AC 2010-2210: EVALUATION OF RAPID DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM USING EYETRACKERArun Chintalapati, Missouri University of Science and TechnologyHong Sheng, Missouri University of Science and TechnologyRichard Hall, Missouri University of Science and TechnologyRobert Landers, Missouri University of Science and Technology Page 15.541.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Evaluation of Rapid Development System using Eye TrackerAbstractThis paper presents the results of the evaluation of Linear Axis Rapid Development System10(RDS), which is under development as part of a NSF funded project. The Linear Axis RDS isused in teaching control design/insertion in the
AC 2010-1860: ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING A COMPUTERGAME TO BRIDGE A RESEARCH AGENDA WITH A TEACHING AGENDAKristen Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette College KRISTEN L. SANFORD BERNHARDT is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College, where she teaches courses related to transportation, civil infrastructure, and engineering ethics and researches issues related to infrastructure systems modeling. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University and her B.S.E. from Duke University, all in Civil Engineering.Sharon Jones, Lafayette College SHARON A. JONES is a Professor at Lafayette College in both the Department of Civil
AC 2010-1648: HOW THE CIVIL ENGINEERING BOK2 COULD BEIMPLEMENTED AT NC STATEGeorge List, North Carolina State University Page 15.653.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 How the Civil Engineering BOK2 Could Be Implemented at North Carolina State University Abstract This paper discusses the way in which the ASCE’s Body of Knowledge, version 2, (BOK2) might be implemented at North Carolina State in its civil engineering curriculum, as perceived by the department head. More specifically, it examines the BOK2 outcomes that relate to the baccalaureate degree, since the plan for achieving the
. Page 15.280.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 CLEERhub.org: Creating a digital habitat for engineering education researchersAbstractCLEERhub.org uses HUBzero architecture to create a digital habitat for engineering educationresearchers. Wenger has stressed that community needs should be explored before a digitalhabitat is created. With this in mind, this paper discusses the features of CLEERhub envisionedby a sample of engineering education researchers. These features are mapped to three polaritiesWenger identified as existing within virtual communities. Features which allow forasynchronous connections are favored by this sample of the engineering education researchcommunity and
,simultaneously interacting, and constantly communicating with learningenvironments. They learn actively, rather than passively, by taking advantage oftechnology.Traditional construction engineering and management (CEM) education followsthe Cartesian view of mind-matter dualism where the learner and the learningcontext are detached. Under this paradigm, concepts are presented as fixed, well-structured, and independent entities. Learning activities are divorced from theirauthentic context resulting in fragmentation and specialization of courses andeducational experiences. This fragility can be observed in school when studentsneither retain nor are able to utilize knowledge allegedly acquired in previouscourses. These problems are not exclusive to CEM
AC 2010-1742: IMPROVING ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION: ARELATIONAL SKILL-TASK MODELNoe Vargas Hernandez, The University of Texas at El PasoJose Davila, University of Texas, El Paso Page 15.694.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 IMPROVING ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION: A PEDAGOGICAL SKILL-TASK MODELThe objective of this paper is to propose a relational skill-task design educational modelon how to improve the engineering design learning experience. The design engineeringactivity is a complex mix of skills and knowledge that has been thought over decades bydirectly delivering to the students the design methodologies developed by designresearchers and
technological products today. In return, technology provides science with the tools needed to explore the world.... The fundamental difference between them is that science seeks to understand a universe that already exists, while technology is creating a universe that has existed only in the minds of inventors… Mathematics and technology have a similar but more distant relationship. Mathematics offers a language with which to express relationships in science and technology and provides useful analytical tools for scientists and engineers. Technological innovations, such as the computer, can stimulate progress in mathematics, while mathematical inventions, such as numerical analysis theories can lead
other web portals, PRISM specializes in highly interactive mind-ware, such asprocess simulations, visualizations, modeling packages, cognitive skills builders, serious gaming– in short, all forms of software that increase student task engagement and improve learning. Theproject’s main goal is to improve learning in middle school STEM by helping teachers toembrace digital learning tools as extensions of their own dynamic presence in the classroom. InDecember 2006, PRISM was selected by T.H.E. Journal (Technology Horizons in Education) asone of the top 15 educational technology innovations in the nation for K-12.We believe our target audience offers substantive opportunities for integrating engineering-basedcomputer tool literacy into existing
participate in SeniorDesign Projects and Enterprises with an engineering service component. Some examples of theseprograms include Engineers without Borders and International Senior Design as part of MichiganTech’s International Sustainable Engineering Initiative.Design Activity DevelopmentWith the interests and motivations of the current students in mind, design modules are beingdeveloped to engage the students in current societal and engineering issues. The learningobjectives provided to the three groups (undergraduates, graduate students and faculty) were: 1. Develop activities that enhance students’ critical thinking, creativity, communication, data analysis and design skills. 2. Outline the activities such that first-year students
AC 2010-1266: ENGAGING SPACES FOR FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING: A TALEOF TWO CLASSROOMSS. Scott Moor, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne Scott Moor is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Coordinator of First-Year Engineering at Indiana University Purdue University – Fort Wayne. He received a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering from M.I.T. After over a decade in industry he returned to academia at the University of California at Berkeley where he received a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering and an M.A. in Statistics. He is a registered Professional Chemical Engineer in California. His research interests include engineering education with an emphasis on developing and testing
AC 2010-987: CDIO IN AEROSPACE ENGINEERING: THE NORTH AMERICAAEROSPACE PROJECT PROGRESS REPORTEdward Crawley, MITRobert Niewoehner, United States Naval AcademyJean Koster, University of Colorado, Boulder Page 15.267.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 CDIO in Aerospace Engineering Education: North American Aerospace Project Progress Report This paper provides an interim progress report for the North American Aerospace Project, an effort of the North American CDIO consortium. The project seeks to promote and facilitate the adoption of the CDIO (Conceive Design Implement Operate) model for engineering
beenmultiple measure assessments (pre-post). Some were designed to assess understanding of basicengineering and technology content (such as “What is Engineering?”), while others have focusedon measuring STEM learning resulting from student interaction with specific EiE units. Page 15.199.2Theoretical FrameworkThe main goal of the EiE curriculum is to help children to learn engineering and technology—not merely facts from and about these fields of study, but practices, habits of mind, and ways oflooking at the world through disciplinary lenses. At the dawn of the twentieth century, JohnDewey 1 advocated that progressive education should provide
AC 2010-1080: GROWING PAINS: CHINESE ENGINEERING EDUCATIONDURING THE LATE QING DYNASTYJunqiu Wang, Purdue UniversityNathan McNeill, Purdue UniversitySensen Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 15.635.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Growing pains: Chinese engineering education in the late Qing DynastyAbstractWith the continued advancement of engineering as a global field of activity, it becomes criticalto understand engineering education from a more global perspective. Specifically, Chineseengineering education has been experiencing radical transformation and development over thepast twenty years, especially in
development of achat-bot built on student’s questions and understandings and perceptions of course contentprovides the instructor with a unique look onto the minds of students. With the oversight anddirection of the instructor and with the aid of students a true content specific engineeringartificial intelligence may be created. Through this process we may better understand thecomplex learning process of our students. Page 15.181.12Bibliography1. S. Crown, "Using Web-Based Games to Enhance the Teaching of Engineering Graphics" Proceedings of theIASTED International Conference, Computers and Advanced Technology in Education. Philadelphia, PA. May1999
wide-ranginginterests outside of formal education. But taken together were they liberally educated? 19What is clear is that the provision of additional subjects whether “tool” or “fringe” is noguarantee of liberal education unless instruction and content are designed with the goalsof liberal education in mind. If those goals are taken from such authorities as Arnold,Newman and Pattison then that means that there is a “cultivation of the intellect”, and afocus on the person rather than engineering. The value to engineering follows: it is not aliberal education if it does not create the space for reflective thought through which aperson can construct and reconstruct their identity. Inherent in Williams’s view thatengineering has lost its
ethical project context responsibility g. communicate effectively documentation, competitions, video conferencing h. understand interactions of project context engineering & society i. ability for life-long learning entrepreneurial habits of mind j. knowledge of contemporary issues project context k. use techniques, skills & tools of product design, production system modern engineering design, prototype fabrication & evaluation Figure 4: Matching
AC 2010-1524: LEARNING OUTCOMES ACHIEVEMENT IN COOPERATIVEEDUCATION: A SURVEY OF ENGINEERING STUDENTSJennifer Johrendt, University of Windsor Dr. Johrendt obtained her doctorate in Mechanical Engineering in 2005 from the University of Windsor after working for almost ten years as a Product Development Engineer in the automotive industry. Currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering at the University of Windsor, she previously worked for two years as an Experiential Learning Specialist in the department. She serves as both the Faculty and Departmental Cooperative Education representative. She has co-authored several journal paper publications and conference
client.Ultimately, students will realize at the end of this course that to be an engineering designer onecan not purely be an engineer; they require a creative mindset, the ability to work in a team, theability to think analytically and remain open-minded, an understanding of experiment design andrisk mitigation, and experience with costing. Engineering design is a multidisciplinary process.The identified process is a result of this instructor’s ongoing industrial involvement and wealthof experience in both engineering and business as a design engineer as well as a financialengineer. It is his experience in these areas that has resulted in a Faculty position involving acombination of the two. He also believes in the importance of design and economics
AC 2010-53: TOWARDS DEVELOPING AN ONTOLOGY FOR K-12ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONM. David Burghardt, Hofstra UniversityMichael Hacker, Hofstra University Co-director, Center for Technological LiteracyMarc Devries, University of Technology, DelftAmmeret Rossouw, University of Technology, Delft Page 15.1270.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Toward Developing an Ontology for K-12 Engineering Technology EducationAbstractHofstra University’s Center for Technological Literacy and the University of Technology, Delft,conducted an international research study in the summer of 2009 to identify the most
AC 2010-1634: CONFLICT BEHAVIOR AND ITS INFLUENCE ONENGINEERING DESIGN TEAMSXaver Neumeyer, Northwestern UniversityAnn McKenna, Northwestern University Ann F. McKenna is the Director of Education Improvement in the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University. She also holds a joint appointment as a Professor in the School of Education and Social Policy as well as a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and is the co-Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research (NCEER). She received her BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University and Ph.D. in Science and Mathematics Education from the University of
laboratory for undergraduates. Journal ofEngineering Education, 97(2), 213-222.National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in thenew century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.National Academy of Engineering. (200). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineeringeducation to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National ResearchCouncil. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC:National Academy Press. Page 15.51.10National Research Council Board for Engineering Education. (1995). Engineering education:Designing an adaptive system. Washington DC
AC 2010-770: ASSESSING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ ABILITY TO USE THEMATHEMATICS THEY HAVE LEARNEDMaria Terrell, Cornell University Math Dept.Robert Terrell, Cornell UniversityLisa Schneider, Cornell University Page 15.201.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Assessing Engineering Students’ Ability to Use the Mathematics They Have LearnedAbstractA Mathematics Applications Inventory (MAI) is being developed by engineering andmathematics faculty at Cornell University to assess students’ ability to apply the mathematicsthey learn in freshman calculus to engineering-related problems. This paper reports on threeaspects of this work
processing, pharmaceuticals, andprosthetics. Its specialties such as bionics6 and bioprinting7 are gaining momentum thanks toinnovative neuro-prosthetics, bionic eye or ear development, and tissue and organ engineeringrespectively. On the other hand, another subset, biomaterials is searching for organic substitutesfor engineering materials. Biofuel8 development and bacteria-based energy generation9 areoccupying minds of the many. While DNA computing10 and bioinformatics11 are redefining theinformatics field, biometrics12 is growing deeper in our daily lives. Most importantly we arestarting experience a scientific revolution in our world through bionanotechnology13.For the U.S. to keep its competitiveness in the cutting edge technology arena, its
MS studentsFigure 1. Survey of 18 engineering faculty members at KU. 100% of these professors reportedtheir MS students work in industry and 77% reported their PhD students work in industry.Responsible Conduct of Research in Engineering at KUBeginning in Fall 2007, we have been teaching a 1-credit hour course each Fall in ResponsibleConduct of Research in Engineering which meets for 1 hour each week. Originally created tomeet the needs of Bioengineering graduate students (who are required to take it as part of theirdegree requirements), this course is open to all engineering graduate students. Mindful of thediverse research types and career trajectories of the students, this course includes a variety ofengineering specific topics that are
first semester canbe amplified in the larger team-oriented design experience.V. ConclusionEngineers and scientists face challenges in both complexity and scope of modern problems.Many of the complexities go beyond the purely technical and involve collaboration acrossnational and cultural boundaries5. Likewise, the scope of today’s major technical challengesplaces them in the category of “grand challenges” whose solutions have worldwide implications.Today’s Electrical and Computer Engineering graduates need preparation that respects the globalnature of the profession that awaits them. The challenge of teaching the Electrical and ComputerEngineering curriculum with this in mind has been outlined in this paper. In addition, somestrategies
first semester canbe amplified in the larger team-oriented design experience.V. ConclusionEngineers and scientists face challenges in both complexity and scope of modern problems.Many of the complexities go beyond the purely technical and involve collaboration acrossnational and cultural boundaries5. Likewise, the scope of today’s major technical challengesplaces them in the category of “grand challenges” whose solutions have worldwide implications.Today’s Electrical and Computer Engineering graduates need preparation that respects the globalnature of the profession that awaits them. The challenge of teaching the Electrical and ComputerEngineering curriculum with this in mind has been outlined in this paper. In addition, somestrategies
Embedding LEGO Mindstorms in the Electromechanical Engineering Technology Curriculum Dr . Rathika Rajar avivar ma Depar tment of Computer Engineer ing Technology New Yor k City College of Technology Br ooklyn, NY 11201 Session: First year experience Abstract: The innovative use of LEGO as a tool for learning and exploring has leaped many boundaries. The use of LEGO is projected as a fun learning tool, while keeping the mind and the hands of the user engaged in creative activities. The degree of the diverse level of users captured by LEGO is practically boundless. The LEGO mindstorms is a fun learning tool for
AC 2010-569: HIGH SCHOOL ENTERPRISE: AUTHENTIC ENGINEERINGEXPERIENCES IN SECONDARY EDUCATIONDouglas Oppliger, Michigan Technological UniversityJean Kampe, Michigan Technological UniversityValorie Troesch, Michigan Technological Univeristy Page 15.642.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 High School Enterprise: Authentic Engineering Experiences in Secondary EducationAbstractThe need for more, and better prepared, individuals entering STEM (science, technology,engineering, and math) education is well documented by several organizations.1 High SchoolEnterprise (HSE) is an extra- or in-curricular school activity in which students
, (2005), Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.2 Devon, R., Engel, R., Turner, G. (1998), “The Effects of Spatial Visualization Skill Training on Gender and Retentionin Engineering,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 4: 371-380.3 Dollár, A., Steif, P. S. (2006), “Learning modules for statics,” International Journal of Engineering Education 22(2):381-392. Retrieved from http://www.ijee.dit.ie/ OnlinePapers/Interactive/Statics/Learning-Modules-for-Statics-Dollar-Steif.html4 Huang, M., Gramoll, K. (2004). “Online interactive multimedia for engineering thermodynamics,” Proceedings ofAmerican Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
the type of students entering our College of Engineering and Science; particularly, students appeared to have less self-reliance and low exposure to working with their hands. 3. The National Academy’s reports; “The Engineer of 20209” was of particular interest. 4. A desire to incorporate more hands-on activity while simultaneously increasing the rigor 5. Student retention data that indicated our previous curriculum was not properly preparing our freshman for their future engineering courses 6. Evidence that indicates robotics curricula tend to attract students10With these and other factors in our mind we began piloting various modifications to our existingIntegrated Engineering Curriculum. Our current Living