Organization is “an organization that facilitates thelearning of all its members and consciously transforms itself and its context”. A learningorganization exhibits five main characteristics: (1) systems thinking, (2) personal mastery, (3)mental models, (4) a shared vision, and (5) team learning. A brief overview of these, taken from[26], is presented below.Systems thinking: The idea of the learning organization developed from a body of work calledsystems thinking. This is a conceptual framework that allows people to study businesses asbounded objects. Learning organizations use this method of thinking when assessing theircompany and have information systems that measure the performance of the organization as awhole and of its various components
engineers are coming out of education systems where they have the opportunity to coop during there education. The [college], now [college] is an excellent example of a solid well rounded education. ● Tie the educational process to industry ASAP. Real world involvement ● LEAN! This drives most major decisions made in my organization ● Looking back at my experience while in school, I have fond memories of courses, I feel, prepared me for an engineering career by assigning projects that had required objectives and milestones. Those types of work fully prepared us for our own experiences once we graduated and were responsible for our own assignments and workload. ● I think that automotive is a huge
on a qualitative study that explores the uniqueundergraduate engineering experiences of engineers who identify as Central Appalachian. Thisstudy employed interviews to collect data on how engineering students of Central Appalachiadevelop interests, make choices, and achieve success in their academic and career experiences. Interms of engineering education access and job opportunities, the inhabitants of CentralAppalachia have historically faced a unique set of challenges. However, this study took an asset-based approach to understand the unique cultural capital these students hold. The primary goal of this study was to understand the experiences of engineers who grewup in the Central Appalachia region, navigated undergraduate
women and underrepresented minorities. He received his M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech and his B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using
awarded to Black orAfrican American students in engineering technology than in engineering [1-3]. The rationale forthis trend is unknown, and the amount of research on this very small part of the academe doesnot explore the issues that affect the decisions made by these students as they confront thequestion of what to do with their careers. Various techniques employed by recruiters at differentinstitutions have diverse results, while academic, and environment, may have a role in thechoices made by these students. Understanding these students, their similarities within aninstitution, as well as between programs is anticipated to provide greater ability to recruit, retain,and encourage more diversity within these student populations.Literature
. Bradford “So I tookthe T-group section and much to my surprise, found that it opened up a whole new life to me. Itexposed me to experiences that I had never had before or for that matter had never evenunderstood existed.” [31].With the help of faculty members from the Stanford Graduate School of Business, who have ledhundreds of T-Groups, the author created a modified version of Stanford’s InterpersonalDynamics course, considering the needs of an undergraduate student population. This newlydesigned course, with the T-Group method as its core element, was offered to the undergraduatestudents of Harvey Mudd College during the spring semester 2017 as a pilot and after a verypositive reception (course evaluations 6.77 out of 7) again during the fall
,socioeconomic status is frequently absent in conversations on access and success in engineering[10]. Engineering serves as an opportunity for upward mobility for low-income engineeringstudents, as well as an opportunity for LIS to bring diverse perspectives to solve engineeringproblems [11][12]. However, in the pursuit of an engineering degree, high-income students arefive times more likely than LIS to graduate within six years [13].Within education, researchers link sense of belonging to a variety of significant student outcomesincluding retention, persistence, major choice, and career path [14][15][16]. Sense of belonginghas previously been defined as the “experience of personal involvement and integration within asystem or environment to the extent
socialrelationships and an understanding of social issues is extremely valuable for the development ofengineering students. Unfortunately, engineering programs emphasize the technical content sointensely that most engineering students do not get the opportunity to work with social issuesthus never creating that awareness.The focus on technical aspects of engineering, and the perception that engineering work isobjective, has also led engineering students to think about the profession as apolitical [8, 9].This depoliticization frames engineering as a technical space where the social and politicalsides are tangential to engineering decision-making. Cech argued that students'conceptualization of engineering as apolitical has also created issues related to
skills, their personal and interpersonal development, andthe ethical implications of our discipline and its role in society. This course is intended to deepen theinternship experience and to provide a vehicle for professional growth by exploring important questionsin an authentic context. In this project, we study how this combination of an immersive internshipexperience and its companion course shifts students’ perspectives on their studies and future careers. In this paper, we consider the offering of the course in Summer 2018 (enrollment 108 students). Thesestudents were all undergraduate CSE majors. For the majority of these students (104 students), theirsummer internship was their first time working at the company hosting their internship
ability to handle the math.Author Kristine Loh was the instructor for the lesson presented in this work and Dr. MoumitaDasgupta was the instructor of record for this course. This lesson was developed as part of Loh’spracticum experience in the University of Minnesota Preparing Future Faculty Program. Thiscertificate program assists graduate students and postdoctoral fellows in developing teachingskills by requiring participants to teach multiple class sessions under the guidance of their chosenfaculty mentors. Kristine developed the lesson presented in this work inspired by her ownbackground both in ballet and engineering. Lessons designed with an instructor’s personalconnection to the material can add value to the students’ learning experience
knowledge gaps of the students in the roomthereby enhancing overall class-wide conceptual understanding [38]. Student centered educationhas been shown to enhance student learning and critical thinking skills [44]. Polling tools on themarket span a variety of cost and ease of use levels so faculty members can select an optimumtool for their specific instructional style and institutional requirements [9], [45]–[47].Reading versus Watching AssignmentsMany faculty members attempt to make in class time more productive for active learning toolsthrough the use of “blended” or “flipped classroom” methodologies which require students toconduct some level of independent learning ahead of class [48]–[55]. Even if the preparatorycontent is substantially
find that their performance is poor may be less likely to participatein a study on thermodynamics because these students are averse to the thermodynamics context.We plan to engage partner sites directly in an effort to recruit more students in the future. Onemethod that Dillman suggests for improving response rates in through the use of rewards44. Wehave developed an incentive plan for faculty members that will help pass on information aboutthe study in an effort to reach more students.Acknowledgements We would like to thank the faculty members that helped distribute the survey and thestudents who took the survey. This paper is based on research supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. EEC-1150384. Any opinions
manufacturing career. By assessing the manufacturing processes course content in directcomparison to manufacturing curriculum standards, along with making sure the program as awhole teaches basic professional skills (that are not manufacturing-specific), Calvin’s programcan become an example that is successfully “incorporating manufacturing content required oftheir graduates and demanded by their constituencies into existing programs” 11 as recommendedin the four pillars document.Curriculum and Manufacturing Processes Course BackgroundThe mechanical engineering concentration curriculum at Calvin includes a number of requiredengineering courses as listed in Table 2. Currently there is only a single course required (andoffered) for engineering students
sophomore level chemical engineering students. This classwas designed to include many game-based activities. Because of these factors, it is uncertainhow transferrable these results may be to other classroom environments, and these results maynot be generalizable to other student populations. This class contained more males than females;therefore, male reflections had more of an impact on the overall top three themes identifiedwhere there was a difference in perceptions between males and females.ConclusionsEffective communication is an important aspect to any field, including engineering. Withoutproficient communication skills, catastrophic events can occur and a successful industry career isunlikely. However, many engineering graduates do not have
application. To provide empirical support forour ideas and implementation, we present both quantitative and qualitative assessment datacollected from students using focus groups and survey. The goal of the assessment was tounderstand student motivation and to document students’ experiences working as a part ofinterdisciplinary teams.IntroductionEngineers are often motivated by the desire to have a real world impact through their work. Thisdesire is present not only among practicing engineers but also among engineering students andfaculty. Over the past couple of decades, engineering faculty members across institutions haveleveraged this motivation to design courses and experiences for students where they can make apositive impact in the life of
Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, critical theory, teacher leadership and social justice teacher unionism.Dr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Dr. Sacks is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto teaching leadership and positive psychology at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. Robin also serves as the Director of Research for the Engineering Leadership Project at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering which aims to identify how engineers lead in the workplace
Farnsworth, Managing Director of NCN (nanoHUB.org)RE: nanoHUB.org Design Project DescriptionLet me start by telling you a little about nanoHUB.org: “nanoHUB.org is arguably the largest online user facility for nanoscale engineering and science modeling and simulations in the world. It is a project that is funded by the US National Science Foundation and serves over 240,000 annually. Our users are researchers from the industry, researchers, faculty members at universities worldwide, and most importantly students – at the undergraduate and graduate levels. nanoHUB.org is the place for computational nanotechnology research, education, and collaboration. nanoHUB hosts a rapidly growing collection of
best practices, we present an overview of literature on engineering designeducation.Engineering design education has been the subject of numerous research studies. In 2005,Dym et al. published a paper that examined about 200 articles on engineering design educationand determined that teaching and learning design in an engineering context should includehaving the student be able to do the following: 1) think at the scale of systems, 2) makeestimates, 3) conduct experiments, 4) manage ambiguity through convergent-divergent inquiry,5) make decisions under uncertainty, 6) communicate in diverse languages, and 7) function aspart of an interdisciplinary team. Many researchers have explored these seven engineeringdesign experience elements, including
students to the very important reality of what expectedreturns are realistic and what risks are likely to accompany those returns. It also introduces asecond very important reality in economic decision-making—neither maximizing expectedreturns nor minimizing risks may be the best approach.The next step is presenting the model of risk and return from a portfolio based on twosecurities—bonds and stocks. This clearly shows the value of diversification, and the theory asrepresented in the underlying equations. This simple diagram is easy to present and understand,and an easy way to say why your investments should not be in one type of security—or evenworse in one stock, such as your employer’s.When time permits we find that this is a good place to
, discussing the root, secondary,and immediate causes of a problem then analyzing the impacts and consequences. In semester two,smaller teams worked on a research project exploring the moral, legal, ethical, and social elementssurrounding an issue, evaluating from different disciplinary and personal perspectives. Other guests were integrated within this first year, to foster connections in the campuscommunity. This included faculty from the Center for Leadership and Service and Center forCommunity-Based Partnership, training through the engineering career center, conversations witha professional engineering and a scientific research librarian, and engagement with the VicePresident of the division of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Networking
or the VBioR Laboratory Project. Biological and environmental engineering studentsgenerally choose the VBioR Laboratory Project, while chemical engineering students chooseeither the VCVD or the VBioR Laboratory Project. In this study, eight teams choose the VCVDLaboratory Project and eight teams choose the VBioR Laboratory Project, with all eight VBioRteams selecting the protein production option. The students work under the supervision of twocoaches, who are faculty members in the unit. One faculty member is the VCVD coach and theother the VBioR coach and both coaches are content experts in their respective fields.Data Collection and AnalysisThis research study is an ethnographic case study using discourse analysis.47 The data iscollected
, Baker University .Zahraa Marafie, Kuwait UniversityPatricia Henriquez-CoronelLior Shamir, Kansas State University Associate professor of computer science at Kansas State University.Ella Lucille Carlson, Kansas State UniversityJoshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University Dr. Josh Weese is a Teaching Assistant Professor at Kansas State University in the department of Computer Science. Dr. Weese joined K-State as faculty in the Fall of 2017. He has expertise in data science, software engineering, web technologies, computer science education research, and primary and secondary outreach programs. Dr. Weese has been a highly active member in advocating for computer science education in Kansas including PK-12 model standards
Paper ID #18926Survey Development to Measure the Gap Between Student Awareness, Liter-acy, and Action to Address Human-caused Climate ChangeDr. Tripp Shealy, Virginia Tech Tripp Shealy is an assistant professor in the Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and principal faculty member in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction at Virginia Tech. He received his doctorate from Clemson University. His research is broadly focuses on judgment and decision making for sustainable infrastructure. This includes education for sustainability, specifically, how student understanding and attitude towards
can become too involved in the design as well. There is a level of advisorinvolvement where the project ceases to be truly run by the students and the advisor becomes thechief engineer. This ensures specific experiences but in a sense the team is less empowered.One way to avoid this risk is to leave the design decision-making to the students. Then, theadvisor’s role can be to support the project planning and technical development (as a consultant).How best to have an advisor involved in the project? With increasing demands on our time, howis a faculty advisor to allocate his energy most effectively? Here are a few alternatives:Integrate into CurriculumMany schools integrate these competitions into their course work, often by tackling the
occurs during interpretive research, we offerthe following reflections regarding our backgrounds, “conceptual baggage”13 and insights relatedto this research.Julie’s career vision is to be a national catalyst for increasing the diversity of students inengineering, and to help all students—particularly those who are underrepresented— achievetheir academic, professional and personal goals. She is a faculty member at a predominantlyWhite institution, where she has taught large-enrollment freshman and sophomore levelengineering courses. In her previous position at a diverse institution, she was the foundingwomen-in-engineering program director and director of recruitment and retention. Her studentaffairs and teaching experience, combined with her
motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their development of problem-solving skills, self- regulated learning practices, and epistemic beliefs. Other projects in the Benson group involve students’ navigational capital, and researchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, and a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research Association (AERA) and Tau Beta Pi. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002
, improved time management skills, career exploration, and understanding campusresources and institutional policies [8], [14], [15], [16].Information on the utilization of campus resourcesPeer advising programs have many benefits to both the students who utilize the service and thosewho serve in the role [4]. Significant transition happens during the first year of college, and thereare many challenges for students to learn about a new culture of an institution [13]. Althoughthere are situational differences among students, all will enter college and confront challenges[9], [17]. Peer advising can be powerful during this transition because they can offer recent,first-hand experience [13], [18], [19].Many times, first-year students are hesitant to
theimplementation of the lessons or skills. Additionally, the research team anticipated that positioningteachers and students within a team would reveal various actions that teachers might take as theywork with their students.During the first two weeks of the workshop, engineering graduate students under the supervisionof an engineering faculty introduced relevant robotics concepts, robot components, and robotprogramming to the participants. In addition to learning about how to design, build, and programa robot, participants were introduced to some ideas of entrepreneurship and how to present theirengineering products to businesses. The ultimate goal of the workshop was that teachers andstudents learn about engineering practice and how its product can be
application of EWB-USAprojects in the classroom is described in this paper to illustrate the mechanics of applying the co-creation framework in a particular instance, but does not reduce the suitability of this model forother design challenges such as the ASCE Concrete Canoe Competition, the ASME HumanPowered Vehicle Challenge, the RoboCup games, or the iGEM competition.2.2 Staff/Course InstructorsHumanitarian Design Projects is led by a member of the SEAS faculty and is supported by aninstructional staff of undergraduate students, each of whom is a leader and/or an experiencedparticipant of an EWB-USA project team.The course’s success in advising technical projects across a large range of disciplines is due to thecombination of the head instructor’s
introduces globalization and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [14]. Thegoal of this module is to help students recognize the implications their design decisions mayhave outside of their immediate community and identify ways their careers as designers couldinclude work toward addressing some of the SDGs.The lesson plan for this module first introduces the concept of globalization, including bothpositive aspects like economic growth and cultural exchange and negative aspects likeoverconsumption and exploitation. The UN SDGs are then presented as an international effort toalign countries and major organizations toward positive globalization outcomes. After a briefhistory of the development of the SDGs, students are encouraged to evaluate the