imperfection or to locatechanges in material properties. Here, the ultrasonic testing equipment (OmniScan SX) is used forthe purpose of demonstration. The IIW type 1 reference Block was tested to detect the hole in theblock and finally the evaluation was made to characterize the hole.Keywords: Nondestructive Testing (NDT), Ultrasonic testing (UT), OmniScan SX, inspection.Introduction Nondestructive testing has been practiced for many decades. At the beginning the use ofNDT was limited into the detection of defects to determine whether any structure or componentshould be in the service or not. Later, the discipline of fracture mechanics brought a major changein the field of NDT. This mechanism helped to predict the failure probability a
programs will be covered.IntroductionMost degree programs that teach building engineering have design opportunities are often less thanideally constructed to reflect practical careers due to relatively few faculty members being trained, or theyhave no similar industry experience necessary to guide students [1]. Consequently in these settings, only asurface level understanding of their value is realized [2]. Many engineering students do not know how toapproach large complex systems due to their exposure to idealistic examples [3]. Additionally, they notcapable of providing critical multi-disciplinary integration of their designs due to the isolated nature oftopics in the classroom [4] [5]. Capstone courses provide a comprehensive evaluation of
turnstilesfor shopping centers or buildings, and even counting ticket sales for theaters. However, each ofthese has its own cons and pros.Several energy audit reports for buildings indicated that occupancy sensors can significantlyreduce energy consumption. The equipment demand for heating, ventilation and air-conditioninghas increased in the USA from $11 billion in 2004 to $19 billion in 2014 [1]. Having an efficientair-conditioning supply and control system can reduce energy consumption in buildings.Many techniques and technologies were used to detect and count occupants inside buildings.Some of the studies investigated the change in the level of CO2 inside rooms and buildings toidentify the number of occupants and their activity level, such as such
thatwould directly impact the community and foster students’ appreciation for the relationshipbetween engineering and social responsibility.Fostering students’ “Base Skills,” a facet of the professional development realm related tosocially responsible engineering, as defined by Canney and Bielefeldt,1 aligns with the project’sconnection between technical abilities and resultant societal benefits. This connection is viewedas imperative for developing future engineers’ attitudes towards human-centered design and theirroles in society.2,3 Similarly, ABET calls for holistic skillsets that encompass both technicalskills and “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility,” while the NationalAcademy of Engineering has emphasized the
thestudents’ learning outcomes and the ABET rubrics.IntroductionEnergy consumption in buildings significantly increases on yearly basis due to the increasedhuman comfort needs and services. Temperature control and air quality are top requirements inany modern house. The ventilation and air-conditioning power consumptions, needed to meet the occupants’ needs for a good temperature level and acceptable quality of air delivered from thesesystems, can reach to approximately one fifth of the total energy bill of buildings [1]. In theUnited States alone, 19 billion US dollars were spent in 2014 to run the equipment for thesesystems [2].The control system that runs and operates the air-conditioning system is
helpstudent engagement and retention due to truncated semester class meeting times each week aswell as the dissemination of the same lecture topics over longer time-frame. Our universitytransitioned from the Q2S system in fall 2017. Furthermore, in order for our program to becompetitive with other schools, we have reduced the total number of semester credit hoursnecessary for graduation, with every effort made to ensure full comprehension of the coursecontents in the quarter system in this Q2S transition. The present paper discusses therestructuring of our ABET accredited undergraduate mechanical engineering (ME) curriculumfor Q2S, its challenges, advantages, and changes made to the content in some courses.1. Introduction Currently, there is no
thermophysical properties, and advanced thermal management. Prof. Roberts is also interested in engineering education, specifically on understanding the role of, adopting, and creating open educational resources for the engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Open Educational Resources in the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum: A Materials Science Case Study Amir Behbahanian1 , Erin L. Davis2 , Spencer Wendel1 , and Nick A. Roberts1 1 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 2 Merrill-Cazier Library Utah State
paper introduces a framework for displaying engineering research artifacts in an artmuseum to efficiently facilitate expanded outreach opportunities. Education of the public aboutnew technologies and scientific discoveries is key to the technological growth of a society. AU.S. National Science Foundation Strategic Plan summarizes this verity: “Effective integrationof research and education at all levels infuses learning with the excitement of discovery andassures that the findings and methods of research are quickly and effectively communicated in abroader context and to a larger audience.” [1] When a new technology is understood by a varietyof individuals and groups, it can be accessed and used in diverse ways to benefit others andimprove
-institutional analysis reveals variations in student perceptions that suggest ways inwhich local cultures may influence approaches to learning and perceptions of teaching practiceslocally, indicating that local cultures may override traditional characterizations of engineeringdisciplines. These emerging findings suggest that changes at departmental and institutional levelscan significantly impact students’ experiences of disciplinary practices and values and challengethe idea of engineering culture as monolithic and immovable. As a result, these local cultures can– and should – play a transformative role in revolutionizing students’ development as engineers.1. IntroductionBeginning with the pioneering work of Anthony Biglan [1], scholars have explored
feedback provided by individual students, the platform functions to dividea large class into multiple small study groups, within which, students can engage in peerinstruction to learn from each other. Meanwhile, the platform will provide instructor with theaggregated, analyzed, and visualized student feedback, which can be used to redesigninstruction in classroom. Made possible by the Viterbi iPodia platform at University ofSouthern California, this platform has been tested based on a technology-enabledinternational course that was attended by 138 students from 8 global universities.IntroductionThe instructional strategy of flipped classroom is increasingly embraced by the engineeringeducation community [1-2]. According to the survey conducted by
not attendthe conference, Donna Reese participated in this paper. The guiding questions for chairsconcerned: the influence of their leadership of the WIED on their career, their perspective on theclimate for women, the main issues the division faced when they were chair, and what researchquestions people should be asking now.IntroductionOn the occasion of the 125th anniversary of the American Society for Engineering Education, apanel of past chairs of the Women in Engineering Division (WIED) were assembled to discuss keyquestions they faced as Chairs of WIED during their two years of leadership. The chairs wereleaders of the division acrosstwenty years, selected in Table 1: Past Chair, Chair, Chair Elect/Program Chair and
effectively (Student Outcome g) [1] as part of anengineering program’s accreditation process. The methods in which engineering programsincorporate the writing instruction into their courses varies greatly. Some engineering programsintegrate intensive writing instruction within first year level Introduction to Engineering courses[2], other programs incorporate it into upper-level theoretical courses [3], while others scaffoldmultiple writing topics over a series of classes [4], [5]. A recently published study by Donald etal. [6] describes the requirements of the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) toinclude a general education component to engineering degrees that complements the technicalcurriculum and provides students with the broad
focus of this practice paper is provide a more holistic discussion of observationsin the classroom and provide narrative feedback from students. The most interesting andrelevant results from this data is summarized in the following section.Results and DiscussionStudent Feedback on PartneringStudents generally preferred the partner quizzes over individual quizzes. This data is presentedin previous work (Reckinger, Manuscript in preparation). Table 2 and Table 1 summarizestudents’ negative and positive comments, respectively. These comments presented are chosenas representative of the comments received. These comments indicate that many students foundpartnering helpful for their learning, and helped reduce stress levels during the quiz time. This
developing educational software applications. The intent was to showhow computing and engineering professionals could make a positive difference in the lives ofothers, even if limited to working from behind a computer screen. However, the project waslargely self-directed by the students, as each team picked the subject for a provided grade leveland then wrote a software application for it. While the project allowed students to displaytechnical competency, it embraced a person-centric view towards learning as an internal process.In his seminal work, Kolb discusses the characteristics associated with the concept ofexperiential learning [1], where thoughts and ideas are not fixed, but are formed and reformedthrough continuous processes grounded in
two of thethree objectives, and 83.3% met all three objectives. However, in the spring clinic-focusedversion of the class, only 57% of 21 students met all three objectives, and 5 students met onlyone or none of the objectives. Additionally, course evaluations for the January term version werehigher than the spring version (4.76 vs. 3.78 course mean on a 5-point Likert scale). We believethe improved results for the January term course may be due to one or more of the followingfactors: 1) the focus on specific patients—and resulting increase in empathy and motivation—rather than a more impersonal clinical observation, 2) the diversity of majors present in theJanuary term course (only half were biomedical engineering majors), and 3) the
important roleof learning-by-discovery approach. [1], [2], [3]Thermodynamics and fluid mechanics concepts are involved in numerous educational and careerfields such as engineering, biology, chemistry, medicine, and other general sciences, which areall important and growing fields in the job industry. Therefore, learning the basics ofthermodynamics and fluid mechanics is vital in the education of students. Learning about energyand energy efficiency is fundamental to engineering students as well. Theoretical concepts arebetter understood if students are involved in practical approach of learned concepts. [4]Specifically, the first law of thermodynamics describes the natural and proven law that all energyis conserved and allows quantification of
formation as engineersand non-engineers work together. While we understand this study to be limited in scope, thefeedback provides preliminary evidence for collaborative research across disciplines and howprofessional skills are fostered in the classroom.IntroductionUndergraduate engineering students are often trained in disciplinary concepts and techniques oftheir specializations, but are rarely given opportunities to work with collaborators from differentdisciplines. In Gary Lee Downey’s words, the very educational processes “producing engineersas outcomes” [1] may neglect key professional skills that those engineers need.Skills that relate to collaborating with peers in different disciplines are increasingly necessary forpracticing engineers
to make the device aesthetically pleasing. Thesecond type of demonstrator is a professionally manufactured device which has been specificallyconstructed for classroom use. It has been designed to clearly delineate its individualcomponents and demonstrate their functionality in an aesthetically pleasing manner. Thisresearch compares the effectiveness of these devices in order to determine which type of deviceis most conducive to student learning and retention.Prior ResearchThis investigation builds upon our prior research which showed that “raw” demonstrations weresuperior to “polished” demonstrations for all measures of learning [12]. This researchdifferentiated raw and polished demonstrations by characteristics listed in Table 1. However
importance of supporting women as underrepresented participants intheir university-based STEM community. They felt a personal responsibility to share theirinsights as academically and socially integrated upperclassmen. Findings suggest that mentoringprograms should leverage the skills and achievements of peer mentors while enhancing theirleadership transitions through the development of the self-determination of their mentees.IntroductionGender disparities in participation in engineering have been persistent in the U.S. for manyyears. Although the number of bachelor‘s degrees in engineering gradually increased by about30% from 2000 to 2012, the actual number of degrees awarded to women has remained nearlyconstant (Figure 1). In light of the increase
Peer Project Management for Capstone Design TeamsAbstractThe mechanical and mechatronic engineering programs at California State University Chicoconclude with a robust, externally funded, two-semester capstone design experience. Students inboth majors work in interdisciplinary teams on year-long design projects sponsored by industrialpartners. Project teams are assigned a faculty advisor whose role [1] is multi-faceted, but doesnot include day-to-day project management or responsibility for project success.Design projects in industry typically have an assigned project manager (PM) with responsibilityfor overall project success as well as a lead role in initiating, planning, executing, monitoring,and controlling the project
National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two- strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Ms. Catherine Anne Hubka, University of New Mexico Catherine (Cat) Hubka, MFA, holds dual appointments at the University of New Mexico in the Depart- ments of Chemical and Biological Engineering (CBE) and Department of English. For CBE, she is em- bedded in the 300 and 400 labs where she supports
will introduce the PRIMES program, and a description regarding the use of UTAs andpeer led groups of students in a Mechanics I: Statics course. This course used the mandatory in-class peer led group implementation. The Statics’ UTAs attended each class meeting, and duringthe final 30 minutes, they worked with groups of students on graded assignments. The studentsgenerally self-selected into small study groups and interacted with the same UTAs throughoutthe semester. In this manner, the students built relationships with the UTAs and the studentsreceived immediate feedback regarding current topic materials.1. IntroductionThe Partnership for Retention Improvement in Mathematics, Engineering, and Science(PRIMES) is a University of Louisville cross
around these skills.IntroductionThere appears to be an ever-increasing body of knowledge associated with being a skilledengineer in practice [1-4]. This includes foundational knowledge, technical information relevantto a particular engineering discipline, and professional skills that cut across all engineeringdisciplines. Leadership is one of the professional skills that appears to be gaining increasingrecognition. A search of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) AnnualConference proceedings identified a generally increasing number of leadership-focused paperseach year (Figure 1; regression slope 2.0 papers/year, p .006), based on leadership in the title,conference session name, tagged topics, or tagged divisions [5
an industrial exemption, or due to other circumstances). ASCE has articulatedthese KSA outcomes in the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CE BOK). The first editionof the CE BOK from 2004 [1] included 15 outcomes (the 11 ABET EAC A to K outcomes [2], 1depth outcome, and 3 professional breadth outcomes). An updated version of the CE BOK(BOK2) was published in 2008 and was expanded to 24 outcomes, each mapped to a level ofachievement in Bloom’s cognitive taxonomy that was to be achieved during a Bachelor’s degree,during a Master’s degree or additional formal education, and/or via on-the-job experience [3]. Itis expected that the KSA needed for civil engineering professional practice will evolve andchange over time; thus, review of the CE BOK
pseudo-Cisco IOS, they are not suitable for teachingCisco Academy content. However, the home-built routers do implement well-understood routerfunctions and capabilities. A review of these implementations appears in the paper forcompleteness.I. IntroductionBased on the first-hand experience of converting an aging mini-tower PC into a network router,it was decided to change to a different form factor PC chassis. A form factor whereby the PCwould meet general business criteria, such as being compact, disk-less, and fan-less. Thecomputer used as the server in this project is a product marketed by Qotom [1]. Figure 1 showsthe device front and back view. Note the width (6 inches) and the depth (5 inches) of the device. Figure 1
proposed tobe widely adopted in engineering education because prior research have suggested its effectivenessin improving students’ problem-solving skills, collaboration skills, and academic achievement [1].By converting lecture-based courses into a project-based learning environment, students learn tocollaboratively solve multidisciplinary, complex problems.Moreover, it has been reported that students’ participation in PBL activities could be beneficial fortheir epistemological development [2]. Personal epistemology refers to students’ reflections on “thelimits of knowledge”, “the certainty of knowledge”, and the “criteria for knowing” [3]. Expertengineers demonstrated higher level of epistemological development than novices [4]. Priorresearch
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Pilot study on experience of engineering students in multimedia-enhanced introductory Physics labsIntroduction Both literature [1] [2] and anecdotal evidence suggest that students, on average, do notcritically read textbooks before coming to class. This lack of student preparedness is detrimentalto creating an active and engaging learning environment. The increase in students’ reliance onmobile phones and computers over books, further exacerbates this issue. While previous studieshave shown that students learn better from reading print texts over digital texts [3], the studentsexhibit clear preference for digital medium; in addition to that, forcing
few states also modified standards related to climate change and theage of the earth, which though controversial in some settings, are not relevant to our presentanalysis of the integration of engineering. In addition to the states listed, after many heateddebates, New Mexico has indicated its intention to adopt the NGSS in July 2018.Table 1 shows the states that have adopted the NGSS, in order of adoption. Ten states adoptedthe NGSS within a year of its release, and another 10 states have adopted them in the years since.The first 14 adoptees were all NGSS lead states that participated in the development of thestandards, making Connecticut the first state to adopt the standards that had not been involved intheir development.Table 3 - The
with math than men. These results suggest two things: a co-ed camp model maynot be the ideal model for fostering women’s interest in engineering, and a single-sex campmodel can have positive effects on the women who attend and participate.IntroductionDuring World War II, manufacturing companies such as GE and Curtiss-Wright began to hirewomen to function as engineers when the men left to fight in the war [1], [2]. Although thewomen were not formally trained as engineers, many were hired in engineering roles to ensurethat the manufacturing companies could produce aircraft parts needed to support the war. Whenthe war ended and the men began returning to their manufacturing jobs, women’s place in theengineering workplace became obsolete. However