. As an innovative approach in student-centered, active learning methods,guided inquiry learning (GIL) has received wide attention and support from the STEMcommunities [1-3]. GIL is a pedagogical approach to active learning, driven by learner-centeredand problem-based strategies emphasizing team-learning environment [1-4]. As the evidence-based research in education has grown on the effectiveness and potential of guided inquiry-basedlearning in the past few decades, an increasing number of colleges and institutions have adoptedthe GIL approach as a means to enhance and transform the teaching and learning experiences forinstructors and students. The guided-inquiry-based instructional curricula resulted in significantlearning gains in comparison
are faced with real-world machinedesign problems.[1] The ability to move a design forward despite uncertainty is an experience-based skill. Other experience based skills that are important to the practice of machine designare the effective use of computer-aided engineering tools and the ability to extract a correctanalytical model from a real-world engineering problem. Liu and Brown suggest that aneffective approach to teaching these experience-based skills is through the inclusion of active,project-based learning.Monterrubio and Sirinterlikci implement this active learning approach into the curriculum of aMachine Design course by including a semester-long laboratory in which students design andconstruct an injection-mold.[2] The authors
interactive version of the "Powers ofTen" video [1] and helps players understand powers of ten and exponents.During the course of the game, players explore the museum and solve puzzles. Some puzzlesrequire the player to estimate the size of an object by finding the floor with an exhibit of thatobject and then clicking on that exhibit. Other puzzles give the player a definition or descriptionof an object and then require the player to click on the exhibit that matches the description.Critics of educational games sometimes compare them to chocolate-covered broccoli and saythat instead of making learning more fun they actually make it worse, just as chocolate-coveredbroccoli is less appetizing than plain broccoli [2]. In this paper we describe how
School of Engineering and Computer Science is a less than 10% of theoverall undergraduate student enrollment. At Baylor, a five-year strategic plan, called ProFuturis, was adopted in May 2014. This vision is consistent with Baylor’s mission "to educatemen and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence andChristian commitment within a caring community [1]." The major emphasis of this vision is onincreasing the university’s research capabilities as part of the vision for growth, which is goodnews for the School of ECS. One of Baylor’s aspirational goals is “Transformational Education.”Many metrics are given to measure this success, such as improved student retention and theaesthetic quality of the campus. These
Purdue University. Her research interest includes the influence of informal engineering learning experiences on diverse students’ attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions of engineering, and the relationship between students’ interests and the practices and cultures of engineering. Her current work at the FACE lab is on teaching strategies for K-12 STEM educators integrating engineering design and the development of engineering skills of K-12 learners. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 MAKE-AN-ENGINEER ENGINEERING EDUCATION Engineers do all sorts of amazing things to make the world a better place. STEP 1
engineering students?The Unexpected FindingA phenomenographic study by the first author identified eight distinct ways engineering studentsexperienced innovation (categories)7. These categories were mapped to a two-dimensionaloutcome space that differentiated categories by the processes participants connected toinnovation and the areas around which they focused their innovation activities (Figure 1).Figure 1. Outcome space demonstrating ways of experiencing innovation (from7)Collectively, categories 5–8 represented the “most comprehensive” categories because theyincorporated all process elements (idea realization, idea generation, problem scoping, problemfinding, and the macro-iterative cycle) and all focus areas (technical, human, and enterprise
thespecified guidelines of the systematized literature review framework to understand the currentstate of research in the field. This will be achieved by addressing two main research questions: 1)What are the current issues in managing engineering talent?, and 2) What strategies exist formanaging engineering talent? The findings from the literature review were grouped based onfour major emergent categories including selection, development, retention, and general talentmanagement activities, with sub-themes under each as they relate to the research questions.Finally, the paper concludes with a brief discussion on potential implications of the literaturereview.1. Background and Literature ReviewAttracting, developing and retaining employees is a major
holds two patents. Dr. Jaksic’s interests include robotics, automation, and nanotechnology engineering education and research. He is a licensed PE in Colorado and a member of ASEE, IEEE, and SME. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Manufacturing Applications of the One-Dimensional Cutting Stock Problem as a Team ProjectAbstractThis paper explains the beneficial and practical impact of operations research in two realmanufacturing settings. Two manufacturing examples used in student projects were (1) cuttingrails (80‘ or 40‘) to manufacture railroad frogs of many sizes and (2) cutting round metal rolls (12‘to 20‘) to meet customer demands for various lengths of
, as well, student ability to transfer and integrate knowledge across domains. This paperdescribes our assessment methods and explores the difficult collaborative process we undertook todesign these methods. The blind men said to each other, “what is an elephant?” But, as none of them had ever seen anelephant, none of them could give an answer. Because the six blind men very much wanted to find out what an elephant looked like, the next day they set out for the village to find the elephant. —Indian folk taleIntroduction and Statement of the Problem:In 2004, The National Academy of Engineering published The Engineer of 2020: Visions ofEngineering in the New Century [1]. That report drew on insights
exploration, rather than an additive course or exercise, is integratedinto valuable GIS mapping and environmental site design coursework.Keywords: design-thinking, creativity, GIS, Mapping, design approach.IntroductionThe creative engineer is in great demand. With expectations of not only competency but acompetitive urgency to innovate, the demands on the new engineer are multiple. While it isrecognized that design and innovation are key areas for growth and development withinengineering education, it remains difficult to integrate open-ended learning into what is alreadyan overly dense, hugely broad, introductory package of courses [1]. We need to explore moreefficient ways of fostering open-ended creativity training for engineering students.The
hierarchy of increasing comprehensiveness of understanding of uncertainty indesign decisions [1]. The previous research involved interviewing twenty five engineers in theaerospace industry. A surprising result from this research is that aerospace engineers mustsimultaneously increase their understanding of teamwork in order to be successful at managingmultiple categories of uncertainty in aerospace design [2]. Now that we know more about whatlargely comprehensive understanding includes, the next step is to investigate strategies forstudents to improve their own understanding of multiple forms of uncertainty in aerospacedesign of complex systems.The goal of our current research in this paper is to identify common themes in the designexperiences of
paper. Reducing the grades for next trials isdone for two reasons: 1) to be fair with the students who master the concepts in the first trial, and2) to avoid the situation where some students would intentionally try the first and second trials toget an idea about the questions and then do the last trial knowing that their grade will not bereduced because of that.This study investigates the following question: Does mastery learning and assessment approachpositively impact students’ learning and outcomes compared to the conventional learning andassessment approach? The data analysis shows that the implementation of mastery learning andassessment approach (intervention group) has improved students’ performance in all examswhen compared to
; and conduct experiments, collect, analyze, and interpret data within theten weeks duration of the academic training. This includes:1. Provide training to the student team in CAD/CAM, and G-Code programming;2. Review of literature and watching online tutorials related to DIY CNC router projects;3. Assemble/build and test the mini 3-axis CNC router;4. Provide training to operate the CNC router and carve simple/complex shapes on different materials;5. Collect data for a 2k factorial design experiment considering 2-levels of machining, material, and shape parameters;6. Measure the parts made of plastic and wood for dimensional accuracy and compare the results;7. Use Minitab and/or Excel to analyze the data collected;8
partner institutions, as well as scholarly publications. In conclusion the paperdiscusses the broader impacts of the NSF funded project on software verification and validationcurriculum in undergraduate software engineering education.1. IntroductionThe body of knowledge appropriate for undergraduate software engineering programencompasses both theoretical and practical aspects. The knowledge areas (KA) listed in the 2014IEEE/ACM Software Engineering Curriculum Guidelines [1] are imperative for undergraduateeducation and the subsequent professional career. However, due to the lack of active learningtools and the dearth of engaged student learning, software engineering education may not beeffectively delivered, resulting in non-coverage by the
work often emphasizes the technical at the expense ofthe social, and rarely provides students the opportunity to solve open-ended problems. This paperdescribes the rationale and process for developing an instrument to measuring students’perspective changes in sociotechnical thinking. That instrument is motivated by research thatexamines the importance of embedding sociotechnical thinking, or the interplay between relevantsocial and technical factors in the problem to be solved, into the engineering curriculum.IntroductionPracticing engineers often learn to recognize the complex interplays between the social and thetechnical dimensions of the typically open-ended problems that they solve [1]–[3]. Professionalengineers also engage in elaborate
FrameworkDespite its identified importance for learning, cognitive engagement is often a difficult constructto measure. Chi and Wylie developed the ICAP framework (Chi & Wylie, 2014), whichrepresents four modes of engagement: 1) Interactive, 2) Constructive, 3) Active, 4) Passive. Thepurpose of this framework is threefold. First, it brings further definition to generally-broadrecommendations for actively engaging students (i.e., moving away from vague actions such asengage students). Second, it provides instructors with criteria to evaluate learning activities inrelation to cognitive engagement. And third, it offers guidelines for the modification of existingassignments to promote active learning (Chi & Wylie, 2014). In short, the ICAP
the Development of Metacognition in Engineering Students in a Problem-Based Learning Program with a Think-Aloud ProtocolThis evidence-based practice paper focuses on how an engineering education program thatpromotes self-regulated learning impacts students’ problem-solving skills. Iron RangeEngineering (IRE) is an innovative, problem-based-learning (PBL) engineering program inVirginia, Minnesota. Throughout the curriculum of this program, students learn about and applymetacognitive skills necessary for self-regulating their learning. For the past several years, wehave been conducting research funded by the National Science Foundation1 to (1) identify themetacognitive skills inherent in self-regulated
likelycontributing to increased belief and recognition to address climate change but an educational gapstill persists in understanding. Future research should explore why misconceptions still existeven when climate change is taught in engineering courses and how particular concepts areexplained and how student experiences shape understanding and interest.IntroductionCivil engineers, who design and construct society’s built environment and maintaininfrastructure services, have a responsibility to ensure safety and wellbeing for people and theplanet [1], [2]. As the global population continues to grow exponentially [3], demand for non-renewable energy is leading to extreme levels of greenhouse gas emissions [4]. The currentconsumption rate of non-renewable
to more clearly emphasize the characteristics of a correct response, and have increasedthe scaffolding to guide students. Additionally, the revised activity is more focused than theoriginal, allowing students to spend more time on the reflection portion of the activity. Studentperformance is measured and compared in two courses at different institutions. Studentresponses on a concept inventory at the beginning and end of the term are also compared toinvestigate the development and persistence of their learning gains.1. IntroductionUnderstanding the three-dimensional relationships in crystal structures is an important skill formaterials science and engineering students. However, students struggle to visualize many of theatomic relationships
different engineeringelective courses by bringing their students together for an interdisciplinary, experiential-learningactivity. Educational pedagogy reports the value of incorporating experiential learningopportunities into course work to greater impact student learning [1], [2]. The courses involvedwere a humanities elective on science fiction and a science elective on nanotechnology. Thecrossover activity was built on a common theme, the societal impacts of new technologies, ineach course. It involved the students presenting content from their course’s discipline to studentsin the other course in a face-to-face event. The authors reported previously on how these courseswere integrated [3]. The effects of the crossover activity on students
unprecedentedincrease in technological advancement has increased the need for multi-disciplinary teams tosolve the complex engineering problems of the future [1]. The well-structured, multi-part‘complicated’ problems of the past have transformed into the interdependent, multi-part‘complex’ problems of today and the future [2]. These problems prevent one person ordisciplinary-specific group from having the requisite knowledge and skills to solve the problemindependently [1], [3], [4]. ABET acknowledges this reality by requiring undergraduateengineering programs demonstrate the ability of their students to work within a multi-disciplinary team upon graduation [5]. Faculty may be challenged to meet this requirementbecause of a lack of sufficiently complex
level of academic engagement a student exhibits[1]. This engagement is contextual and can be strongly impacted by a students’ motivationwithin the given context [2], [3]. In this study, we defined academic success as a combination ofacademic achievement (e.g., grades and GPAs), attainment of learning outcomes (e.g., studentengagement and proficiency profile), and acquisition of skills and competencies (e.g., criticalthinking and problem solving) [4]. We defined student motivation to include expectancy beliefs(i.e., self-efficacy, attributions, and control beliefs), value choices (i.e., goal orientation, interest,and importance), and meta-cognition (i.e., self-regulated learning) [5]. This motivation-cognition-learning model takes the
Engineering.IntroductionScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) educators continue to emphasizethe need to develop an academic climate that supports systematic innovation and change inengineering education [1]. Change strategies in undergraduate education may be categorized bytheir approach to transformation and by the impact they produce [2]. Transformations that impactan entire environment arise from far-reaching policy adjustments or from developing a sharedvision of the desired change, which are referred to as top-down or bottom-up approaches,respectively. However, top-down approaches to change have been demonstrated to be far lesseffective than bottom-up approaches [3]. To successfully implement organizational change, it isnecessary for all of the
advising models have oftentimes become unwieldy, as institutions increase registrationand counseling processes for students. These advising practices and systems have generally beenconstructed over a multitude of years but need to be revamped. While many are meant to guidestudents within their educational path; the reality of the current state of education requires newapproaches to advising.Academic advising, well developed and appropriately accessed, is perhaps the only structuredcampus endeavor that can guarantee students sustained interaction with a caring and concernedadult who can help them shape such an experience. 1 Many times, the traditional models havebecome merely procedural checkboxes that in essence have lost their connection to
College. 8/2005 to 2/2011: Dean, Chino Valley and CTEC Campuses, Yavapai Community College. 7/2000 to 8/2005: Associate Dean and Agriculture Professor, Chino Valley Campus. 7/1999 to 7/2000: Agribusiness Program Director and Faculty, Agribusiness and Science Technology Center, Yavapai Community College 7/1989 to 7/1999: Agriculture Instructor and CTE Director, Chino Valley High School 6/1986 to 6/1989: Research Assistant, U.S.D.A. Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, Tucson, Az (c) Publications A list of: (i) up to five publications most closely related to the proposed project: No information to report. and (ii) up to five other significant publications, whether or not related to the proposed project: 1. John H
and D/HH students in research opportunities is critical for thedevelopment of core skills needed to pursue advanced scientific opportunities (both in pursuingadvanced degrees and obtaining quality work experiences). For example, many graduateprograms seek undergraduate students who have some research experience in order foradmission to their programs. Lacking the core research skills places these individuals at asignificant disadvantage when compared to non-URM and non-D/HH individuals [1]. Therefore,strategies must be implemented in order to offset the imbalance URM and D/HH students faceduring their college careers.There is a gap in the attainment of baccalaureate and advanced degrees by individuals fromunderrepresented groups [2-3]. As it
that I have succeeded inmentoring at least 82 students intensively, with the following diversity: African Mentees Total Hispanic Anglo Other American # % # % # % # % # % Male 51 62% 26 51% 2 4% 22 43% 1 2% Female 31 38% 17 55% 1 3% 12 39% 1 3% Total 82 43 3 34 2 Of these 82 intensively mentored students, 13 are still at SAC in
calledinduced demand [1], [2]). Adding a new road lane brings new drivers, and over time (typicallywithin five years) leads to more traffic, more pollution, and contributes to a reduction incommunity quality of life [3], [4]. Similarly, viewing energy efficient building materials inisolation to how they perform within a system may lead to less than optimal solutions. Forinstance, windows with a low U-value typically cost more but produce less heat transfer, whichcan equate to reduction in HVAC loads, leading to a net positive benefit for both financialinvestors and the environment.Unfortunately, civil engineering practice still too frequently ignores these dynamicrelationships between system components. For example, rating systems like Leadership
expertise in the engineering field [1]. In addition, the industry is left dissatisfied byengineering students’ deficiency in potential skills and low levels of academic achievement [2].In order to assist engineering students to perform well in achievement tests, it is necessary todesign instructional scaffolding during the learning process. Scaffolding students’ learning via anonline learning medium is quite a challenging task. There is thus considerable need for strategiesto enable instructors to assist students’ learning through such a medium. The instructionalscaffolding strategy model can provide a foundation in identifying a mechanism that will lead tothe description of successful metacognitive scaffolding approaches that can be used
for the conveyer and platform7. Both universities successfully demonstrated the stable operation oftheir robot6,8. However, these solutions were not applied to the VSU robot to solve the sudden movementand unexpected stops because there was a lack of knowledge and experience with their hardware.Therefore, the objective of this research was to create a new wireless teleoperation and embedded systemscheme to eliminate or reduce the sudden movements and unexpected stops. The next section,Experiment and Discussion, describes the mining robot, embedded system, relay circuit, electronicsystem, wireless communication system and testing for verification. The paper ends with conclusions.EXPERIEMENT AND DISCUSSIONMining Robot Figure 1 shows the