their effect on the vehicle is a major concern 11.Although perceived by many as a natural or inherent understanding, engineering ethics must betaught. Typical issues which aircraft design students should be required to addresses in opendiscussions in the classroom include: "How safe is !Safe Enough ?" "If it is not practical orpossible to design for zero accidents, then how many fatalities are acceptable?"; "Should wedesign and operate aircraft which carry 1,000+ passengers in spite of the potential for large lossof life should one of them crash?". Although rhetorical in nature these questions serve tostimulate critical thinking. COURSE STRUCTUREAt Western Michigan University AE 469 Airplane Design is a three
similar courses7. In our course,local professionals presented lessons and exercises on various topics including ethics, Page 15.283.3professional licensure, leadership, communication, and project management. Course contentfocused on topics emphasized in two textbooks on project management 8,9.In addition to participating in discussions with practitioners and completing supplementalassignments, the students in our professional practice course completed a Statement ofQualifications (SOQ) for a local engineering project. The students worked in teams of four tosix students during the entire quarter to complete a written SOQ document. At the end of
largepart, the story of failures, both imminent and actual, and of the changes to designs, standards andprocedures made as the result of timely interventions or forensic analyses. In addition totechnical issues, concepts such as professional and ethical responsibility are highlighted byfailure cases. Pilot studies have been carried out over several semesters to assess the use offailure case studies in civil engineering and engineering mechanics courses at Cleveland StateUniversity under an earlier NSF project. Student learning has been assessed through surveys aswell as focus groups, led by researchers from the Cleveland State University College ofEducation and Human Services. Students were asked specifically about the technical lessonslearned, as
ethics, as well asteam workers who communicate well with others for environmentally friendly and sustainable design.creative problem solving. (Burghardt, 1999) Students conduct two projects during the semesterFundamental abilities underlying creativity include that illustrate the basic concepts and materialsprofessional knowledge about engineering design, required of civil and environmental engineering.responsibility, good teamwork, high ethicalstandards, and lifelong study. Many universities havedeveloped generic introductory courses designed to 2. CONTENTS AND PRACTICAL EXERCISEfoster creativity. However, courses that are nottailored to the
suggested by NAE with the assumption that ASCE’s recommendations are included in this combination. For comparison, two sample undergraduate civil engineering curricula are shown from the top undergraduate engineering programs according to the 2004 US News and World. The authors do not endorse this ranking system, but merely use it for illustration purposes. The authors also took the liberty of assigning named courses to various ABET/NAE skills which may be controversial given our significant lack of knowledge of the details of each program. We recognize that some of the skills may be obtained in a variety of courses that cannot be interpreted from the name of the course e.g. ethics may be incorporated in design courses. In addition
and values inScience, Technology and Society (STS) approaches. In fact, those aspects motivate individualsand societies to define actions, rules, ethical codes and moral procedures that legitimate actionsand achievements in all areas. Then, it is necessary to put those subjects together witheconomical aspects (such as competitiveness, productivity, and profitableness), social issues(such as unemployment, social mobility, and poverty), environmental questions (such as Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 9.25.3 Copyright © 2004, American Society for
opportunity to work on construction research projects, 2. emphasize the importance of graduate education and research, 3. expose participants to the challenges facing the construction industry, and 4. provide participants with training in ethics in the construction industry. Page 7.1223.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education3.0 Program DesignThe REU summer program is designed to span a ten-week period. The program is comprised oftwo main components: Research and Professional Development. The
become adying breed. And so, the clever engineer seeking an advanced degree looks elsewhere…usuallyin the direction of an institution offering an MBA. The degree is no longer unique to businessmajors; it is readily available to engineering majors. But, what is so special about the MBAmystique that it now belongs solely in the domain of the business schools? Surely, we engineersin education could do at least as good a job as our business educator counterparts…or perhapseven better. After all, ABET requires that engineering programs include some of the materialoffered in a typical MBA program, e.g., statistics, ethics, etc. This leads to the main thesis of thepaper: engineering educators can provide programs and could very well better prepare
and aid in data-driven decision-making.Implications: The study findings depict the current usage of AI tools in project management andsuggest opportunities to update project management curricula to include AI-focused content,practical applications, and ethical considerations of AI. Educators are recommended to providehands-on experiences with AI tools, aligning academic teachings with current industry practices.This alignment is essential for preparing engineering graduates to meet the demands of aworkplace increasingly reliant on AI.Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, AI, ChatGPT, Project Management, Engineering Education,STEM Education, Chatbots, Industry Trends, Curriculum Development, AI Integration1. Introduction1.1 Evolution of
.• Roundtables with the Program Chairs – Students were assigned to two breakout groups of 20 minutes each: one to meet with the Chair or faculty representative from the student’s intended major, plus one other major.• Ethics Game – A Jeopardy-like game was created that required students to look up answers in codes of ethics such as the one provided by NSPE for engineers [20] or by the ACM for computer scientists [21].• Effective Communication – Written and oral communication activities were included throughout the course, including: o Written Communications – K’Nex instructions. One half of the class was given “Kit A” with 6 K’Nex pieces, while the other half of the class was given “Kit B” with 6 different
, such as writing, coding, orsolving problems. Thus, education must evolve to teach students how to use this tool effectivelyand evaluate the quality of its work. Educators should aim to incorporate AI into their classroomsin ways that help students develop these skills so that students will be better prepared tocontribute to society in the future 3 .However, there are concerns about ethical implications relating to the grey areas of AI, such asprivacy, bias, and accountability 4 . Applied specifically to education, AI’s integration riskscreating an over-reliance on external tools, potentially hindering students’ ability to recall andapply knowledge independently. Educators have also raised concerns about the potential for“academically dishonest
for engineering graduates: Recent trends in higher education AbstractThe research paper discusses how higher education has responded to the existing gap betweenemployers’ expectations and qualifications of recent college graduates in professional skillsreported by national surveys of employers. During the last decade, the National Association ofColleges and Employers has been reporting that less than 50% of employers evaluate collegegraduates as proficient in the competencies such as professionalism/work ethic, oral/writtencommunications, teamwork/collaboration, leadership, and other related skills.The paper presents a two-fold analysis of Engineering
Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering (IMSE) Day held at thecampus of the XXXXXXXXXX during the days of the 24th and 25th of April. The focus of theseminars was to continue with the offering a series of professional development sessions toaddress key issues currently debated and discussed in the Green Energy Manufacturing field.The majority of the planned workshops were directed to address important topics and problemsrelated to green manufacturing education as well as the current leadership directions in preparing21st century technology-savvy workforce and leaders. Six workshops were conducted, wherein,three were geared towards engineering ethics and technical leadership and the other three werebased on Green Manufacturing and energy
68 66URM = under-represented minorities; Hispanics, Black, Native AmericanThe learning goals for the course were intended to enable students to describe civil engineering,apply engineering ethics, and understand sustainability. Although not an explicit learning goal,some global issues were introduced in the course. Table 2 shows the course components from2010 that included global issues; similar elements were also present in 2009. In 2008 and 2006the course did not include the sustainability module. In 2007 the course had a different instructorand the content may have deviated significantly from what is shown. The guest speakers whorepresented various sub-disciplines within civil engineering were not prompted to include globalissues
; conduct experiments in more than onetechnical area of civil engineering and analyze and interpret the resulting data; analyze and solve well-defined problems in at least four technical areas appropriate to civil engineering; design a system,component, or process in more than one civil engineering context; apply principles of sustainability indesign; apply principles of project management; explain basic concepts in business, public policy, andleadership; analyze issues in professional ethics; and explain the importance of professional licensure.2. FacultyThe program must demonstrate that faculty teaching courses that are primarily design in content arequalified to teach the subject matter by virtue of professional licensure, or by education and
Effects of ChatGPT on Student Learning in Programming CoursesAbstract:One of the latest developments impacting computer science education is the availability ofhigh-quality generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) tools like ChatGPT. These tools provide arange of functionalities, such as code creation, debugging assistance, and optimization. From thestudents' perspective, these systems can be virtual tutoring aids that complement the learningprocess. From the educators’ perspective, the availability of AI tools necessitates adjustments tothe course material and raises ethical concerns, primarily related to the potential for codeplagiarism. Rather than disregarding or imposing prohibitive restrictions on these
programs. This work (which was inspired by my own experiences as a graduate student in astronomy) built upon my background in physics education research from my undergraduate days, when I began working as a Learning Assistant (LA) with Dr. Chandra Turpen. My experience as an LA introduced me to PER, and gave me the opportunity to get involved in curriculum design and research as an undergraduate. After my PhD, I returned to Dr. Turpen’s group as a postdoctoral researcher, and have since redirected my focus to the study of ethics and institutional change in STEM higher education.David Tomblin (Director/Senior Lecturer) UMD College ParkAmol Agrawal Amol Agrawal is an undergraduate student at the University of Maryland
student, she focuses on the intersection of Responsible AI, public narratives, policy, and ethics. Her research interests revolve around public trust in AI systems, technology co-design practices with end-users and interdisciplinary approaches to AI literacy. Critical and feminist approaches to science and technology studies inspire her investigative stance. Leslie holds certifications in AI Ethics (LSE), Responsible AI and Human Rights (University of Montreal-MILA), and AI Policy (CADIP). As a consultant for a Global Partnership in AI project, Leslie contributed to research on equality and inclusion within the AI ecosystem. As an educator, she is interested in encouraging critical conversations on technology and
internationalengineering education have published studies of effective programs[2]–[4] and proposed principles of global engineering competency[5]–[7], which includes intercultural communication, reflection onprofessional ethics in a global context, and increasingly, virtual teamskills. The existing literature can inform a new paradigm: globalizingengineering curricula to incorporate analysis of cultural differencewith an explicit equity framework and analysis of power that reckonswith legacies of colonialism and racism.[SLIDE 3]We will be using a live interactive “whiteboard,”starting with the “Quick Poll” questions section. Thisfeature allows for more immediate social feedbackand interaction while also permitting audiencemembers’ anonymity if they wish. (Their
attention inthe business and public sphere with the release of models like ChatGPT [4] and DALL-E [5],robust applications within the field of engineering education remain are still emerging [6]. Aspart of the recent popularity of large language models (LLM) there have been increasingconcerns about the ethical ramifications in educational and industry settings. In their analysis ofthe practical ethical dangers of ChatGPT Zhuo et al. [7] outline areas of concern for LLMs as agroup; the risk inherent in small models propagating with increased scale, potential biases withinmodel training data, and the ballooning size of LLMs computational requirements. Theseconcerns limit the number of practitioners that are willing to adopt ML, NN, or LLM tools
the capacity of K-12 teachers to teach engineer- ing. She is also staffing the Roundtable on Linking Academic Engineering Research and Defense Basic Science. She also co-edited a resource collection translating research on women in science and engineer- ing into practical tips for faculty members and worked on LinkEngineering, an online toolkit to support PreK-12 engineering education, and the Online Ethics Center, a website that supports ethics education and science and engineering. She earned M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Cognitive and Human Factors Psychology from Kansas State University and a B.A. in psychobiology and political science from Wheaton College in Massachusetts.Dr. Beth M Holloway, Purdue University at
served as Program Chair, Associate Chair or Major Chair. The alumnigraduation year ranged from 1971 to 2019. These alumni are currently participating in diversecareers, including entrepreneurship, as employees of engineering firms, academia, graduatestudies, business analysis and management consulting, pharmaceutical science and law.Data Collection and AnalysisData was collected through semi-structured interviews with faculty members and alumni. Thestudy protocol was approved by the appropriate university research ethics board. The interviewswere conducted on Zoom, due in part to the Covid-19 Pandemic, and were subsequentlytranscribed by the research team. The faculty interviews were analyzed using open coding; codeswere developed based on
fruitful user experience [2], ethics and scrutiny on socialeffects [3], and communication and collaboration skills [4]. This initiative, a straightforwardreading assignment, reaching outside the obvious subject matter, fits into none of those categories.This paper suggests the benefits that it can confer in an introductory computing course.The SceneThe Computer Science First-Year Seminar (FYS) is one of about 60 such seminars acrosscampus. The university studies (general education) program requires incoming freshmen andother first-year students to take one from this selection of seminars on different subjects, notnecessariy in their major field if they are among the few who have chosen a major already. Theunderlying FYS goal, teaching these high
) have been experimenting with newapproaches to 102 teaching. We have been coupling into 102 some broaderaspects of the engineer's life and work which we call engineering pro-fessionalism. While teaching 102 we have emphasized the importance of asolid mathematical background [2] and a grounding in the fundamental con-cepts of electrical engineering. However, we have also plunged into suchtopics as the societal impact of many ethical decisions, the importanceof developing communications skills, the effects of technological abso-lescence, the impact of inflation on engineering salaries, and unemploy-ment [1], [3]. In Spring Quarter 1981, the different sections of 102 were taughtwith the instructors presenting a course based on the dual
strategies. Since the use of UORs extendsbeyond engineering programs, this study may be of interest to other academic disciplines as well.Possible future work stemming from this study includes a future iteration of the survey in whichboth the student and instructor samples would be taken in a way that produces collections ofrespondents more likely to be representative of their respective populations.References [1] T. J. Ryan, C. Janeiro, and W. E. Howard, “Perception of academic integrity among students and faculty: A comparison of the ethical gray area,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.25878. [2] W. J. Bowers, Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau
values commitments. From where we sit in 2018, wehave the opportunity to incorporate lessons learned from past efforts, to use the most effectivecurricula and pedagogy, and fight for the values we hold dear. The alt-right is trying to instillvalues of hate in our students, values that run contrary to those of our institutions and ourprofession. We need to band together and say Not in Our Town, Not on Our Campus. 20Review of Arguments for Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice in EngineeringAt their core, arguments supporting diversity, inclusion, and social justice are ethical arguments;they contain a moral “ought,” and articulate an aspirational state for which we strive. Somearguments are made from appeals to enduring principles like
academic and popular press about robots on ourroads, in the skies, in our offices, restaurants, factories, and more. Robotics and automation playan increasing role in the lives of ordinary people. New developments in robotics raise a varietyof social, economic, and ethical questions.As consumers, workers, leaders, and citizens, we all are involved in some way in the decisions toaccept, reject, or choose between new technologies. Most universities have recognized the needfor a science and technology literate citizenry and have incorporated a requirement into theundergraduate curriculum that seeks to motivate students to be inquisitive about the broaderimplications of science and technology and to provide them with the tools to analyze theadvantages
engineeringResearch suggests engineering-based instruction can boost student interest/achievement in S,T, M, but such “integrated” teaching and learning requires time and new pedagogy NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING Emerging Consensus on the “Big Ideas” in PreK-12 EngDesign Process • Constraints and specifications • Modeling • Analysis • Optimization and trade-offs • System(s)Connections to S,T, and MHabits of Mind • systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communication, attention to ethical considerations NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING Positive Trends/Forces of NoteBroadening interest in more “integrated” forms of STEAM in both K-12 and in UG (e.g., +CS
financial data and understand how funds are allocated and budgets are createdvi. Consider the ethical dimensions of educational leadershipvii. Identify the conditions—both individual and institutional—that increase opportunities for professional development and personal transformationviii. Function as an effective change agent Leadership Training offered by Harvard College of Education for Higher Ed.1. Inner Strengths of Successful Leaders2. Performance Assessment in Higher Education3. Performance Assessment Leaders and Managers4. Crisis Leadership in Higher Education5. Institute for Management and Leadership in Education (MLE)6. Institute for Educational Management (IEM
and based on active learning activities. More recently, she started work on engineering education research that aims to effectively incorporate socio-technical thinking in required technical courses. Her discipline research is focused on the production of stabilized biosolids, its use as a fertilizer and its impact on environmental pollution concerning organic contaminants. She recently has started work on Amazonic mercury contamination due to illegal mining.Dr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology