of basic research.That means, if a university leans against enterprise projects alone, the basic research together withthe students training in fundamental scientific methods will come to starve.As mentioned above, we are dealing with two different worlds, the life in an industrial enterpriseand in academia with different goals, criteria and success and reward systems. But, there is potentialsynergy in using industry as laboratories for lecturing, projects and research.A traditional contribution is a set of proposed decisions that represent an appropriate solution to awell-defined problem. However, an equally significant contribution may be structuring a complexissue and the pointing out of appropriate options available, leaving it to the
this step, but the funnel and cup combination that catches the watervapor can influence the net evaporation rate and should be part of this experimentation. It is not Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationuncommon during this experimentation for students to modify their prototype design as they gainexperience in running their system. This can be used to strengthen the concept of the design, testand evaluate, and redesign loop of the Engineering Design process (Steps 5 through 8 in Figure1) and to discuss the evolution of manufacturing processes from laboratory scale to pilot scale tofull
the design of this course, especially given the potential for the “non-typical” female engineering student to experience instances inside and outside the classroom andlaboratory where her self-esteem could suffer.Self-esteem is the value or worth that an individual places on the descriptors that are used todescribe one’s self 18. These descriptors are accumulated through multiple experiences such asdaily living activities, classroom and laboratory experiences, and extra curricular experiences(e.g., summer camp, church or youth group activity). One common component shared by manyperceptions of self-esteem is the influence of social interaction 4, 7, 10, 11. Cooley emphasizes theimportant role that social interaction and the evaluation of
Copyright À2004, American Society for Engineering Education”oral examination of their project. Just as you really learn a subject when you are requiredto teach it, being subjected to questions throughout the student’s briefing by outsideexperts, stimulates increased understanding of the subject -- hopefully before the briefing,but always afterwards3].The Final Readiness Review (FRR) is the equivalent of the Prototype AcceptanceDemonstration (PAD) in the DoD procurement program. The FRR is a formal reviewthat all of the requirements of the program have been fulfilled. This includes the thermalbake-out testing, the shake test, etc. The satisfactory completion of this review means thesatellite is ready to be launched[3].By its nature, any design class
Business Team. Concurrently, the Business Team will work with the Technology Team to produce collateral information such as a market analysis, business plan, and investor presentation to present in the annual UF Howard J. Leonhardt Business Plan Competition and similar investor forums. The net result of the project is a team of Engineering and Business students working collaboratively with “real world experience” in a truly entrepreneurial environment.Major pedagogical componentsContent and team formationThe IPPD program teaches the student participants the structured, top-down developmentprocess through two weekly just-in-time lectures with generic deliverable content, a trainingmanual with generic deliverable requirements
event, engineering students often bringfriends and family which provides a venue for social interaction among engineering faculty,staff, and students.Freshman EngineeringA freshman engineering student entering USD must enroll in ENGR5: Introduction toEngineering. The course includes students interested in Electrical, Industrial and Systems, andMechanical Engineering. The catalog description for the course isENGR5 Introduction to Engineering (3 credits)Introduction to the field of engineering. Exploration of problem solving using the engineeringdesign process in lecture and laboratory projects. Introduction to engineering tools includingspreadsheets and graphics. Intended for majors in engineering or those exploring careers inengineering.The
fellowships. As the program develops, the view from the inside is that it can onlyget better.Table A-3, (Appendix: 3) displays the performance record of the students in the mechanicalspecialty of the engineering program at The College of New Jersey in regional, national andinternational student design competitions. The effectiveness of what we have proposed in thispaper may be measured through the results shown in this table.Bibliography1. Dale, E., Audiovisual Methods in Teaching, Dryden Press, NY, 1969.2. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, C.A., Active Learning; Cooperation in the College Classroom, Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN, 1991.3. Finelli, C.J., et al., "Strategies for Improving the Classroom Environment," Journal of
an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received hisB. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy and his M. S. in Engineering from PrincetonUniversity. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, UK. At Baylor he teachescourses in laboratory techniques, fluid mechanics, energy systems, propulsion, and freshman engineering.STEVEN EISENBARTHSteven Eisenbarth is Associate Dean of the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Baylor University. Hereceived his B.S. in Mathematics and Physics from Albertson College of Idaho and a Masters and Ph.D. in Physicsfrom Baylor University. He teaches courses in electrical and computer engineering including embedded
presentation is help at thesame time.Legal Roadblocks You may not expect your students to produce a design that needs protected. However, anydesign should be treated as if it can be patented. Students need to learn the procedure for protectionof ideas. They should be required to buy a laboratory notebook and required to make notes in thenotebook, sketches of ideas, and shown how to protect those ideas. These are habits that can beinstilled during projects of this type. There are some possible legal roadblocks that need to be considered before the project getsunderway. First, who owns the intellectual property if some ideas come out of the project that areworth patenting or copyrighting? Second, who is responsible for protecting these ideas
teaching level. The K-12 levelschoolteachers are not well informed about engineering and applied mathematics and science. Thelack of understanding of engineering and technology by curriculum designers and teachers make itdifficult to introduce engineering concepts into courses. They must be educated first in terms ofengineering and technology professions. It is established that the schoolteachers who have anappreciation for engineering and technology will convey that appreciation to their students, which,in turn will attract more students to choose careers in scientific and engineering disciplines. Acollaborative relationship between teachers and university personnel to bring about the necessarychanges has proved to be effective between North
analyzed for themobility and the redundant constraints. Then a self-aligning version of the same mechanism isdesigned . The loop method is the only tool available to the students.The teams build mechanisms from parts purchased at hardware and hobby stores. The mostfrequently used parts are: brass tubing with slightly different diameters, used in building jointsof the IV-th class, small self-aligning joints used by hobbyists to build RC cars, brass flats andminiature screws and nuts (see Fig. 10).The cost of parts per team is about $8.00, and money comes from the laboratory fees paid by thestudents. The parts are glued together with a glue gun, the holes are drilled and parts cut with asmall Dremel tool. Some safety precautions have to be taken
example in their Manual. A Model Handbook will be developed.R – The Course Team* This important section outlines the membership of the Programme Team, calendar of ‘Programme Team Meetings’, agreed Programme, etc.S – Course Support Services* This section will be a source of information for Programme Teams, and they should add any systems which operate in their own Faculty of Department, eg for obtaining laboratory/workshop materials for classes.T – Student Support Systems* This will be an information section about services available to help students. Programme Teams will need to be aware of these and make their students aware of them.U – Non-Attendance Systems* This section will give the safety net system for
professionalism. Itis impossible to have a good program without these characteristics in faculty members.Care needs to be taken to insure that these characteristics are not punished. The facultyas a group must take the blame for poor performance. After all, the faculty as a groupshould run each program. Of course, courses can be taught where there is little learningdue to poor instruction. But, problems can arise from a myriad of other complicated andinterrelated factors too. These include too little emphasis on the subject in terms of credithours, students being poorly prepared to take the course, a student population inherentlymore gifted or interested in some areas than others, weak students in general, poorteaching facilities, poor teaching schedules
taken in Chinese/Mexican/English Chinese, Mexican China, Mexico or UK industry (6 credits) (8 credits) Or• Chinese/European/ • Hands-on laboratory • International Mexican Technology experience (1 credit) internship placement Management (4 credits) • Chinese/Mexican/ in China/Mexico/UK• Manufacturing in China, European Civilization through IAESTE or UK and Mexico (4 credits) Course (3 credits) AIESEC
• Inequities in school funding (especially in urban areas with high numbers of economically disadvantaged families) • Less access to science and mathematics education. • Less access to qualified teachers in mathematics and science courses. • Instructional emphasis in minority classrooms focus upon preparing students for standardized tests rather than for further study in math and science curriculums. 4Recognizing these problems, schools must make changes in teaching styles and informationalprograms that target student interest at the middle and high school levels. For example,educators must ensure that minority students receive the same quality of education in math andscience courses. The design intent and
of Michigan. She has also heldengineering positions at General Motors and Ford Motor Company.TIMOTHY W. SIMPSONTimothy W. Simpson is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering with a joint appointment in Industrial &Manufacturing Engineering. He is a member of ASME, AIAA, and ASEE and is actively involved with the ProductRealization Minor at Penn State. Dr. Simpson received a B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from CornellUniversity in 1994 and a M.S. degree in 1995 and a Ph.D. degree in 1998 in Mechanical Engineering from theGeorgia Institute of Technology.JOSEPH GOLDBERGJoseph Goldberg is an Associated Professor in Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering. He teaches and conductsresearch in the field of Human Factors
a system; however,they do not teach the tools that are needed to know how to integrate these concepts togetherduring the system development process. The downfall reflects in the student when theycannot develop a successful senior design project.As a solution, a state-of-the-art education is being presented as a project-based learningexperience. This type of educational method has been designed to push motivated studentsinto a fast pace, learn as you “build” environment in which students need to integrateeducational theory with applications. While not being a requirement by the university, adirected independent study was performed by a junior level student in the summer of 2010.The objective of the study was to apply compartmentalized
School District, where she teaches eighth grade physics and chem- istry. Beyond the classroom, Kellie serves as a trainer, teacher-leader, curriculum evaluator and assists in the screening process for the Greater San Diego Science and Engineering Fair. Her professional experience includes working as a staff developer for the Middle School Science Education Leadership Initiative (MSSELI), the California Math and Science Partnership program, and the San Diego Unified School District; presenting regularly at NSTA’s national conference as well as state and regional science education conferences, and working with WestEd’s K12 Alliance. She is also actively involved in STEM outreach with local professionals in the science
, teaching to female learning style—many women prefer to knowthe context before diving into technical details and many want to see a lab concept demonstratedbefore actually carrying it out8. Second, frequently women are in need of assistance withtechnology building block skills they may have less previous experience with, which are oftenassumed in many technology curriculums. Increasingly, CalWomenTech faculty members report Page 22.1555.9that male students often do not come with these problem solving skills either.Subtracting the faculty professional development on retention, the top strategies rated by thestudents cost nothing. Some other retention
AC 2012-3938: DEVELOPING AN ENTREPRENEURIAL CONSULTINGPRACTICUM WITH A LARGE, ESTABLISHED COMPANY AT THE UNI-VERSITY OF MARYLANDDr. James V. Green, University of Maryland, College Park James V. Green leads the education activities of Mtech at the University of Maryland as the Director of En- trepreneurship Education with responsibilities for the Hinman CEOs Program, the Hillman Entrepreneurs Program, and the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program. As a Senior Lecturer and Associate Di- rector with Mtech, Green designs and teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization. He leads Mtech’s international entrepreneurship education initiatives to include establishing and
OneIntroductionProfessional internships are not a new concept to college and university programs.However, to require this experience in the form of a demanding, well designed andimplemented internship is a very time consuming investment, which will yield excellentreturns for your students and for your program. Students, both traditional and non-traditional, are given an opportunity to demonstrate, advance, and refine technical andsupervisory competencies learned in the classroom and in the laboratories. “Internshipsgive you on-the-job experience, help you learn whether you and that industry are a goodmatch, and can provide you with valuable connections and references.” 1Graduates with this type of resume-worthy experience have a substantial advantage overpeers with
AC 2012-4398: ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION OF ABET OUTCOMESC AND K IN ENGINEERING COURSES THAT UTILIZE SOLID MODEL-ING PACKAGESSteven Joseph Kirstukas, Central Connecticut State University Steve Kirstukas is an Assistant Professor at CCSU, where he teaches courses in solid modeling and engi- neering mechanics. He is exploring the use of virtual reality to enhance the engineering design process. He has degrees in civil and mechanical engineering, with a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota. Steve has worked in industry as a civil engineer, software developer, biomechanics researcher, and mechanical design engineer.Dr. Nidal Al-Masoud, Central Connecticut State University
AC 2012-4155: SOLVING THE ENGINEERING PIPELINE CHALLENGE:REVISED, VALIDATED, AND COST-OPTIMIZEDDr. Robert W. Whalin P.E., Jackson State University Robert Whalin is Associate Dean, Professor of civil engineering, and Director, Coastal Hazards Center, Jackson State University. He is Director Emeritus of the Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss. He received his Ph.D. in Oceanography from Texas A&M University in 1971 and is a registered Professional Engineer. Whalin was Director of Army Research Laboratory (1998-2003, Adel- phi, Md.), and Technical Director/Director of Waterways Experiment Station (1985-1998; Vicksburg, Miss.). He has authored/co-authored more than a hundred technical papers and
mentality,acceptance of women in Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationthe workplace is substantially improved. Gender inequities in the teaching of math andsciences at the high schools have been recognized as a factor. That factor has been addressednationally in recent years. At the dawn of the new century, what appears to remain as a barrierto the entry of many women into technical career fields is an inherent lack of initial interest inthese fields from the women themselves. Empirical evidence and direct interviews with manyyoung women reveals a distinct disinterest in entering many engineering
limitations and is usually a focused project. Wewould like to link cadets with capstone projects early in the design sequence to promote theirinitial efforts and allow them to explore the capstone projects in greater depth. Ideally, if theyidentified their capstone project after the first course in design, they would exercise the designprocess over a longer time frame, internalize it, and advance their thought process on the overallproject. With only a few two semester capstone projects, many cadets spend their timecomprehending the scope and trying to “get their arms around” their one semester capstone.Additionally, the internal support required for faculty to manage extensive design opportunitiescannot be met. With USMA primarily a teaching and not
of STEM majorsfrom community colleges through relevant initiatives. Such initiatives offer advanced scientificknowledge, and laboratory experiences, and inspire aspirations for graduate school, therebyenabling these graduates to pursue a comprehensive education that opens up numerous careeroptions. However, the review also highlighted the challenges faced by community collegestudents and faculty in participating in these initiatives[1].It was reported that effective transfer strategies were developed to customize researchexperiences for community colleges and establish long-term partnerships with four-yearinstitutions, to improve accessibility and tackle obstacles [2]. These initiatives aim to expandopportunities for community college
development and humancomputer interaction research.Alice Merner Agogino, University of California, Berkeley Alice M. Agogino is the Roscoe and Elizabeth Hughes Professor of Mechanical Engineering and affli- ated faculty at the Haas School of Business in their Operations and Information Technology Management Group. She directs the Berkeley Expert Systems Technology /Berkeley Energy and Sustainable Technolo- gies (BEST) Laboratories, the Berkeley Instructional Technology Studio (BITS) and is working to develop a Service Learning Media Lab and Design/Prototyping Studio in the new CITRIS building. She served as Chair of the Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate in 2005-06, having served as Vice Chair during the 2004-05
AC 2011-144: EDUCATING MANUFACTURING LEADERS: CREATINGAN INDUSTRIAL CULTURE FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURERonald J. Bennett, Univeristy of Saint Thomas RONALD J. BENNETT PhD is Honeywell Fellow in Global Technology Management in the School of Engineering at the University of St. Thomas after having served as the Founding Dean. He holds a Ph.D. in Metallurgical Engineering and an MBA. With a background of more than 20 years in industry, Bennett teaches and publishes on diverse topics including materials engineering, technical innovation, technology transfer, leadership and engineering education. He is an EAC of ABET commissioner for SME.Elaine R. Millam, Univeristy of St. Thomas Dr. Elaine Millam is a senior consultant
products and systems,new design techniques are needed. These techniques should be developed through soundresearch methodologies and enhance designers abilities. Toward this end, we have developed aset of indicators which classify design problems between those for which the preferable design isa transformer, devices with multiple functional states, or a monomorph, devices with a singlefunctional state. The indicators reveal, at an early stage in the design process, if developing atransformable product is likely to be advantageous. A novel design methodology is proposedwhich incorporates the indicators and has been tested at teaching institutions of higher education.Design application trials are used as a method for determining the impact of this
AC 2011-259: FACIAL RECOGNITION SYSTEM SCREENING EVALUA-TION METHODOLOGY FOR COMPLEXION BIASESRigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University Dr. Rigoberto Chinchilla (PhD in Integrated Engineering, Ohio University) is an Associate Professor in the School of Technology since 2004 and Current Interim Coordinator of Graduate Studies for the School of Technology at Eastern Illinois University. His teaching and research interests include Applied Statistics, Quality Assurance, Computer and Biometric Security, Information Systems, and Automation. Dr. Chinchilla has been a Fulbright scholar, a recipient of a United Nations scholarship, chosen as a Faculty Marshall for the Graduate School, and received an Achievement and