,” in 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016, pp. 1–7.[2] M. M. C. S. N. Lykke, “Motivating Students through Positive Learning Experiences: A Comparison of Three Learning Designs for Computer Programming Courses.,” J. Probl. Based Learn. High. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 80–108, 2015.[3] A. Bogdanovych and T. Trescak, Teaching Programming Fundamentals to Modern University Students. 2016.[4] Y. Sedelmaier and D. Landes, “Active and Inductive Learning in Software Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2, 2015, pp. 418–427.[5] R. Ellis, “Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA Perspective,” TESOL Q., vol
Psychology, 1997, 22, 125-146.10 P.A. Alexander, “The Development of Expertise: The Journey from Acclimation to Proficiency,” Education Researcher, 2003, 32, 10-14.11 P.A. Alexander, T.L. Jetton and J.M. Kulikowich, “Interrelations of Knowledge, Interest and Recall: Assessing a Model of Domain Learning,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2008, 87, 559-575.12 Kulturel-Konak, S., Konak, A., Esparragoza, I. E., and Okudan Kramer, G. E., 2013, Assessing Professional Skills in STEM Disciplines. Proceedings of the Third Integrated STEM Education Conference, ISEC ’13, Princeton, NJ, 2013.13 R. L. Barry, and E. G. Seebauer, Fundamentals of Ethics for Scientists and Engineers. New York. NY: Oxford University
design.UGTA’s reaped many benefits ranging from an increased sense of ownership and belonging asengineering students to developing the often-overlooked “soft” skills needed to thrive asprofessionals. This model is now being explored for use in the companion course, Introduction toEngineering, which students take in the alternate freshmen semester (the sequence can be takenin either order).Perhaps the most important result can be found a year later in our student study spaces, dorms,and off-campus housing: the teams formed in this course can be found living and workingtogether as friends and colleagues after having forged meaningful connections during their timein Introduction to Engineering Problem Solving.References[1] S. Godin, Stop Stealing Dreams
some use of[2-4].References[1] W. Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White, The Elements of Style. [E-book] Available: http://www.jlakes.org/ch/web/The-elements-of-style.pdf.[2] S. Illingworth and G. Allen, Effective Science Communication: a practical guide to surviving as a scientist. Bristol, U.K.: IoP Publishing, 2016.[3] G.D. Gopen and J.A. Swan. “The science of scientific writing,” American Scientist, vol. 78, pp. 550-558, 1990.[4] B. Mensch and K. Kording. “Ten simple rules for structuring papers”, PLoS Computational Biology https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005619, 2017
civil engineering graduatevibrations course,” in Proceedings of American Society of Engineering Education AnnualConference, 2010.[5] S. Freeman, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, andmathematics,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, May, 2014.[6] J. Du, “Interdisciplinary engineering research experience for undergraduates”, in Proceedingsof ASEE St. Lawrence Section Conference, 2018.[7] M. C. Linn et al., “Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities,” Science,vol. 347, no. 6222, pp. 1-6, Feb., 2015.[8] K. Islam et al., “Assessment formats and student learning performance: What is the relation?”in Proceedings of the 7th Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 2017.[9] T
, Katsuhiko Ogata, 4h Ed., Pearson, 2004.3. Results of an Integrated Project-Based Approach within the Interdisciplinary Electromechanical Engineering Program at Wentworth, S. Badjou, peer-reviewed paper presented and published in the 2011 ASEE National Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26-29, 2011.4. Implementation of a Novel Biomedical Systems Engineering Concentration Within An Established And EAC-of- ABET Accredited Interdisciplinary Electromechanical Engineering Program, S.Badjou, L.G. Chedid, peer- reviewed paper presented and published in the proceedings of the June 2009 Annual ASEE Conference. Austin Texas.5. Engineering Education Upheaval, Kevin Craig, Professor of Mechanical Engineering,DesignNews, 7/24/2012
instructor had also good lessons to Vann and America in Vietnam”, Vintage, 1989.learn. For instance, the course materials and 6. Karnow, S, “Vietnam: A History”, 1983.assessment scheme should be progressively 7. Kiernan, B., “Viet Nam: A History frommodified to fit the goal of the two courses, the Earliest Times to the Present”, 2017students will satisfy the course requirements like 8. The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and thetheir peers in parallel classes held at the Boston American Tragedy in Vietnam, 2018campus, the two courses will be better integrated 9. Goscha, C., “Vietnam: A New History”, 2016such that they will complement
, 2000.[6] V. John-Steiner, Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 85, 2000.[7] V. John-Steiner, Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 72, 2000.[8] A. Regalado, “Innovation Quest, Regions Seek Critical Mass: What’s the secret to becoming the next technology hot spot?,” MIT Technology Review, 1 July 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/516501/in-innovation-quest-regions- seek-critical-mass/. [Accessed March 25, 2019].[9] D. A. Kolb, I. M. Rubin and J. M. McIntyre. (1984). Organizational Psychology: Readings on Human Behavior in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.[10] K. K. Smith and D. N. Berg
Technology.References1. Orton, A. (1983). Students' understanding of integration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(1), 1-18.2. Rebello, N. S., Cui, L., Bennett, A. G., Zollman, D. A., & Ozimek, D. J. (2007). Transfer of learning in problem solving in the context of mathematics and physics. Learning to Solve Complex Scientific Problems, 223-246.3. Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. New York: Academic Press.4. Christensen, W. M., & Thompson, J. R. (2010). Investigating student understanding of physics concepts and the underlying calculus concepts in thermodynamics. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education.5. Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. (2002
, engineer). This approach is coupled with the AskNature.org website,which is a public database of biological information organized by a biomimicry taxonomy [37].The cognitive process of this approach is divided into the steps of scoping, discovering, creating,and evaluating (Fig. 2), and is structured around the search for particular biological insights tosolve a given problem. Scoping involves specifying the problem to be solved with operatingconditions, the functions that must be performed, and which life’s principles the design willincorporate. Discovering involves identifying biological systems that have evolved strategies tosolve the defined function(s) followed by abstracting those strategies into possible designprinciples. This step is often
same students. The discussions were extensive in the discourse of the non-mentored professor; however, these were not part of a classroom experience design based on the critical reflection of the instructor, as it was the case for the mentored professor. TG students had access to computers to use GeoGebra to work individually and collectively. In contrast, in the CG, students had no access to computers, and although some accessed through their smartphones, most of the times was the instructor the only one using GeoGebra to make explanations to the students, while they listened passively.It is evident the positive impact that the redesign of the learning activities had on the learningenvironment from the perspective of the student´s particular
secondary schools) led by Benjamin S. Bloom,committed themselves to create this common framework. They met annually as a working groupthrough the late 1940s and early 1950s to create a common framework for the characterizationand assessment of educational activities. Their goal was to create a common hierarchal set ofterms and language that characterized educational objectives in a uniform and repeatable way.The publication describing their early work presented the concept of three domains ofeducational activities. Those domains included the cognitive, which deals with the recognitionof knowledge and the progressive development of intellectual abilities; the affective domain,which describes changes in interests, attitudes, and values; and the
,QYHVWLJDWLRQRIWKH0RWLYDWLRQRI&ROOHJH6WXGHQWVZLWK 1RQYLVLEOH'LVDELOLWLHVWR8WLOL]H'LVDELOLW\6HUYLFHV´-RXUQDORI3RVWVHFRQGDU\(GXFDWLRQDQG 'LVDELOLW\YROQRSS .5LYLRX*.RXURXSHWURJORX12LNRQRPLGLV³$1HWZRUNRI3HHUVDQG3UDFWLFHVIRU$GGUHVVLQJ /HDUQHU9DULDELOLW\8'/QHW´,Q6WXGLHVLQ+HDOWK7HFKQRORJ\DQG,QIRUPDWLFV$VVLVWLYH 7HFKQRORJ\,263UHVV$PVWHUGDP7KH1HWKHUODQGV9ROSSí 5XEULFIRUD8'/6\OODEXV8'/8QLYHUVH$&RPSUHKHQVLYH8QLYHUVDO'HVLJQIRU/HDUQLQJ)DFXOW\ 'HYHORSPHQW*XLGH>2QOLQH@$YDLODEOHKWWSHQDFWVRQRPDHGXFSKS"J S >$FFHVVHG)HE@ 8QLYHUVLW\RI:DVKLQJWRQ³'2,7´'R,7QG>2QOLQH@$YDLODEOHKWWSVZZZZDVKLQJWRQHGXGRLW >$FFHVVHG)HE@ 86'HSDUWPHQWRI(GXFDWLRQ1DWLRQDO&HQWHUIRU(GXFDWLRQ6WDWLVWLFV'LJHVWRI(GXFDWLRQ 6WDWLVWLFV&KDSWHUKWWSVQFHVHGJRYSURJUDPVGLJHVWGFKBDVS
collaborative projects betweenthe academic and facilities sides of the university that will serve both educational andenvironmental interests going forward.References[1] P. Ballon and D. Schuurman, "Living labs: concepts, tools and cases," Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, vol. 17, no. 4, 2015.[2] C. Veekman, D. Schuurman, S. Leminen and M. Westurlund, "Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework," Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 6-15, 2013.[3] T. Cohen and B. Lovell, "The Campus as a Living Laboratory: Using the Built Environment to Revitalize College Education," Sustainability Education & Economic Development Center by The American Association of
Initiatives to Promote Engineering Success,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June 2018.[2] P. Treuer, and L. Whisler, “Entangled learning: An overview,” retrieved from https://www.EntangledLearning.org, 2019.[3] L. Whisler, and P. Treuer, “How to entangle peer educators,” Synergy, 10, 2017.[4] A. Badir, J. Liao, T. Kunberger, G.I. Papkov, L.D. Nguyen, and R. O'Neill, “Exam Wrappers, Reflection, and Student Performance in Engineering Mechanics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June, 2018.[5] P. Gezer-Templeton, E. Mayhew, D. Korte, and S. Schmidt, “Use of Exam Wrappers to Enhance Students’ Metacognitive Skills in a Large
Paper ID #25144What Impact Does an Engineering Abroad Program Have on the Motivationand Commitment of Community College Engineering Students?Jo-Ann Panzardi PE, Cabrillo College Jo-Ann Panzardi is a Professor and Chair of the Engineering Department at Cabrillo College, Aptos, California since August 1995. She is also the Program Director of a USDE Title III STEM grant and Project Investigator of a NSF S-STEM grant. She received her BS in Civil Engineering from Polytechnic Institute of New York and her MSCE in Geotechnical Engineering from University of Maryland. She is a registered civil engineer in California. She was
through the rest of theacademic year. With the expansion of the data, we hope to arrive at more definitive conclusionsregarding this popular educational topic.References[1] J. L. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, "The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research," in 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, 2013.[2] M. Prince, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2013.[3] J. E. Fogarty, "Assesment of Flipped Classroom in Upper-Level Engineering Coruse," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.[4] M. H. Holdhusen, "A "flipped" statics classroom," in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, 2015.[5] R. Bachnak and S. C
Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 101(4), pp. 817-835, 2009.[5] D.H. Uttal, N.G. Meadow, E. Tipton, L.L. Hand, A.R. Alden, C. Warren, N.S. Newcombe, “The Malleability of Spatial Skills: A Meta-Analysis of Training Studies,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 139(2), pp. 352-402, 2013.[6] S. Farrell, A. Behan, G. Duffy, R. Harding, R. Howard, “A Profile of the Spatial Visualisation Abilities of First Year Engineering and Science Students,” The 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES 2015), Dublin, Ireland, July 13-15, 2015.[7] C. Caldwell, J. Hanus, A. Chalmers, “Integration of Information-Technology Software in a Civil Engineering Program,” pp. 14.775.1
cybersecurity. Executive Order, Office of the Press Secretary, 12.[2] Alves T., Buratto, M., de Souza, F., Rodrigues, T., "OpenPLC: An open source alternative to automation," in 2014 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), pp.585- 589, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1109/GHTC.2014.6970342[3] K. Zetter, "An Unprecedented Look at STUXNET, the World’s First Digital Weapon," Wired Magazine, November 3, 2014. [Online]. Available: Wired, http://wired.com. [Accessed April 28, 2019].[4] N. Sayfayn and S. Madnick, “Cybersafety Analysis of the Maroochy Shire Sewage Spill,” Interdisciplinary Consortium for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, MIT Management Sloan School, Working Paper CISL #2017-09, May 2017.[5] US Department
,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 5(1), 45-61 (2014). Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference The University of Texas at Austin April 4-6, 2018[3] Doolen, T.L. and Choomlucksana, J., “Using [7] Mirehei, S. M., Kuriger, G., Wan, H., and Chen, F.F.,Collaborative-Learning Activities to Introduce Lean “Enhancing Lean Training for the Office EnvironmentPrinciples and Methods in the Higher Education through Simulation and Gaming,” International Journal ofClassroom,” Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Learning and
factors in online collaboration and their relationship tosomething—not necessarily their actual ability. [5] The teamwork satisfaction. The Quarterly Review oftiming of this survey employment at the end of the fall Distance Education, 10(2). pp195-206. Information Agesemester is a very stressful time for first year engineering Publishing, Inc.students, and they may have a very low overall self- [3] Anderson, C. B., Lee, H. Y., Byars-Winston, A.,efficacy. Baldwin, C. D., Cameron, C., and Chang, S. (2016). Assessment of Scientific Communication Self-efficacy,4. Future Work
, June 24-27, 2018.[9] D. Molina and A. Morse, “Military-connected undergraduates: The current state of research and future work,” Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 2015.[10] R. Rabb, K. Bower, R. Barsanti, and R. Welch, Veteran Students in Engineering Leadership Roles, Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Columbus, OH, June 25-28, 2017.[11] M. Loughry, M. Ohland, and D. Moore, “Development of a Theory-Based Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 67 (3), pp. 505-524, 2007.[12] T. O’Neil, S. Park, N. Larson, A. Deacon, G. Hoffart, B. Brennan, M. Eggermont, and W. Rosehart, Peer Ratings and Intentions to Change: Adopting the
Environment & Development”,Oxford University Press, 1987.[2] United Nations, “UN - Conference on Environment and Development”, [Online]http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html, Accessed January 31, 2019.[3] United Nations, “UN - World Summit on Sustainable Development”, [Online]https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/milesstones/wssd, Accessed January 31, 2019.[4] United Nations, “UN - Sustainable Development Goals”, [Online]hhttps://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/, Accessed January 31, 2019.[5] R. Amri and N. B. B. Saoud, "Towards a Generic Sustainable Software Model," Fourth International Conferenceon Advances in Computing and Communications, pp. 231-234, 2014.[6] M. Dick, S. Naumann, and N. Kuhn, “A model and
of Science and Engineeringjobs will grow by 853,600 between 2016 and 2026, a growth rate (1.1% CAGR) that issomewhat faster than that of the overall workforce (0.7%). In addition, BLS projects that4.179 million scientists and engineers will be needed due to labor force exits and occupationaltransfers (referred to collectively as occupational separations). BLS projects the total numberof openings in S & E (science and engineering) due to growth, labor force exits, andoccupational transfers between 2016 and 2026 to be 6.033 million, including 1.265 million inthe engineering occupations [2].”Although there is a strong demand for engineers in the U.S., there has been a decline inthe graduation rate of engineers with a consistently stagnant