persistence, goal setting, andresilience. The persistence factors highlighted in this study include students’ motivation andcommitment to their educational goals4.MotivationStudents are motivated to enter and complete engineering programs by a myriad of sources.Parents, teachers, mentors, and even other students provide the kind of guidance and supportneeded to complete an engineering degree program5. Some students require a great deal ofsupport from teachers and mentors, while others persist on limited support or under their ownvolition. In this study, students that are motivated out of “a true sense of choice, a sense offeeling free in doing what [s/he] has chosen to do” are considered dogged6.An important aspect of motivation is found in the
., Leigh-Mack, P., Davy, B., and Wheatland, J., (2004), “Research experience program for undergraduates in a Historically Black College and University.” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Mervis, J. (1998), “Wanted: A better Way to boost number of minority Ph.D.s”, Science, 281, 1268-1270.4. NSF LSAMP Program: http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/hrd/amp.asp5. Jiang, X., Sarin, S., and Williams, M. (2005), “Assessment of NC-LSAMP project: A longitudinal Study”, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR.6. Williams, M., Watson, J., Jiang, X., and Sarin, S., “Preliminary Results of the NC-LSAMP project
this test were surprisingly accurate, considering the simplicity of the setup.Deflection values agreed with the calculated values to within 1 or 2 mm. It should be noted thatthe students did not find this exercise to be completely straight-forward. Because of the nodenumbering scheme, several made mistakes in assembling the system stiffness matrix or applyingthe boundary conditions. However, these errors provided an opportunity for teaching theimportance of checking the reasonableness of the solution. One common error involved placingthe terms of spring 4’s stiffness matrix in the wrong locations in the system matrix (as if spring 4connected nodes 3 and 4 rather than nodes 4 and 5). In this case, the calculated displacement fornode 5 was zero
Education, 94, (1), 87– 101.8. Saad, A. & Zaghloul, A-R.M. (2002). A knowledge visualization tool for teaching and learning computer engineering knowledge, concepts, and skills. Published Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education IEEE Conference, Boston, MA, Session 2TF.9. Clark, D., Reynolds, S., Lemanowski, V., Stiles, T.,Yasar, S., Proctor, S., Lewis, E., Stromfors, C., & Corkins, J. (2008). University students’ conceptualization and interpretation of topographic Maps. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 377-408.10. Branoff, T. J. (1998, June). Coordinate Axes and Mental Rotation Tasks: A Dual-Coding Approach . Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering
, C., Gupta, S., and Pruitt, L. (2006) Undergraduate Students Teaching Children: K-8, Outreach Within the Core Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education National Conference, Chicago. 2. Elton, D., Hanson, J., and Shannon, D. (2006) Soils Magic: Bringing Civil Engineering to the K-12 Classroom. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, April: p125-132. 3. Moskal, B. et al. (2007) K-12 Outreach: Identifying the Broader Impacts of Four Outreach Projects. Journal of Engineering Education, July, p173-189. 4. Jeffers A., Safferman, A., and Safferman, S. (2004) Understanding K-12 Engineering Outreach Programs. Journal of
statement as compared to the competencies statement. Learning objectives will be in the same format and meet the same criteria as competencies, but should be at the same or, more likely, a lower level. Learning objectives reflect what learners must do in an educational setting to achieve a specific related competency. They tell learners what supporting skills, knowledge, and attitudes they will learn; begin with an action verb; and they are measurable and observable13.E. Key: In this field, the competencies are identified by a key. K is used for Knowledge, S is used of skills, G is used for Global and A is used for attitude and behavior
one. It is feltthat this would even further enhance the development of self-reliance that students currentlydevelop during their engineering graphics experience.Bibliography 1. Lotus, M. “Lending a Hand”, ASEE Prism, 2005,14(5), 24-29 2. Berry, C., Brown, C., St.Omer, I., Adams, S. and Smith M., “ A Survey of Teaching Styles and Classroom Techniques to Engage African- American Students in the Engineering Classroom” , Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference 2007, AC2007-2543. 3. McGrath, M., “Bridging the Gap to the Engineer of 2020”, Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference 2007, AC2007-2564. 4. Standards for Technological
. Gray, M. & Daugherty, M. (2004). Factors that influence students to enroll in technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 5-19.5. Karnes, R. & Starkweather, K. (1999). Technology Education in Prospect: Perceptions, Change, and the Survival of the Profession. Journal of Technology Studies, 15(1) 27-28.6. Litowitz, L. S. (1998). Technology education teacher demand and alternative route licensure. The Technology Teacher, 57(5), 23-28.7. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. The National Academies Press. (pp. 47-57).8. National Science Foundation (2006). Extraordinary Women Engineers: Final Report. Grant
brick was to be placed in the water, the number and locationof masts, or the number, magnitude and location of weight(s). Students were told the activitywas to be summarized in a one-page paper, including testing procedure, results, and conclusionsand were allowed thirty minutes for experimental setup, testing, and clean-up. Determination ofstudent comprehension was assessed through both the summary paper, as well as an examquestion. Results showed a high level of understanding, both in the short term, as concludedwith the paper outcomes, as well as long term retention, validated with testing results.Quantitative analysis can easily be incorporated into the program by providing measuringinstruments (rulers, calipers, and a balance) if a more
, L. Baker-Ward, E. Dietz, and P. Mohr, (1993) "A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention I. Success and Failure in the Introductory Course," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 15-21, 1993.House, J., (2000). “Academic Background and Self-Beliefs as Predictors of Student Grade Performance in Science, Engineering and Mathematics," International Journal of Instructional Media, vol. 27, pp. 207-220, 2000.Immekus, J., S. Maller, P.K. Imbrie, N. Wu, P. McDermott, (2005). Work In Progress: An Analysis of Students’ Academic Success and Persistence Using Pre-College Factors” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 2005.Jagacinski, C. and LeBold, W., (1981). “A Comparison of Men and Women
two faculty conducted the study.NASA took the lead in identifying desired capabilities and performance attributes thatwould significantly enhance range capability. The study was funded by MIST and NASAEight Doppler radars with different capabilities and characteristics from three companieswere considered in this study8. Doppler radar capabilities considered were: CW Dopplerradars (The continuous wave (CW) Doppler radar has typical low operation andmaintenance cost), available at X-, C-, and S-bands, Velocity only, Full angle trackingand Direct ranging. The Doppler radars can interface to range data networks throughmost range data formats and have Doppler radar hardware/software upgrades with PCbased and PowerPC architectures. In addition, the
AC 2008-18: A LABORATORY SESSION DEVELOPMENT: STUDY OFMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF PETROLEUM-BASED PLASTIC COMPOSTBAG AND BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC COMPOST BAGSeung Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Spencer Seung Kim is Associate Professor in Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology/Packaging Science Department and works as Associate Director in American Packaging Corp. Center for Packaging Innovation at RIT. His research areas are in composite materials synthesis and characterization. Dr. S. Kim graduated with M.S. (1989) and Ph.D. (1993) from University of Illinois at Chicago.Bok Kim, Div. of Advanced Materials Engineering, Chonbuk National University Dr. Bok H. Kim is Professor
coordinate value shown in column two. Column three is acontinuation of column 1 and column four is continuation of column two. Position dataare dimensionless because they were normalized by diving each entry by the amplitude ofoscillation of the sphere during the tested cycle. That amplitude was taken to be the initialdisplacement of the sphere. The time data were not normalized, however. Page 13.1364.5Table1. A sample of collected dataTime Position Time Position(s) (-) (s) (-) 0 -0.90847 0.37 1 0.017 -0.87254 0.395 0.984692 0.034 -0.85317 0.415 0.930334 0.051 -0.80631
average Nusslet number at location LPr Prandtl numberRa Rayleigh numberRaL Rayligh number at location LT fluid temperature, ºCTı fluid temperature far from the wall, ºCTw wall surface temperature, ºCu x component of the fluid velocity, m/sv y component of the fluid velocity, m/sx distance along surface of heated plate, in or mmy distance away from heated plate, in or mmc thermal diffusivity of the fluid, m2/s volumetric thermal expansion coefficient = 1/T for an ideal gas, K-1 kinematic viscosity of the
industrial advisory boardsand employers of engineering graduates has brought to the forefront that practical know-howmust be integrated into engineering education. It is not enough to be “book smart.” Industrywants engineers who are flexible, savvy and can produce quality results in real world situations.Higher education must find ways to educate engineering students with both practical andtheoretical knowledge to ensure the student’s success.ABET1 has led the charge by instituting learning outcomes for accreditation. Many of theseoutcomes are not technical but are considered “soft skills.” Soft skills include interpersonal,“people” skills. Following ABET’ s lead, higher education is experimenting with methodologiesto address all outcomes, and to
Dyne Inc; Model: PX209-200A5V ̇ Temperature sensors Omega Engineering Inc; Model: TX91A-K2 ̇ Vortex Tube ̇ National Instrument-DAQ card 16 inputs, 16 bits, 200KS/s, Multifunction I/O for USB ̇ Server Host Computer, IP Address: 144.118.69.219 ̇ Client PC downloaded with LabVIEW Runtime Engine ̇ Network IP Camera Toshiba; Model: IK-WB21A ̇ Flow Sensor/Controller Mass Flow controller: FMA 5400/5500 Omega and control valveControl Volume, Energy and Entropy using Vortex TubeA vortex tube (Figure 9) is an instrument that separates a compressed gas supply into streams of
, which provides students the opportunity to apply theirknowledge and skills gained in the previous years of coursework.Bibliography Page 13.210.10 1. Clough , W. The future of engineering education. 2007. Retrieved from http://gtalumni.org/news/magazine/win00/future.html.2. Hoff, A., Barger, M., Gilbert, R., Riggs, R. Workforce development: a critical interaction between high technology industries and academia. Univ. of South Florida, Tampa, FL. 2001. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/7603/20743/00960289.pdf?tp=&isnumber=&arnumber=9602893. Anderson-Rowland, M. R., Blaisdell, S., Fletcher, S., Fussell, P
writing the curriculum, 4) professional development for thestaff, and 5) outside support provided for identifying engineering concepts to include in thecurriculum. Page 12.937.7We believe the integration of elementary engineering elements with the language arts curriculummutually reinforce each other and increase student motivation resulting in higher studentachievement.BibliographyBear, D.R., M. Invernizzi, S. Templeton & F. Johnston. Words Their Way. Linda Ashe Montgomery(ed). New Jersey:Jeffery W. Johnston (2004).Burghart, D.M. & M. Hacker. New York State Curriculum for Advanced Technological Education (2003).Ellery, V. Creating
with appropriate projects and deliverables. We lookforward to reporting on the results of our revised service-learning seminar.BibliographyDuffy, J., Tsang, E., Lord, S., Service-Learning in Engineering: What, Why, and How?Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education.Meadows, L., Jarema, S., An Evaluation of the Impact of a Service-learning Project in a RequiredFirst-Year Engineering Course. Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Conference of American Societyfor Engineering Education.Oakes, W., Duffy, J., Jacobius, W., Linos, P., Lord, S., Schultz, W., Smith, A. Service-Learningin Engineering. Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002.Thompson, M., Oakes, W., Using Service-Learning
mission of OIS advances two objectives of the Strategic Plan: to “[e]nrich student academicexperiences by means of…International and multicultural perspectives” and to “[s]erve as anintellectual and cultural resource for the extended local community [by promoting] to thecommunity academic, cultural, intellectual, and professional programs and service”.The guiding philosophy of the OIS always has been one of immersion. It is not enough forstudents merely to be in a foreign country, participating in what John Dewey derisively called the“spectator theory of knowledge.” They must be engaged with the “Other,” actively andexperientially learning about the culture in which they are studying. The mission of theUniversity, therefore, is an important
. Partial results are presented in the paper and more results will beavailable during presentation in the conference . Page 12.661.6 Figure 1 Observing sites used for wind speed data Page 12.661.7Figure 2. Percentage of time the required wind speed (at least 5 km/hr) availableWind turbines are designed to produce electrical energy as economically as possible.Wind turbines are generally designed to yield maximum output at wind speeds around 15m/s. (i.e. 30 knots or 33 mph). As discussed above, the wind speed has to exceed some cutin wind speed to produce
. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2000.6. Shulman, L. S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14,1986.7. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review,57, 1-22.8. Barkel B and Woolf P., Process Control: A Relevant Approach. Proc ASEE, Chicago, IL, 2006.9. Hamilton S, Brunell L, Tamm G and Arnas O. Peer Review in Engineering Courses as a Learning Tool ProcASEE, Chicago, IL, 2006. Page 12.1485.11
style than a single self rating. Social style researchers have found self-assessments of style todiffer from peer assessments half of the time. [7] Social styles assessments were developed inindustry settings during the 1960’s, and the current peer-assessed format has demonstratedacceptable internal consistency, reliability and evidence of construct validity. [13]Social Style Training in a First-Year Engineering Projects CourseFor the present study, social style training was conducted in the University of Colorado at Page 12.708.4Boulder’s First-Year Engineering Projects (FYEP) course, a large, multi-section, team-based,engineering design
semiconductor manufacturers.CAN is the basis of several sensor buses such as Devicenet, CANopen, J1939, and SmartDistributed System.CAN uses a twisted pair cable to communicate up to 40m at speeds 1Mbit/s without repeaters,and up to 1 km at 20 kbps speed. It can support up to 40 devices. CAN uses CSMA busarbitration. The CAN protocol, which corresponds to the data link and physical layers in theISO/OSI reference model [1], meets the real-time requirements of automotive applications.CAN data packets are 8 bytes long and use 11-bit packet identifier. A second version of CANcan support 29 bit identifier.Each CAN data frame consists of seven different bit fields shown in Figure 1. A data framebegins with the start-of-frame (SOF) bit. It is followed by an
With Emotional Intelligence, Daniel Goleman, Bantam Books, 2000, ISBN:0-553- 37858-9 Page 12.889.10 10. The Goal, Eliyahu M. Goldratt & Jeff Cox, The North River Press 11. Critical Chain, Eliyahu M. Goldratt, The North River Press, 1997, ISBN: 0-88427-153-6 12. Lean Thinking, James P. Womack and Daniel T. Jones, The Free Press, 2003, ISBN: 0-7432- 4927-5 13. Strategy Maps, Robert S. Kaplan, David P. Norton, HBS Press, 2004, ISBN: 1-59139-134-2 14. Sanghi, S & Jones, M. (2006). Driving Excellence: How the Aggregate System Turned Microchip Technology from a Failing Company to a Market Leader, page
, as Bruner arguesthere is a serious lack of emphasis on the process between the stimulus (S) and the Page 12.203.11behaviour (B) in the behaviourist paradigm 17.On examination of the research data, it is evident that the experimental group engaged ina more effective learning experience and demonstrated significantly higher performanceson the acquisition of knowledge, transformation, and manipulation of information, andapplication and demonstration of understanding.References 1. Pink, Daniel. (2005) A whole new mind: How to thrive in the new conceptual age, New York, River head Books. 2. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality
Kerns, Bradley University Dan Kerns hold BS and MS degrees in Speech Communication from Indisna State University and a PhD in Radio and Television Communication from Norther Illinois University. He has been a speech coach for the IMET Department's capstone design course for the past 17 yers. Page 12.888.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Industry Based Capstone Design Projects: You Can’t Sell the Solution If You Can’t CommunicateAbstractIndustry-based capstone design projects have been used by Industrial Engineering departmentssince the 1960’s. The format for the project
distribution in non-prismatic beams and comparison of their Strength to Weight Ratio with the prismatic beams,2. To create an opportunity for collaborative research and design efforts between undergraduate Page 12.385.2 engineering student(s) and faculty, Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineering Education3. To design and produce a cost-effective, reproducible apparatus with outstanding features.4. To incorporate (optional) use of ANSYS for comparison of the measured and calculated results,5. To make all
numerous prerequisite courses identifyareas of weakness and develop ways to eliminate them as they strive to prepare their students toachieve excellence in all 17 Program Outcomes. In essence, using embedded indicators as adirect assessment of student learning can feed into the assessment of an entire engineeringprogram, as discussed in “A Technique for Program-Wide Direct Assessment of StudentPerformance”.7Bibliography1. Meyer, K., Morris, M., Estes, A., Ressler, S., “How to Kill Two Birds with One Stone-Assigning Grades and Assessing Program Goals at the Same Time,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, June 2005.2. Keith, B., LeBoeuf, J., Meese, M
case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting a Learning-by-Designcurriculum into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-548.7. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1997). Scienceachievement in the primary school years: IEA’s third international mathematics and science study. Chestnut Hill,MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.8. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrostowski, S. J., et al. (2000).TIMSS 1999 international science report: Findings from IEA’s repeat of the third international mathematics andscience study at the eighth grade. Chestnut