our current courses throughparticipation in a RHIT-sponsored Sustainability Teaching Network (STN). This community ofpractice (CoP) created time and space for faculty across departments and programs to developcourse updates and provided modest financial compensation for our development work. Ignitedby this CoP, our course updates benefited from a transdisciplinary approach, as Dugan is inmechanical engineering and Chenette is in chemical engineering. This CoP also let us betteralign what we do in the classroom with industry expectations and with our institutions’ newstrategic plan, which has a theme around infusing sustainability into education [7].We embarked on this study to understand students’ learning, interest, and reception of
had not taken courses that used SBG before, so some onboarding time andpreparation were necessary. Although students expressed some confusion in the first few weeksof the semester, they adapted quickly and did not report this to be a major barrier to theirlong-term success in their courses. To improve acceptance, Fluids Instructor noted theimportance of planning and preparation: “I think with the way I set it up visually, I had to havethe course all planned out from the beginning. So I think that's one of the things from thelogistics side of thinking through things and really understanding, because I've got to havedecided what are the essential tokens up front. What am I expecting students to do? Whatnumber of tokens is going to be equivalent
-computer integration technologies, whilesimultaneously providing the researcher with valuable experience in robotics and artificial neuralnetwork based controls.An ideal prototype would demonstrate the following capabilities: • Provide the operator with the ability to construct a robot as needed from individual limbs, without requiring explicit programming of geometric parameters. • Self-adapt to changes in geometry, without user, utilizing integrated sensors to detect its own environment, identify potential obstructions, and determine safe movement ranges; and • Execute high-level commands such as object retrieval without requiring explicit path planning, demonstrating the ability to
to Engineering” course at the two-yearcollege in service of the “2+2” engineering transfer program. The course is a required part of engineeringdegrees in the state of South Carolina and is a standard course for any student planning to transfer to aBachelor of Engineering program from the two-year Trident Technical College. It must be noted that the“2+2” program is separate from the two-year engineering technology degree programs at the institution.Students enrolling in the course discussed here do so with the intention of preparing for a bachelor’sprogram and thus employing learning practices aligning with a four-year program is encouraged by theinstitution. In this initial implementation of the Framework in a two-year college setting, we
data was recorded using coordinates and analyzed for trends. Table 1: Triads and Dyads that participants will use to self-signify their own stories. Theoretical Grounding Question Triad Autonomy My actions were motivated by... Expectations of others, Self- Care, Necessity Investment/ Discipline What was valued in this story Willingness to Experiment, was... Grit and Perseverance, Planning and Efficiency Internal alignment/ Alignment The experience I shared
was distributed tostudents from an engineering technology program at a large public university in the U.S. In thenext phase of work, we plan to collect experiences of at least 500 students from differentcolleges and universities, ensuring a broad and diverse range of responses, thereby enhancing thedepth and breadth of the findings.The quantitative survey aims to explore several aspects of students’ experiences. Questions focuson understanding their decision to pursue an engineering technology degree, their future, andtheir sense of preparedness for the program. The survey also asks students about their confidencein completing the degree and their strategies for managing academic challenges. Additionally,students are asked to assess the
ABET accreditation standards. The results underscore theeffectiveness of intentional project-based curriculum design in enhancing student learning, promotingskill development, and ensuring that graduates are well prepared to meet the demands of theengineering profession. The University plans to expand and utilize this data collection tool as neededfor future courses in the program.4. Strengths of the ProgramWith an industry-aligned and outcome-focused combination of foundational courses and corecurriculum, the primary features of this new program are: 1. The three pronged (specializations) customizable curriculum supported by the robotics core offers a dedicated pathway into each specialization. 2. With established support from
severaldisciplines, including business [3-6], engineering [7-9], healthcare [10, 11], and biometrics [12].A number of institutions have been teaching systems thinking and examining its integration inthe engineering curriculum [13-16]. The tools for systems thinkers, as identified by Acaroglu, areinterconnectedness, synthesis, emergence, feedback loops, causality, and systems mapping [17].In engineering, systems thinking enables us to plan, design, and optimize complex systemseffectively, leading to more reliable and adaptable solutions and aiding in managing risks,reducing failures, and enhancing system performance. By understanding the relationshipsbetween various components, engineers can create systems that are easier to maintain andmodify.The following
helmets, select appropriate materials for bikes and helmets, applystructural engineering and mechanical systems, engage in ergonomic design thinking, andinnovative bike designs. These experiences are rooted in everyday contexts, enabling students toconnect STEM concepts with their backgrounds.Figure 1. Initial conceptual diagram representing the connection between peer interaction andlanguage resources in informal learning environments associated with learning through biking.The program, which was planned to impact 96 students in grades 9 and 10 over three years,adopts a comprehensive research design. Data collection will include observations and videorecordings of sessions, semi-structured interviews with students, mentors, and instructors, as
current situation of the cultivation of engineeringand technological talents’ intercultural communicative competence, summarizes thecurrent problems and reasons, and attempts to propose solutions.Key words: intercultural communicative competence; engineering and technologicaltalent; “Belt and Road” initiative; China1. IntroductionThe “Belt and Road” initiative① is a major initiative and strategic idea for China tobase on its own strengths and look to the world, actively plan a panoramic opening up,tap the ancient spirit of the Chinese Silk Road, and actively assume the responsibilityof a country with great power. With the continuous promotion of the “Belt and Road”initiative, China’s economic, political, cultural and other cooperation with
their awareness of the social and environmental issuesthese communities face, reinforcing their professional ethics and social responsibility.Despite the well-documented benefits of SBL, its implementation is not without challenges.Harding et al. [15] note that one of the main obstacles is resistance to change among facultyand students, who are often reluctant to move away from traditional teaching methodsperceived as more familiar or less demanding. Additionally, the planning and execution ofSBL projects require substantial time and resource investment, which can be a barrier foreducational institutions with budget constraints [12]. In financially limited contexts, the lackof technical and human resources can significantly diminish the
aggregate below. In order to preserve participantanonymity within a relatively small population, neither institutional nor demographicinformation was collected in the survey. In interviews, the three universities were evenlyrepresented with three participants from each. However, demographic data did not relate to theresearch questions and was not collected. The researchers also did not explore institutional trendswithin the small sample size. Planned future work will increase the number of institutions andindividual participants in order to validate results and analyze trends specific to institution type,STEM field, gender, and/or ethnicity.The new “collabo-gleaning” framework presented in Figure 2 below was developed to addressthe research
May 2025. After graduation, she plans to pursue her master’s degree in clinical counseling.Dr. Emma Treadway, Trinity University Emma Treadway received the B.S. degree in Engineering Science from Trinity University in 2011, and her M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 2017 and 2019, respectively. She is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Science at Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas. Her research interests include haptics and the role of affect in engineering education.Dr. Jessica Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor at the University at Buffalo. She was
) explicitly state the need for ethical and sociallyconscious work. For example, the ASCE BOK states that “civil engineers must be able toaddress the sustainability of a project during planning and to help stakeholders understand theenvironmental, economic, and social impacts” [4, p. 40]. Further, engineers must be able toanalyze situations with conflicting professional and ethical issues in order to determine anappropriate next step [5]. Building these skills in the classroom is critical, and professors mayhave the opportunity to mentor students through the complex problems that engineers solve inpractice. A recent survey of 5,025 college students found that 55% believe professors are at leastpartially responsible for being a mentor of them while 39
volunteer their time and technical skills.As an extracurricular activity, with little formal instruction, there is the danger that withoutintentional planning, humanitarian engineering projects can disenfranchise the very communitiesthey are trying to help [16]. Students must engage with the project from a perspective of blendedboundaries that meaningfully engages with both the facts and values of a project – values whichmust be considered from the perspectives of all peoples. This view is not one traditionally heldby engineering systems, which often embrace traditional power roles, making determinations onwho is worthy of being served [11, 15].To evaluate these concepts properly, previous research has determined a significant gapadequately
demandstrategies such as setting up milestones and actively coaching the students [21]. More facedchallenges are institutional constraints such as limited budgets and new ideas requiring extensiveplanning. Lastly, most PSI research focuses on psychology and behavior analysis of students,raising concerns about the generalizability of findings to other disciplines and diverse studentpopulations [21]. Accordingly, careful planning was done in Math Launch to benefit from PSIand address identified challenges. The customized PSI tenets in Math Launch pedagogy are:1. Preparation of written materials: ALEKS was set up so it provided an explanation page before a student attempted an exercise which enhanced student understanding and helped with improving self
different profiles can influences the load capacity of astructure without necessarily changing its weight. These profiles are clamped on one side andloaded by a point load at the free end for the static experiments. Due to the different bendingstiffnesses, different deflections are achieved with the different profiles, even though theyweigh the same. To convince the participating audience, these beams should be easilyremovable for weight comparison.Another topic of the planned workshops is the deliberate shift of the natural frequencies of astructure through a suitable selection of the profiles to avoid undesirable resonances whilemaintaining the weight of the structure. This is demonstrated by carrying out modal analyseswith the same cantilever
., P.E. and Jim Kish Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo / Kish FabricationAbstractThe common safety bicycle design first appeared in Brittan in the 1870s. In the 130 years since,engineers and craftsmen have created hundreds of new bicycle designs, fabrication methods,materials and components. However, the simplistic diamond frame design has survived, is stillcommercially available and fully functional. The bicycle itself provides a rich learning platform inwhich to illustrate topics such as design, manufacturing process planning, tooling, materials, and thedesign/build process. This paper gives a status report on the development of a course that teachesengineering undergraduates the process of building a bicycle frame. Learning
5 From the start of the project, the team proposed a six-phase project plan. Phase 1 consisted of scheduling future meetings and drafting the proposal, during which time we began sharpening our skills in time management and task delegation as a team. Phase 2 consisted of proposing and developing our multi-sensor system design. We learned many interesting skills during this portion of the project, including how to run a 3D printer and incorporate sensors onto system hardware. Phase 3 consisted of our midpoint progress checks and presentation, during which time we further harnessed our skills in time management and proper formatting of technical projects such as this one. Phase 4 consisted of the implementation
an interactive teaching and learning environment which is beneficial for their futureendeavor in civil engineering profession. Proper initiatives could be applied by the instructorafter a few initial class performance evaluations.Methodology The lesson plan is divided into two parts. In part 1, students receive the guided stylenotes through Brightspace or through printouts provided by the instructor prior to the lecture.During the lecture, they complete the handouts with the guidance of the instructor. In part 2,once in a week, at the end of the lecture, students solve problems in group and then attend anindividual quiz. The procedure is described below:Part 1(guided notes) The handouts are prepared in skeleton style [8] with
5 Summary and ConclusionsAMAR is a four-wheeled, tracked, robot built from T-slot aluminum tubing, 3D-printed materials,and connective components. This robotic system consists of several subsystems. It was completelydeveloped by the students and it was a challenging project. Additional tests are needed to verify theML algorithms’ performance. Also, we have identified several areas for improvement. First,switching back to Tensorflow (from TF-Lite) should fix most errors in plant identification eventhough it will take around 250 msec. Second, we plan to research other mapping tools to be used inthe setup mode. Finally, we should offload the computational unit (Raspberry Pi) to mainly run theML algorithms
also allowfor a reduced pumping rate. A maximum allowable pressure for pipelines was identified to be41.1 MPa. Repair costs, specifically for wastewater pipelines, and pumping time during repairwere able to be reduced by at least 70%. 7 Summary and ConclusionsUnderstanding the findings in the articles allow for predictions to be made about structuralintegrity and pipeline failure, thus allowing for better planning and reduced costs. Moreimportantly, the findings help to narrow down the materials to be used in the prevention ofpipeline failure. Further research should first focus on the types of soil or additives to soil thatwill prevent liquefaction and maintain
such as employees, customers, and shareholders. To communicate my recommendation to the leadership team, I would present a clear and concise report outlining the benefits and risks of each option, as well as my rationale for why I believe option b) is the best fit for the company's new business strategy. I would also include a detailed plan for how we would go about
recommend an already-developed rubric [12] or create their ownthat search committees can use as-is or adapt to their own needs. As a result of this study onsearch committees, we have developed rubrics for our institution for both DEI statements andoverall candidate evaluation at all stages of the faculty search process that are adaptable to anydiscipline. An interesting theme that arose from the interviews was how search committees talkedabout DEI, including how they evaluated DEI statements, what was considered evidence of acommitment to DEI (e.g., past activities or ideas for future contributions), and how importantDEI was in comparison to research and teaching. We plan to write a future paper addressingthese topics.References• [1
community. Eachsemester we selected a PESP alum, who had graduated from the university, to talk to the studentsabout her job and career plans at the Reunion party. The Reunion party occasionally featuredguests from industry.In addition to the pay for the peer leaders and PhD stipends, the only other costs involved inrunning ESP were the light suppers provided to the two workshops (approximately $200 perweek) and the cost of the end of semester reunion dinner.Admissions practices at the University of PennsylvaniaAt the University of Pennsylvania, students can begin freshman year with a declared major orthey can be undecided, which is called curriculum deferred in Penn Engineering and undeclaredin the College of Arts and Sciences. The vast majority
teamwork mental model is the shared understanding of the roles, responsibilities, and skillsof team members as well as interpersonal interaction requirements (Mathieu et al., 2000;Mohammed et al., 2010). In the design work context, Stempfle & Badke-Schaub (2002) describeelements of the teamwork model to include planning, analyzing, evaluating, deciding, andcontrolling (or summarizing) elements of the team’s process. These steps are mediated throughbasic thinking operations. This model is developed over time and is an important element in thesuccess of the team. A task mental model is the shared understanding of the work goals, the process for how toachieve those goals, performance requirements, and design constraints. Stempfle & Badke
skillsfor HRMs. Following analysis of a larger sample size, course material inclusivity will be furtherexamined on a larger scale in multiple course modules intending to impart EML skills.Curriculum Development and Preliminary DataFigure 1: A) EML is based on the acquisition of the 3 C’s: curiosity, connections, and creatingvalue.The EML project (Figure 1) consists of three modules providing students with two patient casesrequiring a hip or knee implant for which they will develop a comprehensive treatment plan. Inthe previous study, students in the control group are provided with the patient profile without anyadditional prompting from the project brief. However, students in the EML group were givenspecific requirements soliciting the usage of EML
courses to 281 graduate students.At an institutional level, equality, diversity, and inclusion are part of the main strategicdocument of the university and are linked with a need to improve student experience, widenparticipation and to create an environment of research excellence in which “all of theUniversity community (area able to) fulfil their potential”. The Strategic Equality Plan is setin the context of complying with the Equality Act (2010), and describes the protectedcharacteristics as covered by the General Duty. The document lists nine ‘Equality objectives’,along with their success measures. Two are aimed at students, the first referring to areduction in the ‘BAME’ degree awarding differential, and second to embed inclusivity
list. For students, this list could act as a list on par with hints from aprofessor. Figure 12 – Controls Cabinet Parts List (Partial) for Microwave ControlConclusionThe tools decrease the time required to perform tedious tasks like writing reports and algorithms.Instead, the engineer must be able to define a problem clearly for the AI tools. For example,more time should be spent on specifications and concepts and less time on detailing. But, theengineers must develop better test plans to verify the work of the AI.As educators, we have focused on the ‘how of problem solving’ with methods such as meshcurrent analysis, method of joints in trusses, and solving differential equations. The newemphasis will need to become the ‘why of
education, director of the university’s Quality Enhancement Plan, and director of the Center for Teaching & Learning. Randy holds a B.B.A. in Information Systems and Quantitative Studies from Abilene Christian University, an M.Ed. in Secondary Education from Stephen F. Austin State University, an Ed.D. in Higher Education from Texas A&M-Commerce, and an M.S. in Library Science from the University of North Texas. His publications have addressed technology’s impact on course development, teacher education, and library services. Randy McDonald is a past-president of the Texas Distance Learning Association.Lani Draper, Texas A&M University Lani Draper, Instructional Designer for the College of Engineering at