Serving Institution(HSI) university with a combined total of 140,000+ undergraduate students. Further, the presentproject was modeled after a previous, successfully completed initiative entitled ComputerAccelerated Pipeline to Unlock Regional Excellence (CAPTURE), which was sponsored by theFlorida Board of Governors (BOG) [27].UNIVERSITY-STATE COLLEGES COLLABORATIONBelow is a brief description of the partnering institutions: Florida Atlantic University (FAU) is a large, diverse, degree-granting institution (180undergraduate and graduate degree programs) located in south Florida. It is designated as a"High Research Activity" university by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement forTeaching. FAU serves over 30,000 undergraduate and graduate
scienceprograms and, ultimately, achievement of bachelor’s degrees (Wang, 2020). The need for financialsupport, resulting in most community college students needing to work while pursuing degrees, iscited as a major barrier for many community college students (Mendoza, 2009), particularly forthose who could benefit from full-time enrollment. Just-in-time academic support is one strategyfor improving student persistence in STEM, among many other researched best practices.Growth Sector, the backbone organization for the NSF Eddie Bernice Johnson INCLUDES Initiative’sSTEM Core Expansion Alliance (#1834628), along with partner institutions, has developed andimplemented the STEM Core at 30+ partner colleges in seven states, serving over 3,000 studentssince
identifiesthrough examples the areas where mathematical rigor is necessary. Then it presents the emphasison select topics and the advantages and drawbacks of specific pedagogy. Finally, a blended andextended approach is suggested as a hopeful remedy for better absorption of mathematicalconcepts. The steps proposed must start from the freshman level and reinforced through thesenior level, and measured outcomes must be realizable before graduation from the BS program.ApproachESCC provides an approach to gather examination data as a direct evidence of learning usingcarefully designed conceptual questions. Together with this, we collect inputs from facultyadvisors and teaching assistants to provide further proofs of identifying difficult conceptual areasfrom a
Lotería, Art Education and Creative Resistance: A Funds of Knowledge Approach to Art Education in Working-Class Schools (Doctoral dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University).Garringer, M., Kupersmidt, J., Rhodes, J., Stelter, R., & Tai, T. (2015). Elements of effective practice for mentoring [TM]: Research-informed and practitioner-approved best practices for creating and sustaining impactful mentoring relationships and strong program services. MENTOR: National Mentoring Partnership.Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. teachers college press.Gelles, L., Youmans, K., & Villanueva, I. (2019). Hidden curriculum advocacy and resources for graduate
” [6], which leads to further negative health and emotional outcomes. Bereavement canprofoundly impact an individual's ability to function effectively in the workplace. The failure toacknowledge and support individuals experiencing grief not only undermines their personal well-being but also jeopardizes their professional contributions and overall organizational health.In this study, the researchers examined the literature concerning grief and bereavement, with aspecific focus on the profound ramifications for women in academic settings. Moreover, theycritically investigated existing organizational policies and grief and bereavement supportinitiatives within academic institutions. Drawing insights from their analysis, recommendationsand a
Paper ID #35751Civil Engineering Accreditation Assessment in a Forced Online LearningEnvironmentDr. Indumathi Jeyachandran, San Jose State University Dr. Indumathi (Indu) Jeyachandran is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environ- mental Engineering at San Jose State University. She is a Certified Mapping Scientist- Remote Sensing, offered by the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, and a LEED Accredited Pro- fessional. Dr. Jeyachandran has been adapting high-impact teaching practices including Universal Design for Learning, Active learning, backward design principles in the courses she
. The attendees learned about compositesthrough lecture/discussions, Catia software demonstrations, and practical exercises. Theattendees were strongly encouraged to participate in the hands-on projects and they reallyenjoyed making parts. Figure 3a shows a CATIA software demonstration taught by one of theUnivalle graduate students who completed phase 2. Figure 3b and 3c show the attendeesworking in the laboratory making composite parts. The IDEXA trainees performed excellent andwe were all convinced that the intense training of phase 2 had created knowledgeableinstructors for future courses and research at Universidad del Valle.Figure 3a CATIA demonstration. Figure 3b Laboratory training. Figure 3c Laboratory training.Cultural
adepartment head or a Dean. The NSF call says that this is to “establish institutionalaccountability.” For change to occur, it is critical to have someone in administration who cansupport change or provide leverage. An expert in engineering education or computer scienceeducation research is needed--this person should be familiar with the literature in this area and beable to ground the project plan within that literature. For example, have similar ideas been triedat other institutions? What are best practices? An expert in social science must be included--thisperson could be from a number of different departments including sociology or education. Thisperson should be familiar with the literature on organizational change. They need to be able toadvise
(though it isopen to all) that introduces students to mentors and campus resources, there is a residentialcampus with a living-learning community program, there is a “University 101” class that allstudents take that acclimates them to university life and study, and there is a robust tutoringcenter which is free of charge. One possible explanation for the lack of differences betweengroups in the current research may be the efficacy of these programs in alleviating gaps foundin previous research. However, since this research was not designed to test the efficacy of anyor all of these programs, such an explanation is clearly speculative. In any case, the effects ofthese programs might be short term. Once students get further into their college
; Measures impact and outcomes (good intentions are not enough) > Identifies areas for improvement (formative evaluation) > Helps you tell your story to stakeholders > Helps you make a logic model for your project There are lots of different ways to work with an evaluator.Evaluators are not really meant to grade you or to fill out a checklist. An evaluator’s role isto holistically measure your impact, identify areas of improvement, and gather data to helpyou tell your story. 18 Examples of Various Logic Models The best ones are somewhere between very simple to very complex There is
doctorate in engineering education. She previously conducted research in Purdue University’s First- Year Engineering Program with the Network for Nanotechnology (NCN) Educational Research team, the Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) Educational Research team, and a few fellow STEM education graduates for an obtained Discovery, Engagement, and Learning (DEAL) grant. Prior to attending Purdue University, she graduated from Arizona State University with her B.S.E. in Engineering from the College of Technology and Innovation, where she worked on a team conducting research on how students learn LabVIEW through Disassemble, Analyze, Assemble (DAA) activities.Dr. Matthew A. Verleger, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona
, Architectural Technology, and a Master’s in Facility Management. His field experience includes residential and light commercial construction. He has been an architectural designer as well as superintendent for single and multi-family residential construction projects. Mr. Ray worked as an engineering design manager in the Building Components Manufacturing Industry for over fifteen years.Dr. Brandon Sorge, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Brandon Sorge is an Assistant Professor of STEM Education Research in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication at the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. His research interests include all aspects of STEM education, espeDr. Katrenia Reed
) mentorship (M=3.68) 2. Overall: Promoting long-term career 7. Research: Translating research into real-world satisfaction (M=3.84) impact (M=3.64) 3. Student engagement: Enhancing 8. Student engagement: Promoting student engineering student motivation and accessibility and belonging in engineering interest (M=3.84) (M=3.6) 4. Overall: Reducing burnout and stress 9. Overall: Mental health and work-life balance in your work (M=3.84) (M=3.56) 5. Mentorship: Building effective 10. Mentorship: Faculty mentoring best practices mentor-mentee relationships (M=3.72) (M=3.52)trying to be on the top
Kwak Tanguay is a Ph.D. Candidate in Multicultural Education at the University of Washington. Her research examines how educational policy & practice, curriculum, and instruction mediate cross- racial and cross-ethnic peer relations among students, and how these peer relations shape students of color’s educational experiences, trajectories, and access to opportunities.Dr. Joyce Yen, University of Washington Joyce Yen, Ph.D., is the Director of the ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change at the University of Washington where she focuses on advancing women and underrepresented minority faculty in STEM fields and leading faculty professional development programs. Her diversity and faculty work has received over
initial research questions (RQs) can be addressed as follows:RQ1: The primary objectives of participants include making friends and fostering curiosity aboutother cultures. These could be a great motivator even for engineering students to encourageparticipation in mobility programs, in addition to the educational benefits. While earning studycredits is also an essential incentive, it is a secondary factor in encouraging their actions to travelabroad.RQ2: Regarding WA11GAP, mobility programs are great opportunities for team work,communication, and awareness of lifelong learning, which can be more effective to acquirethrough practice rather than traditional educational studies.RQ3: The most influential factor for participants' learning outcomes is
across a broad swath of American manufacturing industriesincluding the machine tool and auto industries. Many of those that remained are reaching the ageof retirement and will take valuable expertise with them when they leave their companies. Forthis reason the education of new engineers remains a critical need for many states across the US.As important as this need is, budgetary constraints occurring simultaneously with the economicdownturn, have resulted in challenges to four-year schools graduating engineers in sufficientnumbers. In particular manufacturing engineers, whose expertise is best matched to theproduction of goods, only graduate from fewer than 20 programs here in the United States.Part of the need for manufacturing engineers is
engineering design. This fosters social justice by creating individual andcommunity opportunity and redirectors the authority to design and create solutions tomarginalized learners. This study clarifies how engineering education, grounded in ourexperience in two refugees camp, can foster self-reliance in displacement by empoweringdisplaced students. Thus, this paper investigates both engineering education and social justice indisplacement and looks for places where the fields contribute to each other. In doing so, weinvestigate the following research question: How does localized engineering in displacement(LED) empower tertiary learners in displacement to become socially engaged?Research background Education is considered a critical element
success of engineering LIATS.One of the intervention mechanisms has centered in driving students to establish early in theiracademic lives, a roadmap of their school path as students, looking into their objectives asgraduating engineers. The mechanism used for such an objective has been an individualdevelopment plan (IDP) specifically tailored for undergraduates and first-year graduate students,complemented with a faculty mentoring program.The main research question driving this initiative is identifying how the exercise of bringing sucha tool to early study program engineering LIATS in an HSI could impact their success indicatorsand understanding the IDP influence in the mentor-mentee relationship.This paper presents the process of developing
, equity and inclusion (DEI). Simple exposure to adiverse environment in the classroom does not fully prepare students to succeed in a similar real-world environment.In order to best prepare students for post-graduation roles, we must incorporate DEI into ourcurriculum. Education in these issues promotes their awareness of the topic and allows them toexplore their own implicit bias in a safe environment. Practicing our teaching with similarthought, we must assess the student outcomes in a manner which is reflective of our ownunderstanding of these issues and aims to minimize performance gaps due to disparities betweenstudents.Systems Engineering is an ideal platform to promote student awareness of global inequities inthe world as well as explore
both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University,she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis.From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement ofTeaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designingfor the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSFinnovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences forhigh school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:”Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and
socialsupport to my students, as well as enrichment and research or practical experienceopportunities. I have been the PI and Co-PI for grants received from NSF, NASA and theDepartment of Education amounting to over $5 million to develop the engineeringprogram and award CSEMS/S- STEM (Science, Technology Engineering and Math)scholarships to students at San Antonio College. An NSF discretionary grant from EngineeringEducation I obtained in 2003 allowed me to initiate the EDGE (Early Development ofGeneral Engineering) 13 a summer program, designed to attract and retain high schoolstudents into the engineering field. The program continued through 2015 with help fromDepartment of Education MSEIP funding. A majority of my mentees have participated in
and Social Inquiry, Sociology of Education, and Gender and Society) on topics including the legal profession, intellectual property, and constitutional law.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Rincon joined the Society of Women Engineers in February 2016 as the Manager of Research, where she oversees the organization’s research activities around female engineers from elementary through col- lege and into the workforce. With over 15 years of experience in higher education administration, includ- ing as a Senior Research and Policy Analyst for The University of Texas System, her focus has been on understanding the factors that impact student success and influencing the policies that support students
Paper ID #28509Student Construction Sustainability Evaluations: A LEED Lab Case StudyDr. Jeyoung Woo P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Jeyoung Woo is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona). He is a registered Professional Engineer (Civil - Construction) in Texas. He has worked in the industry for nine years as a project manager, a corporate quality manager, a field engineer, and a designer. Also, he conducted several research projects about construction labor productivity, construction safety, engineering
thetraditional content of a culture and assimilates its knowledge, practices, and values(KPV). Under such definition, ABET outcomes were transferred to a set of culturalconstructs based on the content of the first-year engineering program. A depiction of suchcultural constructs or traits is portrayed in Figure 1.Figure 1. Schematic of outcomes from the course organization for the first-yearengineering course. II. Research Design, Analysis and ResultsA. The open-ended analysisThe primary purpose of the open-ended study was to analyze student perspectives on howthe process of engineering enculturation is occurring according to what is taught in afirst-year engineering course. The three open-ended questions from a pre-survey thatwere
College Collaborative. Supporting Engineering programsacross multiple rural colleges, sharing resources, faculty, perhaps including a mobile lab anddeveloping an Introduction to Engineering Project between colleges could potentially lead tonew ways of delivering Engineering education in rural Arizona. Using remote access labs,sharing key faculty/lab resources, and employing on-line web delivery of programs are examplesof this model.Sharing of Ideas and Best PracticesThe colleges’ sharing of ideas, resources, and even faculty through the Network has strengthenedthe community and yielded collective impact as follows: • Shared experiences and best practices led to an appreciation for high quality work being accomplished on each campus
social justice education from Iowa State University; and a Ph.D. from the University of Utah where she studied Educational Leadership and Policy and also earned a graduate certificate in gender studies from the School of Social Transformation. Whether related to research, practice, or teaching, Dr. valerie guerrero williamson has prioritized strate- gic, research-informed efforts to actualize equity for students, staff, and faculty. Broadly, her research focuses on higher education at the organizational level, including change models and their implementa- tion, campus climates and cultures, cultivating critical praxis, and faculty development and socialization. Dr. v has also developed and led hundreds of educational
in engineering dynamics with applications to wearable technology for analysis of human motion in a variety of contexts ranging from warfighters to astronauts. In addition to her engineering work, she also has an interest in engineering education research, which most recently has focused on incorporating authentic engineering educational experiences through engineering history education and open-ended modeling problems designed to initiate the productive beginnings of engineering judgement and engineering identity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Incorporating History Lessons into a Second Year Mechanical Engineering SeminarIntroduction Unlike the other major
experience in areas of Automotive and Systems Engineering.Dr. Lisa Elanna Burris, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Lisa Burris is an assistant professor of Civil Engineering at the Ohio State University. Dr. Burris’ exper- tise lies in the areas of cement and concrete optimization, durability of construction materials, forensic evaluation of structural and material deficiencies, and infrastructure construction and repair best practices. Dr. Burris holds a B.S. in Architectural Engineering and M.S. in Civil Engineering from Kansas State University, a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, and has over a decade of experience in construction materials research
theories,methods, and promising practices across institutions and disciplines. Harassment, threats, andintimidation cannot be tolerated if we are to engage this call to the best of our abilities. It iscrucial that all our students are able to realize their potential, and that our profession welcomesand cultivates talent to more fully enhance and protect the welfare of people and the planet.Each of us is a potential ally to another STEM diversity researcher. We offer [35] a shortacronym to help scholars remember how to respond in such an attack: RSR, for Report, Support,and Recommit. When a scholar is attacked, they (or a supportive colleague) should Report theattack to multiple bodies: the unit, college, and university levels; to law enforcement
students for innovationcompetitions and their upcoming careers as well as catalyze their entrepreneurial minds forfuture success. Based on a series of interviews with experienced mentors of innovationcompetitions and programs, this paper presents a set of best practices for mentoring studentinnovation teams.IntroductionInnovation competitions and programs encourage students to think creatively and innovatively,solve complex problems, develop professional and technical skills, and improve communicationand teamwork skills. Hackathons, pitch competitions, design challenges, startup competitions,and entrepreneurship programs can be considered innovation competitions and programs, whichhave been known to have many important benefits for undergraduate