. She has led and co-led numerous grants from corporate foundations and state and federal agencies, and has numerous publications in refereed journals and edited books. Her research interests include communities of practice, gender, transformative learning, and identity.Christina Convertino ConvertinoDr. Erika Mein, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Erika Mein is an Associate Professor of Literacy/Biliteracy Education and Associate Dean of Under- graduate Studies and Educator Preparation at the University of Texas at El Paso. Her scholarship focuses on disciplinary literacies in postsecondary contexts, with a particular emphasis on engineering identities and literacies among English Learners and bilingual students
. He has over 10 years of experience teaching Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Equations. In more recent years, Dr. Fury has shifted focus to service in administration. He is especially interested in developing impactful practices and programs that support the success of underrepresented groups in STEM education.Dr. Michael Kagan, Pennsylvania State University Michael (Mike) Kagan is an associate professor of physics at Penn State Abington. He received a Ph.D. in Physics from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Kagan’s research interests are diverse and include Quantum Gravity and Cosmology, Electric Circuits and Algebraic Graph Theory; Physics EducationDr. John Majewicz, Pennsylvania State University
their identity and promote change on the campus atlarge.Here, we will discuss our design and implementation of a LGBTQIA+ reading group for STEMstudents and faculty as a mechanism to disrupt the erasure of queer narratives in STEM. Throughthis group, students are able to discuss queer identities and social issues in a formal setting andconnect with literature that validates their experiences of isolation and discrimination in their field.We will discuss the reading group structure and design, provide reflection on best practices fromour pilot group in Fall 2020, and will present student and faculty reflections on their experiencesin the group.Reading Group Development and StructureReading Group DevelopmentThe idea to run this reading group
Paper ID #39068Telling Half a Story: A Mixed Methods Approach to UnderstandingCulturally Relevant Engineering Education in Nigeria and the U.S.Moses Olayemi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Moses Olayemi is a Doctoral Candidate and Bilsland Dissertation Fellow in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests revolve around the professional development of engineering educators in low resource/post-conflict settings and the design and contextualization of in- struments to measure the impact of educational interventions. Research projects on these topics have and are currently being
, mentored and have productively conducted research, theywill choose faculty careers. Conversely, they found scientists, no matter their background,reported less interest in faculty careers (particularly for those at research-intensive universities),and increased interest in careers outside of research over time in graduate school.25Reflecting on the work of these programs and the resulting improvements in completion of PhDsand steps forward in institutional change, a faculty career model that better defines what ishappening in best practice situations and that better speaks to the PhDs who are choosing non-academic careers is clearly needed. An improved model can be used by policy makers indeveloping funding solicitations as well as by institutions
Social Thought and a bachelor’s degree in anthropology from Dickinson College.Dr. Matthew Frenkel, New York University Matthew Frenkel is the engineering librarian at NYU’s Bern Dibner Library, and an adjunct faculty in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon. He is a member of the ASEE Engineering librarian division (ELD). Matthew’s background is in the experimental study of optical whispering gallery sensors, but his current research interests are in how undergraduate and graduate engineering students develop their professional skills.Mr. Mikolaj Wilk, New York University Engineering Reference Associate at Bern Dibner Library c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
Paper ID #34380Study Abroad While Studying Abroad: International Students’Participation in the RSAP Study Abroad ProgramJohnny C. Woods Jr., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Johnny C. Woods, Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Higher Education and Research Group Coordinator for the Engineering Competencies, Learning, and Inclusive Practices for Success (ECLIPS) Lab in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Johnny is also a Graduate Teaching Assistant for the Graduate School Certificate Course–Preparing the Future Professoriate. He has a Master in Educational Foundations and
1, 2, and 3 . This ability can be used as a prognostication factor for achievement andattainment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) 4, 5 . It is well documentedthat 3D spatial skills can be developed through practice. Sorby has shown that a course aimed atdeveloping the 3D spatial skills of first-year engineering students has a positive impact on studentsuccess, especially for women 6 . The research team has developed a semester-long online, spatialskills workshop. The content incorporates online resources related to mental rotation, 2D and 3Dspatial visualization, and abstract reasoning. An experimental group of female first-yearengineering students will participate in the weekly online workshop. To assess
able to live, learn, and understand othercultures and environments (NAE, 2005; Specking et al., 2013). Therefore, the sooner thislearning process for future success begins, the greater would be the benefits for both the studentsand their employers. Recognizing this need many universities in the United States offer studyabroad programs, both at graduate and undergraduate levels. Shuman et al. (2005) argue thatmanufacturing and global supply chain can best be studied “if classroom work is combined withtruly multidisciplinary team projects and well-designed field visits” in other countries.Furthermore, one of the ABET accreditation criteria (also known as ‘outcomes h’) requiresengineering programs to provide students with a broad understanding of
Manufacturing Resource Forum - She is dedicated to researching and issuing action-provoking reports on advanced manufacturing trends, workforce development and disruptive technologies.Dr. Teresa A. Johnson, Ohio State University Teresa A. Johnson, Ph.D. is an assistant director and the Coordinator for Assessment and Curriculum Design at the University Center for the Advancement of Teaching at The Ohio State University. She earned a doctorate in Microbial Ecology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She has taught in the sciences at Butler University and at the College of Wooster. Her pedagogical research has focused on classroom assessment techniques and impacts of prior knowledge on student learning in the
: “This Is Rocket Science”There is strong evidence in the literature [cf., 5, 6] that retention to graduation in highereducation is improved by interventions and engagement in the first year. Such first-yearinterventions might take the form of a “low-stakes” course that includes close interactionbetween faculty and students, and/or connecting to student clubs and university research labs.The “This Is Rocket Science” first-year seminar (FYS) is designed to provide just suchopportunities for engagement. Two faculty members, each with experience in space engineeringand research, lead the class and work with the students during the semester. The teachingobjectives for the class include: 1. Introduce first-year engineering students to atmospheric
requirements and other logistics.Much like an iterative research or engineering design loop, a thorough assessment andimplementation process will reveal information useful to determine the value to an institution’sslate of activities and to its diversity goals. In this context, the “problems” include theoverarching objectives or goals such as increasing the number and representation of diversestudents in the college, creating an inclusive climate, and increasing the likelihood of diversestudents graduating from engineering. Prior to designing an intervention, an “informationgathering” process incorporates a review of the literature can reveal best practices and researchresults. It can also help to discuss with colleagues at other institutions to learn
experience at K&A Wireless as a research associate in Albuquerque (USA). Additionally, he has profes- sional experience at Hitachi Automotive Systems America as an Intern in Research & Development in Detroit (USA) and Senior Product Engineer at Fiat Chrysler Automobiles in Brazil. He served as the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED). Before joining SPEED, Claudio served as co-founder of the Student Chapter of the Brazilian Automation Society. Among his many achievements, his project was awarded the Best Student Initiative for Engineering Students pro- moted by Cengage Learning. He received the Leadership Award by ISTEC, and the Young Scientist Award supported by
impact students’ ethicalreasoning and decision-making abilities [15]. There is also evidence that programmaticorientations (e.g., entrepreneurship, business, and community engagement) affect students’ethical perceptions and decision-making [16]. In addition, research on a service-learning designprogram found that a human-centered approach utilized in that program helped students orient toethical considerations, motives, and decisions, yet the students tended to narrowly focus onethical concerns linked to interactions with users while struggling to explicitly see the salience ofethics for their day-to-day design work [17].Previous research continues to reveal novel insights about engineering students’ understandingsof ethics and social
design capstone course is an important experience for engineering undergraduatestudents. This course prepares students for industry by having students solve open-ended real-world problems1. In particular, the senior capstone course involves solving problems posedfrom industry and faculty rather than “made up” projects 2,3 to allow for real-world situationsexperienced post degree. These problems typically require simulations using controlled real-world situations designed to meet specific learning objectives, or prototyping in a real-worldenvironment2 in which students are exposed to real situations with open-ended projects. Thedesign problems posed to the students allow for the practical side of engineering design to betaught in the engineering
passions is teaching. Her area of teaching specialization is structural engineering with a particular emphasis in the analysis and design of buildings. At Penn State she currently teaches a structural analysis course, the advanced steel design course and a graduate level course in steel connections. Her approach to these courses is to provide strategies for complex problem solving and a framework for lifelong learning. She is the recipient of the Penn State Engineering Society’s Outstanding Teaching Award (2003) and the Premier Teaching Award (2008). Building on a strong teaching record and an interest in building a more diverse engineering community, Dr. Hanagan has begun to expand her research into engineering
persevering in STEM pathways is exemplified in the lowpass rates (40-55%) for additional core major requirements, such as General Chemistry andIntroduction to Programming. The lack of retention of STEM students in community collegesand the lack of growth of minority representation in the science and engineering workforce4demonstrates the need to develop strategic programs and practices that increase the number anddiversity of students succeeding in STEM.Skyline College, located in the San Francisco Bay Area, CA is a member of the CaliforniaCommunity College System and is a federally-designated Hispanic-Serving Institution. Duringthe 2014-15 academic year, the college enrolled 20,787 unique students, with white students asthe largest single group at
finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:” Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Chrysler Corporation. At Stanford she has served a chair of the faculty senate, and recently served as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate
terms of student performance, studies have shown mixed results for online learningcompared to in-person learning [12]. Some studies have found that online students performed aswell or better than in-person students [13], while others have found that in-person learning isassociated with better academic performance [14]. The impact of race and financial backgroundon student success in online learning has also been explored in previous research. Studies havefound that students from lower-income backgrounds and minority students face greater challengesin online learning, such as limited access to technology and the internet [7, 11, 15]. A study has demonstrated that the abrupt transition to online education during the middleof a semester can
Modeling and Design, Design of Experiments (DOE), Systems and Reliability Engineering, Lean Practices and Techniques, and Process Simulations. Aside from being a Professor in Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering Department at Baltimore City Community College (BCCC), Marc is the team lead in MSU’s Liquid Propellant Rocket Subtask Team, where he reviews and designs the essential rocket components such as the nose cone and all the way to the rocket’s boat tail. In addition, he is also responsible for leading diverse and highly motivated engineering students in the RockOn program, where they implement and test a rocket payload that can measure and record the acceleration, humidity, pressure, temperature, and radiation
positive impact on students as it teaches them to take100% responsibility of their life, to live their life with purpose, focus and direction and tobecome leaders that cause positive change in their communities.Students that had direct contact with communities had greater commitment and drive. Theyalso formed a different relationship with adversity. Instead of seeing the problems as personalroadblocks, they simply saw them as challenges that had to be cleared. Students that haddirect contact with struggling communities gained additional value as they became sensitiveto the challenges and opportunities that surround them.Through the process we discovered a number of things, which are the hypothesis andfoundations for our continued research
is often described as “horrific” and “living hell” (Godfrey & Parker, 2010, p.12). Mental health impacts of such a culture merit further study.The limited research on mental health completed specifically in engineering education used quantitativemethods (Cross & Jensen, 2018; Danowitz & Beddoes, 2020; Jensen & Cross, 2020) and shows thatengineering students experience higher rates of mental health issues like panic disorders, PTSD, anxiety,and depression compared to students in other majors regardless of identity. However, rates of mentalhealth disorders climb substantially for both white women and women of color, but also for bisexualwomen, who have panic disorder at eleven times the national average (Danowitz & Beddoes
her research, including the Joenk Award for the best article in IEEE Transactions in Professional Communication, the Nell Ann Pickett Award for best article in Technical Communication Quarterly, and the NCTE Best Article in Theories of Technical Communication (in both 2015 and 2018). She is also the co-founder of Women in Technical Communication, a mentoring organization that received the 2015 Diana Award from ACM Special Interest Group in the Design of Communication.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, The Ohio State University Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State Uni- versity. Prior to this appointment, she was an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education
each other and withthe dependent variable, suggesting that they are complementary and synergistic for theachievement of collaborative entrepreneurship competencies. From a practical standpoint, it offersa concrete and applicable proposal for the training of entrepreneurs in technical careers, withpotential positive impacts on the economic, social, and environmental development of the country.RecommendationsFor teachers, it is recommended to incorporate the proposed pedagogical model into their teachingplans, using the suggested teaching strategies and resources. It is also urged to continuouslyevaluate the process and results of the application of the model, providing feedback to studentsand adjusting the design according to specific needs and
materials for them. Some teachers have reached out to us to ask for guidancein designing an engineering lesson for their students and we’ve provided ideas, suggestions,and recommendations for how they could create a lesson based on the subject topics andconcepts they are teaching. We’ve also provided additional professional development andtraining throughout the academic year for interested teachers. We’ve also planned several fieldtrips to Virginia Tech for their students to see the university campus and visit some engineeringlabs.In addition, research will be conducted on the impacts of engineering integration initiatives. Bymaintaining these relationships and providing sustained support, we hope to have a lastingimpact on engineering education
than 31% were aware of our departmental liaisonprogram. Only 18% of the respondents said that they got help from a librarian when citingsources or doing research BUT fewer than 25% of the undergraduates and graduate studentscould recognize a scholarly article from a list of different types of citations given in the survey.In the Spring 2018 semester, a library satisfaction survey for faculty was distributed. 544 facultywere requested to complete the survey, 28 responses were received at a response rate of 5%.Although the response rate was low, some responses were interesting and caused our liaisonlibrarians to think further on how to better market the library. Below are some examples to oneof the survey questions:How do you think a librarian
with WIL in French engineeringeducation (CTI, 2023; Rouvrais et al., 2020), which is notably distinct from the prevailingChinese model where practical experience, although required to varying extents, is oftenlimited to company visits (Du et al., 2017).Literature reviewA significant amount of research has been done on the impact of WIL internships onemployability and student development. WIL is considered instrumental in enhancinggraduate employability by improving a range of employability skills (Jackson & Dean, 2023;Patrick et al., 2008), providing opportunities to practice and refine skills in a real worldsetting (Jackson, 2015). Work placement enhances career clarification for students (Zegwaard& Coll, 2011), facilitates graduate
Paper ID #33015Using the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) to TrackStudents’ Growth and Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Learning StrategiesCourseMs. Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University Abigail Stephan is a doctoral candidate in the Learning Sciences program at Clemson University. Broadly, her research interests include intergenerational learning in informal settings and self-directed learning. Since 2017, Abigail has been the graduate assistant for the General Engineering Learning Community (GELC), a program that supports first-year engineering students in their development of self-regulation and time
, graduating in May 2023 and a Graduate Research Assistant in the Center for Engineering Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Their research revolves around investigating how LGBTQ+ students resist the hos- tile culture of engineering and, more broadly, STEM. They mentor a group of LGBTQ+ undergraduate engineers and investigate the collective resistance by LGBTQ+ students through student driven organiza- tions with them. They are especially interested in rethinking ways in which DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) can be approached to be more inclusive and effective. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Modeled Professionalism, Identity Concealment, and Silence: The Role
for FEWS. Figure 1. Project objectives mapped to components of the Traineeship under the Stewardship framework.The key components of theTraineeship are: 1) Dissertation research on a FEWS issue for the generation of new knowledge; 2) A graduate certificate in Data-Driven Food, Energy and Water Decision Making, which consists of 3.5 credits of core courses and 9 credits of electives as described in Table 1 that represents conservation of knowledge; 3) A Graduate Learning Community [3] for transformation of knowledge that includes a two-year series of monthly workshops and weekly small-group activities designed to enhance the trainees’ interdisciplinary