, we hold a parts auction. Teams competitively bid on thereusable components from year’s past. Students from previous years enjoy connecting to thecurrent groups using “their” motors or wheels.Teams budget parts purchased at auction in the same manner as purchased new components.Students gain insight into design for reuse, recycling, and the circular economy connecting ourstudy of ethics and sustainability to an applied project. Following the competition, studentsdisassemble their vehicles and complete a reusability report tabulating the percentage of theoverall vehicle cost that is reusable. Students were intentional with their incorporation ofreusable parts with one team having 92.2% reusability and the overall winner of the
community instill in students the ethos of engineering as a service to the public• Projects provide student participants with direct experience with teamwork, communication, customer-awareness, project management, leadership, ethics, societal context, professionalism 77 What IEEE had contributed• A structure for groups of engineering students and educators to receive – Guidance and training – Support network – Local support (IEEE local sections) – Seed Funding – Tracking and assessment• 57 official projects around the world – About double that number initiated and funded locally – 33 official projects completed – Many involve high-school groups (EPICS-High
institutioncovers not only introduction to the engineering disciplines, design and ethics, but also a range offoundational topics from mathematics (e.g. trig, exponentials, logarithms, vectors, matrices) andphysics (e.g. mechanics, energy, DC circuits), as well as Excel as an analysis tools.Khan offers a breadth of instructional videos, articles and exercises. These are used as asupplement to the material developed by the instructor. The exercises allow the students topractice their problem solving. Most problems are selected from question banks and/or includerandomized numbers so each student gets a fairly unique problem set. The students get instantfeedback on correctness, as well as hints as to how to solve the problem. The instructor
courses and how each has been converted to a primarily ac-tive learning format. These are “Modeling with Computer Applications” (first semester, sophomore); “Opera-tions Design, Planning and Work Measurement” (second semester, sophomore), “Human Factors Engineering”(first semester, junior), and “Total Quality Management” (junior/senior elective). We discuss how we introducestudents to different learning styles, teamwork, provide team training, address conflict resolution, utilize theworld wide web, address “real” problems, use the computer for problem solving, introduce ethics, and stresswritten and oral communications skills. We also discuss issues involved with grading team assignments, main-taining accountability, and student evaluation and
ofactivities have been growing rapidly along with continuation to graduate study.ENGR 4940 Undergraduate Engineering Research ProjectsThe course syllabus for this undergraduate course is embedded into the body of this paper. Thecourse description implies that this course will be “of a well-defined and academicallysupervised basic or applied engineering research project experience leading to a scholarly work.Research terminology, literature review process, formulating and justification of researchproblems, research ethics, quantitative, qualitative and mixed research methods, analysis andinterpretation of their data, and citation styles will also be included along with writing examplesfor conference and journal publications. 3 Credits”5.The goal is to
but little confidence in it. This is because their courses casta large net in context and were unable to fully specialize in much. Students barely mentionedpersonal or social ethics, neither in school nor in the workforce. Organization was a skill thatwas not linked to a particular context but students agreed it to be a skill they had utilizedfrequently. All of the students described their work environment as independent-focused. Onestudent mentioned “guidance from [their] supervisor” throughout the placement, while theother student focused on their learning from doing. It seems from the conversations that manyof the students had more formal relationships with their supervisor, mirroring managers morethan mentors. This did adapt and
number and data structure (Big Idea #3: Data and Information) A simple tour in programming (Big Idea #4: Algorithms, Big Idea #5: Programming) Construct a simple website (Big Idea #1: Creativity) Computer hardware organization in a regular desktop computer (Big Idea #2: Abstraction) Different types of operating systems (Big Idea #2: Abstraction) Cutting-edge computing technologies such as Cloud Computing and Internet of Things (Big Idea #6: The Internet) Ethics in Computer Science (Big Idea #7: Global Impact)Our online course is divided into eight units. Each unit includes three theoretical sessions andone hands-on session. The course also includes four online discussion sessions. The four-weekonline course
easier to meet than the existingrequirements and present increased flexibility for many programs.Criterion 3 ChangesThe current Criterion 3 (a)-(k) student outcomes1 which have been unchanged since theywere adopted as part of EC2000 are:Student outcomes are outcomes (a) through (k) plus any additional outcomes that may bearticulated by the program.(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, healthand safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to
rubric consistently. The rubric consisted of three information literacy criteria: accessing needed information, using information effectively, and accessing and using information ethically. Scores ranging from 14 can be assigned for each of the three criteria according to the rubric, with situations in which a 0 would be assigned defined during the norming session and noted on the rubric. Page 26.1663.6Identifying information, including name, group number, and course section number, was removed from the assignments and replaced with a code by a staff member who did not participate in assessment. Each of four librarians who participated in
importance of traditionallearning pedagogies combined with experiential learning has been shown to increase overallcognitive competency [7] - [9]. To maintain relevancy and competitiveness in engineeringeducation, hands-on learning experiences with a global perspective needs to be integrated intothe curriculum [10], [11]. We believe critical skills such as empathizing, weighing ethicalconsiderations and effective communication are needed by graduates to navigate the 21st centuryglobal societal needs [12] - [17]. These learning opportunities could allow them to learn andpractice empathetical and ethical decision making with people from diverse backgrounds.Central to this capability is to provide the students with experiential learning opportunities
training: 1. Process-based: case studies and group problem solving 2. Awareness-raising and reflection 3. A confidential and brave forum to share the collective experience of mentors across a range of experiences 4. Distribute and adapt resources to improve mentoringStandard Competencies• Aligning expectations• Maintaining effective communication• Addressing equity and inclusion• Assessing understanding• Fostering independence• Cultivating ethical behavior• Promoting professional development• Promoting self-efficacy• Fostering wellbeing (beta)Adaptations for Career Stage
withenthusiastic and capable students to assist with recruiting and mentoring. The team wasestablished in 2006 as part of a National Science Foundation grant initiative to provide academicsupport to technical students and to assist in recruiting high school students into technicalprograms. Only two years later, the team has evolved into much more than the organizersimagined, as a result of the team members taking ownership of their activities.Students are recommended for the team by high school industrial education instructors andIVCC engineering design, electronics and manufacturing instructors. A committee of IVCCinstructors selects students for the team based on attitude, commitment and work ethic,willingness to help others and leadership potential
, modeling, evaluation, iteration) to satisfy project requirements for thermal or mechanical systems. C-3. Can work within realistic constraints, (such as economical, environmental, Page 12.464.3 social, political, manufacturability, health and safety, ethical, and sustainability) in realizing systems. C-4. Can build prototypes that meet design specifications.Each PC appears in various courses. For example, the faculty identified that theperformance criterion “C-1” would be achieved if the corresponding activities in Mech314, Mech 414 and Mech 417 are successful. We have a total of 38 such
(IPRO®) at our university provides a six credit multi-disciplinary, project team based course required of all undergraduates which helps develop inthese students various knowledge and skills deemed essential by ABET and future employers.This knowledge and skill, defined from our course Learning Objectives [LO], are competency inteamwork, communications, project management and ethical behavior, developed in the contextof addressing a real world problem. Through this research, we are assessing whether or notstudents that participate in an IPRO course gain a more thorough understanding of thedeclarative knowledge supporting comprehension of the Learning Objectives by administering aknowledge test to each IPRO student both at the beginning and at
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationcurriculum: • Understanding cost estimating, planning, and scheduling • Utilizing critical thinking • Communicating effectively to engineers and non-engineers • Understanding the importance of timely and effective communication • Working effectively within multi-disciplinary teams • Understanding the necessity for high professional and ethical standards • Having basic knowledge of business and management principles • Interacting with practicing professionals • Developing leadership skills lizing critical thinkingTo enhance these areas and meet, or exceed, the criteria set
section is, in order, thepreliminary design review (PDR), the critical design review (CDR), and the final designreview (FDR).During the first twelve weeks, various social issues of engineering design are introducedas case studies, including legal, ethical, and environmental. In addition, practical designissues are introduced including cost, ease of use, packaging, resource efficiency, etc.Design students are divided into several working groups. Groups then select projects anddevelop proposals to be presented as the PDR to the department faculty at the end of thefirst twelve weeks. Upon approval of the proposed project, students generate a purchaseorder that contains parts list, quantity, cost, and vendors’ addresses to the departmentsecretary for
Award1, we have developed a unique interdisciplinary MS degree specialization inStem Cell Research. This paper describes the structure of this new program. Theinterdisciplinary nature of our program stems from the involvement of faculty and students fromthree departments that span three academic units at our university - Biomedical Engineering,Biological Sciences, and Animal Science. The goals of our program are to prepare students forcareers in stem cell research by providing them with 1) broad technical skills, 2) critical thinkingand problem solving skills, 3) familiarity with current research, 4) familiarity with the ethics andtheory of stem cell investigation, and 5) presentation and communication skills.To accomplish these goals, students
anyethical responsibilities do they have both for citizens of the United States as well as other peoplethroughout the world. ≠ Course Module 2: Developing a Social Justice Index (SJI)Consider the issue of poverty in the world today. What are our responsibilities -if any towards -the underdeveloped world and/or those impoverished? If engineering has only lately addressedresponsibilities that we have as a profession towards the health of the Earth, even less attentionhas been paid to the question of our professional responsibilities towards the poor. Somehowuntil very recently that notion has been seen to be outside our ethical responsibilities. Todayhowever there is a growing belief that engineering does have such a responsibility. The
example, “anunderstanding in most of the following: biology, geology/geomorphology, engineeringeconomics, mechanics, material properties, systems, geospatial representation, and informationtechnology.” There is an increased emphasis on ethics, leadership, social awareness, politicalunderstanding, public policy, and business practice. The outcome that requires an understandingof asset management suggests the use of tools and techniques that include “design innovations,new construction technologies, materials improvements, geo-mapping, database management,value assessment, performance models, web-based communication, and cost accounting.” Thereis a clear emphasis on breadth at the undergraduate level with much of the specializedknowledge deferred
.- Writing mechanics: We discuss the elements of a proposal, writing styles, developing and testing a hypothesis, determining the audience and review criteria for the work, etc.- Research ethics: We discuss integrity in scientific research and writing. The case studies found in On Being a Scientist 1 provide discussion material to help the students apply the Page 7.608.3 ethical standards of our professional organizations to realistic situations. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationThe
36.8 21.1 15.8 2.7 Manufacturability (Constructability) 68.4 26.3 5.3 0.0 3.6 Ethical Considerations 42.1 36.8 10.5 10.5 3.1 Health and Safety Issues 47.4 36.8 15.8 0.0 3.3 Social Ramifications 26.3 26.3 26.3 21.1 2.6 Political Factors 36.8 15.8 26.3 21.1 2.7 Legal Issues 10.5 26.3 26.3 36.8 2.1* Composite Score based upon 4.0 = high; 3.0 = average; 2.0 = low
Session 2542 Engineering Management: The Practical Discipline Taggart Smith School of Technology, Purdue UniversityA headline in USA Today caught my eye: "Education gaps leave graduates ill-prepared." 1 Thelead stated: "College graduates enter the work force with strong technical skills but aren't verygood at communicating, being part of a team or accepting ambiguity, among other things." The"other things" included ethics and global awareness. The report was the result of a study done bythe Task Force on High-Performance Work and Workers, sponsored by the Business
electric circuits for two-ways light.19. Ethical behavior Create ethical code for students.4. The Process of Teaching Ideally, conveying the instructor’s interest in the material to be learned to students is the beststimulus to learning rather than such external goals as grades or later competitive advantages. The firstobject of any act of learning [2] over and beyond the pleasure it may give, is that it should servestudents in the future. Theodore R. Sizer [6] indicated that mastery of the fundamental ideas of a field Page 4.181.3involves not only the grasping of general principles, but also the development of an
in essence the inclusion of some subjects ofhuman sciences with the goal to stimulate our students so that they adopt a strong ethics andalso to increase their creativity.To get this goal the following subjects have been included in the curriculum: Philosophy,Development of Projects, Assisted Training Period, Human Resource and Management Strategy.In 1999 the subject Sociology has been included because the coordinating group considered thenecessity to increase the importance sense of Engineering for society and humankind. The goalis to show the students the commitment of Engineering with society, humankind andenvironment. Page 4.522.3These
engineering clinic class. This class is a major hallmark ofthe Rowan engineering program. The theme of the Freshman Clinic class in the spring semester is reverseengineering of commercial products. Students in teams of four or five spend an entire semester learning aboutengineering fundamentals such as fluid flow, heat and mass transfer, thermodynamics and engineering materials.They are also exposed to intellectual property rights, safety and ethics, ergonomics and environmentalconsiderations in engineering design.IntroductionThe college of engineering at the Rowan University was created through a $100 million gift from Henry andBetty Rowan in 1992 to the then former Glassboro State College (1). This newly constructed state-of-the-art$28M Henry M
must be approved by the supervisor. Then each team chooses their own advisor(which cannot be the supervisor). Through lectures and class discussion from the supervisor,students gain knowledge of the product development process, project management, professionalengineering practice, and the regulatory, legal, ethical, and economic aspects of design4,5,6.The students adhere to an engineering design process that includes early stages of design projectdevelopment including three design proposals. They must conduct customer surveys to selectone best design proposal. The advisor for each project must technically evaluate and approve theselected best design proposal.The design process provides the students with an important experience in defining and
presents the concept of “Prevention throughDesign” as a means for designing safety into bioengineering innovations. The paper describesinstructional materials that prompt consideration of possible hazards throughout a design projectand discuss risk assessment methods for evaluating and systematically reducing hazardsassociated with different design alternatives. These educational resources enable engineeringstudents to purposefully design safety into a technology.IntroductionBiomedical engineers have clear obligations to design and implement technologies and practicesthat ensure the safety of people involved. ABET Engineering Criteria state that engineeringgraduates must understand professional and ethical responsibility and must be able to design
engineersbe more socially responsible in their practice.4 The teaching of ethics is part of manyengineering curriculums.5 The following individual needs were identified to the students as those to be fulfilled bytheir senior projects. Figure 1: Individual Needs Page 24.1131.3 The following societal needs were identified to the students as those to be fulfilled bytheir senior projects. Figure 2: Societal Needs The following categories of public policies were projected by the students on their seniorprojects from the individual and societal needs. Figure 3: Public Policy
key classes during the first-year and senior year for students, while being aimed atindividual work during the middle two years of study.This awards program targets eight values the engineering program seeks to develop in eachstudent: Community, Professionalism, Ownership, Relevance, Resilience, Ethics, Excellence,and Service. These values are introduced to students with discussion and reflection during thefirst year of study, as well as being prominently displayed in the academic building mostassociated with engineering. Awards are given in the spring semester. Students are nominated byothers including peers, faculty and staff, and representatives from local industry with the processvarying by which year of study the awards are for. In the
investigation and artistic exploration. The resulting images have inspired, and in somecases themselves become appreciated as, art. A sophomore-level seminar in The Art and Scienceof Flow Visualization exposes students to these techniques and the science of fluid mechanics,and to the photographic methods needed to create effective images that are successful bothscientifically and artistically. Unlike other courses in flow visualization, this course assumes noa priori familiarity with fluid flow or with photography. The fundamentals of both are taughtand practiced in a studio setting. Students are engaged in an interdisciplinary discourse aboutfluids and physics, photography, scientific ethics, and historical societal responses to science andart. The