willreport the above conceptual framework in more details against its literature background.2. The Multiple-Lab-Driven Pedagogy with TCK IntegratedThere have been plenty of studies performed on lab-based curriculum. For instance, Abbas andLeseman [5] developed a laboratory-based curriculum on the theory, fabrication, andcharacterization of microelectromechanical systems, in which course assessment data is input bystudents from three semesters, based on which the effectiveness of the laboratory project isevaluated. Alexander and Smelser [6] proposed a distance laboratory teaching method thatcombined multi-media computer experiments, portable hands-on exercises, and place-boundlaboratory experiments. Zhang et al. [7] utilized graphical development
Paper ID #17771Artificially Intelligent Method (AIM) for STEM-based Electrical Engineer-ing Education and Pedagogy Case Study: MicroelectronicsDr. Faycal Saffih, University of Waterloo Dr. Fayc¸al Saffih (IEEE, 2000) received B.Sc. (Best Honors) in Solid-State Physics from University of S´etif-1, Algeria, in 1996, M.Sc. degree in Bio-Physics from University of Malaya, Malaysia, in 1998, and Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Waterloo, Canada, in 2005. In 2006, he joined the Communication Research Laboratory, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, where he developed a versatile FPGA
incorporated problem-based learning into her lectures, lab- oratories, and outreach activities to engage students and the community in the STEM education process.Dr. Morris M. Girgis, Central State University Morris Girgis is a professor at Central State University. He teaches undergraduate courses in manufactur- ing engineering. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Hannover University, Germany. His current research in engineering education focuses on developing and implementing new educational tools and approaches to enhance teaching, learning and assessment at the course and curriculum levels. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Application of
involvedexperiments. A few experiments in the second course involve surge generators. The surgegenerators are all in-house design and construction. Therefore, the design information pertainingto the surge generators are available for teaching purposes. This gives students a visual tool toobserve exactly how certain devices are constructed2.Also at OSU, dissectible machines are used in the energy conversion lab. The test machines arefully dissectible and can be used to construct a wide variety of ac and dc electrical machines.This allows students the opportunity to observe the behavior and construction of various kinds ofac and dc machines2.At IIT Bombay, laboratory instruction is offered and believed to be a necessary part of theelectrical engineering
hands-on labs; using such methodology will not only improve students’ learning but will also offer a low-cost and a flexible training platform. g. Even though AUC is a preferable type of feedback compared to KCR, it is more complex and therefore expensive to develop. h. Instructional designers are often interested in efficiency. It might be expected that the additional steps necessary for AUC would require more study time. i. Simulation-based teaching methodology offers a cost reduction by replacing expensive physical lab equipment such as routers, switches, and firewalls. By incorporating simulation-based laboratory experiments in place of physical
, virtual laboratory experiments, and videos were used to teachelectromagnetic theories [4]. Some instructors use visualization tools such as MATLAB toimprove students’ learning in class and assigns software-based projects to enrich the interpretationof fundamentals of electromagnetics [5]. While simulations are helpful to explain theories, studiesshowed that students who can create and analyze simulations, already have a good understandingof the theory [6]. Thus, computer simulations do not help all students in core EMF courses to Fall 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, October 6-7 – Penn State Berksdevelop a deeper interpretation of abstract theories. According to Dale [7], people learn and retain20% of what they hear, 30% of what
Paper ID #19459Adopting an ACI/ASCE Competition as a Learning Tool in Civil EngineeringMaterials ClassDr. Daniel Hochstein, Manhattan College Dr. Daniel Hochstein is an Assistant Professor at Manhattan College and he received his PhD from Columbia University in 2013. He teaches civil engineering courses in the areas of engineering mechanics and materials, probability and statistics, and structural design. His research interests include studying the mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight concrete and performing accelerated weathering, durability, and aging tests on civil engineering materials.Dr. Goli Nossoni
influencing undergraduate Hispanic and other minority students’ decision to considerengineering as their major; 3) Dual programs for Community Colleges and summer programs aswell as High Schools at one of the institution are providing access for pre-college minority andwomen students to careers in engineering and technology; 4) Our project aims to develop andestablish an integrated research-oriented educational facility to support and enhance teachingand learning in these areas, by providing a set of comprehensive laboratory experiments,teaching and learning modules; and 5) The design and implementation of a computationalworkbench for simulating hybrid power systems and distributed energy resources.2. Curriculum ChangesEngineering and technology
to promote women in STEM fields by both supporting graduate student’s professional development as a Committee Member of the College of Engineering’s Women In Engineering Program and participating in engineering outreach events for high school girls through the Perry Initiative. You can reach her at dhaidar@udel.edu . c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Manipulation Matters: Isolating the Impact of Lecture vs. Lab Experience in an Undergraduate Engineering Controls ClassAbstractSeveral studies have shown that laboratories that implement interactive learning and cooperativegroup exercises lead to an improvement in student outcomes as compared to the passive
of a Power Systems Course for EETAbstract:There are a number of areas that a modern Power Systems course in EET should consider. Oneis the conflict between laboratory experiences traditionally taught in an Electrical Power Courseand the ArcFlash requirements of NFPA 70E. A second is the need to teach the calculations offaults necessary to build a modern one-line diagram for a manufacturing facility. A third is alook at the theory behind all electrical and magnetic circuit design (Maxwell’s Equations). Apossible fourth is the expanded role of emerging energy generation methods and the impact thesehave on the grid. This paper discusses the development of various methods used to teach thetraditional Motors or Power Systems course while
resources can be more effective in engaging students andimproving student performance than those provided by textbook publishers38.The online Graphics class at Cañada College was developed by an engineering instructor whohas been teaching the face-to-face version of the class for about 20 years, and has been teachingonline lecture courses (Statics, Dynamics, Circuits lecture, Materials lecture) deliveredsynchronously for the past several years. The online Graphics class is the first asynchronousclass to be developed by this instructor. Online course materials that have been developedinclude PowerPoint lectures, lecture videos, video tutorials, laboratory exercises, and homeworkassignments. Most lecture videos and video tutorials were created and
with the HECI,handouts, and instructions.AcknowledgementsThis work was funded by the National Science Foundation, DUE #1225031.Works Cited[1] Vigeant, M., Dahm, K., and Silverstein, D. 2017. The state of the chemical engineering curriculum: Report from the 2016 survey. American Association for Engineering Education.[2] Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V. N. 1980. The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Research Implications.[3] Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V. N. 2004. The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci. Ed. 88, 1, 28-54. DOI=10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.[4] Hofstein, A. and Kind, P. M. 2012 Learning in and from science laboratories. In Second International Handbook of Science Education,[5
Berks TRICIA K. CLARK, M.S., Instructor and Program Coordinator for the Information Sciences & Technol- ogy degree program at Penn State Berks. Teaching interests include programming, information security and first-year experience. Research interests include exploring ways technology can be integrated into teaching and promoting STEM education opportunities to K-12 students.Mr. Terence Laughlin, Blue Mountain High SchoolDr. Abdullah Konak, Penn State Berks Abdullah Konak is a Professor of Information Sciences and Technology at the Pennsylvania State Uni- versity Berks. Dr. Konak received his degrees in Industrial Engineering, B.S. from Yildiz Technical University, Turkey, M.S. from Bradley University, and Ph.D
a logicalmanner. This characteristic of tutorial makes it an effective way to teach Pakistani studentsthe basic knowledge which they didn’t have access to in Pakistan.Power systems laboratory designed and organized specific tutorials for the students in theUSPCAS-E program. The tutorial covers four portions, including the classic power systemprotection schemes, the operation of digital relays, the design of the smart grid, and thePSCAD simulation. Each portion is introduced and discussed in four one-hour lectures.Four projects are carefully designed for each portion of the tutorial. The exchange studentsneed to use the knowledge covered in the tutorial to finish the corresponding projects.Students are also required to submit project reports
Research Faculty at Rutgers University. At Rutgers, he was heavily involved in research and teaching at both graduate and undergraduate levels. In the period of 2011-2014, Dr. Al-Sharab was a visiting professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at New York University Polytechnic School of Engineering. In addition to his work with academic institutions, Dr. Al-Sharab was a consultant of various technological companies es- pecially in the areas of structure-property-correlations and advanced characterizations. Dr. Al-Sharab’s research interests are in the areas of Nanotechnology, Electron Microscopy, Structure-property correla- tions, synthesis and characterization of energy related
at Harvard Medical School where he was listed as a Research Associate in its Renal division.Dr. Tariq Akmal, Washington State University Tariq Akmal is currently the Chair of the Department of Teaching & Learning at Washington State Uni- versity. He has collaborated with engineering scholars on numerous projects, providing expertise in cur- riculum and instruction, learning, and K-12 schools.Dr. Ryan Anderson, Montana State UniversityDr. Phillip Himmer, Montanta State University, ECE Dept., Montana Microfabrication Facility Phillip Himmer received his B.S. in Physics at Washington State University and M.S. in physics at Mon- tana State University. He obtained his PhD in engineering at Montana State University in
done at course levels without approval from thehigher levels.Further enhancement of the laboratories and course project includes making slaves amicrocontroller-based control system, as well as adding a light sensor and LED to form a closedloop control system that provides feedback in the form of analog signals. With the motor speedcontrol project, there is one drawback, that is, all signals are digital. The addition of the lightsensor adds the analog component to the DCS. Student learning will be evaluated throughsurveys as the laboratories and course project are finalized.References1. Avitabile, P., Hodgkins, J., and Van Zandt, T., “Innovative Teaching of Fourier Series Using Labview,” Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.2. Bowen, K
to both the lecture and laboratory componentsand the focus of the new course is on improving of the course. We modified the lectures to focus on thestudents’ performance and retention in calculus, we mathematics topics emphasized in the Wright Stateevaluated the effectiveness of the new course by curriculum, including trigonometry, vectors, solvinglongitudinally tracking students’ success and persistence systems of equations, and derivatives and integrals. We alsoin subsequent engineering mathematics courses. The incorporated using Matlab, with an emphasis on using it as aresults of these analyses show that students’ tool to solve engineering mathematics problems
Paper ID #19084Bringing Experiential Learning into the Online Classroom: A Mechanics ofMaterials Course Case StudyDr. David Brian Dittenber, LeTourneau University Dr. David Dittenber is an assistant professor of civil engineering at LeTourneau University in Longview, Texas. He earned his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering at LeTourneau and spent a year teaching high school math and science. He then attended West Virginia University, where he earned his master’s and doctoral degrees in civil engineering, with a research focus on the use of composite materials in infrastructure. Dr. Dittenber chose to return to his
as designing and testing of propulsion systems including design and development of pilot testing facility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past 10 years she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and mechanical areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate
outcomes that they enhance. Prof Lindsay is the Foundation Professor of Engineering at Charles Sturt University. His research interests centre largely around online learning – the use of remote and virtual laboratories, MOOCs and other methods for making learning asynchronous, and data analytics for promoting student learning. Prof Lindsay was the 2010 President of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education. He is a Fellow of Engineers Australia, and a Fellow of the UK Higher Education Academy. Prof Lindsay was the recipient of a 2007 Carrick Award for Australian University Teaching. In 2005 he was named as one of the 30 Most Inspirational Young Engineers in Australia.Dr. Pamela Roberts, Charles Sturt
circuit of S3 board, as an example to illustrate inductive instructionimplemented in our class.Longitudinal data on students’ performance in this class have been collected from 2014 to 2016.Assessed by laboratory reports, midterm and final exams, the students had better understandingon the topics than those in the previous semesters. The teaching evaluations from studentscontinually improved over the past three years. We have received more positive comments fromstudents with regard to this course as well.The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section II presents inductive instruction using 7-segment LED time-multiplexing circuit as an example. Section III discusses student attitudes inthe engineering course through active learning and
) minigrant toacquire the software at CSIT Department, Clayton State University.additional approaches used for teaching such approaches. Tablet PC are reported in [11] to be usedto enhance student engagement for programming courses. Use of computer games is anotherapproach reported in [12] for teaching algorithm and programming concepts and [13] reports useof Web-Based laboratories for courses covering digital circuits, data representations, computerarchitecture, operating systems and networking to name a few.Computer programming fundamentals has always been challenging to teach for faculty, andlearning these concepts for students who are beginning in the computer science program.Traditional teaching is not effective in achieving course goal in such
. Interconnectivity, Frictional Behavior, Macro, Micro, Nano………. Regulatory ISO – ASTM – FDA Substantial equivalence Accepted Protocols for testing and verification and validation So where is the journey taking us?Disruptive Technologies Present An Exceptional Opportunity for Collaboration Translational and Applied Research opportunities Interdepartmental and Multi-disciplinary collaborative teaching and research opportunities Educational Support to prepare graduates for a career with emphasis in Additive Manufacturing Additive Manufacturing processes Mechanical Engineering (Machine Design )– Computer Aided Design, Finite Element Analysis and other modeling Biomechanics
collaborates with faculty on the Scholarship of Teach- ing and Learning through various research projects. Particular current areas of collaboration include instructional design, evaluation, engineering education and learner support. In addition, Dr. Jackson is an Affiliate Faculty in Penn State’s Higher Education Department.Prof. Karl R Haapala, Oregon State University Dr. Karl R. Haapala is an Associate Professor in the School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering at Oregon State University, where he directs the Industrial Sustainability Laboratory and is Assistant Director of the OSU Industrial Assessment Center. He received his B.S. (2001) and M.S. (2003) in Mechanical Engineering, and his Ph.D. in
Immanuel Selvaraj is an associate professor of civil engineering at the University of Evansville, IN. He holds a PhD degree from Auburn University and a licensed professional engineer. His research interests are in pavement design and analysis, pavement management, pavement instrumentation and engi- neering education. At the University of Evansville, he teaches courses such as transportation engineering, soil mechanics, geotechnical engineering, advanced pavement design and management, and surveying.Dr. Corrie Walton-Macaulay, Bucknell University With degrees in both Bachelor of Science and Master of Science from the University of Arkansas, and a doctoral degree from the University of Kentucky, Dr. Corrie Walton-Macaulay is
Paper ID #18044Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) Site: Sustainable ElectronicsDr. Inez Hua, Purdue University Dr. Inez Hua is Professor in the Lyles School of Civil Engineering and the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering. Her research and teaching areas include aquatic chemistry, water pollution control, environmental sustainability in engineering education, and sustainable electronics. Dr. Hua has a Ph.D and an MS in Environmental Engineering and Science from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), and a BA in Biochemistry from the University of California, Berkeley.Dr. Monica E Cardella
types of questions to measurestudents’ understanding of the subject matter along with different styles of learning assessment.These exercises are completed during the laboratory component of the course as an additionalactivity.The second approach is the development of a learning community for freshman students. Thelearning community is built focusing on the freshman level Computer Aided Drafting andDesign and Manufacturing Processes courses. As a part of the learning community, these courseshave collaborative teaching and joint projects. The instructors of both courses coordinate theteaching materials so that students can always reference the teaching materials in both coursesand are learning the materials in the right pace. A joint project is
canbenefit from the laboratory experience in applications of mechatronics, robotics, and rapid prototyping.As well as helping in the teaching of various courses, such experience benefits students who are pursuingdegrees in the engineering field. Students in the Mechanical, Electrical, and Industrial fields along withmany others can learn many new skills from multi-disciplinary projects such as the rapid prototype designof consumer products, a walking robot or various designs related to capstone senior design projects3, 4.Such projects show students how to use different types of technology, and demonstrate how advancedtechnology can be used in an actual application. Overall, many different fields of engineering can benefitfrom this application
to be able to correct the process toward normal operation. Thedifferences in these two broad outcomes lead to differences in emphasis and approach toteaching similar topics.Our ATE project involves adapting novel in-classroom laboratory equipment and activitiesdeveloped for teaching engineering to teaching process technology. The equipment beingadapted consists of very low-cost models of common industrial equipment [1-5]. These are itemslike heat exchangers and pipes which are common to both process technology and manybranches of engineering. The emphases are different however, process technology or PTECprograms are concerned with ensuring that students understand normal behavior and how someof the phenomena can be used to cross-check