Analysis of Online Master’s Programs inEngineering." Proceedings of the 2011 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society forEngineering Education. 2011.13. Pontes, Manuel CF, and Nancy MH Pontes. "Undergraduate students’ preference for distanceeducation by field of study." Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 16.2 (2013):n2.14. Badjou, S. and R. Dahmani. “Current Status of Online Science and Engineering Education.”Journal of Online Engineering Education. Vol. 4, No.1, Article 3, 2013.15. Kowalski, Theodore J., Dolph, David Alan, and Young, Ila Phillip, "Student Motives forTaking Online Courses in Educational Administration" (2014). Educational Research Quarterly,Vol. 38, No. 1. pp. 27 - 42. September, 2014. Retrieved
senseof pride of what was accomplished when they are finished.References[1] A. Kolb and D. Kolb. (2005). Learning styles and learning space: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2):193-212.[2] K. Robinson, and A. M. Azzam. (2009). Why creativity now? (interview). Educational Leadership, 67(1):22-26.[3] S. B. Velegol, S. E. Zappe, and E. Mahoney. (2015). The evolution of a flipped classroom: evidence-based recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2015.[4] A. Pears, S. Seidman, L. Malmi, L. Mannila, and E. Adams. (2007). A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming. Working Group Report on ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in
thesecontexts might differ across the engineering classroom and workplace could illuminate potentialavenues and best practices for bridging the education-practice gap. Ethnographic methodsprovide a well-suited methodology for exploring in depth the social and material contexts of theengineering workplace and classroom because these methods situate the researcher(s) withinthese contexts for an extended period of time.Methods: The ethnographic methods employed in this study consisted of field notes of activitiesparticipated in and observed, artifact documentation, and informal and formal interviews. Theresearch sites where these methods were conducted were within a medium-sized structuralengineering department at a private architecture and
2017.Dr. Kristen Sara Cetin, Iowa State University Dr. Kristen S Cetin is an Assistant Professor at Iowa State University in the Department of Civil, Con- struction and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Andrea E. Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Andrea Surovek is a research scientist working in the areas of biomimicry for sustainable construction and engineering education at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. She is the recipient of the ASEE CE Division Seeley Fellowship and the Mechanics Division Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award. She is a fellow of ASCE and ASCE/SEI. She received her PhD from Georgia Tech, and also holds degrees in both Civil Engineering
classroom activities.AcknowledgementThe author is grateful for the help of undergraduate teaching assistants in the course sectionsunder study in this paper: Max Anderson, John Biggs, Zachery Eldemire, and Megan Moore.BibliographyCrouch, C. H., Watkins, J., Fagen, A. P., & Mazur, E. (2007). Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once. Research-based reform of university physics, 1(1), 40-95.Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.Garcia, S. (2018). Improving classroom preparedness using guided
Modeling and Simulation in health care and energy planning. He has participated in several funded projects through various sources such as NASA, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Colombian Research Institute. He also have several years of experience working as a consultant for Pharmaceutical and energy companies in the U. S. and Latin America.Dr. Yaneth Correa-Martinez, Colorado State University, Pueblo Hasan School of BusinessMrs. Katherine Sof´ıa Palacio, Fundacion Universidad del Norte Education: PhD in Engineering Management, May 2014 - Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA. Mas- ter of Science in Industrial Engineering, September 2006 - Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colom- bia. Bachelor of
—an effort that we have already begun. ● Fully implement the portfolio initiative.References[1] Harding, T., Mertz, T. E., Genereux, W. E., Guzek, S. A., Bower, T. (2017). Reinventing a computer technology curriculum to meet the needs of students and future employers. Proceedings of the 2017 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/28790.[2] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor (2018). Occupational Outlook Handbook, Web Developers. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and- information-technology/web-developers.htm.[3] Koo, T. S. (2012). Integrating design
grade, 3 hours): Working in small groups, studentscreate a solar scribbler and use the engineering design cycle to refine their STEAM design basedon a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, (i.e. Build, Test, Reflect, Refine, Repeat). For the entire set of lesson instructions and materials, please click here.This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Department of Energy (DOE) under NSFCA No. EEC-1041895. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect those of NSF or DOE.
, and for the benefit of future users of the online teaching platform.In Winter 2018 there were six major Xorro-Q deadlines comprising around 70 activities relatedto the stated curriculum course topics, students were required to achieve ≥ 75% grade on allactivities in order to receive the 5% of the course grade allocated for out-of-class assessments.Sample Student QuestionsTopic: Beam Shear, Moment, and DeflectionThe following is a selection of questions from a Xorro-Q activity that requires students toanalyze a beam and complete the following tasks (grouped by question type).Hotspot questions where students use mouse click(s) or finger tap(s) to select locations on adiagram and are graded against correct regions as defined by the instructor
in Design-Based Learning Environments: The Case of Engineering Education," Computers & Education, 64(0), pp.143-152.[2] Carr, R. L., Bennett Iv, L. D., and Strobel, J., 2012, "Engineering in the K-12 Stem Standards of the50 U.S. States: An Analysis of Presence and Extent," Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), pp. 539-564.[3] Pruitt, S., 2014, "The Next Generation Science Standards: The Features and Challenges," Journal ofScience Teacher Education, 25(2), pp. 145-156.[4] Porter, M. E., and Heppelmann, J. E., 2015, "How Smart, Connected Products Are TransformingCompanies," Harvard Business Review, 93(10), pp. 96-114.[5] Conte, G., Scaradozzi, D., Donnini, R., Pedale, A., “Building simulation/emulation environments for homeautomation
would not traditionally be considered engineering. The instructors who developedthese profiles felt that it was important to showcase this range of jobs to students to help themunderstand that the skills learned while studying engineering can be useful even in what wouldbe considered a non-engineering career and that career shifts are not unusual.To compile each profile, each person whose job was featured was asked to provide as much ofthe following information as they were willing to share: 1. Name and Job Title 2. Description of employer 3. Type of engineering degree(s) 4. Description of a typical day at work 5. What type of skills are important for the job? 6. If not working in an engineering field, how did having an engineering
the results of the anonymous student feedback surveys conducted atboth the mid-semester and end of the semester. A full assessment of Bloom’s learning objectiveswas not conducted as part of this initial and limited study.References1. G.V. Oddsson and R. Unnthorsson. (2017). “Flipped Classroom Improves the Student’s Exam Performance in a First Year Engineering Course,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(6), 1776-1785.2. L.W. Anderson, D.R. Krathwohl, P.W. Airasian, K.A. Cruikshank, R.E. Mayer, P.R. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M.C. Wittrock. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York, NY: Pearson, Allyn, & Bacon.3. S. Kiefer and S
beliefs about the nature of knowledge (simplicity and certainty of knowledge) andprocesses of knowing (sources of knowing and justification). Many studies using themultidimensional frameworks are quantitative in nature.More recently, situation and context-specific models of epistemic cognition have emerged. Thesemodels suggest that an individual’s epistemic cognition is dependent on situational factors, suchas interest and time. One example of a situation and context-specific model is Chinn et al.’s [4]AIR Model of epistemic cognition, which places an emphasis on an individual’s aim for a taskand the processes used to achieve this aim.Each type of model for epistemic cognition is marked by different underlying theoreticalassumptions and
& Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/29920[3] Komives, S., Longerbeam, S., Owen, J., Mainella, F., & Osteen, L. (2006). A Leadership Identity Development Model: Applications from a Grounded Theory. Journal of College Student Development,47(4), 401-418.[4] Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity: Cambridge university press.[5] Greeno, J. (2006). Learning in activity. In Sawyer, K. (Ed). Cambridge handbook of learning sciences (pp. 79–96). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.[6] Johri, A., Olds, B. M, & O’Connor, K. (2013). Situative Frameworks for Engineering Learning Research in A. Johri & B. M. Olds (1). Cambridge Handbook of
: InstrumentDevelopment and Preliminary Psychometric Data”. Proceedings from the 125th American Societyfor Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Paper #22372.[3] Zenios, S., Makower, J., & Yock, P. (2010) Biodesign: The process of innovating medicaltechnologies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.[4] Cech, E.A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology,& Human Values, 39(1): 42-72.[5] Bairaktarova, D., & Woodcock, A. (2017). Engineering student’s ethical awareness and behavior: a new motivational model. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(4): 1129-1157.[6] Mamaril, N.A., Usher, E.L., Li, C.R, Economy, D.R., & Kennedy, M.S. (2016). Measuringundergraduate students’ engineering self-efficacy
implementation to other courses in our Construction Engineeringcurriculum, as well as through partnering and feeder institutions. This would, hopefully, allowgreater access to our program as well as to the Construction field, at large.References[1] Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers. “Leaning Out Textbook Costs” Industrial Engineer, August 2015.[2] Potter, Sarah. “Missouri S&T helps students save money on textbooks”. Missouri S&T News and Events, May 10, 2018. https://news.mst.edu/2018/05/missouri-st-helps-students-save- money-on-textbooks/[3] Perry, Andre. “Nothing says welcome to college like exorbitant book prices” The Hechinger Report, August 28, 2018. https://hechingerreport.org/nothing-says-welcome-to-college-like
focused on an engineering educational game that emphasized trussstructural stability topics covered in the traditional undergraduate Statics curriculum. The goalof the game is to assist students in developing engineering intuition on how truss structuresbehave when subjected to loads. The software tool is based on finite strain theory that enablesthe user to visual material and geometric nonlinearities and dynamic movement of failedstructure. Users play the game by positioning bars and joints to construct a truss structure that isable to support an external mass and the weight of the truss structure itself. The structure theplayer builds must consist of joints and bars, where the bars are connected via the joints. Theplayers win nut(s) based the
rules early, guiding members to note their thoughts in the “parking lot,” adhering to these practices, and coming back to review tabled issues were key. • Pay attention to facilitation and process implementation. Communicating clear goals and objectives and sharing a detailed agenda that outlined the process and expectations ahead of time helped everyone start on the same page. Flexibility in the process is needed when additional relevant issues emerge. Use facilitation practices to leverage members’ expertise and skills to keep the entire group on track and help each other.ReferencesAmbrose, S., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., & Norman, M.K. (2010). HowLearning Works: Seven Research-Based
, or B to C, etc. Late progress report is not accepted. Midterm report: This report is a compilation of the weekly reports. It is to be submitted by the project team using the “Final Report” format. Each team member prepares his/her section(s) and submits it to the project leader so that s/he can email it to the project advisor(s) by the specified deadline. Midterm report counts as three progress reports. Late midterm report is not accepted. 2 Final report: The final report is to be submitted by the end of the semester before the project presentations. The final project report format requirements are same as the ones used in SYEN 4385, see appendix. Late final report is not accepted
) observing, (4)experimenting, and (5) networking. All of these, they argue, can be deliberately cultivated (asopposed to being innate). The broader category they use to describe the confluence of these skillsis "creative intelligence, which enables discovery yet differs from other types of intelligence[because it] engage(s) both sides of the brain.” Associating, which they define as “the ability tosuccessfully connect seemingly unrelated questions, problems, or ideas from different fields,” isthe culminating skill. They liken associating to “a mental muscle that can grow stronger by usingthe other discovery skills. . . .The more diverse our experience and knowledge, the moreconnections the brain can make.” The article is only seven pages long and is
level of student engagement in our extracurricular activities.References1. Abeysekera, K., Davari, S., Yue, K., Brown, E., Kent, M., Betts, P., & Meeks, J., Success through AcademicRecognition (STAR): Sustaining and Expanding UHCL and SJC TWD Computer Science Scholar Program, thethird annual Texas Engineering and Technology Consortium Best Practices Conference, Dallas, Feb. 28, 2008, pp 7-9. www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=8828378A-D358-8867-5E14BDC65C9860B92. Chun-Mei Zhao and George D. Kuh, “ADDING VALUE: Learning Communities and Student Engagement”,Research in Higher Education, vol. 47, 2006, pp 89-1093. Jolly, Campbell, and Perlman, “Engagement, Capacity and Continuity: A Trilogy for Student Success” (GEFoundation
offer more evidence for the presence of differences for theawareness of, attitudes for, and adoption of research-based educational practices. Additional datafrom the participants would possibly offer more confirmation of our findings. Overall, our data provides preliminary evidence to support framing faculty developmentmodels around courses because it may lead to higher adoption rates of research-basededucational practices in engineering classrooms.References1. Singer, S. R., Nielsen, N. R., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2012). Discipline-based education research: understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press.2. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2011
. Longitudinalsurveys should also be used to assess the long term success of the course in improving studentself-efficacy and interest in STEM majors and careers. The authors suggest that theseimprovements be made for the future across the entire program and analyzed in future papers.References[1] ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,2016 – 2017. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/[2] NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: TheNational Academies Press.[3] Goldstein, M. H., Purzer, S., Adams, R. S., & Xie, C. (2015). High School
competitive at the event in New Orleans at the end of May 2016.Reference 1. Archibald, M., Clauss, M., and Dupree, J., “Entrepreneurship in Capstone Design Using Interdisciplinary Teams and a Business Plan Competition,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2. Trevisan, M., Davis, D., Beyerlein, S., McCormack, J., Thompson, P., Leiffer, P., Davis, H., Howe, S., LeBeau, J., Gerlick, R., Brackin, P., and Khan, M. J., “Integrated Design Engineering Assessment and Learning System (IDEALS): Piloting Teamwork and Professional Skills Development Instructional Materials,” (2012) American Society for Engineering Education. 3. Oladiran, M., Uziak, J
examples of community needs as well as success storieswhere sustainability was considered. The group visited 6 different wineries (see Figure 4) tolearn about their processes, best practices and current issues with respect to sustainability. Theproduction of wine in Ensenada dates back to the early 1900’s when Russians from the Molokangroup established in the Guadalupe Valley. The quantity and quality of the wines has increaseddramatically in the last decades; this has brought an economic boom as it attracts tourism anddetonates other activities such as arts, sports, gastronomy, culture, entertainment and education.This growth challenges the resource in the region, specifically water. Figure 4 Field trips to the Valley of
discipline were more intense (larger dosage) than the discipline-specificsessions associated with the residential camps of 2014. Thus, it is possible that this larger dose ofcontent generally helped students identify with each discipline as a possible major/profession forthem. The second factor that might (also) explain this difference is that the campers in 2014attended all discipline-specific sessions, whereas students that attended the 2015 day camps self-selected into those days (disciplines) that they wanted to attend. Thus, it is possible that the 2015campers that attended each day had more self-identification with the discipline(s) associated withthe day(s) they chose to attend. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree
). Using blended learning to foster education in a contemporary classroom. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 5(2), 1–11.2. Boyle, T. (2005). A dynamic, systematic method for developing blended learning. Education, Communication & Information, 5(3), 221–232.3. Bassett, E., & Gallagher, S. (2005). Students prefer hybrids to fully online courses. Recruitment & Retention in Higher Education, 19(8), 7–8.4. Gecer, A., & Dag, F. (2012). A blended learning experience. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 438–442.5. Musawi, A. S. A. (2011). Blended learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 8(2), 3–8.6. George-Palilonis, J., & Filak, V. (2009). Blended
. 13References1. Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Part I, Cognitive Domain; McKay: New York, 1956.2. Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach?. Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 21-32.3. Jacquez, R., Gude, V. G., Auzenne, M., Burnham, C., Hanson, A. T., & Garland, J. (2006). 2006-2175: integrating writing to provide context for teaching the engineering design process. 113rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago.4. Jacquez, R., Gude, V. G., Hanson, A., Auzenne, M., & Williamson, S. (2007, June). Enhancing critical thinking skills of civil engineering students through supplemental
that are probably typical of many senior design programs. These included • A process that allowed some students to assume a large portion of the project system design while others minimized their contributions, resulting in variable learning, • A system that made it difficult to evaluate individual students’ work as a team member, • Inconsistent and sometimes untimely mentoring of technical design work because this occurred only as-requested by groups or after identification by another faculty member, also resulting in widely variable learning experiences, • A very heavy mentoring load for the year-long course instructor(s) that gave the course a reputation of being a highly undesirable assignment
Assessment, 2009, Retrieved from http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/ occasionalpaperone.htm6 Baehr, M. and S. W. Beyerlein, “Overview of Assessment, “ In S. Beyerlein, C. Holmes & D. Apple (Eds.), Program Assessment Handbook, Pacific Crest. 2010, (pp. 3-6). Retrieved from http://www.pcrest2.com/institute_resources/PAI/PAI2010_020910.pdf7 Advisory Committee for Academic Assessment, Kent State, Six Steps to Continuous Improvement of Student Learning, no date. Retrieved from http://explore.kent.edu/aa/guide/fulltext.html8 Morest, V.S., “Accountability, Accreditation, and Continuous Improvement: Building a Culture of Evidence,” New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 143, Fall 20099 Suskie, L., “Understanding the Nature and