more than 50 articles in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings and two invited book chapters. He serves on the conference committee for the International Conference on Wear of Materials and has been recognized for his accomplishments with the Young Engineering Fac- ulty Research Award and Early Achievement in Teaching Award at Iowa State University. He received his B.E. degree in mechanical engineering from the Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (India), followed by M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, and ASM.Dr. Theodore J. Heindel, Iowa State UniversityDr. Baskar GanapathysubramanianShankar Subramaniam
. TheUniversity has established Kern Innovative Teaching faculty which consists of selected facultymembers who are developing and teaching the modified courses focusing on problem-basedlearning, active collaborative learning and entrepreneurial learning. The KEEN grant hasallowed development of a new Entrepreneurial Studio at Lawrence Tech. This unique facilityprovides space for the entrepreneurial student teams to create their product ideas and buildprototypes. In addition, Lawrence Tech students have an opportunity to hear fromentrepreneurial alumni. Select alumni’s personal entrepreneurial journey is featured in themonthly Entrepreneurial Lecture Series (ELS). All of the ELS are archived in the LawrenceTech Digital Entrepreneurial Library. The
upon completion of the AS degree continue their last 2 years at a senior college; 2. A program where students attend both the community college and the senior college at the same time for the first 2 years. With the senior college just a short bus ride away (1.4 miles), students in the joint/dual program have easy access to both campuses. This allows them to take courses at the senior college that are not offered at the junior college for a variety of reasons. These may include inadequate enrollment in specialized engineering courses, lack of specialized faculty to teach the courses, or lack of adequate teaching and laboratory facilities and equipment. The benefits to students, following the community
, for a faculty member who develops an objective to proclaim its Page 5.657.2amenability to objective assessment; it is quite another to suggest to a student that the studentshould be equally as adept at assessing achievement. Moreover, the assessment tools available tothe faculty will be significantly different from those available to the student.Faculty tend to focus on test scores, comparative assessments of students within a class, and theexpectations of the faculty teaching a class to assess achievement of objectives. There is a built-in bias in such an assessment which can lead the faculty to see achievement and success on amacro-scale
students do perform work and provide quantifiableeconomic value universities through research and teaching that are critical to the business modelof universities and essential to the advancement and dissemination of scientific knowledgeallows us to begin to recontextualize doctoral engineering students as workers. Whenrecontextualized as workers, many frameworks and theories can be used to explain theexperiences of doctoral engineering students and perhaps why attrition is such an issue. Onepromising framework is the Psychology of Working Theory (PWT) [26]. Central to the PWT isthe concept of decent work. The PWT claims that in order to have access to well-being in anaffluent western context, decent work is necessary. Decent work is defined within
Paper ID #43176Work in Progress: Exploring the impact of Generative AI on InformationSeeking Behavior of Engineering StudentsProf. Matthew Frenkel, New York University Matthew Frenkel is the engineering librarian at NYU’s Bern Dibner Library, and affiliated faculty in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon. He is a member of the ASEE Engineering librarian division (ELD). Matthew’s background is in the experimental study of optical whispering gallery sensors. His current interests are focused on professional skill development and teaching practices.Hebah Emara, New York UniversityAmanda He, New York UniversityLindsay Anderberg, New
Bioengineering and Director of the Engineering Education Research Center at Washington State University. He has led numerous multidisciplinary research projects to enhance engi- neering education. He currently leads projects creating and testing assessments and curriculum materials for engineering design and professional skills, especially for use in capstone engineering design courses. He has been a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education since 2002.Paul B Golter, Washington State University Paul B. Golter obtained an MS from Washington State University and recently defended his PhD degree and is currently the Laboratory Supervisor in the Voiland School of School of Chemical Engineering and Bio-engineering
and require different assessment tools. Academic skills incomputation, engineering topics, and computer modeling are all necessary for successfulcompletion of a design project. However, successful design students must also masterprofessional skills such as oral and written communication, project management, teamworkskills, problem solving, and professional ethics. These skills can be difficult to teach in atraditional lecture format, but can be very naturally integrated into capstone design5. Sincecapstone design courses offer many opportunities for situated learning, they allow students tolearn these professional skills in a realistic context6.Given that these professional skills are necessary for a successful capstone design experience,one
teaching area. This feature allows instructors to showcampers online videos and demonstrations to compliment camp activities. For example, FLATEcamps use Stanford University’s website, http://manufacturing.stanford.edu/, “How EverydayThings Are Made” to relate to the manufacturing component of the camp.Next there are “warm and fuzzy” requirements. The drop-off area is an important example.Parents are used to seeing where their children go right after they are dropped off but want easyaccess off of the property, so select the child “docking station” with care. In addition, parentsfeel more confident when they have the opportunity to speak to someone who is not onlyknowledgeable, but who will actually be in attendance at the camp. Thus, make sure
Page 22.287.11development of student life opportunities. Among these were the development of aresidential college and special interest housing, coffee talks and regular “hang-out” time. Figure 3: Interest in Participation in Extra-Curricular Initiatives Faculty development and strategies to engage faculty saw strong appeal andsupport as shown in Figure 4. Teaching in each other’s classes or sitting in each other’sclasses was high at 86%. There was also a strong interest in working on projects together(86%) and holding reading group meetings (86%). Other areas of strong supportincluding publishing together, proposal writing, shared “snap talks”, socials, and “openhouses” to each other’s laboratories, studios and workspaces. In
cover. She is an active men- tor of undergraduate researchers and served as co-PI on an NSF REU site. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activities in area schools. Adrienne has been an active member of ASEE’s WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams since 2003.Jason M. Keith, Michigan Technological University Jason Keith is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Technological University. He received his B.S.ChE from the University of Akron in 1995, and his Ph.D from the University of Notre Dame in 2001. He is the 2008
systems. Where appropriate, these exercises should involve team-based work among students. Effectiveness and practicality of designs should be key components of the evaluation of students’ work.If design projects are used, students should be required to develop, follow, and periodicallyprogress report on their design developments. Evaluation should consider the quality of thepresentations and the professionalism demonstrated by the students.The proposed IPFC-IMD system, which is implemented mainly with discrete components,provides various teaching components to enhance EMET 325 Electric Drives course. It will beuseful for the practical dc and ac motor drive systems sections. Possible teaching topics and theirbrief explanations are listed
digitalsystem simulation course. Simulation, employing a sophisticated computation system, lendsreality to the solution process and matches the procedures used by practicing engineers in thatME speciality.I. IntroductionOn the quarter system, the ME faculty taught a classical vibrations course emphasizing one andtwo degrees of freedom systems and their mathematical solutions. A follow-on, one-credit hourdigital simulation laboratory (requiring the vibrations class as a pre-requisite) emphasized thenumerical solutions of differential equations using such higher-level programs as SL-1(developed by Xerox in the late 1960’s), CSMP (developed by IBM in the late 1960’s), ACSL1,and now MATLAB®2; this evolution followed the introduction of each new package
test, 1999.8. McCaulley, M.H., Mary, H., “the MBTI and Individual Pathways in Engineering Design”, Engineering Education, Vol. 80, pp. 537-542, July/Aug. 1990.9. McCaulley, M.H., “Psychological Types in Engineering: Implications for Teaching,” Engineering Education, Vol. 66, No. 7, pp. 729-736, April 1976.10. McCaulley, M.H., et. al., “Applications of Psychological Type in Engineering Education”, Engineering Education, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 394-400, Feb. 1983.11. Myers, I.B., McCauley, M.H., Manuel: A Guide to the Development and Use of Myers Briggs Type Indicator (2nd ed.), Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1985.12. Rodman, S.M. Dean, R.K., and Rosati, P.A., “Self-perception of Engineering
. He's the PI on two NSF S-STEM grants providing academic and career guidance to students in CSEM fields. He's a Professor of Electrical Engineering within the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering at ASU. Prior to joining ASU, he worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has authored over 190 technical papers and three engineering texts. He has given more than 60 invited presentations - including 13 plenaries. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research program that has served over 300 students. He's an AT&T Bell Labs Fellow, Boeing A.D
technical lessons learned, as well as theirresponse to the case studies. Case study questions were included on homework assignments andexaminations. Survey questions linked student achievement to educational outcomes. Thefocus groups identified additional benefits to the use of case studies. The sophomore studentsobserved that the cases helped build engineering identity, and provided historical understanding.The cases made the technical information relevant and linked theory to practice. In addition, faculty who participated in the case study workshops have been surveyedabout the time commitment required to implement the case studies, and whether the benefitsjustify the investment. Since teaching and revising a course is a time-consuming
the Iowa State University Information Assurance Center. Dr. Jacobson teaches network security and information warfare and has written a textbook on network security. Dr. Jacobson has received two R&D 100 awards for his security technology and has two patents in the area of computer security. Dr. Jacobson has given over 50 presentations in the area of computer security and has testified in front of the U.S. Senate committee of the Judiciary on security issues associated with peer-to-peer networking. Page 22.127.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 AAS + 2
, literacy education, content literacy, and global education as well as assessment and measurement in STEM education. She teaches courses in science education, measurement, literacy and language development, courses in learning and instructional theory, and teacher education research courses. She extensive expertise in assessment, psychometrics, advanced quantitative analyses, and multimodal research design.Dr. Cheryl Matherly, The University of Tulsa Dr. Cheryl Matherly is Vice Provost for Global Education and Applied Assistant Professor of Education at the University of Tulsa, where she has responsibility for the strategic leadership of the university’s plan for comprehensive internationalization. Dr. Matherly’ special
. “Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research.” Ethics and Behavior. 11(3): 219-232. 2001.12 Beck, L., and I. Ajzen. “Predicting dishonest actions using the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Journal of Research in Personality. 25(3):285-301. 1991.Biographical InformationDR. TREVOR S. HARDING is Associate Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at KetteringUniversity. Dr. Harding is Director of the Biomedical Materials Research and the Environmental Scanning ElectronMicroscopy Laboratories at Kettering University. He currently serves on the ERM Division Board of Directors aswell as the Advisory Board for the Kettering University Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning.DR. DONALD D. CARPENTER is Assistant Professor of
population. Questions about enjoyment and ability regarding math andscience were also included to measure their relationship to the choice of scientific or engineeringcareers. In addition to math and science, a compilation of research studies yielded the followinglist of factors related to the likelihood of females choosing to enter an engineering ortechnological field: family income (socioeconomic status), self-confidence, role models, peersupport, teaching methods, education, perceptions of engineering, and sex-rolestereotypes9,10,11,12,13. Several studies particularly emphasized the importance of parental andteacher support in choosing these fields 2,14,15,16. The National Center for Education Statisticsorganizes these factors into three
partner university. An important side benefit in this age of dwindlingeducational resources is that students will have access to the full array of specialized electivetopics, laboratory equipment and practical experiences available at any partner university.From a practical perspective, the Global Engineering College (GEC) model consists of four keyelements that interact in complementary fashion to provide a wide range of internationalexperience and training opportunities: Curriculum Internationalization. International perspectives can be integrated into existing engineering course curricula by replacing generic, context-free assignments and projects with “scenario-based” challenges, in which the same pedagogic exercises are situated
for Engineering Educationcampus is one of four campuses of Penn State to offer a BS in EMET, and at Altoona, theprogram emphasizes manufacturing and automation.1 The students gain skills in a wide varietyof technologies and have available state-of-the-art laboratories, including CAD, controls, andautomation. A machine shop and projects area are also available. The projects area is used forannual student design competitions, including SAE Mini Baja and the ASME Student DesignContest and for student projects as part of the EMET capstone design course.One of the most useful tools students have to help with the development of their capstone designprojects or student design competitions is the fused deposition modeling (FDM) system. TheFDM allows
grants (NSF, 2004) states: “The REU program,through both Supplements and Sites, aims to provide appropriate and valuable educationalexperiences for undergraduate students through research participation. REU projects involvestudents in meaningful ways in ongoing research programs or in research projects speciallydesigned for the purpose. REU projects feature high-quality interaction of students with facultyand/or other research mentors and access to appropriate facilities and professional developmentopportunities. Active research experience is considered one of the most effective ways to attracttalented undergraduates to and retain them in careers in science and engineering, includingcareers in teaching and educational research.”NSF thus expects
problems as a set of equations that may involvethermodynamic property calculations. EES is then able to solve a properly posed problem. Itcan also be used for finding an individual property at a single state. The texts by Sonntag et al.3and Moran and Shapiro4 include programs that can find state properties or generate tables.Several recent ASEE papers have discussed the use of computer property calculations inthermodynamics instruction. Dixon5 suggested that it is time to teach thermodynamics with onlycomputer property calculations. He noted that the U.S. Coast Guard Academy introduces EES inthe first thermodynamics course, and concluded that the “the value of utilizing the programcapabilities makes the learning effort well worthwhile.” Ngo and
to the current members ofWomen in Technology. Of the 81 students involved in the group, 51 responded to the survey, fora 63% response rate.The survey questions were modified from the WEPAN Pilot Climate Survey, designed to assessengineering students’ perceptions of the educational climate at their universities 26. One studyidentified those factors as isolation, the perceived irrelevance of theoretical preparatory courses,negative experiences in laboratory courses, classroom climate, and lack of role models 27. Otherstudies have suggested that the different learning styles of women may influence their desire toenter engineering or technology fields. Finally, Santovec contends that the problem is the imagethat engineering and technology is not
Educ, vol. 16, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-05-0085.[4] C. J. Atman et al., “Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the center for the advancement of engineering education,” Seattle, WA, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.engr.washington.edu/caee/caee final report 20101102.pdf[5] K. Schneider, A. Bickel, and A. Morrison-Shetlar, “Planning and implementing a comprehensive student-centered research program for first-year STEM undergraduates,” J Coll Sci Teach, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 37–43, 2015, doi: 10.2505/4/jcst15_044_03_37.[6] T. L. Strayhorn, L. L. Long III, J. A. Kitchen, M. S. Williams, and M. E. Stenz, “Academic and social barriers to Black and Latino male collegians’ success in
fill this requirement.Most recently, BIOE 2100 has been modified for specific designation as a “writing-intensive”course at the university level. UGA’s Franklin College Writing Intensive Program (WIP)administers the process by which courses acquire the “W” suffix (i.e., BIOE 2100W) andstipulates what is expected of such courses: The W suffix is used for courses taught as writing intensive, which means that the course includes substantial and ongoing writing assignments that a) facilitate learning; b) teach the communication values of a discipline — for example, its practices of argument, evidence, credibility, and format; c) support writing as a process; and d) prepare students for further writing in their
Paper ID #10565Multidisciplinary Construction Engineering Design ProjectsDr. Cameron J Turner P.E., Colorado School of Mines Dr. Cameron Turner is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering with a research interest in the foundations of design across multiple disciplines. Dr. Turner earned his Ph.D. at the University at Texas in 2005, focusing on Surrogate Model Optimization for Engineering Design. He also holds an MSE from the University of Texas at Austin, with a focus on robotics, and a BSME from the University of Wyoming. He has more than 13 years of experience at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and in 2009
workforce development initiative involving K12 schools and community colleges,and the evaluation of North Carolina’s Race to the Top initiative.Dr. Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University Dr. Wiebe is a Professor in the Department of STEM Education at NC State University and Senior Research Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. A focus of his research and outreach work has been the integration of multimedia and multimodal teaching and learning approaches in STEM instruction. He has also worked on research and evaluation of technology integration in instructional settings in both secondary and post-secondary education. Dr. Wiebe has been a member of ASEE since 1989
now motivated to from other pursue PhD because of faculty) REU. 3 Behavior (+) Use various instruments No Confidence to Advisors very Positive (+) Dream job is to be a No and learned new subjects “self-teach” helpful in researcher or college prior learning process