Session 2542 A Novel 3D Internet-based Multimedia Method for Teaching and Learning About Engineering Management Requirements Analysis Paul G. RankyProfessor, The Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering,New Jersey Institute of Technology, MERC (Multi-lifecycle Engineering Research Center), Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. Email: ranky@njit.eduIntroductionThe objective of this research was to create a case-based / problem-based teaching andlearning curriculum, supported by an advanced 3D web-enabled case library, focusing onneeds, or in other words requirements analysis.Our solution enables students
Approach to Integrating Designand Manufacturing into Engineering Curricula. ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 86, No.2, April 1997.3 George D. Paterson, Engineering Criteria 2000: A Bold New Change Agent, ASEE PRISM, September, 1997.4 Gloria M. Rogers and Jean K. Sando, Stepping Ahead: An Assessment Plan Development Guide, Foundation Coalition, 1996.methods and tools and, finally, the elaboration of feedback mechanisms. Data collection requiresthe development of assessment instruments focused for appropriate audiences.Either prompted by EC-2000 or by the desire to improve quality standards, engineering programshave started to gather data for use in appraisal and improvements efforts in their institutionalprograms. For example, the
Approach to Integrating Designand Manufacturing into Engineering Curricula. ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 86, No.2, April 1997.3 George D. Paterson, Engineering Criteria 2000: A Bold New Change Agent, ASEE PRISM, September, 1997.4 Gloria M. Rogers and Jean K. Sando, Stepping Ahead: An Assessment Plan Development Guide, Foundation Coalition, 1996.methods and tools and, finally, the elaboration of feedback mechanisms. Data collection requiresthe development of assessment instruments focused for appropriate audiences.Either prompted by EC-2000 or by the desire to improve quality standards, engineering programshave started to gather data for use in appraisal and improvements efforts in their institutionalprograms. For example, the
7 Foreign language and international study 7 Engineering 6 Health professions 6 Communications and journalism 5Engineering students face competing priorities and challenges, such as curriculum rigor,compatibility, apathy, perception of the value of international education, and an emphasis inengineering education on practical work experience, that can hinder participation in study abroad[12], [13]. High impact practices in international education such as internships, co-ops, andtechnical research conducted abroad has been shown to have the most significant influence onenhancing global
AC 2008-2956: CONTEXT-BASED PROBLEMS AND EXERCISES FORTEACHING ENGINEERING ECONOMYRajkamal Kesharwani, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Rajkamal Kesharwani is an MS student in the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department at Virginia Tech. His interests include decision making in engineering design and design economics.Xiaomeng Chang, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Xiaomeng Chang is a doctoral student in Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech with an expected graduation in May 2008. Her research and teaching interests are primarily focused in the areas of engineering design, integration and knowledge environments.Janis Terpenny, Virginia Polytechnic
ChatGPT, posing a potential threat to theequilibrium of academic integrity. The adaptive strategies employed by institutions in responseto GenAI are also discussed in this paper, and we have explored whether instructors restrictstudents’ access using sophisticated detection systems or simply advocate ethical and responsibleuse of GenAI. The potential consequences of these policies on students’ learning were alsoexplored with an emphasis on whether students feel unfairly disadvantaged when detectionsystems fail or if they perceive the need to rely on GenAI tools to maintain academiccompetitiveness.Keywords: Engineering education, generative AI (GenAI), adaptive strategies, undergraduateBackgroundEngineering education is an ever-changing field that
HispanicContext. TaLENt Fellow Action-Based Research ProjectsThe four action-based projects conducted during the 2021-2022 school year are brieflydescribed in Table 2. These projects aimed to integrate engineering design into the participatingschools' curriculum by implementing various strategies, such as creating engineering designchallenges, developing a teacher professional development program, integrating engineeringdesign into existing science curricula, and building partnerships with local engineers andindustries. The TaLENt fellows led these projects, with support from their school colleagues andan engineering curriculum mentor from the "TaLENt." While this article does not provide adetailed account of each Project's implementation cycle, it does
Conference, New Orleans, LA, May 2004. 3. Falkenburg, D. and Schuch-Miller, D. “Strategies for the Development of Web-Based Engineering Case Studies,” International Conference on Engineering Education, Valencia, Spain, July 21-25, 2003. 4. Fortenberry, N.L. “An Examination of NSF's Programs in Undergraduate Education,” Journal of SMET Education: Innovations and Research, 1(1), pp. 4-15, Jan-April 2000. 5. Fromm, E., “The Changing Engineering Educational Paradigm,” Journal of Engineering Education, 92(2): 113-121, April 2003. 6. Marghitu, D. Sankar, C.S.. and Raju, P.K. “Integrating a Real Life Engineering Case Study into the Syllabus of an Undergraduate Network Programming using HTML and Java Course,” Journal of
to insure the integrity and effectiveness of the engineering curricula on a continuous basis.Distributed grading is a direct quantitative linkage between typical assessment methods (exams,projects, etc.) and the educational objectives. Stevens believes that in conducting assessments it iscrucial for improvements to begin with full utilization of current examinations, projects and otheractivities. Distributed grading distributes current aggregate grades as well as the Grade PointAverage over the curricular objectives and allows for a quantitative expression of the emphasis givento the objectives across the curriculum (DeLancey, 1998, 1999).To make this work at the course level requires a series of problems, exams, projects, etc
understanding.Thus, over time, we developed an ad-hoc accessible EER definition that helped describe thebreadth and importance of the discipline to our non-EER colleagues. Similar to an elevator pitch,our serendipitously developed definition starts with a general description of EER, adds the focusof our individual research, and optionally finishes with how the intended audience can providesupport. All of this in a memorable, understandable, and comprehensive manner. Since initiallydeveloping our pitch, we have reviewed and updated our definition following an engineeringdesign cycle by integrating stakeholder feedback into the definition.In addition to presenting our definition, we discuss how this exercise has improved ourunderstanding of EER, as well as
College in Massachusetts.Greg Pearson, National Academy of Engineering Greg Pearson is a Senior Program Officer with the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) in Washing- ton, D.C. Greg currently serves as the responsible staff officer for the NSF-funded project ”The Status, Role, and Needs of Engineering Technology Education in the United States.” He is also study director for the Chevron-funded project, Guiding Implementation of K-12 Engineering in the United States. He was the study director for the NAE and National Research Council project that resulted in the 2014 report, STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. He was the study director for the project that resulted in
the chronicproblem of inclusion and retention of underrepresented minority (URM) groups. One grouprequiring unique retention efforts is students who are making satisfactory grades when theydecide to withdraw. Many of these students have a difficult time connecting the work ofintroductory engineering classes with the local, national and international societal issues thatthey value. Service learning has been integrated into many non-engineering curricula withsuccess in developing skills and promoting social engagement. In engineering settings it canalso be used to highlight the link between engineering and society at moments when studentsseek such a connection. The authors have established an international service club with activities
manufacturing process have been removed frommany undergraduate curriculums. The University of Alabama now offers an integrated pair of courses onmanufacturing processes and design. A central theme behind the courses is that manufacturing topics are cast ina concurrent engineering design context. The introductory first course is taught at the junior level, while thesecond course is a more comprehensive senior offering. Both courses require the student to participate in designand build projects. The students are placed in teams and must learn to communicate and work effectively in theteam environment. Further, both courses make use of the state’s educational manufacturing resources in anovel, collaborative arrangement. This approach allows the
, “blind devotion to ethical codes will not address the ethical concerns of theengineering profession. The study of engineering ethics must therefore begin with thestudy of personal values. The final burden is upon the individual’s conscience andvalues.” 4 Engineering ethics curriculums should emphasize that all decisions-bothprofessional and personal-are based on one’s values. No one makes decisions of any kindin a moral vacuum; no decision is value-free. Beginning professionals need to be madeaware of this reality, as it is germane to developing professional integrity. Whenindividuals have had the opportunity to explore and develop their own moral autonomy,this moral framework then serves as an explicit roadmap for any decision they
integral windup. The student writes theProportional Integral Derivative (PID) control algorithm such that auto/manual transitions andgain changes are bumpless.The addition of the control system experiment cost less than $5.00 per student, but provides thestudent with a realistic control system problem complete with all of the vagaries of an in-plantcontrol system commissioning.IntroductionEngineering Technology and Management (ETM) students fill many roles in the work force.ETM students are generalist and most will become involved with control systems at some timeduring their career. The control system experiment described here is designed to give thestudents a working understanding of a control system so they are prepared for positions
: race and first-generation status. Genderdifferences (lower scores for females versus males) have been observed in many other studies.We hypothesized that the service-learning project may positively impact females more thanmales, but this was not the case; all scores increased proportionally equally. Differences in scoresby major are difficult to conclude due to small sample sizes, but the results could impact thecurricula of those specific majors, which diverge after the first year, and thus will be explored infuture work. Future teaching modules will continue to integrate sociotechnical problem-solving,including service-learning projects, into the first-year curriculum. Other potential interventions tostrengthen engineering identity and
have never experienced doing research or engineering design.4 Addressing these significant factors in the learning of STEM and especially in coming toknow, experience, and integrate engineering practices as part of the STEM learning continuum isbecoming an imperative that pre-collegiate education must address. However, challenges existwhen a shift in paradigmatic approach to learning and instruction is introduced to a well-established educational system.Shifting approaches to STEM educationThe recent release of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) marks a significant shift inthe core concepts and approaches guiding science, technology, engineering, and mathematicseducation content in the coming years.5 Most notable is the
Coordinator with the Department of Applied Physical Sciences at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Education and Workforce Coordinator/Graduate Assis- tant at PowerAmerica and FREEDM System Center of North Carolina State University, and as a middle school teacher for Wake County Public School System (North Carolina).Dr. Richard Goldberg, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Richard Goldberg is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the De- partment of Applied Physical Sciences at UNC Chapel Hill. He is developing a new interdisciplinary engineering minor and major at UNC. He is interested in integrating engineering with the liberal arts and an entrepreneurial mindset. He
individual’s scheduledid not impede the critical path.One challenge of the working group approach is that an “Integrations” team needs to be assignedearly. Integrating each of the subteam pieces proved to be one of the most time consuming andchallenging portions of this engineering challenge. In addition, individuals on the integrationsteam must have a deep understanding that constantly updates as each working group iteratesthrough their design. Tools such as GitHub and Google Drive assisted with this aspect of theengineering design as version control and up to date documentation was critical to systemfunctionality.Approach Taken: Systems EngineeringSystems engineering, in practice, is the succession of several structured design phases plannedwith a
Session 3530 Effective Strategies to Motivate Engineering Students to Develop Their Technical Writing Skills Ann Peck, John E. Nydahl, Colin K. Keeney Department of Mechanical Engineering/ Department of Mechanical Engineering/ Department of English University of WyomingAbstractMany engineering students have a real aversion to writing-intensive assignments. This paperdiscusses several curriculum changes incorporated in a mechanical engineering program todemonstrate just how vital communication skills are in an engineering environment
admitted to a university engineering program. Feedback fromthat initial deployment will drive enhancements to be incorporated in subsequent, and moreexpansive, distributions of the products (courses).As referenced previously, these college preparatory courses are an integral and foundationalelement of a larger enhancement strategy for the secondary school to first-year collegeengineering transition space. To build on the benefit of the pre-teaching activity provided bythese college preparatory courses, college instructors will need to “stimulate recall of priorlearning” (Gagne event number 3) [8, p. 248] in their lessons. Further reinforcement occurs withthe embedding of basic skills development in the college curriculum [9]. Looking to the
Paper ID #7553The Impact of Inclusive Excellence Programs on the Development of Engi-neering Identity among First-Year Underrepresented StudentsDr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Pro- gram and Laboratory. He holds a BA in psychology from Louisiana State University, and an MS degree in industrial/organizational psychology and PhD degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Prior to joining the University of Colorado at Boulder, he gained extensive experience in assessment and
, as well as creative problem solving skills [11-16]. Design projects are a promising way toprepare students for industry [17]. Authentic design problems that have meaning beyond theclassroom are most effective [18] as they allow students to integrate knowledge and practice[19].Commonly, instructors include a host of active learning instructional strategies to scaffoldstudent learning related to projects. Broadly, active learning instructional strategies have beenshown to better support learning than traditional lectures [4, 20, 21]. We employed an activelearning technique used commonly in the past—particularly in elementary classrooms—calledjigsaw [22], which is well backed by learning theory [23, 24].Jigsaw is a technique in which students
rationale to support a marketing concept and strategy for theRAMP program? I soon found similarities among the course descriptions and curriculum charts.The topics listed in the standard engineering courses were much like ours - not surprising with theuse of standard textbooks and software.Not so apparent is an emphasis on applied engineering skills that increases as you go from Canada toMexico. In fact, Mexican universities feel that one of their strengths is a comparatively highpercentage of faculty members who teach and work in industry. This is viewed as a positive featurein the preparation of graduates for jobs in Mexico’s “productive sector.” While this approach favorsindustry, it slows faculty development in Mexican universities. Even some
. Engagement Measurement System (EMS)The EMS classroom layout is illustrated in Fig. 2. Each student may make use of either their ownlaptop camera or utilize a small desk camera dedicated to them. Wristband biometric dataincluding heart rate will also be collected and integrated into the classification if determined tobe an effective data point. Overview cameras (wall-mounted cameras), typically one to a few perclassroom, will capture overall student movement and gestures. Figure 2: EMS classroom layout.Features are extracted from the sensors using deep learning approaches. These features are thensent to the classification engine for classification of emotional and behavioral engagement.Cognitive engagement is further classified by a
work, posters, presentations and final projects), a pre/post analysis of a scenarioinvolving a hazardous chemical and a video-recorded session of teams analyzing anambiguous scene indirectly related to course content.Background and Context“Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present” is an experimental first-year, two-termcourse designed and taught by an interdisciplinary team of faculty from engineering,humanities, and entrepreneurship and innovation at Worcester Polytechnic Institute(WPI), a technology-focused university in Worcester, Massachusetts. The university isbest known for its 47 year-old project-based curriculum.“Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present” provides a deep, integrative learningexperience of benefit to both STEM and non
unfortunately,minimizing their utilization of academic support activities.Findings support that efforts to foster academic and social integration are especiallyimportant for commuters 1. A sense of community plays an important role in retention.Campus integration can be achieved by providing students with an academic and socialenvironment that enhances learning and various opportunities to connect with others. TheProceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education Page 6.979.2congruence of the SEM core curriculum lends itself
provided with a larger view ofthe entire undergraduate curriculum including major and general education requirements andsequencing.Utilizing database management software and web tools, a system has been implemented thatprovides both students and faculty advisors with timely and accurate student program data. Theinformation is presented in an easy-to-understand format that is effectively utilized in advising.Providing this information changes the dynamics of an advising session, and allows students andtheir faculty advisors to focus their conversations on forward planning rather than bookkeeping.IntroductionProper academic advising has always been important to student success in engineering programs.In recent years, additional pressure has come to
modifications,based on the consideration of process or design constraints, is facilitated by theavailability of a physical model.Participants all agreed that the inclusion of rapid prototyping content into course subjectmatter broadened students’ exposure to design and integrated manufacturing practicesand, in the case of Engineering Graphic courses, provided a tool for enhancing thevisualization skills of students. The following is a partial list of comments from theteacher/instructor survey information. • This was great, RP is truly amazing. I only wish there were more time to explain ways to use RP activities in K-3 curriculum. • Wonderful workshop- I was fascinated by the technology and am proud TTU is
AC 2012-4182: STUDENT RESPONSES TO CHALLENGE-BASED ENGI-NEERING CURRICULADr. Leema Kuhn Berland, University of Texas, Austin Leema Berland is an Assistant Professor of science education at the University of Texas, Austin. She earned a Ph.D. in the learning sciences from Northwestern University in 2008 and was a Doctoral Fellow with the NSF funded Center for Curriculum Materials in Science (2003-2008). Berland is broadly inter- ested in facilitating and studying students as they engage in complex communication practices. She is currently focused on exploring the dynamics of how and why students are able (or unable) to productively communicate in engineering classrooms, in the context of UTeachEngineering high school