look into the student writing samples. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S A Centrality of Military & Corporate 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 B Commitment to Problem Solving 0 6 3 9 0 0 3 0 1 0 5 1 2 20 0 6 0 2 C Narrow Technical Focus 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 D Persistence 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 E
students at their institutions,” Teach. Learn. Inq., vol. 7, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.7.[8] J. H. Waldeck, V. O. Orrego, T. G. Plax, and P. Kearney, “Graduate student/faculty mentoring relationships: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end,” Commun. Q., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 93–109, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1080/01463379709370054.[9] W. Wright-Harp and P. A. Cole, “A Mentoring Model for Enhancing Success in Graduate Education,” Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord., vol. 35, no. Spring, pp. 4–16, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1044/cicsd_35_S_4.[10] N. A. of S. Medicine Engineering, and, P. and G. Affairs, B. on H. E. and Workforce, and C. on E. M. in STEMM, The Science of Effective Mentorship in
. 179. Au, N.; Bayles, T.; Ross, J., Exposing chemical engineering students to real worldproblems: Health care and renewable energy systems. In ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh,PA, 2008.10. Zydney, A. L., Analysis of membrane processes in the introduction-to-ChE course.Chemical Engineering Education 2003, 37 (1), 33-37.11. Lipscomb, G. G., A compendium of open-ended membrane problems in the curriculum.Chemical Engineering Education 2003, 37 (1), 46-51.12. Comolli, N.; Kelly, W.; Wu, Q., The artificial kidney: Investigating current dialysismethods as a freshman design project. In ASEE Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 2010.13. Harrell, G. K.; McPeak, A. N.; Ford Versypt, A. N., A pharmacokinetic simulation-based module to
, pp. 1–7, 2013.[2] S. Provasnik, A. KewalRamani, M. McLaughlin Coleman, L. Gilbertson, W. Herring, and Q. Xie, “Status of Education in Rural America,” Washington, DC, 2007.[3] J. J. Versypt and A. N. Ford Versypt, “Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical En- gineering Undergraduate Enrollment in the States of Illinois and Kansas Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Enrollment in t,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.[4] L. Zahedi, M. Ross, and J. Batten, “Pathways and Outcomes of Rural Students in Engineering," no. June 2019.[5] K. M. Ganss, “The college transition for
larger group of individuals. Indeed, this resulted in a library ofrecordings that can be used to make the content available online, which could provide a measureof sustainability by facilitating the offering of these materials beyond the conclusion of the awardcurrently funding the NRT.Acknowledgement and disclaimerThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1922694.References[1] E. Santillan-Jimenez, Q. Duan, J. Dariotis, and M. Crocker, "Enhancing graduate education by fully integrating research and professional skill development
forward with their failures.” Another student alsocommented that it was important to realize that many have faced challenges. “Just learning ofothers' experiences really helps let me know that I am not alone in the hardships I face and haveto overcome.”Students were asked to suggest changes to improve the Epic Fail event. One student suggestedlengthening the event time. A number of others suggested providing more time for interactionthrough a Q and A session and time for a discussion or for sharing.DiscussionThe intent of this evaluation was to determine if the EPIC program is meeting its goals throughthe implementation of its three
-College and Pre-Professional Supports:CWIT’s Bookend Approach to Inclusive Excellence in Undergraduate Tech Education Presented by: Danyelle Tauryce Ireland, Ph.D. Cindy Greenwood, M.Ed. Erica D’Eramo, M.A. Kate O’Keefe, M.S.Ed. 2 AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Pre-College Programs a. Impact b. Lessons Learned 3. Pre-Professional Programs a. Impact b. Lessons Learned 4. Future Directions 5. Adapting the Model 6. Where to Start 7. Q&AThe Center for Women in Technology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore Countyhas a 21 year record of working to enable success
to students to connect in teams any time. Another engagement strategy this instructor listed was to have optional sessions like office hours on Friday for discussion and for Q&A. However, they did not continue this due to lack of interest. Table 1 below shows a summary of the engagement strategies that faculty listed as being used in the Hybrid in-person and Hybrid remote learning environments. There was no difference in the strategies listed by faculty based on the gender, years of teaching, and number of online classes taught. TABLE 1 List of Primary Engagement Strategies in ENED 1100 Hybrid LEs Strategies In-Person RemoteDiscussions
timeto wrap up conversations before resuming. Once in presentation mode, the host can share theircamera, screen, websites, and videos they may wish to show. Hosts can also invite guests on a"stage," where they can share their camera and screen. Presenters also can record the entiresession to share later. While in presentation mode, another helpful feature is the "Q&A" option,where guests can create questions anonymously that they wish to be answered by the presenterand arrange these questions by importance and popularity. This feature can also be used forpolling the audience about selected topics or as a quiz to check for understanding [8]Use of Remo for Classes, Workshops, and Community Outreach Programs Even though the original
children’s STEM learning in a children’s museum. Early Child. Res. Q. 29, 333–344.[14] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in society, 6, 52-58.[15] Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy. In Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 18-34). Longman.[16] Creswell., J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among the five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.[17] Chenail, R. J. (2012). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Qualitative data analysis as a metaphoric process. Qualitative Report, 17(1), 248-253.[18] Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM: Science Technology Engineering Mathematics
Zealand Journal of Law and Education, vol. 13, no.2, 2008, pp. 21-32.[14] A. O. Madan, “Cyber aggression/cyber bullying and the dark triad: effect on workplace behavior/performance,” International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, vol. 8, no.6, 2014.[15] Q. Li., “Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences,” School Psychology International, vol. 27 no.2, 2006, pp. 157-170.[16] E. M. Lund and S. W. Ross, “Bullying perpetration, victimization, and demographic differences in college students: A review of the literature,” Trauma, Violence and Abuse, vol. 18, no. 3, 2017, pp. 348-360.[17] L. K. Watts, J. Wagner, B. Velasquez, and P. I. Behrens
packed with team building andprofessional development activities. Activities include Skype and in-person alumni talks, industrysite visits and Q&A with engineers, faculty research talks, and a University career center visitwhere staff discusses the college application process, various majors in STEM, alumniconnections and inspirational stories. These features of the camp align with the dimensions ofrelatedness and autonomy in SDT.The code camp was led by a female faculty/lecturer that has extensive experience with teachinglower-level Computer Science courses at the University level. The code camp instruction teamalso included undergraduate student teacher assistants (TAs); two female TAs and one male TA,all of whom were Computer Science
: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/writing_in_engineering/handbook_on _report_formats/reports_and_memos.html. [Accessed: Mar. 4, 2021][18] M. Prince, “Does active learning work: A review of the research,” J. of Eng. Educ., pp. 1- 9, July 2004.[19] Y. Chen, A. K. Awasthi, F. Wei, Q. Tan, and J. Li, “Single-use plastics: Production, usage, disposal, and adverse impacts,” Science of the Total Environ., vol. 752, no. 15, 2021. [Online] Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720353018. [Accessed: Mar. 4, 2021][20] P. G. Ryan, “Entanglement of birds in plastics and other synthetic materials,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 135, pp.159-164, Oct. 2018. https
, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778.[11] L. Watts, “Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication in Distance Learning: A Review of the Literature,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ. Charlotte, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 23-32,56, 2016.[12] M. M. M. Abdelmalak, “Web 2.0 technologies and building online learning communities: students’ perspectives,” Online Learn. J. OLJ, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87-, Mar. 2015.[13] “70019_Mertler_Chapter_7.pdf.” Accessed: Feb. 19, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/70019_Mertler_Chapter_7.pdf.[14] S. L. Walker and B. J. Fraser, “Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Distance Education Learning Environments in Higher Education: The Distance
USD and the broader San DiegoEvents justice and encourage and facilitate critical community. Events typically feature a reflection on current practice. speaker or a panel of speakers, followed by discussion/Q+A. Professionals across all disciplines are invited Engagement through invitations toPro Bono to contribute their expertise, time and participate in ExSJ ProfessionalProfessional resources towards projects in support of Development events and CommunityNetwork communities, social and environmental Forums, as well as collaboration on ExSJ justice
and Exposition, USA.[5] M. Q. Patton, “Qualitative evaluation and research methods,” (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2002.[6] Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. E. "Three approaches to qualitative content analysis." Qualitative Health Research, vol 15, no. 9, 2005, pp. 1277-1288. SAGE Publications[7] Ryan, Gery W., and H. Russell Bernard. "Techniques to identify themes." Field Methods, vol 15, no. 1, 2003, pp. 85-109. SAGE Publications.[8] St. Pierre, Elizabeth A., and Alecia Y. Jackson. "Qualitative data analysis after coding". Qualitative Inquiry, vol 20, no. 6, 2014, pp. 715-719. SAGE Publications.[9] A. Osterwalder, and Y. Pigneur, “Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers
., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943Ye, Q., Wang, D., & Guo, W. (2019). Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure. European Management Journal, 37(4), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.006
construction safety management and visualization system. Autom. Constr. 33 95–103, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.012.[3] Le, Q. T., Pedro, A., & Park, C. S. (2014). A Social Virtual Reality Based Construction Safety Education System for Experiential Learning. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 79(3–4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-014-0112-z[4] Wu, W., Tesei, A., Ayer, S., London, J., Luo, Y., & Gunji, V. (2018). Closing the Skills Gap: Construction and Engineering Education Using Mixed Reality – A Case Study. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), San Jose, CA, USA, 2018, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8658992.[5] Rudd, T. (2008). Learning spaces and
deviation, no leverage values greater than 0.2, and values for ' 'Cook's distance above1. Also, the assumption of normality was reasonable, as evident by the inspection of the Q-Qplot.We hypothesized that (1) high impact engagement practices will predict academic achievementgoals; (2) course motivation will predict academic achievement goals; (3) confidence atcompleting a degree will predict academic achievement goals. The regression results indicatedthat the model explained 23.9% of the variance and that the model statistically predictedacademic achievement goals, F(3, 489) = 52.45, p = .001, adjusted R2 = .24. This result indicatesa linear relationship in the population, and the multiple regression model is a good fit for thedata. All three
handling and coping skills. The informal gathering took place in fun places in campus, the bowling arena and pooltablezone, where food, drinks, and opportunity drawings were gifted to the students. The workshopsfor on-campus resources, time management and financial planning took place in differentmonths, at least one month appart, at different hours of the day, in the same large classroom withround tables, and consisted of oral presentations, roundtable discussions, printed brochuresoffered to the students, food, drinks and opprtunity drawings. The forum with faculty andindustry professionals took place in a medium sized classroom and consists of a panel discussionfollowed by Q&A. b) Undergraduate Research Experiences To increase the
both in and out of the classroom. In 2020, this activitywas conducted as a virtual webinar and student questions were asked in the Q&A feature whichwas monitored by the meeting host.After listening to the dean’s interview, students are asked to write a one-page reflection paper inwhich they are asked to describe what they learned from the interview: (1) what is needed to besuccessful in the engineering profession; (2) the expectations of, or norms for, engineeringstudents; and (3) the lessons learned from the examples provided regarding the differencebetween successful and unsuccessful engineering teams. These reflections play an important rolein helping students understand the importance of valuing diversity in engineering teams
insophistication of stakeholders also results in higher confidence. 13Bibliography[1] T. D. Sadler, “Situated Learning in Science Education: Socio-scientific Issues as Contexts for Practice,” Stud Sci Educ, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–42, 2009.[2] A. Johri and B. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” J Eng Educ, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, 2011.[3] B. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global Engineering Competency in Context: Situations and Behaviors,” Online J. Glob. Eng. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2014.[4] G. Downey, “Are Engineers Losing Control of Technology
] S. R. Singer, M. L. Hilton, and H. A. Schweingruber, “America's lab report: Investigations inhigh school science,” National Academies Press, 2005.[10] M. Q. Patton, “Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to EnhanceInnovation and Use,” Guilford Press, 2010.[11] J. L. Glazer, and D. J. Peurach, “School improvement networks as a strategy for large-scaleeducation reform: The role of educational environments,” Educational Policy, vol. 27, pp. 676-710, 2012.[12] H. Preskill, and R. T. Torres, Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. SAGEPublications, 1999.[13] J. Clarke, and C. Dede, “Design for scalability: A case study of the River City curriculum,”Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 18, pp. 353-365, 2009