-Generation College Students that Impact Persistence,” Georgia Journal of College Student Affairs, vol. 37, no. 1, Jan. 2021.[6] R. L Navarro, L. Y. Flores, J. P. Legerski, J. Brionez, S. F. May, H. N. Suh, and A. K. Jung, “Social cognitive predictors of engineering students’ academic persistence intentions, satisfaction, and engagement,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 66, no. 2, p.170, Mar, 2019.[7] P. O. Garriott, R. L. Navarro, and L. Y. Flores, “First-Generation College Students’ Persistence Intentions in Engineering Majors,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 93–106, Aug. 2016.[8] C. Gillen-O’Neel, “Sense of Belonging and Student Engagement: A Daily Study of First- and
about mentoring their students,and perhaps see some techniques or skills that they would like to explore for themselves.References[1] R. D. Augustine, “Persistent and attrition of engineering students, a study of freshman and sophomore engineering students at three Midwestern universities,” 1966.[2] L. A. McDade, “Knowing the ‘right stuff’: Attrition, gender, and scientific literacy,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 93–114, 1988.[3] C. Adelman, “Women and men of the engineering path: A model for analyses of undergraduate careers,” 1998.[4] M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman, and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering,” J
to understand what this process may entail.According to some graduate education scholars, there are four core elements related to graduatestudents' development of an identity congruent with the norms and values of their field:knowledge acquisition, investment, involvement, and engagement (Weidman, 2006). Knowledgeacquisition describes how students learn skills and information that will help them perform wellin their new role as a Ph.D. student, as well as gain an understanding of what academic successentails. Through knowledge acquisition, students become aware of normative expectations of thePh.D. student role and can make a realistic assessment of their personal ability to pursue theirdesired career. The student's investment reflects their
, culturally sustaining and responsive pedagogies, design for additive man- ufacturing, project management, and process improvement. Lisa recently designed a framework for the implementation of design for additive manufacturing in the engineering curriculum. She is passionate about engineering education and enjoys working with students both as an instructor and as a role model to help prepare them for careers in industry.Dr. Andrea T. Kwaczala, Western New England University Andrea Kwaczala is an assistant professor at Western New England University in the biomedical engi- neering department. She teaches Biomechanics, Product Development and Innovation, Senior Design and Prosthetic and Orthotic Devices. She focuses on hands
Engineering Learning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 355–368, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00984.x.[13] A. Godwin, “The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 2016, p. 26122. doi: 10.18260/p.26122.[14] K. L. Tonso, “Engineering Identity,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 267–282. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.019.[15] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M.-C. Shanahan, “Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study
traditional college experience with 6credits of internships over the summer. The students seeking a license must complete anadditional 42 credits during their academic career, including 18 credits of summer practical workon a ship. This means the license students must take 17 to 19 credits every semester to graduateon-time. Therefore, students who transfer into the school tend not to select the license programand there is strong overlap between transfer students and non-license students.This paper aims to assess whether transfer (XFER) students at SUNY Maritime College performpoorly in senior-level courses, long after the post-transfer semesters, compared to first-timefreshmen (FTF). Performance scores were evaluated for three discipline-specific
, making it possible for the user tocustomize their practice and focus on issues with which they struggle.Overview of the App Development ProcessThe design and development process was organized into three phases: design and prototype(complete), deployment and refinement (underway), and research study (future work). Moredetails of each of these stages are supplied in the sections below, and an overview is providedin Figure 1. Within each phase, iterative cycles of testing and refinement based ondesign-based research methods [19,20] were employed. Early undergraduate students,advanced undergraduate students, early career engineers, and faculty members were identifiedas key stakeholders and consulted during the development process
should be used in the classroom because it has been shown to deepen students’ criticalthinking, increase student interest in their area of study, and increase students problem-solvingskills [1, 2, 3]. PjBL is an instructional method that aids students in deeper learning anddevelopment of non-cognitive skills that are necessary for their future career [4]. The main issuewith these two instructional methods is that it can present significant challenges for students thatare under-prepared or are not provided adequate resources (e.g., instructor office hours or tutors)[5,6]. A variety of PBL and PjBL methods utilize programming software such as MATLAB toallow students to simulate their model and various conditions.At the Virginia Military Institute
the biomechanics of biting in bats and monkeys, also using finite element modeling techniques. In 2010, he started his career teaching in all areas of mechanical engineering at the Univer- sity of Southern Indiana (USI). He loves teaching all of the basic mechanics courses, and of course his Vibrations and Finite Element Analysis courses.Dr. Andrew Jason Hill, University of Southern Indiana Jason Hill is an associate professor of engineering and director of civil engineering at the University of Southern Indiana. He holds B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in civil engineering from Tennessee Technolog- ical University. His research interests include rainfall-runoff modeling, stream restoration, and wetland hydrology
coursework and have lots to learn. Knowing they are not ready will keep themfocused on their career paths. Students that indicated positive response (27% of studentsindicated readiness; 6 out of 22 responses) are already working at some level in industry and twoothers indicated “may be” depending upon the role.Moreover, a similar percentage of positive and negative responses are identified in the rest of thequestions. However, when asked about “Digital Twin” 95% of students (21 out of 22 responses)indicated they had never heard of this term and/or have no knowledge of it. One student thatindicated he heard the term also commented “don’t know much about it.” Figure 4 shows thestudents self-rating on their knowledge on Digital twin, Industry 4.0
semester. Therefore, the videosolutions could be beneficial on ad-hoc basis.The solutions posted helped students as the survey revealed. However, the procedure was oneway; to incorporate feedback in the procedure, some additional questions can be introduced.Therefore, to improve learning, video exercise can be paired.The mentioned course is now offered for four different programs. Because the number ofstudents in the class is relatively large compared to higher level courses, the interaction with allstudents beyond the classes is challenging for an instructor. However, the interaction is importantfor most students since success for the remaining semesters and in their career depends on thesolid foundation in this basic course. The survey results
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Currently she is the internal evaluator for the projects Recruiting, Retaining and Engaging Academically Talented Students from Economically Disadvantaged Groups into a Pathway to Successful Engineering Careers (PEARLS) and for Building Capacity at Collaborative Undergraduate STEM Program in Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructure (RISE-UP). Both projects are funded by NSF.Prof. Fabio Andrade Rengifo, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Director of the Sustainable Energy Center (SEC) and associate professor in Power electronics applied to renewable energy in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at The University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez.Ruben Esteban
careers. Industry professionals also tended tosee value in having introductory level training across disciplines, but desired to see moreadvanced technical coursework within their own discipline. Non-technical skills were commonlyidentified as the differentiator in hiring decisions for both recent graduates and experiencedemployees.Other programs and institutions are strongly encouraged to survey alumni and non-alumniprofessionals to obtain industry perspectives on curricular matters. Future work may include theinclusion of members of professional organizations as a group to be surveyed—it is unknown ifongoing continuing education activities would affect industry responses. Through such a process,engineering curricula may be aligned to better
respond to nine different motivational factors and rankthe top three they considered when deciding on what career to pursue. The interest factor wasranked first by the majority of the students, and was present in the top three for the highestpercentage of students. Another J. B. Speed School of Engineering study [18], focusedexclusively on the effects of interest in engineering on first-year retention, found that out of thetop three factors influencing students’ decisions to study engineering (i.e., interest inengineering, job availability, and good pay), interest in engineering was the only constructspecified as a reason students drop-out of the school of engineering. In addition, first-year J. B.Speed School of Engineering students were
/s11162- 013-9321-8Hu, S., & Wolniak, G. C. (2013). College student engagement and early career earnings: Differences by gender, race/ethnicity, and academic preparation. Review of Higher Education: Journal of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, 36(2), 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2013.0002Kuhl, J. (1992). A theory of self-regulation: Action versus state orientation, self-discrimination, and some applications. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41(2), 97-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00688.xNonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2010). Performance of college students: Impact of study time and study habits. Journal of Education for Business, 85(4
. Due to the complex and multidisciplinary nature of their projects, engineeringstudents must learn how to work effectively on a team, as the majority will be expected to workas part of a team after graduation. The projects that they will face during both their academic andpost-academic careers will involve problem-solving and critical thinking, and the unique skillsand perspectives of each team member are necessary to arrive at effective solutions. This paperintroduces a pedagogical boardgame aimed at simulating arguments within an engineeringexercise, as well as the study planned to track the changes.A diverse team has people with different backgrounds, experience, and ways of thinking. Thiscan lead to a wider range of perspectives and ideas
their career. The essential(E) and advanced (A) skills are still important, but they are not pre-requisite material for othercourses. If a student is able to master all the fundamental skills, they will have a C- and they willpass the class as shown in Table 2. While students who only pass the fundamental skills may notget as much practice with the essential and advanced skills, they will still be exposed to theseskills on instruction days and through homework and laboratory exercises. By achieving masteryon the fundamental skills, students should have a full understanding of these topics which theycan apply to future engineering courses. This is where mastery based learning and traditionalgrading differ—mastery-based learning prioritizes
. This tutoring is generally capped at two hours per week with an option to extend beyondthat in cases where more is deemed urgent.Overall, the delivery of tutoring provides Tutor Fellows experience in communicating that servesthem in their future careers – whether it is specifically in education or not. It is often touted inletters of recommendation that, while seemingly different from the exact job they seek, TutorFellows have experience creating a safe environment, building a rapport, understanding thestigmas and inequalities that a person may be experiencing, and being empathetic. These arecharacteristics that go across boundaries of discipline.Another detail to share is that while the tutoring is specifically in STEM, the Tutor
concrete bridges and in the development of damage detection techniques in structural systems based on Non Destructive Evaluation. He actively collaborated in the creation and development of the Monitoring Center for Intelligent Bridges and Structures, leading the analysis and structural evaluation of the systems. In the academic field, he has worked as a professor in the Civil Engi- neering career, in the area of structural engineering at the Instituto Tecnol´ogico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM) Campus Quer´etaro. He has directed research projects for undergraduate and master’s degree students. He has authored several technical publications of the Mexican Institute of Transporta- tion, extensive
Paper ID #39604Team dynamics and cultural competency in a first-year engineeringclassroomDr. Jutshi Agarwal, University of Cincinnati Jutshi Agarwal is a Post Doctoral Fellow with the Department of Engineering and Computng Education at the University of Cincinnati. She has a Doctoral degrree in Engineering Education and a Master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from University of Cincinnati, and a Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from SRM University, India. Her research areas of interest are graduate student professional development for a career in academia, preparing future faculty, and using AI tools to solve
engineering is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 supportive I feel that I belong to my college of engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 There are support systems available in my college of engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 to help with my academics There are support systems available in my college of engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 to help me with my mental health and wellbeing The college of engineering provides opportunities to interact 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 with my peers (i.e., events, and clubs) Engineering Practice Opportunities The practical hands-on experiences offered by my college of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 engineering will help me in my professional career I am grateful for the quality of education offered by my college 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 of
engineering design courses. Her research interests in engineering education include first-year engineering experience enhancement strategies, retention of underrepresented groups in engineering, and inclusion and equity in engineering design.Laura Maria Pigozzi PhD, Northwestern University Dr. Laura Maria Pigozzi holds a PhD in Rhetoric and Scientific & Technical Communication with a doctoral minor in Bioethics. She has taught professional communication since 2010, first at the University of Minnesota and, since fall 2018, at Northwestern University. Prior to her academic career, she has worked as a R&D engineer, a technical writer, and a business owner. Dr. Pigozzi’s research stands at the intersection of the
thehighest job fatality rate were structural iron and steel workers, roofers, and electrical power-lineinstallers and repairers [3]. These data indicate that, Fall is still a major safety issue both on thejob and outside of worksite. Students and trainees will be the future worksite safety leaders therefore they need to have indepth knowledge about Fall related safety, hazard identifications, and mitigation. A Fall safetytraining conducted by VR simulation can save a lot of money to do it in house [4]. It is veryimportant for the students to get training by VR simulation before joining to work force andstarting their careers. This work used VR simulation and analysis of Fall safety inspection andprevention which is a common hazard in industries
Paper ID #37494The Use of Lean Principles to Improve Teaching Efficiencyfor Engineering CoursesJohn A. Mirth (Associate Professor) John Mirth is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at St. Cloud State University in St. Cloud, MN. Dr. Mirth received his Ph.D. and MSME degrees from the University of Minnesota, and his BSME degree from Ohio University. During his career he has taught at five different universities: University of Denver, University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, University of Iowa, and St. Cloud State University. Dr. Mirth's technical expertise lies in areas
project for the first time.”“The transportation route project allowed me to put my knowledge to the test in completing reallife problems. As stated earlier, I have also learned a lot about wildlife and habitat protectionwhich will help me in my career. I think that the project will be a good resource to refer back toif any specific questions arise in the future.”“In 10 years, I will still remember the Riverwalk project and the coordination my design teamhad with City officials. I will be interested in 10 years to see if this project, or a similar one, wasever professionally designed and constructed. Being able to work on a real project with realdesign constraints is something that will stick with me into the future.”“In 10 years, I think that I
course and bring hands-on experienceto their students.IntroductionLaboratory work has a strong impact on students’ learning and play important role in engineeringeducation. Labs help students to learn the concepts in depth and to gain practical skills, so theycould succeed both academically and in their careers. In the labs students learn how to integratetheory and practice. The labs also teach students hypothesis forming, experimental design andevaluation of results. In most cases, students work as a team in labs which help them with ethics,communications, report writing and team working skills. A survey of student perceptions of thelab work has been published [1]. They found that engineering students see themselves asessentially practical, and
underrepresented and underserved youth. Jennifer develops engineering education curricula that focus on integrating the engineering design process and design thinking into STEM education and works with K-12 educators to increase teacher capacity in classroom engineering education. She also teaches a first-year Engineering Projects course at CU. Prior to pursuing a career in higher education, Jennifer taught middle school science for 15 years and she received a Teacher of the Year community award and guided her students to numerous state and national sustainable project awards, including the Siemens We Can Change the World Challenge. After transitioning from the classroom, she joined the CU Cooperative Institute for Environmental
mealand re-imagine the meal using different textures, delivery methods, and presentations. This paperwill detail connections between the curriculum used for the “Food as a Building Material”project and the Next Generation Science Standards. We will also provide teacher reflectionsfrom our implementation to inform future implementations by other teachers.IntroductionEngaging K12 students in engineering education can broaden their perspectives of career options[1],[2]. There are some challenges to bringing engineering to the K12 classroom includingteacher confidence [3] and availability of resources [4]. Food provides an accessible platform topractice engineering. Courses across the spectrum of education have been developed around thetopic of
in Engineering; facilitating career advancement, fostering connections, and providing leadership development opportunities. Heidi served as the Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Diversity in the College of Engineering at Montana State University from 2001-2012 and was the Director of EMPower, the engineering minority program. Heidi earned her PhD in Educational Leadership from University of Nebraska-Lincoln. She studies developmental relationships in higher education and investigated the processes through which higher education leadership is fostered including mentoring, coaching, role-modeling, sponsoring, and networking.Pauline Khan (Director)Tershia A. Pinder-grover (Director of CRLT in Engineering
together. • I would also decrease the budget as our team didn’t come close to spending it all. • I would make the budget a little bit bigger. • I would show current students designs from the past classes to spark some ideas or set a standard. • Maybe a little more distribution in making the seems [teams], like if possible someone from each career in a team. • Change the presenting of the PRs to the small groups instead of huge groups. I liked how in the small group presentations it seemed like people asked more in-depth questions about the project instead of trying to get it over with. • Spend more time on what makes a good schedule and how to divide task up. • I would change how often we got to work in class