, 1978; North American Association forEnvironmental Education, 1999). Despite this, ‘two-thirds of adult Americans consistently failsimple tests of environmental knowledge’2.It can only be imagined, how much high school and beginning college students know aboutenvironmental and ecological engineering and are aware that engineering is a major careerchoice for students who want to make an environmentally and ecologically sustainable impact.The following examples demonstrate that engineering skills and knowledge are essential toenvironmental protection and enhancement. First, would a person switch from a standardresidential home to an “energy efficient home”, if s/he knew that the carbon footprint, use ofenergy, and greenhouse gas emissions of
technology.III. What is Software Defined Radio(SDR)?Software Defined Radio (SDR)11-14 is an emerging technology built on one of the greatdevelopments of the 20th Century: fast and cheap microcomputers. It represents a new method inprocessing radio signals that is a quantum leap over the older, original method of analogprocessing.Since the invention of radio in the late 1800’s, signals have been processed through a singlemethod: the signal is picked up by an antenna that turns the radio wave back into a fluctuatingvoltage signal. This signal is passed on to various components in the receiver which react with itto eventually produce the sound, video or data that is desired.The function of these components and systems has been modeled mathematically in
Perspectives on Science and Mathematics Learning,” Science Education, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 9-21.6. K. Williamson, H. Ndahi, S. Waters, L. Nelson (2005) “Facing the realities of “high-stakes” testing while keeping science and engineering outreach alive,” Paper No. 2005-1184, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.7. ENERGY STAR for K-12 School Districts, retrieved February 15, 2006 from the World Wide Web: http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=k12_schools.bus_schoolsk12 Page 11.351.10Appendix A – Survey InstrumentsA1. Energy Consciousness Survey Table 1
determine the effectiveness of thecurriculum at higher learning institutions, similar attitude and aptitude data are being collected. Efforts arealso underway to examine whether the Alice software can be used to introduce middle school and highschool students to programming concepts.Acknowledgments:We would like to thank Dr. William Navidi from the Colorado School of Mines for his assistance with thestatistical analysis. We would also like to thank Dr. Tracy Camp from the Colorado School of Mines forher consultation regarding computer science education.References1. Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Moskal, B. Java-Based Animation in Building viRtual Worlds for Object-oriented programming in Community colleges. NSF-DUE-0302542.2. Alice v2.ob Learn to
time and any where''. Inthis paper we discuss the transformation from a traditional to a distance education model that isoccurring here at the College of Engineering in Virginia Tech. We will specifically explain howsynchronous systems like videoconferencing over the Internet (especially video over IP) arebeing put to use in an attempt to minimize costs while extending the range and reach ofeducators.I. IntroductionDistance learning has been around for the last 75 years or more. Since the early 1930's distancelearning has seen phenomenal growth both in the number of people opting for a distance learningbased initiative as against a traditional classroom and in the technology used. Till about the late1980's and up to an early part of the 1990's
2006-196: INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATION IN AN INTRODUCTORYBIOENGINEERING COURSELaura Sullivan, Kettering University Dr. Laura Sullivan arrived at Kettering University in 1992, after completing M. S. and Ph. D. degrees in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington. Prior to this, she obtained a B.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering from Arizona State University and worked as a Clinical Orthopedic Engineer for the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas. With expertise in polymer engineering and biomaterials, Professor Sullivan has taught Mechanics, Engineering Materials, Polymer Processing, Polymer Properties, and Biomaterials at Kettering
Foundation, 2002, NSB-02-1.3. Sorby, S., “Improving the Spatial Skills of Engineering Students: Impact on Graphics Performance and Retention”, Engineering Design and Graphics Journal, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2001, pp. 31-6.4. Hsi, S., M. Linn, and J. Bell “The Role of Spatial Reasoning in Engineering and the Design of Spatial Instruction”, Journal of Engineering Education, April, 1997, pp. 151-8.5. Rochford, K., A.P. Fairall, A. Irving, and P. Hurly, “Academic Failure and Spatial Visualization Handicap of Undergraduate Engineering Students”, International Journal of Applied Engineering Education, Vol. 6, No. 5, 1989, pp. 741-9.6. Poole, C. and G. Stanley, “A Factorial and Predictive Study of Spatial Ability”, Australian Journal of
reflectiveengineers of tomorrow.References1. Kolb, D. A., 1984, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.2. Dixon, J. R., 1991 (March), “New Goals for Engineering Education,” Mechanical Engineering, pp. 56-62.3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. and Cocking, R. R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.4. Carroll, S., S. Beyerlein, M. Ford and D. Apple, 1996, "The Learning Assessment Journal as a Tool for Structured Reflection in Process Education," Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 310-313.5. Maharaj, S. and L. Banta, 2000, “Using Log
Leadership and Change. New York: Addison-Wesley.6. Deming, W.E. (1994). The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: The W. Edwards Deming Institute. Page 11.865.117. Edvinsson, L. & Malone, S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower. New York: Harper Business.8. Gotterbarn, D. & Riser, R. (1994). Real-World Software Engineering: A Spiral Approach to a Project-Oriented Course. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Software Engineering, San Antonio, TX, pp. 119- 150.9. Howell, J. M. & Hall
=.16k k c No Water 12 Inch S upports 0.4 Added Water 0.4 16 Inch S upports lo w dam ping
on society. Theprimary difficulties are the lack of a textbook in this area, and the constant need to keep abreastof rapidly changing engineering policy topics. It is also becoming more difficult to coverengineering public policy at anything other than the federal level because of the vast amount ofinformation. And, it is important for the instructor to maintain a classroom environment thatrespects differing political perspectives, and in fact, highlights the many aspects other thanpolitics that affect technology policy.References1. Kraft, M. and Furlong, S. (2004). Public Policy: Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives, CQ Press, Washington D.C.2. Easton, Thomas A. (2005). Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Science
completing a course in engineering economy. Regardless of the pedagogical techniques, students experience significant improvement in conceptual understanding of economy concepts during the course.This research provides a necessary first step towards identifying capabilities and limitations inour capacity in teaching engineering economy and can provide important feedback with regardsto what works and what does not work for improving student’s conceptual understanding offundamental concepts.References: 1. Chappuis, J., Stiggins, R,J, Arter, J., Chappuis, S. Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right - Using It Well. Pearson, 2012, ISBN: 0132685884, 9780132685887. 2. Methods of Assessment. The
major. However despite a lack of connection between their identity andengineering, some students may persist in engineering based upon factors such as the desire toearn an engineer’s salary. Students with lower academic performance have been shown to persistin engineering if they identify with the engineering major or feel as if they were getting futureusefulness or enjoyment from engineering.6,10Engineering programs across the country have varying formats and matriculation processesranging from: common course(s) for First-Year Engineering (FYE), direct admittance to anengineering discipline, or programs in which all students are initially undesignated11. Studentsenrolled in common FYE were more likely to persist to the third semester than
formation in a multicultural and interdisciplinarysetting coupled with hands-on doing based on repetitive do-test-learn cycles that areconstantly assessed and communicated by the teaching team.Design, whether as design science or design thinking has been with us for quite some time.Already in the 1950´s B. Fuller, a renowned scientists and inventor described design scienceas: “…the effective application of the principles of science to the conscious design of ourtotal environment in order to help make the Earth’s finite resources meet the needs of allhumanity without disrupting the ecological processes of the planet” Buckminister Fuller [17].There is relevant criticism to be considered as well. The three perspectives, based on Kimbell2011, are that
. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 Edition, Biomedical Engineers, on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/biomedical-engineers.htm.[2] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 Edition, Occupational Information Included in the OOH, on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/about/occupational-information-included-in-the-ooh.htm.[3] C. G. Prober and S. Khan, “Medical Education Reimagined: A Call to Action.,” Acad Med, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 1407–1410, Oct. 2013.[4] T. Jong, M. C. Linn, and Z. C. Zacharia, “Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education.,” Science, Vol. 340, Issue 6130
allow students to better develop into adult learners upongraduation. References1. P. Mortimore and C. Watkins, Understanding Pedagogy and its Impact on Learning, SAGE, 1999.2. M. S. Knowles, The Modern Practice of Adult Education, Andragogy versus Pedagogy, New York: Associated Press, 1970.3. M. Knowles, The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species, Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company, 1973.4. S. B. Merriam, "Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory," New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, pp. 3-14, 2001.5. Educational Technology and Mobile Learning, Accessed March 2017. http://www.educatorstechnology.com/2013/05/awesome-chart-on-pedagogy-vs- andragogy.html.6. S. Bell, "Project-Based
there is less than a 95% probability that the two groups are actually different.The significance of differences in overall student score for the questions of the pre- and post-testwere determined using a one-tailed t-test (Equation 4). x 0 t (Equation 4) s/ nWhere: ̅ = Mean score on concept inventory, end-of-semester = Mean score on concept inventory, beginning-of-semester s = Standard deviation, end-of-semester n = Number of students, end-of-semesterThe internal consistency of the concept inventory was evaluated with the Kuder-RichardsonFormula 20 approach (Equation 5). k j 1 p j q j k
with a variety of long-termcareer objectives including premedical students pursuing a baccalaureate inenvironmental engineering.Table 1. Summary of six seminal learning opportunities including a course at theUniversity of Cincinnati (CEE600) and a course at the Missouri University of Scienceand Technology (CE390/CE4099).Description; Co-leaners Outcome(s)Time frameCEE600 MDG7: Ensuring Author Development and deliveryEnvironmental 3 additional faculty of a term-length, dual-levelSustainability (dual-level, approx. 80 undergraduate course with two tripsterm-length course) and 40 graduate students abroad to IndiaAutumn, 2004
problems in their communities and beyond using the Game Changers as examples of innovative solutions.• Q: If you were going to grade our infrastructure systems (at the local, state or national level), what grade(s) would you give and why? Can you justify the grade(s) using similar criteria as in the Report Card? o Activities: For older students, teachers assist in exploring why the various infrastructure categories received the grades that they did, bring in local infrastructure “experts” to assist with the discussion and assessment. Additionally, depending on the infrastructure that is being considered, teachers
) “Educating Generation Net-- Can U.S. Engineering Woo and Win the Competition for Talent,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 246-257. 3. Tavrou, S., Thong, C., & Steele, C. (2011) Increased female participation into engineering education through specialised courses, Australasian. 4. Matusovich, H.M., Streveler, R.A. and Miller, R.L. (2010) “Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students' motivational values,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 289-303.5. Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2002) “Gender differences in science attitude-achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students,” Journal of Research in
Learning Communities: Building Connections among Teaching, Learning, andTechnology. Jeffrey S. Nugent, R. Martin Reardon, Fran G. Smith, Joan A. Rhodes, Mary Jane Zander,Teresa J Carter. 1, s.l. : International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2008, Vol. 20.51-58. 12AppendicesAll new faculty and academic staff are invited to participate in anonymous surveys at the end of eachsemester of their first year. This survey is Appendix 1: Biannual Survey. The post survey is for new facultyonce they have been at UW-Platteville for two years, and can be found in Appendix 2: Post SurveyAppendix 1: Biannual Survey 1. If you attended any meetings of the New Faculty Learning Community
. https://c9.io/ 4. Wu, L., Liang, G., Kui, S., & Wang, Q. 2011. CEclipse: An online IDE for program- ing in the cloud. In 2011 IEEE World Congress on Services, IEEE, pp. 45-52. 5. https://www.codecademy.com/ 6. http://cscircles.cemc.uwaterloo.ca/ 7. Pritchard, D. and Vasiga, T. 2013. CS circles: an inbrowser python course for begin- ners. In ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 591-596. 8. Guo, P. 2012. Online Python Tutor: Embeddable web-based program visualization for CS education. http://pythontutor.com/.9. Brusilovsky, P. and Sosnovsky, S. 2005. Individualized exercises for self-assessment of programming knowledge: An Evaluation of QuizPACK. ACM Journal of Educa- tional Resources in
to foster higher student retention rates inintroductory computer programming courses.References: DiSalvo, B., & Bruckman, A. (2011). From interests to values. Communications of the ACM,54(8), 27-29.Newhall, T., Meeden, L., Danner, A., Soni, A., Ruiz, F., & Wicentowski, R. (2014, March). Asupport program for introductory CS courses that improves student performance and retainsstudents from underrepresented groups. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium onComputer science education (pp. 433-438). ACM. Goldweber, M., Barr, J., Clear, T., Davoli, R., Mann, S., Patitsas, E., & Portnoff, S. (2013). Aframework for enhancing the social good in computing education: a values approach. ACMInroads, 4(1), 58-7Guzdial, M. (2009
unwillingness to answer the question.Some students expressed frustration about the fact that even if they have already applied whatthey perceive are effective learning strategies, their performance in the class was stillunsatisfactory (“I don't know… I put more effort into learning this material than all of myclasses combined, and then some more. To say that I was disappointed in the results is anunderstatement.”) There are a select few, however, who chose to provide ambiguous responses(“Nothing”; “N/A”; “not applicable”) or expressed unwillingness to comment on their learningprocess as part of the survey (This is a bad question please stop asking it. It[’s] not relevant, Iget it I could [have] done more but that’s not point of the spot surveys”). The
Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Guru is a computer scientist and educational researcher who focuses on curriculum development in both formal and non-formal educational settings. His expertise includes systems thinking and design, op- erations research, statistical modeling, and simulation. He has taught several graduate and undergraduate courses in statistics, systems engineering, operations research, and business analytics. Dr. Guru has pre- viously served as the Director of Research Strategy at the Jeffrey S. Raikes School of Computer Science and Management at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. In addition to his academic experience, Dr. Guru is an expert in supercomputing; he has 10 years of experience in building and
. D., and B. Stein. The Ideal Problem Solver. New York: Freeman, 1983.Brent, R., & Felder. R. M. (2014). Want your students to think creatively and critically? How about teaching them? Chemical Engineering Education, 48(2), 113-114.Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Siefert, C. M. (2014). Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103 (3), 417-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048Dannenhoffer, J. F., Green, M. A. (2017). Use of a Full-motion Flight Simulator for Teaching Aircraft Performance and Dynamics, 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 9-13 January 2017, Grapevine, Texas.Diaz, A. Freeing the Creative Spirit. San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1992.Napolitano, M. R., Aircraft Dynamics
of evidence- based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.2. Ruey, S. (2010). A case study of constructivist instructional strategies for adult online learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 706-720.3. Maor, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). An online questionnaire for evaluating students' and teachers' perceptions of constructivist multimedia learning environments. Research in Science Education, 35(2), 221-244.4. Rovai, A. P. (2004). A constructivist approach to online college learning. The internet and higher Education, 7(2), 79-93.5. Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual review of
. S., 1955) parameters as showed in equation (2). Ai is thelink transform for the i th joint; i 1,2,..., n and n is the number of links. cosi cos i sin i sin i sin i ai cosi sin cos i cosi sin i cosi ai sin i i 1 Ai i (22) 0 sin i cos i di 0 0 0 1 Baxter
to the question “List the part(s) of today’s program you enjoyed most,” were more varied,but many fell into two general categories: • Nearly half of the responses (37/75, 49%) included some element of the overall experience that was enjoyable, such as learning something new, interacting with the University students, and the satisfaction of getting the circuit to function correctly. • A large portion of responses (30/75, 40%) included specific portions of the project that were enjoyable, such as learning how to wire circuits or learning about how computers work.There were relatively fewer responses to the question “List two ways to improve today’s program.” • A majority of the responses (40/67, 60%) indicated that no
thenames of every component [they] used.”Figure 8 suggests that students were able to grasp the core mechanics of arch stability afterconducting the activity. Students claimed that understanding how a hanging chain’s shape isdetermined from equilibrium helped solidify their understanding of how an arch is able to stand,and that a catenary is the optimal shape for an arch. Students also commented on theirunderstanding that the “[s]urface area of the blocks affects stability” and that “friction plays acrucial role in keeping the blocks together”.The Tanks and Culverts activity displayed positive results for understanding how granular mediabehaves in pipe structures. Most students seemed to grasp how gravity, in conjunction withfriction, produces the