate designvectors, and to demonstrate the behavior in a physical test or application. The activities will alsoshowcase different modes of failure of mechanical components, and the uncertainty that lieswithin the material itself or within the process of manufacturing. Focusing the activities in a self-learning group environment, students’ learning experience will be greatly improved in tandemwith their soft skills: reporting, communications, and planning [2].To promote a better interest in the overall learning outcomes, the series of activities arestructured to combine their knowledge and culminate to a final project competition for the designof a planar-truss. A competition can bolster the intellectual maturity of students who begin torealize
. Her areas of expertise are performance-based modeling, project delivery methods, communication networks, and uncertainty and risk analysis in design and construction of transportation projects. She also has industrial experience as a project manager in multiple building construction projects. Dr. Kermanshachi has con- ducted several research projects which were awarded by Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) and Construction Industry Institute (CII). Dr. Kermanshachi has received several prestigious national and regional awards, including the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Professional Service Award, ASCE Excellence in Education (Ex- CEEd
aninterdisciplinary team of faculty at San José State University (SJSU). The minor degreecomprises four courses: Python programming, algorithms and data structures, R programming,and culminating projects. The first ACBSS cohort started in Fall 2016 with 32 students, and thesecond cohort in Fall 2017 reached its capacity of 40 students, 62% of whom are female and35% are underrepresented minority students. Considering ACBSS students’ interest in humanbehavior and society, pedagogical approaches using relevant examples and projects have beendeveloped and integrated throughout the program. Preliminary assessments show that studentsappreciated learning programming skills with which to expand their career opportunities whilegaining confidence in studying technical
power electronics. He has been working on thin film solar cell research since 1979 including a Sabbatical Leave at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in 1993. He has also worked on several photovoltaic system projects Dr. Singh has also worked on electric vehicle research, working on battery monitoring and management systems funded primarily by federal agencies (over $3.5 million of funding). Dr. Singh has consulted for several companies including Ford Motor Company and Epuron, LLC. He has also served as a reviewer for the US Department of Energy and National Science Foundation. Dr Singh has over 100 conference and journal publications and holds six issued US patents. Dr. Singh’s recent work is focused on
cohort and a distance cohort to whomthe lectures were delivered asynchronously. The class included a term project focused onreplacing a part currently in service with a similar part fabricated from composite materials aswell as weekly homework assignments and in-class exams. All students were given pre- andposttests to gauge learning gains over the course and an end-of-term survey was administeredrelated to student perceptions and preferences. Performance results, preference results, andclassifications of submitted muddiest points will be compared between the on-campus anddistance cohorts. Differences in demographics (age, work experience, etc.) are expected topotentially affect the value that each cohort puts on different aspects of the course
Paper ID #23289Crafting the Future of Computing Education in CC2020: A WorkshopDr. Stephen T Frezza, Gannon University Deacon Steve Frezza, PSEM is a professor of Software Engineering and chair of the Computer and In- formation Science department at Gannon University in Erie, PA. His research interests include Global Software Engineering, Affective Domain Learning, Engineering Education Research, as well as Philos- ophy of Engineering and Engineering Education. He is regularly involved in supporting the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem, as well as projects that serve the regional community. He is an active member
courses. She aspires to understand and improve student attitude, achievement, and persistence in student-centered courses.Mrs. Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University Lindy Hamilton Mayled is a PhD candidate at Grand Canyon University. She is pursuing her PhD in Psychology of Learning, Education, and Technology. Her background in in K-12 education where she has served as a high school science teacher, Instructional and Curriculum Coach, and Assistant Principal. Her research and areas of interest are in improving STEM educational outcomes for Low-SES students through the integration of active learning and technology-enabled frequent feedback. She currently works as the Project Manager for the NSF faculty
that has been achieved in successfully chairing ten or more graduate student culminating projects, theses, or dissertations, in 2011 and 2005. He was also nominated for 2004 UNI Book and Supply Outstanding Teaching Award, March 2004, and nominated for 2006, and 2007 Russ Nielson Service Awards, UNI. Dr. Pecen is an Engineering Tech- nology Editor of American Journal of Undergraduate Research (AJUR). He has been serving as a re- viewer on the IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing since 2001. Dr. Pecen has served on ASEE Engineering Technology Division (ETD) in Annual ASEE Conferences as a reviewer, session moderator, and co-moderator since 2002. He served as a Chair-Elect on ASEE ECC Division
, China in 2015.Participating students at our institution are required to develop a research project around one of theGrand Challenges. They may take courses designed with the Grand Challenges in mind, or develop aproject that applies subject knowledge. They must seek out opportunities to develop global perspectives,and participate in service learning projects. Our Engineering College web site sets out the programgoals: Research or Major ProjectAll GC Scholars will be required to initiate, complete and make a presentation on a research projectrelated to one or more Grand Challenges. Interdisciplinary CurriculumGC Scholars will be required to complete a curriculum that provides knowledge related to solving one ormore of the Grand Challenges. GCSP
global energy crisis,but provides society with a cheap and user-friendly product is unprecedented. The skills learnedfrom this project were invaluable, as research, design, trial and error, as well as technical writingare all important experiences within engineering. This brake not only provides scientists andresearchers with more valuable information about alternative energy, but is also capable ofeducating the everyday person about the basics of engineering as well as the importance ofrenewable resources.IntroductionThis paper shares a sample project illustrating a new teaching approach via innovation. One of theobjectives of the Experiential Engineering Education1-4 and this paper is to reform engineeringeducation by moving away from the
performed many private and government projects. Dr. Fathizadeh has published numerous journal, conference and technical articles. He has been instrumental figure in establishing mechatronic engineering technology at Purdue University Northwest. His areas of interests are, control systems, power systems, power electronics, energy, and system integration. Dr. Fathizadeh is a registered professional engineer in the State of Illinois.Anan Ismail Ayyad c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Students’ Participation to Improve Formula SAE CarAbstractFormula Society of Automotive Engineers (FSAE) competition provides opportunity for studentsto enhance their engineering design and
Paper ID #27493Construction Curriculum of the Future: Changes and ChallengesDr. Ihab Mohammad Hamdi Saad P.E., Northern Kentucky University Dr. Ihab Saad is Professor of Construction Management and an alumnus of the University of Kentucky in Lexington where he received his Ph.D. in 1996 from the department of Civil Engineering and Construc- tion. He has over 25 years of experience in the construction industry primarily in the civil/construction project management area. Dr. Saad received his Bachelor of Science and Master’s degrees in Civil En- gineering from Cairo University in his native country Egypt in 1984, and 1993
the College of Arts and Sciences. Over the course of this grant, he advised over 500 individual calculus students on their course projects. He was given an Outstanding Advising Award by USF and has been the recipient of numerous teaching awards at the department, college, university (Jerome Krivanek Distinguished Teaching Award) and state (TIP award) levels. Scott is also a co-PI of a Helios-funded Middle School Residency Program for Science and Math (for which he teaches the capstone course) and is on the leadership committee for an NSF IUSE grant to transform STEM Education at USF. His research is in the areas of solution thermodynamics and environmental monitoring and modeling.Ms. Manopriya Devisetty Subramanyam
Paper ID #25804Developing Photovoltaics Curriculum for Middle and Upper Grades: UsingSolar to Engineer Our Energy Future (P12 Resource Exchange)Dr. Michelle Jordan , Arizona State University Michelle Jordan is as associate professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State Uni- versity. She also serves as the Education Director for the QESST Engineering Research Center. Michelle’s program of research focuses on social interactions in collaborative learning contexts. She is particularly interested in how students navigate communication challenges as they negotiate complex engineering design projects. Her
physiological studies and general use In time, the laboratory soon was equipped for molecular biology work, mechanical testing,hand tools (hammers, drills, etc.), electronics and test equipment, human and animalphysiological study supplies, chemicals and chemistry work, and laser cutters and 3D printers(Figure 2 and Figure 3). This breadth allowed us to create modules for our lab classes whichcould, for example, have students grow cells with specific characteristics, and measure theconcentration of these cells using their own custom-built spectrophotometer. Figure 2: Part of the lab’s “Projects Room”. This side houses electronic components, hand tools (such as drills and hammers
Research in Science Teaching (NARST). In addition, he is one of two scholarship recipients awarded by NARST to attend the ESERA summer re- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in 2016. He can be reached at iyeter@purdue.edu. search program in Cesk´Ms. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting
Kee Wook Lee is a senior student at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, majored in electrical engi- neering.Dr. David B Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette David B. Nelson is Associate Director of the Center for Instructional Excellence at Purdue University. He received his Ph.D in World History from the University of California, Irvine in 2008. David has been involved in many educational research projects at Purdue, including published worked in the programming education, student engagement and academic performance in dynamics engineering courses, and educational modalities in engineering, technology and economics.Dr. Yung-Hsiang Lu, Purdue University Yung-Hsiang Lu is an associate professor in the School
implementation of the Ideas to Innovation (i2i) Laboratory, which opened in August 2008 and houses classrooms and laboratories used by the 2000 students in Purdue’s First-Year Engineering Program. He oversaw the daily operation of the i2i lab, and was responsible for the personnel, logistics, and technology used in the classroom and labs. Eric also helped build and directed the College of Engineering sponsored Artisan and Fabrication Lab (AFL), which houses a machine shop, carpentry shop, and a prototyping lab used by all students in the College of Engineering for project work. In 2009, he received a New Employee Staff Award of Excellence from the College of Engineering for his work in launching the i2i lab. Eric has served
responsible for the structural and thermal analysis of payloads. She served as Director of the Space Engi- neering Institute and in 2010 she accepted a position with the Academic Affairs office of the Dwight Look College of Engineering where she oversaw outreach, recruiting, retention and enrichment programs for the college. Since 2013, she serves as the Executive Director for Industry and Nonprofit Partnerships with responsibilities to increase opportunities for undergraduates engineering students to engage in experiential learning multidisciplinary team projects. These include promoting capstone design projects sponsored by industry, developing the teaching the Engineering Projects in Community Service course, and developing
-learning (CL) setting involves smaller groups (2-4 members) andruns non-permanent teams. Most CL tasks are structured to be completed within one class period,and can be handled by groups with 2-4 members. Smaller groups are both more efficient and moreeffective than larger groups in dealing with small-scaled tasks and projects. For a thoroughcomparative study on various types of learning in small groups, which include collaborativelearning, cooperative learning and problem-based learning, see Davidson and Major (2014) 17.We adopt a mixture of team-based and cooperative learning strategies to best suit our pedagogicalneeds. In particular, we adopt permanent team (a TBL feature) with 3-4 members each team (a CLfeature), and design experiments to
(ILS) (antenna, phasedarray application). Page 26.116.2Finally, we present multi-year data from end-of-course surveys as the assessment toolthat suggest our students see this course as highly relevant, applicable, and motivating.Studies on GPS: GPS P/N Sequence Generator Mini-Project, Gold Code Properties,and Signal Acquisition Using Cross-CorrelationIn our sophomore level course called Digital Circuits and Computer Systems (DCCS),students first learn about shift registers. In the junior/senior level Electronic Navigationcourse, students see a more in-depth, direct application for shift registers, tied to “Pseudo-random Noise” (PN) sequence generation
be made more truthful and productive. He is the leader of the NSF funded project KredibleNet, whose goal is to set the agenda for computational social science analysis of authorship, leadership, trust and credibility in knowledge markets. He has published papers and developed software that aim to make this into a reality. Among the tools he has created are: KredibleNet: kredible.net Visible Effort: veffort.us Alterpode: alterpode.net Visible Past: visiblepast.net Ubimark: ubimark.com/inDr. Esteban Garcia Page 26.127.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
appointment he received his PhD from Washington State University in Materials Science and En- gineering. Dr. Holmes enjoys teaching a wide variety of classes and involving students at all levels of un- dergraduate study in team based design projects and project based learning. Contact: wholmes@jbu.eduKyle Crouse, John Brown University Kyle Crouse is a junior in engineering (with an electrical/computer concentration) at John Brown Univer- sity. He is the Head of Communications and Treasurer of the JBU IEEE Student Branch ad is currently working with a team to design a low-cost maximum power point tracker (MPPT) for use with solar panels in developing countries. Kyle is passionate about engineering and music and aspires to work
education as K-12 engineering standardsbecome more prevalent1-3 and as benefits of design experiences for science learning gainrecognition.4, 5 Collaborative problem solving around engineering design projects are especiallyimportant because they represent the ways professional engineers often work.6, 7 Drawing on ourdiverse backgrounds as a highly effective middle-school science teacher, an assistant professor ina teacher preparation program, and a pre-service teacher candidate, we explored the creativecollaboration of eighth-graders engaged in engineering design activity. In particular, we wereinterested in learners’ perceptions of their group’s communication patterns, and their perceptionsof their own participation in their group. Our interest
profession, are presented and discussed.IntroductionFailure case studies have been found to be a valuable addition to the undergraduate engineeringcurriculum, providing valuable support into technical, professional, and ethical issues1. Duringthe past several years, a project funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) has focusedon the implementation of failure case studies into engineering curricula. Work has focused ondeveloping teaching resources on a wide variety of failure cases for faculty to utilize in a varietyof undergraduate engineering courses1, 2, 3. The project has extended from the lead institution,Cleveland State University, to eleven other university partners, including the university of thelead author, the University of North
’ to test and refinepolytechnic approaches and to help drive the reformation of the technology learning experience.During the fall semester of 2014, the PPI began with its first cohort of freshmen students, self-selected from departments across the College of Technology. The PPI experience incorporatedcombined studio and seminar experiences that provided collaborative learning opportunities intechnology, programming, English, and communications, with an emphasis on project-basedproblems. One of the novel approaches taken by the PPI was the elimination of course-basedobjectives, and the adoption of competency-based goals in their place. The faculty members whoparticipated in the PPI were released from other teaching loads and were designated as