developing knowledge and defining theory [1]. However, engineeringeducation researchers must reach a wide range of engineering domains and programs in order towholly succeed at improving engineering education. Thus, expanding the EER community is agrowing mission for academia and organizations such as the National Science Foundation.Although funding opportunities like the NSF’s Professional Formation of Engineers: ResearchInitiation in Engineering Formation (NSF PFE: RIEF) grant provide an opportunity for facultyinterested in conducting EER, overall awareness of EER remains limited thus restricts theexpansion of research and community [2].Recent research indicates that unfamiliarity with qualitative methods and theoretical frameworksare barriers of
facilitated wound closure techniques (e.g., suturing, etc.) on resultant scarring. She is currently a contributing research member of the Renaissance Foundry Research Group.Dr. Robby Sanders, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Robby Sanders is an Associate Professor at Tennessee Technological University (TTU) in the Depart- ment of Chemical Engineering. He obtained his Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering from TTU in 1995, and he obtained his Master’s degree and his PhD in Biomedical Engineering from Vander- bilt University in 1998 and 2001, respectively. His research efforts address 1) innovation-driven learning with a focus on student learning at disciplinary interfaces, 2) clinical diagnostics and
. Asian males were the only group overrepresented among FASEstudents and underrepresented among FASE returners. To build off of these descriptive statisticsof FASE undergraduates, we recommended future research and interventions based on CriticalRace Theory (CRT) to lead to greater equity in engineering graduation rates.Introduction The National Student Clearinghouse Research Center recently reported the smallestincrease of 0.3 percentage points in six-year college completion rates [1]. Of those who started ina 4-year public US institution, 67.4% completed that degree in six years [1]. The percentagepoint gap between Black and White students in four-year public institutions narrowed slightlyfrom 25 to 23 percentage points from 2019 to 2020
ofEngineering and Applied Science at Binghamton University have been asked to complete a two-question survey in the first week of classes regarding their intended engineering major. The two,multiple choice questions are: (1) what is your intended engineering major? (2) how sure are youof your decision? Responses have shown that between a third and a half of the 1st-yearengineering students express some uncertainty in their intended choice of engineering major,indicating that they are either very unsure, unsure, or neither sure nor unsure of the strength oftheir engineering major interest.Out of programs that offer a combined 1st-year experience for engineering students, many do notrequire that students declare their major until the end of the first
University (MSU) works towardsthis goal is through accreditation of its Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) programwith ABET. To maintain accreditation, the program must define outcomes, assess thoseoutcomes, evaluate how well those outcomes are being attained, and finally, continuouslyimprove the program. To satisfy ABET defined Criteria for Accrediting EngineeringTechnology Programs, 2019-2020 the MSU MET program has adopted student outcomes listedas #1 through #7. The focus of this work is Student Outcome #6: “An ability to conduct standardtests, measurements, and experiments and to analyze and interpret the results to improveprocesses.” This outcome was noted in prior assessment activities at MSU as an area forimprovement. For assessment
this study was to understand how an integrated teaching model (e.g., science,engineering, and mathematics) influenced 5th-grade students' perceptions of their mathematicsand engineering abilities. We sought to answer the following research question using a sequentialmixed methods research design: how do 5th-grade students' mathematics and engineeringself-efficacy and instrumentality for abstract mathematics concepts change because of anintegrated teaching experience?We utilized self-efficacy [1] and perceived usefulness [2] frameworks to explore how studentsdevelop their perceived abilities and usefulness of mathematics through integrated instruction.Seventeen students from a Title-I elementary school worked in teams to design solutions
group that used GrandChallenges for Engineering to create altruistic framing that highlights the impacts of engineeringon society and our everyday lives. Students from the same region as the traditional STEMprogram were recruited for this new summer camp program called Tomorrow’s CommunityInnovators. We compared the impacts of the traditional STEM program to the camp withaltruistic framing to explore how they impacted students’ attitudes towards engineering andperceptions of the field.Engineering is a widely misunderstood field. It is often perceived as a field for those who preferisolation, value individual accomplishments, and have little interest outside of math and science.[1] [2] The reality is that engineers work collaboratively to solve
-granting, Title IV-eligible institutions for higher education, and they enroll approximately30 percent of all undergraduates in the United States [1]. However, in 2018, only 3 percent of allfederal obligations for science and engineering research and development provided to institutionsof higher education was distributed to MSIs. Two agencies that tend to provide most of theresearch funding, the National Institute for Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation(NSF), awarded 2 percent and 6 percent of their research funding to MSIs in 2018 [2]. Federalfunding agencies, such as the NSF, have recognized the need to diversify their fundingportfolios to increase the engagement of under-participating institutions, including MSIs. Withthis in mind
talent by both industry and government entities. The workof talented inventors, engineers and scientists of the past have permitted the United States to bethe first country to have a piloted, powered, heavier-than-air machine to achieve controlled,sustained flight; break the sound barrier with an aircraft; land rovers on Mars; and land a man onthe moon [1]. As we move into the third decade of the 21st century, we approach a time wherethere will be a shortfall of engineering talent in industry due in part to the large number of pendingretirements by those in the Baby Boom generation [2].To address this issue, there have been efforts to recruit students into the engineering professionand increase the talent pool [3] and provide students industry
one andprovides further evidence to the student of the meeting’s importance.At the end of the semester, they turn in a final written report and a final presentation which isevaluated by several faculty members from the department.IntroductionIn order to engage today’s students who are always on mobile devices, new models andapproaches to teaching and learning are needed from the educators. There are two types ofgames: fun games and serious games. One approach which has been successful is using seriousgames. Serious games are different from fun games in that they have a serious purpose that iscombined with the entertainment aspect [1]. Game based learning is increasingly being used ineducational settings and is widely predicted to become
in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His research interests are engineering students beliefs about knowledge and education and how those beliefs interact with the engineering education experience. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Gender and Human Imagery in the Halls of a BME DepartmentColleges and universities struggle with the numerical representation of women in engineeringdepartments as well as the often chilly climates found therein [1]. Studies of women inengineering academic environments mostly focus on human components of the environment,such as the experiences of women
instructors with recent findings to discuss the role of women in constructionnowadays.IntroductionThe construction sector is one of the largest contributors to the United States’ gross domesticproduct (GDP), with 4.2% of the total GDP [1]. Though the construction industry employs closeto 11 million people [2], it still faces a shortage of workers due to increased demand for newprojects and a reduced number of skilled workers [3]. Despite employing millions of workers, itremains a male-dominated industry, with women accounting for roughly 10.9% of workers inconstruction [2]. And in the case of construction managers, that number is even lower, at 8.4%[4]. Though economic and societal changes have helped to increase women’s participation in theworkforce
men opt for technology [1]. Within different fields, thesegregation shows as differences in occupations, wages, and career paths. Research hasshown that the careers of women and men diverge upon labor market entry and continue todiverge along the career [2]. Much of the divergence reflects the horizontal segregation ineducational choices, but also the career paths of women and men with the same educationalbackground differ in many respects. This vertical segregation has not been studiedextensively in Finland. Understanding the gender differences is necessary to design effectivemeasures to reduce the vertical segregation and promote equality in the engineeringprofession.Horizontal and vertical gender segregationAll over the world, women and
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Gendered Elective Track Choice in Engineering Undergraduate Education: Antecedents and Career Path ImplicationsIntroduction With support from the NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) Program,this Institutional and Community Transformation project aims to serve the national interest ofbroadening participation by improving the representation of women in more technically-orientedroles and career paths within engineering. Research has shown that women who pursueengineering careers are more likely than their male counterparts to be in less technical roles andcareers paths, and these gendered career patterns increase attrition risk for female engineers [1-3]. This project
whilemanaging the underlying tension between their care and responsibility-oriented moral stance andthe combat-related course contents.Theoretical FrameworkSocial Constructivist Learning Theories Constructivist theory of learning has been the most influential theory of learning ineducational research over the past four decades. In particular, social constructivism (orsociocultural approaches to learning), derived from the work of Vygotsky, locates cognition andlearning in the sociocultural context and interactions with others, rather than primarily within theindividual mind. Social constructivists make it clear that “we actively realize and changeourselves in the varied contexts of culture and history” (p.131) [1]. Educational researchers
. Students are given 1 week to complete the activity which can be asynchronously. Foreach of the 5 weeks the student team also worked on group assignments. Models and templatesof the group assignments were created to help the student teams respond to the open-endeddesign process. The culminating activity for the team was to create a video presentationdescribing their healthcare innovation and the supporting research collected during the program.IRB approval was obtained, and subject informed consent was requested as a prerequisite toparticipation in this study. A global competency survey regarding “Cross-CulturalCollaboration” was requested from each participating student at the beginning and end of theprogram. Students were invited to participate
ECP project, where ECP isbeing utilized across seven STEM disciplines. The term ECP originates from the Mobile StudioProject (NSF CCLI #0717832) which was originally developed by Rensselaer PolytechnicInstitute to increase students’ motivation and achievement in electrical engineering. The ECP,through generous NSF funding, has been successfully implemented and assessed in the electricalengineering departments at 13 HBCUs [1]. Faculty (95%) stated that students were moremotivated and had higher engagement with course content [1]. One of the current ECP projectobjectives is to organize workshops whereby STEM faculty in biology, chemistry, physics, civilengineering, computer science, industrial engineering and transportation systems will learn
the measures that U.S.higher education institutions are taking. This paper will present data specific to engineeringstudents, engineering student mobility in the U.S., and how leveraging the consortium modelenables institutions to quickly pivot when institutions open their doors to student mobility.Student Mobility DataInternational (non-U.S.) StudentsThe United States saw an increase of over 80 percent of International Students studying in theUnited States from 2006 to 2016. Data also shows that student appetite for study abroad inEngineering continues to grow. According to IIE’s Open Doors, specific to InternationalStudents studying in the U.S., Engineering leads in field of study [1] and 52% of all internationalstudents come to the U.S. to
, industry feedback, and the challenges involved during the process indetail from the engineering technology perspective. It also includes discussion on the twodifferent tracks for earning the MSET degree with a flexible selection for the research focus area.This paper will add value to the technology programs planning to develop a new MEROcurriculum in the future.1. IntroductionThe US Department of Labor projects an increase in the number of engineers in the USA from1.68 million to 1.82 million by 2026 [1]. The fastest-growing demands are in Data Science andMachine Learning, and Mechatronics and Robotics. The term ‘Mechatronics’ is expanding itshorizon due to the current digital disruptions in industrial automation. Starting with a concept
, an international online community helping provide resources to promote graduate student welfare.Dr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue University at West Lafayette Greg J. Strimel, Ph.D., is an assistant professor of Technology Leadership and Innovation and coordi- nator of the Design & Innovation Minor at Purdue University. Dr. Strimel conducts research on design pedagogy, cognition, and assessment as well as the preparation of K-12 engineering teachers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Graduate Student Wellness and Experiences as Told Through Instagram Liesl Krause1 and Dr. Greg Strimel1 1 Purdue University, Polytechnic
-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these in- stitutions. Specifically, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical transitions in education and career pathways, and (3) design as central to educa- tional and global change. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Graduate Student Perceptions of an Ideal Mentor in Engineering and Computing at a Minority Serving Institution: Preliminary ResultsAbstractReports from the National Academies and Council of Graduate Schools suggest that
activities, provides students with opportunities to developskills such as critical thinking, problem solving, and teamwork [1] [2]. Incorporating hands-onlearning into the classroom environment involves several challenges including the design of theactivities, building and setup of equipment, and reallocation of limited contact hours. Whilechallenges exist for in-class hands-on learning, further hurdles, such as access to materials andactivity scaffolding, are presented when adapting hands-on learning for remote course delivery.This paper describes the process of designing a series of remote hands-on activities, called Handson Learning Days (HOLD), for an Introduction to Statics course based on materials that studentshave in their residences
. TheBachelor of Science in Computer Science program was one of the first Bachelor of Scienceprograms implemented at UVU in 1993.IntroductionAccording to Wikipedia, haptics refers to any form of interaction involving touch. Haptics refersto working with the sense of touch. Haptic technology refers to any technology that can createan experience of touch by applying forces, vibrations, or motions to the user [1].Haptics is the science of applying touch sensation and control to interaction with computerapplications. By using special input/output devices (joysticks, data gloves, or other devices),users can receive feedback from computer applications in the form of felt sensations in the handor other parts of the body. Several researchers have already
“engineering design challengeswithin classroom makerspaces as a means to improve the inclusion of women andunderrepresented minorities in pre-college engineering and design learning” (pg. 1) using aninterest-based framework. This, and literature like it, demonstrates the considerable efforttowards broadening participation in engineering starting at the pre-college level. Although teachers, principals, counselors and others are critical in enacting efforts tobroaden participation in engineering, less research has focused on this perspective. Literature isnot void in this area though, much research has focused on teacher and school counselor’s beliefsabout teaching engineering (Ming-Chien Hsu et al., 2011), and teacher engineering self-efficacy
one sability to contribute to the level of their talent is an ethical and professional responsibility to thefield.This paper shares some early results from our broader NSF-funded project, titled Identif ingMarginalization and Allying Tendencies to Transform Engineering Relationships, or I-MATTER. The project s research questions are: 1. What does marginalization look like within engineering classrooms where teamwork is a primary feature? 2. How is marginalization legible (or not) to instructors at the classroom level? 3. What are the different ways that instructors respond to incidents of peer-to-peer marginalization? 4. How might the lessons of this work be implemented to systematically alert instructors when
), from three different introductory courses: 1. A hands-on section focused on naval architecture, involving physically building a vehicle, and framed as a competition (students S1 and S2) 2. A hands-on section, focused on food science and chemical engineering (student S3) 3. A research-based section with no hands-on component, focused on biomedical engineering and materials (students S4 and S5)Data Analysis: Codebook DevelopmentFirst, the transcripts were coded by two researchers using open coding, in which key themeswere identified. Next, the transcripts were coded by the whole research team, at which pointsome codes were expanded or reworked. After this, the research team realized that the codes fellinto three categories, each
Research Assistants. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 How well can Makerspaces build an Entrepreneurial Mindset?1. IntroductionIn this paper, we explore if makerspaces can contribute to student development of anentrepreneurial mindset. Makerspaces take prior implementations of hands-on engineering, suchas machine and wood shops, and push a step further to have complete digital tools available toassist with the common goal of creating a final product or solving problems. Often integratedthrough coursework, students usually have access to tools and a maker community both in andout of the classroom. They also allows students to unleash creative potential and
completed three co-ops at early stage biopharmaceutical companies. She will be entering a Ph.D. program in Fall of 2021.Ms. Amanda Dee, Northeastern University Amanda Dee is a second-year undergraduate student at Northeastern University, majoring in bioengi- neering and minoring in mathematics and music. This is her first year with the Connections Chemistry Review program. In the past, she has been a first-year tutor for the College of Engineering and is currently a CRLA Level 1 tutor for the Northeastern Peer Tutoring Program. She is also passionate about research and is currently developing tools for engineering and evaluating transgenic root cultures. Outside of aca- demics, she is an avid musician and performs with
coherence. We took adecidedly academic approach to this process; taking advantage of relevant literature in highereducation and curriculum studies, and applying qualitative methodology to our process.The idea of striving for coherence is a key goal in this work. Coherence has been defined byTatto [1, p. 176] as “shared understandings among faculty and in the manner in whichopportunities to learn have been arranged to achieve a common goal.” Hammerness [2] drewupon this definition and defined conceptual and structural coherence, while acknowledging thatthe borders between these constructs often become indistinct. Conceptual coherence refers to theconnections between content within a program, and the relationship between foundational ideasand
, in the contextof engineering organizations, are not well explored. This study examines the actions newlyhired engineers take during organizational socialization and identifies the actions from newlyhired engineers working in the U.S. aerospace and defense (A&D) industry. By followingMorrison's framework of new employees' primary tasks in socialization, we present theproactive actions taken by 10 participants. Specifically, we identified 13 actions andclassified them into four categories: Relationship Developing, Knowledge Acquiring, RealTask Training, and Positive Attitude Cultivating. This study expands the research literature asit 1) explores new employees' proactive actions in the context of engineering organizations,2) discusses and