Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE and IEEE.Richard . Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard Layton is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology. He received a B.S. from California State University, Northridge, and an M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Washington. His areas of scholarship include student teaming, longitudinal studies of engi- neering undergraduates, and data visualization. His teaching practice includes formal cooperative learning and integrating communications, ethics, and teaming across the curriculum. He is a founding developer of the CATME system, a free, web-based system that helps faculty assign students to teams, conduct self
ethics of reverse engineering, and also issues on manufacturing decisions, design forassembly, and how they would communicate their findings to the manufacturer.Biomedical Engineering: Nature’s Graphics Card – Sensory Processing in the Brain (2013)Students worked in teams to dissect earthworms and isolate the animal’s central nerve cord andthen externally stimulated the nerve cord electrically. Through use of oscilloscopes and dataacquisition software, they were able to observe the response and characterize how the nervoussystem transmits signals. In a second activity, students went through several examples of humansensation versus perception, the difference between what information the senses provide andhow that information is stitched together
could potentially benefit the most. Lowachieving students can benefit from co-op experiences especially during difficult job markets 4.Research suggests that industry partners must improve co-op work environments for minoritygroups by improving ethical conditions 14.One of the two most distinguishing characteristics of the engineering population is that it is“disproportionately male” 15. While women persist in undergraduate engineering programs at thesame rate as men, a lower percentage of women pursue engineering careers after graduation andthose who do enter engineering careers are less likely to persist 16. Since students with prior workexperience with an employer report higher levels of interpersonal support from their mentors,and women
Capstone Design Curriculum and the dual degree BS-MS program.Dr. Gregory John KostrzewskyDr. Lin Xiang Sun, Danfoss Turbocor Compressors Vice President of Engineering and Product Development Page 26.538.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Development of Sustained Academia-Industry Partnership ─ A Successful Model and Two Case StudiesAbstractIncreasingly, engineering educators recognize the importance of preparing our students in notonly technical knowledge and skills but also in professional components such as leadership,management, teamwork, ethics
and the Young Masters Program”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 13, Issues 10–11, August–September 2005, pp. 1107-1112.11. Vargas, C.M., “Sustainable development education: Averting or mitigating cultural collision”, International Journal of Educational Development, Volume 20, Issue 5, September 2000, pp. 377-396.12. Lindgreen, A., “Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in Developing and Transitional Countries: Botswana and Malawi”, Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 90, Issue 3 Supplement, December 2009, pp. 429-440.13. Orts, E. and Spigonardo, J. “Special Report: The Pathways to Sustainability in Emerging Economies”, Initiative for Global Environmental Leadership (IGEL), University of Pennsylvania, 2012
humor, and his/her ethics and professional integrity. (11)A new international faculty member can learn from other teaching experiences by attendingteaching workshops. One such workshop, for example, is “Engineering Engineering Education:A Catalyst for Change”. (12) The workshop helps the faculty member gain an ability to redesignhis/her courses such that students become more active, find effective ways to engage students ininteracting with each other, develop a better understanding of teamwork and how it works best,and learn about new assessment tools especially assessing team performance. At anotherteaching workshop "ExCEEd Teaching Workshop" a faculty member can gain skills that allowhim/her to improve ways of communicating with students
humanoids, emotion,teaming, ethics, machine learning, natural language processing, robot control, safety, userinterfaces, user-centered design, social behaviors, the Uncanny Valley, and HRI metrics.Murphy et al. states that one challenge in creating such a course is identifying a cost-effectiverobot and case studies to illustrate these key principles of HRI2.The HRI Young Researcher Workshop was part of the inaugural ACM/IEEE Conference onHuman-Robot Interaction (HRI’06)3. This workshop provided a means for young HRIresearchers to present their current research and provide students with the opportunity to presentwhat they feel are challenges to a career in HRI. This allowed for the formation of collaborativerelationships across disciplines and
Page 26.1621.11 engineering students. Asian Social Science, 7(10), p. 183. [17] Perry, W.G. (1999). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 10
work. Science Education, 90(1), 44-67.[8] Middleton, H. (2013). Representation in the transition from novice to expert architect. Transfer, Transitions and Transformations of Learning (pp. 109-122): Springer.[9] Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The ethical implications of the five-stage skill-acquisition model. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 251-264.[10] Wang, F.-K., & Bonk, C. J. (2001). A design framework for electronic cognitive apprenticeship. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 131-151.[11] Austin, A. E. (2009). Cognitive apprenticeship theory and its implications for doctoral education: A case example from a doctoral program in higher and adult education
. CS1 Calc 2 non-Eng Calc 2 Eng Comp Arch CS CoP Stoc Proc CS Ethics Dynamics TAM CoP MatSE Mech CS Systems Statics Solids MatSE CoP Therm & MechFigure 10: Spread of the randexam system from its
# Semester#or#year#studying#abroad# 0%# 20%# 40%# 60%# 80%# 100%# %"Indica)ng"engagement"in"ac)vity"Figure 8. Results from Senior Survey for Participation in Educational Activities and Service –Question was “Did you participate in any of the following activities?” Developing#a#deep#sense#of#empathy#and#concern#for#others# Developing#a#deep#sense#of#ethics#and#morality# Accep0ng#others#as#they#are# Trying#to#change#things#that#are#unfair#in#the#world# Searching#for#meaning
,implement, and communicate solutions to their problems. This synthesis of skills is a criticallearning outcome of the capstone course, as it provides students with an understanding of thework they will be doing when they graduate.There are a variety resources that describe the topics covered and desired outcomes of capstonedesign courses. Surveys of capstone instructors 1-3 show that instructors teach a wide range ofsubjects, including oral communications, teamwork, project planning, and ethics, among manyother aspects of engineering design. Moreover, the Engineering Profile 4, developed using datafrom both industry practitioners and design faculty, highlights the importance of bothprofessional and technical skills, describing engineering roles
engineering, civil engineering projectmanagement, ethics, and the capstone design course. Class sizes ranged from 12 to 70.The next section summarizes results for each assessment category. We also analyzed results foreach course, but no patterned differences were found.5.2 ResultsThe quantitative assessment measures consistently show improvements in student writing (Table2). Every statistical measure was significant. Below we discuss a few noteworthy aspects of theassessment.Table 2. Summary of Quantitative Assessment Results No. of courses Assessment Category Quantitative Results (and levels)1 Genre Analysis (Field 4 courses
conducted a survey of the 2008 NSF Summit on Globalization during which the topfive competencies were identified. Among these were an appreciation of other cultures, an ability tocommunicate across cultures and in other languages, an ability to work in cross cultural teams and dealwith ethnic and cultural diversity and having an international work/educational experience.6 In additionthe global engineer must have a higher standard of competency in the broad range of electroniccommunication tools over the internet and over a broad range of ethical and professional standards whichincludes a sensitivity to norms other than one’s own country. These attributes among others take on new
University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many
Technological University AJ Hamlin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technolog- ical University, where she teaches first-year engineering courses. Her research interests include engineer- ing ethics, spatial visualization, and educational methods. She is an active member in the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE and is currently serving as the Associate Editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal. Page 26.381.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Comparison of On-line versus Paper Spatial Testing
semester of junior year to allow student to pursue a study-abroad. If studying abroad,IE students take their technical elective courses in their last two semesters of study. Note that ourprogram requires an internship. We included a seminar course in our curriculum before theirinternship where resume writing, interview skills and ethical issues are covered. Freshman Sophmore Junior Senior Intern. Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Intro. Hum
camp with learning blocks creates a totally immersiveand engaging environment for the learner. At the same time, these learning blocks allowfor entrepreneurial concepts to be embedded inherently. The character traits of successfulentrepreneurs, as defined by state school standards, are adaptability, creative thinking,ethical behavior, leadership, positive attitude, and risk-taking.1 These character traits willalso be focused on in terms of outcomes.Mater ials and methodsEntrepreneurship and deeper learning outcomes have been a recent focus of industry andeducation with many new studies outlining how these skill sets can substantially changethe outcomes of students. Research findings demonstrate improved student outcomes,higher levels of
compare students’ metacognitiveresponses with those criteria that leaders in engineering and education have determined arenecessary for a sustained and successful engineering workforce. We have pulled the followingskills from the Engineer of 202014: strong analytical skills, practical ingenuity, creativity,communication, business and management, leadership, high ethical standards, professionalism,dynamism, agility, resilience, flexibility, and lifelong learning. We can see from studentresponses that EPICS has impacted their practical ingenuity, creativity, communication, businessand management, leadership, professionalism, resilience, and flexibility from the followingstudent comments (and others previously listed): ● Practical ingenuity
habits of mind.Engineering habits of mind refer to the values, attitudes, and thinking skills associated withengineering and include systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communication,and an attention to ethical considerations. Wing (2006) also connects computational thinking toengineering thinking, as she defines computational thinking as not simply programming but theoverlap between mathematical thinking and engineering thinking. Likewise, Barr andStephenson (2011) compare computational thinking capabilities across computer science,mathematics, science, social studies, and language arts. For example, learning to implement aparticular algorithm in a computer science context would be analogous to following anexperimental
current professionalgraduate students of a university industrial distribution program, through industrial distributiontrade organizations and online networking or recruitment sites.All potential participants were emailed a link to an online study hosted by Qualtrics. The surveybegan with an introduction explaining that the purpose of the study is to identify genderperceptions related to the trends, challenges, and opportunities for women interested in orcurrently engaged in a career in industrial distribution. All survey questions were anonymouswith an opt-out feature if a respondent did not choose to answer. We received IRB approval priorto running the study, and all respondents were treated ethically. Of the original 293 participants,282
skillset and their entrepreneurial mindset in a year-long, real-world design project.Throughout the curriculum, professional skills such as oral and written communication,innovation, understanding constraints, sustainability, technical feasibility, customer value,societal benefits, economic analysis, and professional ethics are addressed with increasing depthas students develop their skillset.Course Overview The focus of this paper is the sophomore level EGE 2123: Entrepreneurial EngineeringDesign Studio course mentioned above. Specifically, in this course, students identifyopportunities for engineering design themselves within the context of the design theme“Accessibility in the Workplace”. The focus of this theme is to design and build a
, (c.2) An ability to apply realistic constraints within a system, environmental, social, political, ethical, health component, or process design. and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability EAC (d) An ability to function on (d) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams multidisciplinary teams (g.1) An ability to produce written technical reports (g.2.) An ability to present oral reports EAC (g) An ability to communicate effectively (g.3.) An ability to apply graphical
engineering (Seymour et al., 1994). One aspect of the course focuses on theexperiences of women in the field, addressing experiences of sexism and gender discrimination,and the ways in which to promote gender equality in STEM fields. Throughout the second year,Flexus students develop an awareness of self through completing instruments such as theStrengthsQuest for leadership development, beginning to explore information about potentialcareer opportunities and professional development experiences. Other topics include ethics anddiversity within the context of engineering leadership development. The program incorporateslocal engineering-related field trips and visits from speakers, including research presentationsfrom faculty members and/or local women
’ attitudes are changing [11]: “focus on their own agenda” Agree 75% (2015) to 59% (2017) [11]. “behave in ethical manner” Agree 52% (2015) to 65% (2017) [11]. “leaders are committed to helping society” Agree 53% (2015) to 62% (2017) [11]. These trends indicate a decrease in self-centric attitudes and emerging “social optimism[11].” “The latest survey indicate that millennials feel accountable, to at least a fair degree, formany issues in both the workplace and the wider world [8].” This is supported by responses thatindicate that millennials feel more accountable than influential to protect the environment (59%feeling accountable to 38% influence) and social equity (53% feeling accountable to 33%influence) [11]. Like
STEM education: ASHE higher education report,” John Wiley & Sons, 2011.[19] Inroads Organization. (2016.). Home Page. Retrieved from Inroads: http://www.inroads.org/[20] M. Burke, “School-Business Partnerships: Trojan Horse Or Manna from Heaven?” NASSPBulletin, 70(493), 45–49, 1986.[21] C. Veenstra, “The Collaborative Role of Industry in Supporting STEM Education,” Journalfor Quality and Participation, 37(3), 27, 2014.[22] K. Kaufman, “The Company in the Classroom Principals’ Perceptions on How BusinessPartners May Support the Role of High School Education,” NASSP Bulletin, 2015.[23] N. Flynn, “Politics, Economics, and Ethics: Thinking Critically about School-corporateTechnology Partnerships,” University of Minnesota, 2006.[24] C. D'abate
Polit´ecnica de Ingenieria de Gij´on, as well as multiple internships in Manufacturing and Quality Engineering. His current work primarily investigates the effects of select emergent pedagogies upon student and instructor performance and experience at the collegiate level. Other interests include engineering ethics, engineering philosophy, and the intersecting concerns of engineering industry and higher academia.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and
, they are suitable for thecosine similarity algorithm. Lastly, the text-based messages posted by students in their studygroups are analyzed and compared based on the measure of TF-IDF (i.e., term frequency-inverse document frequency). TF-IDF is broadly used by the content-based recommendersystems to compare the similarity between two pieces of textual contents [17-18]. The morefrequently two students use the same set of keywords, the more similar they are considered. Itshould be noted that, in consideration of ethics, the content analysis of group discussions canbe disabled in practice. The instructor is enabled to select whether he/she prefers to place themost similar/different students in the same study group.Figure 7 illustrates the system
from different universities,undeclared first-year students, and a few students in different majors, including students from theSustainable Urban Environments degree program who are required to take this class during theirfirst or second year,The objectives of the Introduction to Civil Engineering course are 1. List the subdisciplines of civil engineering, identify types of projects that engage each, and understand the multidisciplinary nature of most large infrastructure projects; 2. Explain the overall role of civil engineers in design and operation of urban infrastructure, with understanding of the range of typical day-to-day tasks and responsibilities; 3. Discuss the ethical responsibilities of engineers to their
, lack of tolerance, and censorship among academic and publiclibrarians despite the Library Bill of Rights, which was created to guide collection developmentpractices. Harmayer’s study focused on the librarians’ preference of collections related to pro-choice over those representing pro-life. Quinn (2012) has addressed both the psychological andphilosophical reasons for bias. The latter is related to librarian’s commitment to an ethical codewhereas the former can be both conscious and unconscious. The banning and challenging ofbooks and media has also been an act of censorship whereby works on controversial topics areplaced on a list. Implicit behind this explicit and consciously biased selection of books is thecovert bias against target