elements, logic elements, timing elements,digital logic gates and so on. In this paper, a description of the interesting and innovative designinglogic circuit project is presented which can apply to community college students in Electrical andComputer Engineering Technology fields. Project-Based Learning (PBL) provides students theability to gain knowledge and skills by working to investigate and respond to a complex question,problem or challenge in real-world scenarios (www.bie.org). The goal of PBL is to develop andenhance student learning by encouraging critical thinking, problem solving, teamwork and self-management. It has been emphasized by previous study (Han et al.1) that student-driven, Fall 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE
recent finding showed that it is the high achiever that would have a higher tendency tocheat, a break from the traditional viewpoint that low achievers would cheat more often 1. CityUniversity of New York has a writing intensive requirement and physics lab report writing wouldbe acceptable for meeting that writing requirement 2. The resubmission is dedicated by the writingintensive policy such that our community college has tutorial center where writing tutor wouldhelp a student in the first submission as well as in the resubmission. Given that professors arefaced with these challenges, it is important to develop a qualitative content analysis methodology.Our department also has a regrade policy where the chair will appoint regrade committee
the overall course were evaluated within each group. The mean grades for each group areoffered in Table 1, including the results of a two-sample t-test to determine if there is enoughstatistical significance in the difference between the means of the two groups. Table 1: Comparison of Grades including Two-Sample t-test Graded Item Picked Up Not Picked Up Null Hypothesis Significance (Mean Grade) (Mean Grade) (Means Equal) (p-value) Homework Assignment 95.0 92.6 Cannot Reject 0.5503 Midterm Exam 80.9 75.6 Cannot Reject 0.1367 Final Course Grade 86.9
innovative teaching delivery methods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Creation of an Immersive Environment to Provide Shop Equipment Training Wyatt J. Ritchie1, Dr. Marietta R. Scanlon1 1 Division of Engineering, Penn State BerksAbstractThe purpose of this project was to create an immersive environment to provide an introduction tomachine shop equipment on the Penn State Berks campus. Using a 360o video camera,operational videos of a lathe, vertical band saw, horizontal band saw, mill, and arc welder wereproduced. The videos were edited to incorporate informational narration and processed forviewing on either a desktop
American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Development of a Sustainable Technology for 3D Printing Using Recycled Materials Jason Lehrer1 and Dr. Marietta Scanlon1 1 Division of Engineering, Penn State BerksAbstractAs part of an undergraduate research project, a study was undertaken to determine the feasibilityof extruding recyclable plastic into usable filament to create a sustainable technology for 3-Dprinting. An extrusion process was developed using Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol (PETG)pellets to establish a baseline that would be used when investigating recyclable plastics.Modifications were done to allow for higher temperature extrusion to accommodate the
national security. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Towards Real-time Ergonomics Feedback and Educational Content with the use of Co-Robots Christian E. López 1 and Dr. Conrad S. Tucker1,2 1 Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, the Pennsylvania State University. 2 School of Engineering Design, Technology and Professional Programs, the Pennsylvania State University.AbstractEngineering students will play a major role in the process of improving the ergonomics in theworkplace. Nonetheless, studies indicate that engineering students are not familiar with theHuman Factors & Ergonomics (HF&E) methods used to improve
engineering.wave of revisions in their first-year programs in the last Previous findings suggest that students’ course perceptionsyears. These program modifications are intended to can affect their motivation to persist in an engineeringenhance student success in engineering, including both career [1]. The purpose of this study is to compare students’students’ achievement and students’ motivation to course perceptions in two versions, 1024 versus 1215, of apersist in an engineering degree. This paper will look at required introductory engineering course.students’ perceptions as it compares Traditional versus There is a need to understand how to better supportRevised versions of an
combined traditional classroom lectures with avarieties in the so called blended techniques [1] [2]. The competency-based learning approach. The fall 2016 semesterflipped classroom technique, primarily, is still a framework used a flipped classroom delivery with traditional evaluation.where content is disseminated outside the classroom and the The spring 2017 semester used a flipped classroom deliveryconcepts are applied inside the classroom in the presence of with the competency-based learning approach. In each ofthe instructor. Many studies have been conducted in all areas these semesters, 44 ±3 students were enrolled in the classesof education by partially [3] or fully flipping a classroom [4] where these techniques
engineering degree [1]-[3]. program must formulate a set of program student outcomes The Universidad Panamericana is a young private (PSO) (knowledge, skills, attitudes) that directly address theuniversity with 50 years of creation. It has three campuses in educational objectives and have specific outcomes. Thesethe main cities of Mexico: Guadalajara, Aguascalientes and PSO must be the ultimate goal acquired by the students whenMexico City. The School of Engineering at Mexico City has they complete the bachelor program. Table I show the PSO36 years of creation and offers the following Engineering in EAC commission [4].programs: Industrial, Mechanical, Innovation and Design
fulfill their own teaching or researchas time management, career options, on-campus tutoring objectives [1]. But current literature suggests that faculty areand resource centers to name a few. Based on student moving away from the earlier models in an attempt tofeedback and low retention rates, it was obvious that a increase retention rate by redefining first year engineeringnew model was needed. The focus was to be much more education [1,2,3]. Recently, there has been an emphasis onhands-on and use a project-oriented approach. In engineering design and hands-on, team work based projects.addition, multiple instructors were employed from four Such practices have shown to
-knowledge which is essential to the application of these facts solving flowchart. We use one flowchart per system. Toand procedures in problem solving. (Pawl, 2009)” solve multiple-system problems with multiple flowcharts, simply determine the order in which to solve each system. The S.I.M. (System, Interactions, and Model) [1] physicsproblem solving strategy, created by this MIT educationFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6 – August 8, 2017, Daytona Beach, FL W1A-1
involves the recording of a class session andworkshop will also have the opportunity to examine the structured annotation of the video classified as video-barriers to the implementation of VAPR and develop annotated peer review (VAPR) [5].actionable solutions to overcome those challenges. VAPR: VIDEO-ANNOTATED PEER REVIEWIndex Terms – evidence-based instruction, teaching Utilizing a commercially available web-based softwareobservations, peer-review platform, such as Swivl (shown in Figure 1), a community FACULTY PEER-REVIEW OF TEACHING of practice of
) introduce industry present an overview of different fields and careerprogramming and specifically MATLAB early in our opportunities in electrical engineering. In the second course,program, (iii) stress communication skills, and (iv) attract and ECE 102, students learn to develop algorithms and applyengage more students, in particular from under-represented computational software tools (mainly MATLAB) to solvegroups, into ECE [1]. While we have had some successes – primarily simple electrical engineering problems. They do apopular and engaging team design projects, hands-on lab project using MATLAB programming for data acquisitionexperience, and an alumni mentor program – we still
UVA studentsstudents who receive tutoring benefit from the individualized, who receive tutoring, as well as provide a model foractive learning experience, as well as the increased comfort continuing this assessment in future semesters.and understanding that comes from working with a peer [1]. METHODOLOGYTutoring also offers financial advantages, as supporting apeer tutoring program is generally more cost efficient than The tutoring survey (Appendix) was distributed as a Qualtricshiring professional tutors or additional TAs. Engineering and web survey via email to students tutored in the spring 2017applied science programs have adopted peer tutoring semester; the survey was
instructors can facilitate the transition from PCE to FYE.students arriving in first-year engineering programs Table 1 provides an overview of the workshop.with significant prior engineering experience. To assistfirst-year engineering faculty and staff with improving TABLE Ithe alignment of their programs with their students’ pre- WORKSHOP OVERVIEW Topic Descriptioncollege engineering experiences, in the first part of this Introduction Introductions and workshop objectivesworkshop we present a framework we developed to
become a primary focus at the University of economic backgrounds, and prior knowledge among studentsTexas at Arlington (UTA). UTA conducted a study that at UTA, ENGR 1300 utilizes the Student-Centered Activefound students were ill-equipped in the areas of problem Learning Environment with Upside-down Pedagogiessolving, professional writing, and computer (SCALE-UP) method. This method, developed at NC Stateprogramming. Therefore, UTA has recently created a University [1] and now utilized in many universities [2],new first year engineering course focused on improving focuses on creating a highly active and collaborativethese specific skill areas using the Student-Centered
found [1] that most students could not connect the conceptsthe semester, culminating in a laboratory final that in- from the laboratory to any practical applications and hadvolves applying concepts learned in a practical setting low perceptions of applicability of the material to their ma-under strict timing constraints. jor, based on an exit survey administered at the end of the Data show that students attained a more even level semester.of understanding across multiple topics, could apply Addressing these concerns, we designed a new labora-digital logic design concepts to real-world design prob- tory sequence that was piloted across two sections of thelems, and
) task-specific and not customizable. They can also be veryand personnel (faculty and graduate teaching assistants) costly when applied to a large class desiring hands-onrequired. The statics project is considered simple to experience.implement at a low-cost but effective and appreciated by Some course learning outcomes for the two creditthe students. Continuous improvements to the project are freshman course are stated as follows and the projectmade based on faculty observations and assessments, as discussed here relates to one part of outcome 1. It also relateswell as a survey administered to the students. to outcomes 2 and 3
with University’s context and initial efforts, including [1]-[3].concentrations in chemical and mechanical engineering. Reference [1] reports on Campbell University’s efforts toThis paper describes efforts to intentionally support the recruit a diverse cohort of students, [2] reports on thedevelopment of engineering identity in students during facilities prepared for and used by the incoming engineeringtheir first year through the formation of a community of students, and [3] discusses some elements of the origins andpractice. Faculty managed and supported a variety of in- adaptation of the first-year engineering curriculum.class and extracurricular activities to encourage the
” to provide after-hours support. ESEPs support One courses specific to the Faculty of Engineering.the instructional team by developing and focus-grouping Involving students as active participants in teaching andcourse materials, administering extra problem sets learning is growing in popularity. Healey et al. [1] suggestthrough on-line rooms, and informing instructors of that successful approaches take advantage of sharedstudent difficulties. Finally, the ESEPs support the engagement between students and academics seeking to learnadministration through research into best practices in together and enact changes to enhance student learningfirst-year engineering
, after participating in STEP. Supplemental Instruction was implemented as a mandatory intervention for allFYrE@ECST participants (Figure 1), to help them succeed in Calculus and Physics courses,which are high attrition courses. SI was selected because the model had been widely investigatedin engineering education and a great deal of researchers has reported on the positive results of SIworkshops (Martin & Arendale, 1994), since it was initially proposed in 1973 by Dr. DeannaMartin at the University of Missouri–Kansas City (UMKC). But most importantly, SI UMKCmodel goals were aligned with our goals to improve student performance in these high-attritioncourses and to increase retention and graduation rates of engineering students. The
-definedgenerating their own idea. projects in Lego robotics, computer-aided design (CAD) of a building, and a LabVIEW digital logic problem. The firstThe project combines entrepreneurial thinking and weeks of the pilot section were devoted to studentsmaker technology to allow students to address large-scale identifying a problem, then they spent the rest of the semestermultidisciplinary engineering problems. In addition to designing and building their solution. Teams were instructedthe introduction to engineering course, a 1 credit hour on design thinking and consumer-oriented design. Studentsfirst-year course, called the
mathematics. Another reason is students placed intohurting students’ chances to make satisfactory progress Calculus I lose their drive to do well in the course as theytowards their degree and ultimately graduate within find it difficult to establish a connection betweeneven six years. In order to address these serious issues, in mathematics and engineering [1-3]. Therefore, they struggleFall of 2016, New Jersey Institute of Technology offered to keep up with the coursework. In addition to loss ofENGR 101 – an application oriented course based on motivation, any delay in entry to Calculus I or failure inWright State University model to engineering students Calculus I is almost automatically
and pedagogies2011, with the first Computer Engineering graduates implemented in the first-year engineering programs over thefollowing in 2012. Although the Software Engineering past three years include:program was subsequently dropped, the Electrical and • Adoption of Studying Engineering: A Road Map to aIndustrial & Systems Engineering programs received ABET Rewarding Career. Ray Landis’ seminal work [1] wasaccreditation in 2012, followed by Computer Engineering in established as a foundational text in the Introduction to2013. The Mechanical Engineering program was started in Engineering course. In-class discussions and out-of-2014 and is on track to have its
an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor Univer- sity. 2017 FYEE Conference: Daytona Beach, Florida Aug 6 Session T2C First-year Redesign: LabVIEW, myRIO, EML, and More John Miller and Carolyn Skurla Baylor University, John_Miller1@baylor.edu, Carolyn_Skurla@baylor.eduAbstract - Over the past year, faculty at Baylor previously published [1]. One of the qualifying requirementsimplemented a new curriculum in a pilot course for first- is that
potentially transform a student’s pedagogical approaches along with the engineeringmindset. It was discovered that freshman engineering entrepreneurial mindset defined by the Kern Entrepreneurialstudents frequently re-examine their values and motivations Engineering Network (KEEN) [4-5], this paper describesduring their first year in college [1]. Thrown into unfamiliar how the Freshman Engineering Discovery courses have beensituations with a new environment and expectations, integrated with the EML. And it also shows the primaryundergraduate engineering programs become a crucible in outcomes obtained by implementing the EML in the courses,which engineering students have an opportunity to
two separateQuality Enhancement Plan (QEP). The MAPS program support initiatives: 1) Transition, academic success, andserves as indoctrination for engineering, engineering professional development coaching, and 2) Specific first-technology, and construction management students to and second-year engineering course Supplementallearn, understand, and establish personal connections to Instruction (SI) selection and funding. The focus of thisacademic success and professional development paper is on the transition, academic success, andstrategies, campus-wide resources, networking professional development coaching component of theopportunities, and organizations. The MAPS program
to select from whenare also becoming increasingly popular in course teaching programming; however there is little evidence toframeworks. This workshop will discuss the application support which is best for teaching students introductoryof second language acquisition in a blended learning programming concepts [1]. The goal in these courses is notenvironment (SLA-aBLe) and will examine the to teach students Python or Java, for example, as there areeffectiveness of using SLA techniques to teach other courses which specialize in those languages;introductory programming. The proposed workshop will introductory programming courses’ overarching goal is toalso share
Paper ID #20927Hardening Freshman Engineering Student Soft SkillsDr. Andrea Carneal Burrows, University of Wyoming Andrea C. Burrows is currently an associate professor in the Department of Secondary Education at the University of Wyoming, where she teaches courses in science methods and pedagogy. Dr. Burrows taught at Northern Kentucky University for five years. In 2010, she was hired as an external evaluator to con- duct research on community/university partnership relations at the University of Cincinnati. She has re- ceived several awards including the: 1) Lillian C. Sherman Award for outstanding academic achievement
university is dedicated to learning,versity. This 5-1/2-week residential pre-college bridge pro- discovery, and community engagement. NCATSU is the na-gram is used to recruit, retain, and graduate minor- tion's largest producer of African American bachelor of sci-ity freshmen engineering and computer science students ence graduates in engineering and computer science. The en-and to provide a sense of community. Since the inception gineering and computer science programs are housed in thein 2005, the HOME Program has recruited 189 students College of Engineering (COE).into the program. Each summer, a cohort of approxi- The COE at NCATSU is home to seven different depart-mately 20 students are