Page 8.1021.2architecture and design. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationDuring 1990’s decade, our curriculum, like many others, had a capstone software engineering andsenior project course. Over the years it became clear that students were learning design issueswhile they were building their senior project; they did not have a foundation of design experienceto bring to bear on their project work.The latest ACM/IEEE guidelines, currently in draft form [4], also define areas of the body ofknowledge for degrees relating to computing. Section 7, Introductory Courses, discusses theoption of
preliminary list of concerns suggests topics forinstructional development and provides a basis for surveys exploring the concerns of specificgroups of faculty. Documented variability in the level of individuals’ pedagogical expertiseindicates that instructional developer effectiveness can be enhanced by beginning instructionaldevelopment interactions with efforts to ascertain participants’ pedagogical knowledge. Suchassessment, which can be either formal or informal, can help instructional developers to customizeactivities to suit their user(s). The importance of vocabulary and terminology to engineeringfaculty suggests that instructional development materials and activities be reviewed for potentiallydissonant vocabulary. Instructional development
Program with ABET Driven Assessment”, Proceedings of the 2010 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.6. Peercy, P. and Cramer, S. (2011). Redefining Quality in Engineering Education Through Hybrid Instruction,Journal of Engineering Education 100(4): 625-629.7. Johnson, C. (2008). “The Evolution of Professional Associations, Engineering and Information Literacy”,Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.8. Parker, A. (2011). “ The Value of Direct Engagement in a Classroom and a Faculty: The Liaison Librarian Modelto Integrate Information Literacy”, Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition.9
Back Iron Figure 1. Heavy Rotor Schematic using NdFeB permanent magnet material laminated in the Silicon Hub with electro-deposited Ni80-Fe20.Electrodeposition of Permalloy Ni80Fe20Electrodeposition is the process used in electroplating, whereas electroplating is the process ofusing electrical current to reduce metal cations—an atom or group of atoms carrying a positivecharge—in a solution and coat a conductive object with a thin layer of metal2. The primaryapplication of electroplating is to deposit layer(s) of a metal having some desired property(example, abrasion and wear resistance, corrosion protection, lubricity, improvement of aestheticqualities, magnetic, etc.) onto a surface lacking that property. Also
activities which are designed to improve student learning outcomes.Dr. Rosalyn S. Hobson, Virginia Commonwealth University Page 25.711.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Identifying significant features that impact URM students academic success and retention upmost using qualitative methodologies: focus groupsAbstract:The purpose of this research is to develop a hybrid framework to model first year studentacademic success and retention for Under Represented Minorities (URM) comprisingAfrican Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Native Americans. This model was
. Students were also expected to reviewthe best practice literature associated with their group assigned area of study and any relevant(animal health distribution related) industry specific information to support their analysis. Duringthe residency week, they follow the schedule of activities shown above in Exhibit 1.On day 1 (Monday), students along with the instructor(s), will travel to visit the companyfacility. The objective of this visit is to understand the current business process and refine theirproblem statement. The typical sequence of events on Monday is as follows: a) students arrive atthe company premises and are guided to the conference room by company associates; b) the topexecutive(s) of the company will give a brief presentation on
. Assessment of Final Term Paper in GLY 2805 Geology for Engineers Outcome(s) 2009 2011Number of students 61 5318: Develop a thesis statement and formulate questions based on the information 4.8 4.8needed12: Define or modify the information need to achieve a manageable focus 4.8 4.74: Read text, select main ideas, and restate textual concepts in their own words 4.5 4.59: Demonstrate an understanding of intellectual property, copyright, and fair use ofcopyrighted material8: Communicate clearly and with a style that supports the purposes of the intended
Page 25.798.9discipline. Below are key points for student learning in any course that integratesentrepreneurship and innovation into the subject material. Like Steve Jobs and StevenChu, students should be encouraged to do the following: 1. Cast a wide net. Keep up with what is happening in your field and in the world generally. 2. Actively seek out problems to solve or areas opportunity where you would be the first person to do the particular type of work you are doing. Even freshman students can find something new to add to a conversation. 3. Figure out who has been talking about this problem or working in a similar area. 4. Get up to speed on the conversation of the field(s) regarding this topic so far. 5. Do
State School Officers). Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.[4] Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77–84.[5] Brophy, S. P., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in the P-12classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 97(3), 369–387.[6] Roselli, R. J., & Brophy, S. P. (2006). Experiences with formative assessment in engineering classrooms.Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 325-333.[7] Biesta, G .(2004). Mind the gap! Communication and the educational relation. In Bingham, C., & Sidorkin,A .eds. No Education without relation. New York: Peter Lang.[8]Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A user's manual
Supervision, 10, 227-249.12. Mills, T.H., Auchey, F.L., and Beliveau, Y.J. (1996) The Development of a Vertically and Horizontally Integrated Undergraduate Building Construction Curriculum for the Twenty First Century. Journal of Construction Education, Summer 1996, 1(1) pp. 34 - 4413. Hauck, A.J. (1998) Construction Management Curriculum Reform and Integration with a Broader Discipline: A Case Study Journal of Construction Education, Summer 1998, 3(2) pp. 118-13014. Al-Holou, N, Corleto, C., Demel, J., Froyd, J., Hoit, M., Morgan, J., and Wells, D. (1998), First-Year Integrated Curricula Across Engineering Education Coalitions, 1998 Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe, AZ.15. Yost, S. A. and Hoback, A. S. (2000) A team approach
. Page 25.1011.11[13] Goleman, D. What Makes A Leader? Harvard Business Review, 2004.???-1-4244-1970-8/08/$25.00 ©2012 ASEE/IEEE June, 2012, San-Antonio, TX 40th ASEE/IEEE Session ???[14] Baum, J., Locke, E. & Kirkpatrick, S. 1998.A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83. 43-54.[15] McClelland, D., Power: The Inner Experience. Van Nostrand: New York, 1964.[16] McClelland, D., Human Motivation. Van Nostrand: New York, 1987.[17} Stefik, M. & Stefik, B. 2004
Devices and Systems”, 3rd ed., publisher Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998. 6. J.G. Skakoon, “The Elements of Mechanical Design”, ASME Press, New York, 2008.7. R. S. Figliola, D. Beasley, “Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements” 5th ed., Wiley and Sons Inc.2011,8. A.J. Wheeler, A. R. Ganji, “Introduction to Engineering Experimentation”, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, 20109. J. P. Holman, “Experimental Methods for Engineers”, 7th ed., McGraw Hill, 200110. Hibbeler, R., “ Statics and Mechanics of Materials”, 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, 201111. Cornwell, P., Fine, J., “Mechanics in the Rose Hulman Foundation Coalition Sophomore Curriculum”12. Borghi, L., Ambrosis, A., Mascheretti, P., Massara, C. I., “Computer simulation
OrganizationalDevelopment Network of Thailand Higher Education (ThaiPOD).Bibliography1. D. Lavansiri, and S. Koontanakulvong, Use of CUQA in Quality Assurance System of Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Proceeding of the 4th ASEE/AaeE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, Sydney, 26-29 September 2005.2. A. C. Cleland and B. J. Wakelin, Graduate Profiles for Washington Accord degrees; Broad Principles and the Design Component. Engineering Design in Engineering Education: JABEE Symposium/Workshop, Tokyo, Japan, December 2004.3. Canadian Council of Professional Engineers (CCPE), Task Force Report on the Future of Engineering Education, July 1988.4. Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems (CETS), Engineering Employment
AC Light + - P N A O E S G C 12V BatteryFigure 2. Major components and their connections of the training unit2.1. Metal Stand (Frame)To begin planning the units, the current commercial training units were studied to get a generalconcept of different training station metal housings, the nature of parts used and
difficulties, however, here we briefly describe a preliminarypilot sample exercise to help students address a small subset of these difficulties. The exercise isintended to be completed by students in small groups of 3 or 4 in a “recitation” type format. Therecitation instructor(s) do not lecture, rather leave the students to complete the task and posequestions to individual groups when they have problems.The exercise focuses on student understanding of the potential energy of two metal atoms as afunction of separation. We chose this topic for several reasons. First, a basic (and we stressbasic) conceptual understanding of the major features of the potential is fundamental tounderstanding the nature of atomic bonds and this can be used throughout the
, synthesis, integration of previous course work, and experimental work. Differentdepartments, majors, areas and topics may have other evidence based criteria to consider.Regardless, it is incumbent on the center advisor(s) to insure that all team members are aware ofthe criteria and that the students are directed along a learning path that will address the criteria.Although WPI has been focused on projects based education for well over thirty years it wasonly in 2009 that outcomes were approved for the capstone design (Table 2). Table 2: Capstone Learning Outcomes Students who complete a Major Qualifying Project will: (a) apply fundamental and disciplinary concepts and methods in ways appropriate to their
= air density (about 1.225 kg/m3 atsea level, less higher up), A = rotor swept area, exposed to the wind (m2), Cp = Coefficient ofperformance (.59 {Betz limit} is the maximum theoretically possible, .35 for a good design), v =wind speed in meters/sec (20 mph = 9 m/s), hg = generator efficiency, hb = gearbox/bearingsefficiency.The key to developing a successful wind energy facility is in finding a site which has a strongand steady wind stream. The feasibility study (Phase 1) of this research was completed in the2003-04 academic year. The wind tower location on the dam area was found to have the secondhighest wind speed in the Hickory Hills Park. The maximum wind speed location was far fromthe hydro generator and therefore was not selected. A
of external groups (e.g., societal needs, state or related professional societiesaccreditation requirements, institution or department curricular goals), nature of the subject (e.g.,convergent or divergent, cognitive or physical skills, stable or rapidly changing), characteristicsof learners (e.g., life situation, professional goals, prior knowledge and skill, learning style),characteristic of teachers (e.g., prior experience, competence in the subject), and specialpedagogical challenge. Since the learning suites are intended to be materials that faculty caneasily insert into an existing course(s), each suite was designed for three-hours of in-class time(i.e., a one-week class period in a common class setting or common length of a workshop
. Education, 96(4), 309-319.10. Schimmel, K.A., King, F. G., Ilias, S., (2003) Using Standardized examinations to assess engineering programs. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.11. Buckendahl, C. W, and Plake, B. S. (2006) “Evaluating Tests”, in Handbook of Test Development edited by Downing S. M. and Haladyna, T. M., Lawerence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey.12. Geiser, S. and Studley, R., (2002) “UC and the SAT: Predictive Validity and Differential Impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California.” Educational Assessment, 8(1) p1-26. Page 15.1202.14
. How much does the choice of application affect (or how you would expect it to affect): (1 = Not affected at all, 3 = Affected, 5 = Extremely affected) Your engagement in a course 1 2 3 4 5 Your interest in the course material 1 2 3 4 5 8. Overall, would you say that having an application-based curriculum is beneficial to you as a student (compared to the conventional alternative)? Why or why not? 9. Overall, would you say that some applications would be more beneficial than others? Why or why not? 10. If yes, which application(s) in the above list would be the most beneficial to you as a student? Why
AC 2010-1605: ET CONTRIBUTION TO UNIVERSITY CORE CURRICULUMTHROUGH A COURSE ON SUSTAINABILITYAnoop Desai, Georgia Southern University Dr. Anoop Desai received his BS degree in Production Engineering from the University of Bombay in 1999, and MS and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial Engineering from The University of Cincinnati in 2002 and 2006. His main research interests are in Product Lifecycle Management, Design for the Environment, Total Quality Management including tools for Six Sigma and Ergonomics. In addition to teaching ET courses in these fields, he is an instructor and co-developer of the core course described in the paper.Phil Waldrop, Georgia Southern University Phillip S. Waldrop
skills which are practical and valuable.We believe that this paper will help others to reuse, redesign and redevelop hands-on modulesfor mobile and wireless networking courses in both electrical engineering and computer scienceprograms. Some these hands-on labs could be used as either introducing laboratory modules inexisting computer network courses or to aid in the creation of new stand-alone mobile andwireless networking course.Bibliography[1] Abbott-McCune. S., Newtson, A. J., Girard , J., Goda, B. S., (2008). Developing a Reconfigurable Network Lab, Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education, pp255-258[2] Cannon, K., Lab Manual for CWNA Guide to Wireless LANs, Second Edition, Thomson Course
) shell and tube, one-shell pass and two tube passes, d) Cross flow, single pass, both fluids unmixed. Fluid 1 as a specific heat of 3500 J/kg-K and a flow rate of 2 kg/s initially at 80 C and needs to be cooled to 50 C. Fluid 2 is water with a flow rate of 2.5 kg/s initially at 15 C. Assume an overall heat transfer coefficient of 2000 W/m2 K. Use thermalHUB.org to solve this problem. 2. Find the oil flow rate and length of the tubes required to achieve an outlet temperature of 100 C with an initial temperature of 160 C. The heat exchanger is this case is a shell-and-tube with 10 tubes, each 25 mm in diameter, making 8 passes and the other fluid is water initially at 15 C and ending at 85 C flowing at 2.5 kg/s. You
Session 3261 Life-centered Design – A Paradigm for Engineering in the 21st Century Andrew S. Lau The Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractThe engineering field, particularly engineering education, is in need of a new paradigm. Weneed a vision of engineering that encompasses traditional technical competence with the enlargedscope of social responsibility and ecological awareness. There have been significantdevelopments in this direction, including the concept of sustainability, the latest engineeringaccreditation outcomes, ethics canons in some engineering disciplines, the field
Case D Misconception(s) 1 Same Mass B Same Mass A Inertia has no effect/Inertia is only effect 2 Mass B Mass B Same Mass A Inertia is all that matters 3 Mass B Mass B Mass A Mass A Unclear 4 Mass B Mass B Same Mass A Inertia is all the matters 5 Mass B Mass B Same Mass A Fails to see the blocks as a system Page 24.407.9Discussion, Conclusions and On-Going WorkIt is evident that the Mass-Pulley IBLA is successful at making clear the concept thatacceleration of
, Publisher Delmar- Cengage Learning.15. Rapid prototyping and engineering applications, a tool box for prototype development by Frank Liou, Publisher CRC Press, 2007.16. Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Applications by C. K. Chua, K. F. Leong , C. S. Lim, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2010.17. Carliner, S., An overview of online learning, Minneapolis, MN: Lakewood Publications/HRD Press, 1999.18. Connick, G. P., 1997, “Issues and trends to take us into the twenty-first century,” In T. E. Cyrs (Ed.) Teaching and Learning at a Distance: What it Takes to Effectively Design, Deliver and Evaluate Programs: No. 71. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 7-12.19. Herring, S., 2002
). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 4. Cox, M.F., London, J.S., Ahn, B., Zhu, J., Torres-Ayala, A.T., Frazier, S., & Cekic, O. (2011) Attributes of Success for Engineering Ph.D.s: Perspectives from Academia and Industry, 2011 Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (10 pages). 5. Ahn, B., Zhu, J., Cox, M.F., London, J.S., & Branch, S. (2013). Recommendations for Engineering Doctoral Education: Design of an Instrument to Evaluate Change. 2013 Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Oklahoma City, OK. 6. Pruitt-Logan, A. S., Gaff, J. G., Jentoft, J. E. (2002). Preparing
365.33 436.33 61.00 $85,842,104 100 O 94.33 482.33 301.00 20.00 $10,266,666 100 P 146.67 731.67 228.00 74.00 $48,452,394 99.61 Q 105.00 262.00 239.00 49.00 $74,392,134 99.38 R 200.00 646.67 382.33 132.67 $150,514,179 99.37 S 37.33 128.00 133.00 4.00 $2,155,104 98.58 T 377.67 1294.33 916.00 236.33 $188,390,621 98.39 U 278.00 1029.00 457.00 191.33 $161,379,281 98.37 V 49.33 169.00 205.00 2.33 $1,939,628 97.09 W
, which is vital for achievinga functional project. Additionally, the integrated circuit employed is very simple and the studentsmust actually encode and decode the actual "1's and 0's" of the message at the very lowest level.For most students, this represents their first exposure to wireless systems and communicationsconcepts. We expose the students to error detection techniques at both the bit and message level,and introduce very rudimentary methods of implementing a messaging protocol. Additionally,although it is rather ad hoc, the students develop a sense of the directionality of the on-boardantenna, and gain insight as to how noise affects achievable communications rates. Althoughthey will not have had a formal communications course at this
underrepresented minority, female and socioeconomically disadvantagedstudents enrolled in civil engineering degree programs and graduates serving in the civilengineering profession. The program is administered in the civil engineering departmentat The Citadel (Charleston, SC) and is supported through a grant from the NationalScience Foundation’s Scholarships in Science Technology, Engineering and Mathematics(NSF, S-STEM) program. The program, Excellence in Civil Engineering Leadership forSouth Carolina (ExCEL-SC), provides scholarships to qualified students, within targetdemographic groups, who are pursuing a Bachelors of Science degree in civil engineering.Equally important, the ExCEL-SC program furnishes a variety of specific student supportservices