- cation. He has served on the ASEE Pacific Southwest Section Board of Directors since 2014, including serving as the PSW Section Chair for 2018-2019.Dr. Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Jessica Ohanian Perez is an assistant professor in Electromechanical Engineering Technology at Califor- nia State Polytechnic University, Pomona with a focus on STEM pedagogy. Jessica earned her doctorate in education, teaching, learning and culture from Claremont Graduate University. Her research focuses on broadening participation of marginalized group in engineering and investigating alternate paths to the field.Mr. Cesar Moreno c American Society for Engineering
manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67(5-8), 1191-1203.[2] Go, J., & Hart, A. J. (2016). A framework for teaching the fundamentals of additive manufacturing and enabling rapid innovation. Additive Manufacturing, 10, 76-87.[3] Fidan, I., Chitiyo, G., Wooldridge, E., and Singer, T. (2019). Multi-Institutional Collaboration in Additive Manufacturing. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference. http://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10107925. Visited on January 15, 2020.[4] Fidan, I., Chitiyo, G., Singer, T., & Moradmand, J. (2018). Additive Manufacturing Studios: a New Way of Teaching ABET Student Outcomes and Continuous Improvement
. Retrieved from Washington, DC:Brubaker, E. R., Kohn, M., & Sheppard, S. (2019). Comparing outcomes of introductory makerspaces courses: The role of reflection and multi-age communities of practice. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces, New Haven, CT.Carbonell, R. M., & Andrews, M. E., & Boklage, A., & Borrego, M. J. (2019, June), Innovation, Design, and Self-Efficacy: The Impact of Makerspaces Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32965Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Fasso, W., & Knight, B. A. (2019
. Leal, A. Schleife, D. R. Trinkle, M. West, and G. L. Herman. Reforming an undergraduate materials science curriculum with computational modules. ” J Mater Educ, 38(3-4):161 – 174, 2016.[10] Xiao Zhang et al. Computational curriculum for matse undergraduates and the influence on senior classes. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[11] Cheng-Wei Lee et al. Impact of computational curricular reform on non-participating undergraduate courses: Student and faculty perspective. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[12] A. Stukowski. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with ovito-the open visualization tool. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 18(1
, vol. 116, no. 39, pp. 19251-19257, 2019.[6] Kern Family Foundation. "What is Entrepreneurial Mindset?" https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset-matters.aspx (accessed 2020).[7] C. Naumann, "Entrepreneurial mindset: A synthetic literature review," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 149-172, 2017.[8] S. R. Brunhaver, J. M. Bekki, A. R. Carberry, J. S. London, and A. F. McKenna, "Development of the Engineering Student Entrepreneurial Mindset Assessment (ESEMA)," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 1, p. n1, 2018.[9] M. J. Mabey, S. S. Jordan, M. Lande, and S. Weiner, "A Comparison of Maker and Entrepreneurial Characteristics," presented at the ASEE Annual
,” Technical Services Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 257–268, jul 2018.[14] T. Boto and D. Herman, “Creating a curriculum-aligned OER discovery tool: A twist on faculty mini-grant incentives,” in Northeast Regional OER Summit, Amherst, MA, may 2019. [Online]. Available: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/neoer/2019/implementing/14[15] Open Textbook Network, “On-Campus Workshops: Engaging Faculty, Answering Questions,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://open.umn.edu/otn/workshops/[16] J. P. Moore and T. L. Reinsfelder, “Work In Progress: A Snapshot of OER Adoption in Engineering Mechanics Courses,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/31266[17] I. E. Allen and J. Seaman
. Research results demonstrated thatthe flipped lesson improved the quality of students’ sources on mid-semester design proposal andless so on their final report. The lesson was fully implemented for fall semester 2017. Based ondata from the team’s first research project, and feedback from course faculty, the team piloted amid-semester reinforcement lesson in fall 2019. This second phase of the research project seeksto specifically reinforce students’ retention of concepts related to both the use of proper citationformatting and incorporation of more scholarly and authoritative sources in their team’s finalproject report. This work in progress paper discusses preliminary results from the fall 2019 pilot,specifically faculty perceptions of the lesson
). from https://interestingengineering.com/7-of-the-most-in-demand-engineering-jobs-for-2019.Moalloy, T. (2018). "9 Popular (and High Paying) Engineering Careers." from https://www.gijobs.com/9-popular-engineering-careers/.Nocera T.M., Delaine D.A., Ortiz-Rosario A., Shermadou A. (2018) Bridging the Gap between BME andIndustry: A Case Study, ASEE, Salt Lake City, UT.Ortiz-Rosario A., Shermadou A., Delaine D.A., Nocera T.M. (2019) To what extent does gender and ethnicityimpact engineering students’ career outcomes? An exploratory analysis comparing biomedical to three otherundergraduate engineering majors, ASEE, Tampa, FL.Torpey, E. (2018). "Engineers: Employment, pay, and outlook." fromhttps://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2018/article
LGBTQIA+ CommunityThroughout this paper, we reference the term “LGBTQIA+,” which is an umbrella acronym usedto describe any person who does not identify with heterosexual and cisgender norms (Gold,2019). Recent research on the LGBTQIA+ student experience shows a growing interest on thistopic, both within and outside of the field of engineering education (Lange et al., 2019). Withinthis encouraging trend, the disciplines that have placed the greatest sense of urgency onunderstanding this community’s experiences appear to have been higher education, psychology,and queer and gender studies. Research from these fields have shown that LGBTQIA+ studentsexperience heightened levels of verbal and physical violence, harassment, and discrimination. Asa
received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Dr. Misty L. Loughry, Crummer Graduate School of Business at Rollins College Misty L. Loughry, Ph.D. is a Professor of Management in the Crummer Graduate School of Business at Rollins College. She studies peer control, peer evaluation, and teamwork. She earned her Ph.D. from University of Florida.Dr. David J Woehr, U. of North Carolina Charlotte David J. Woehr is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of
., & Kim, J.-H. (2018). Fostering Reflective Engineers: Outcomes of an Arts- and Humanities-Infused Graduate Course. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC) (p. 6). Albuquerque, NM, USA: IEEE8. Kim, J.-H., Campbell, R. C., Nguyen, N. T. T., Taraban, R., Reible, D., & Na, C. (2019). Exploring Ways to Develop Reflective Engineers: Toward Phronesis-Centered Engineering Education. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference (p. 21). Tampa, Florida, USA: ASEE.9. Kim, J.-H., Nguyen, N. T. T., Campbell, R. C., Taraban, R., Reible, D., Chongzheng, N., & Yoo, S. (forthcoming). Would Eisner Be Happy with Us
facets of ethical constructs and professional identity.References[1] W. Helmer, “Is all diversity good?” in ASEE Prism, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 10, 2013.[2] S. Scales, “Teaching civility in the age of Jerry Springer.” Teaching Ethics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1-20, 2010.[3] “Criteria for Accreditation of Engineering Technology Programs” [online], Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-technology-programs-2019-2020/#GC5[4] ”Diversity and Inclusion,” [online], https://www.abet.org/about-abet/governance/board-of- directors/policies/[5] J. Maxwell, Ethics 101: What every leader needs to know. New York: Warner Books, 2005.[6] Maples v Martin, 858 F2d 1546 (11th Cir
Pedagogy Paperpresented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida.https://peer.asee.org/32399Connor, K., Scott, C., Chouikha, M., Wilson, A., Anderson, A., Astatke, Y., Berry,F., Newman, D., O’Rourke, J., Little, T., Millard, D. Multi-InstitutionalDevelopment of Mobile Studio Based Education and Outreach, ASEE AnnualConference, Vancouver, June 2011. https://peer.asee.org/18549K. Connor, Y. Astatke, C. Kim, A. Eldek, H. Majlesein, P. Andrei, J. Attia, K.Gullie, C. Graves, A. Osareh, “Simultaneous Implementation of ExperimentalCentric Pedagogy in 13 ECE Programs,” ASEE Annual Conference Seattle, WA,June 2015Astatke, Y., Ladeji-Osias, J., James, P., Moazzami, F., Scott, C., Connor, K., Saka,A., Improving and Expanding
Student Engagement," presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019/06/15, June 2019. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32850[7] A. K. T. Howard, "Flipped Classroom – Ten Years Later," presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019/06/15, June 2019. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32849[8] B. J. Mealy, "Assessing Student Assessment in a Flipped Classroom," presented at the 2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference, Boulder, Colorado, 2018/03/25, March 2018. Available: https://peer.asee.org/29601[9] P. R. Pintrich, D. A. F. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. J. McKeachie, "A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire
remained stable (all on a Likertscale of 1-4) between the fall and spring semesters. Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 6Table 2: First-Year Behavioral Engagement Indicators for FTFT Program Participants, 2018-2019(Likert Scale range = 1-4) Fall Spring Likert Scale: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Most of the Time, 4=Always 1. How regularly are you attending class? 3.6 3.6 2. How often are
those who did not to determine if thereexists a similar pattern to that found with students who took the surveys and those who did not.Question Q20 – How do you think you are doing in your engineering courses? – was only addedto the mid-semester survey in the fall 2019 semester. The main motivation when the survey wasfirst done was assessing student performance in their mathematics and science courses. Theauthors plan to report on results of this newer survey question in future work.References[1] S. Gratiano and W. Palm, Can a five-minute, three-question survey foretell first-yearengineering student performance and retention?, Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA.[2] M. Anderson-Rowland, A first year
University Commission (WSCUC). Handbook of Accreditation 2013 Revised. WSCUC 2018.4. Augustine, N., and Vest, C., Engineering Education for A Changing World, Joint Project by the Engineering Deans Council and the Corporate Roundtable of the American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE, 1994.5. Lo, Kurt C.K. (2000) Engineering Program Accreditation: ABET Engineering Criteria 2000. 2000 International Conference on Engineering Education, Taipei, Taiwan.6. Accreditation Board for Engineers and Technology (ABET). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020 (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/ on October 10
(June 2019) Bakrania, S., & Mallouk, K., “Blowing Off Steam Tables,” Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Columbus, Ohio (June 2017) Baughn, J., and Maixner, M., “Teaching Psychrometry To Undergraduates,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Honolulu, Hawaii (June 2007). Cengel, Y. A. and Boles, M. A., “Property Tables Booklet for Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach,” McGrawHill: Boston (2015) Clausius Introduction, Accessed May 23, 2019, https://youtu.be/U34Dn5NZacA Dixon, G., “Teaching Thermodynamics Without Tables Isn’t It Time?” 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque,New Mexico (June 2001) Engineering Equation Solver (EES), Accessed May 23, 2019, http
of the survey results is included in Appendix D ofthe CEBOK3 [1] and in the 2019 ASEE paper, “Constituent Input in the Process of Developing the ThirdEdition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBOK3)” [12].There is no doubt that the surveys proved instrumental in development of the CEBOK3 and were criticalin both providing input and generating discussion among the committee members. However, theCEBOK3TC was fortunate to have two committee members who had extensive experience withdesigning and conducting surveys and providing the analysis for the committee. This was notdeliberately considered in the selection of committee members for CEBOK3TC. The authors recommendthat any future committees that may have extensive survey work
various classes. Students were told that participants who completed both a start-and end-of-semester version of the survey would be entered into a random drawing for one ofthree $50 gift cards. Three hundred forty-eight FTIACs were eligible to participate. One studentdied during the Fall 2019 semester and four others made complete withdrawals from theuniversity for unknown reasons. These students were removed from the analysis, leaving apotential pool of 343 participants. One hundred four completed the start-of-semester survey(30.3% response rate) and 42 completed both the start- and end-of semester surveys (12.2%response rate). Only results from the start-of-semester survey are included in the current work.Table 1 shows the demographics of
students perceive bias within machine learning and search algorithms.Over 700 computer science and computer engineering students from three different institutionsparticipated in the survey from Fall 2018 to Spring 2019. Based on survey results, Google wasoverwhelmingly the preferred search engine. The participants also predicted that artificialintelligence algorithms will improve over time. The majority of respondents believe that privatecompanies, not government organizations, need to regulate their own artificial intelligencealgorithms. On average, computer science and computer engineering students acknowledge thatalgorithm bias could occur when people create algorithms. The results suggest that students arefamiliar with search engines and in
perspective, he is able to better understand the business side of research, which many future scientists and engineers will encounter in industry [5, Conclusion].BackgroundThe engineering program at James Madison University (JMU) was established in 2008. Thatsame year saw the opening of a campus STEM library, Rose Library, and the creation of anApplied Sciences Librarian position to provide reference, instruction, and collection managementfor engineering and other applied sciences programs on campus. The Applied Sciences Librarianhired in 2008 has served in this role ever since. As of fall 2019, nearly 1,900 students at JMU areenrolled in the College of Integrated Science and Engineering [6].JMU is also home to a nationally recognized
the many people, both at CSU as well as the ASEE members, who reviewed and improved this paper.References[1] G. Kuh, C. Schneider, High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter, Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2008.[2] P. Healy, “We should all be concerned about the student debt crisis,” CNBC, November 4, 2019. [Online]. Available: CNBC, https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/04/we-should-all-be- concerned-about-the-student-debt-crisis.html [Accessed March 10, 2020][3] N. Stump, “At these colleges, students begin serious research their first year,” The Conversation, September 16, 2019. [Online]. Available: The Conversation
from those in years 2 and 3. This is due first, to a University-widechange in learning management systems which moved all courses from Blackboard™ toCanvas ™ in 2018, and a corresponding move from the video capture system TechSmith Relayto VidGrid. The free online whiteboard, Stoodle, that was used for group collaboration in 2016was eliminated and left an essential gap in the course design. To fill this gap, in 2018 and 2019,Microsoft One Note was used because it was free on campus and mimicked much of the samefunctionality, albeit with intermittent lags in performance. Figure 4 Weekly Synchronous In-person Class Meeting with Both CohortsSignificance of the StudyWhile previous
/papslcen19/. 2019.[8] D. Gibson, and P. Brackin, “Capstone design projects: Helping the disabled” in Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. June, 2012. Available: https://peer.asee.org/10407[9] S. B. Niku, and R. J. Miller, “Designing Devices to Help the Disabled” in Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. June, 2011. Available: https://peer.asee.org/17724[10] M. Pilotte and D. Bairaktarova, “Autism spectrum disorder and engineering education- needs and considerations,” Proceedings of the 2016 Frontiers in Education Conference, Erie, PA, October 2016.[11] C. J. Groen, M. C. Paretti, L. D. McNair, D. R. Simmons, and A. Shew
#29689he worked for the Vanderbilt University Department of Orthopaedics performing skeletal biodynamicsresearch. Before beginning engineering school he completed an apprenticeship and was awarded the titleof Journeyman Industrial Electrician.Ray has been an active member at both national and sectional levels. He joined ASEE in 1994. He cur-rently serves as Chair of the Engineering Technology Council and Vice-President, Institutional Councils.Other service includes being a member of the Frederick J Berger awards committee; National Teachingawards committee, and the ASEE Bylaws and Constitution committee. He has served as a member of theEngineering Technology Council board since 2008. Additionally, Ray has been a reviewer, moderator,and author in
Influencing the Interest Levels of Male Versus Female Students Going into STEM Fields.” Proceedings of 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa FL, June 15 - 19, 2019. Paper ID: 26352.[9] Nadelson, L., Mooney, D. K., Dean, N. “Why I am an Engineering Major: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students.” Proceedings of 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18, 2014. Paper ID: 9097.[10] Shields, D. R. and K. P. Kisi. “Factors Influencing High School Students’ to Pursue and Engineering Baccalaureate.” Proceedings of 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 16-29, 2011, AC 2011- 2263.[11
inalignment with the social pillar of sustainable design. However, classes rarely give students theopportunity to interact with communities to develop these listening skills. A small ethicallistening exercise was integrated into three civil engineering courses in fall 2019. Videos withstories from community members impacted by engineering were shown during class. The panelCommunity Engagement Ethics – First Steps in a Conversation with Affected Communities thatwas held at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference in2019 served as the main source of community voices. In a first-year Introduction to CivilEngineering course, discussion of the human-centered design process was supported bycomments from Lena Young-Green in
undergraduate research students.Dr. Charles E. Pierce, University of South Carolina Dr. Pierce is the Director for Diversity and Inclusion and Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Carolina. He is a Bell South Teaching Fellow in the College of Engineering and Computing and ASEE Campus Representative.Dr. Zulfikar Berk, University of South Carolina Dr. Zulfikar Berk’s research interests include constructivist learning approaches, global education, ex- periential learning, and problem-based learning. He is enthusiastic about the contribution of innovative pedagogical approaches by working on various teaching and learning models in advancing engineering education
of engineering students: An empirical study,” Indian J. Public Heal. Res. Dev., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 63–68, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.5958/0976- 5506.2019.00014.7.[29] B. Rieken, M. Schar, S. Shapiro, and S. Sheppard, “Exploring the Relationship between Mindfulness and Innovation in Engineering Students,” in ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc. June 25-28, 2017. Columbus, OH, 2017.[30] M. V. Huerta, “Inner Engineering: A convergent mixed methods study evaluating the use of contemplative practices to promote resilience among Freshman engineering students,” in ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., June 24-27, 2018. Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.