ortechnical problems [9]. Lifelong learning skills like “ability & eagerness to learn” and “selfawareness” align with the need to work through the complex sociotechnical challenges thatengineers face today [10], and support students in navigating an evolving labour system [11].Furthermore, the development of future skills through work integrated learning experiences hasbeen documented in other research [12]-[15].2.2 Identity Trajectory TheoryIdentity theory has a strong presence in the scholarship on the education and development ofengineering students, as practitioners attempt to understand the interplay between curricular,co-curricular and work experiences, and the development of students “as engineers” [16]-[18].While Identity Trajectory
economic structures. “Anti-toxics activists, through the process of local fights against polluting facilities, came to understand discrete toxic assaults as part of an economic structure in which, as part of the ‘natural’ functioning of the economy, certain communities would be polluted.” (Cole and Foster, 2000 p. 23).In the 1980s, civil rights leaders worked with the anti-toxics movement to conduct economicanalyses through their understanding of structures. In turn, anti-toxics leaders brought in the civilrights activists’ racial critiques (Cole and Foster, 2000). Together, these integrations ofknowledge and methods grew the environmental justice movement.Traditional Environmental MovementThe initiatives and efforts of
Engineering ProgramsAbstractChemical engineering education needs to be updated to reflect its growth and inclusion ofelements from various fields, such as pharmaceuticals, renewable energy, biotechnology, andconsumer products. As the industry continues to expand and there is a greater need forcommunication and leadership abilities in the 21st century, engineers who are working areanticipated to possess both technical expertise and professional skills. However, the typicalchemical engineering undergraduate core curriculum has not adapted to prepare students for themultiple needs encompassed by the chemical industry. Lack of industry-relevant examples/topicsand applications in the course contents results in less motivated and/or engaged
and characteristics 11. Transportation impact studies 6. Speed, travel time, and delay studies 12. Signal coordination 7. The hierarchy of intersection control 13. Actuated signal controlAppendix B provides a summary of the concepts (broken up by topic) that respondents indicatedwere included in their undergraduate curriculum. Responses are provided for all respondents (outof a total of 108 responses) and for those who only indicated their university had an introductorycourse that covered concepts related to traffic operations (out of a total of 22 responses).Participants were also asked about topics or concepts that were not specifically included in thelist. The most stated topics that were not
modernengineering practice and are best addressed in a group project. Shekar [3] suggests that in project-based learning, students are active learners and involved in hands-on activities. Professors arefacilitators who provide guidance to students and encourage students to think and work throughthe problem. This process has been shown to increase student motivation, allowing them to applythe knowledge learned in engineering classes, in an interactive environment. Students get a chanceto discuss concepts with each other and collaborate on projects working towards a common goal– this is also representative of a real-world project. Hadim et. al. [4-7] suggest that project-basedlearning facilitates the development of many of the “soft skills” demanded from
Ft. Campbell, the120-credit program totals $35,430. The flight lab fees add $96,619.50 to that tuition (seeAppendix B). The approximate cost of a nearby fixed-wing program with a similar curriculum is$ 60,000. [11]Aircraft: The next decision was what aircraft to obtain for the training. The predominant helicopterused for initial helicopter training in the U.S. is the Robinson R22. Its unmatched low initialacquisition cost makes it a natural choice for flight schools. It was determined, through initialresearch that the operating characteristics of the R22, were marginal, at best, for initial pilot training.The R22 suffers from an extremely low inertia main rotor system. This characteristic leaves theR22 main rotor susceptible to over
or subject matter (the modeling of the cancer tumordomain) are guided by the Catalytic Pellet4 that works as the “microscopic” level of the applicationto the learning topic. More details about the learning process and how it works are presented inthe section below.A Dual Level Learning ApproachAs indicated, the learning process in this contribution is driven by two levels of guiding tools forthe students. In Figure 1, we present an overview of the key levels of the processes integrated inthis learning approach. The students guided by the Foundry follow and overall strategy to learnand apply concepts related to the modelling of the transport in cancer tumor domains; the detailson how to apply the principles associated with the different
course available in some high schoolsbut many schools lacked teachers with the experience necessary to teach the class, and the situation waseven more dire at the middle school level. For example, there was no common CS curriculum. There hadalso been a lack of administrative support for having teachers attend CS PD. In addition, counselors hadnot encouraged students entering high schools offering the CS course to take it. To meet CS goals in the state, an RPP approach was implemented. RPPs are collaborative, long-term partnerships whose goal is to improve persistent problems of practice in education in a local context.In the RPP model, research is incorporated into decision-making processes, and the problems addressed aremeaningful to
assessment of immersing first-year ArchitecturalEngineering students into a beginning architecture design studio that is instructed by bothArchitecture faculty members and an Architectural Engineering faculty member.IntroductionThe utilization of interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and cross-disciplinary approaches inengineering curriculum is not a unique concept and has been widely used and accepted withinundergraduate engineering curriculums for decades. In 1997, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) adopted Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000), whichfurther emphasized that accredited engineering programs need to consider the ability to functionon multidisciplinary teams within their curriculums [1]. Since this time, there
topersist in STEM for these STEM students[12].STEM identity is a reflection of how one understands and positions oneself within theSTEM culture and is often defined as the composition of self-views that emerge fromsocialization and culturalization. Settings (communities) have the power to influence,create expectations, and influence decisions regarding STEM persistence.Culturally Relevant Pedagogy and Persistence in STEM DisciplinesCulturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRP) is an approach to teaching that recognizes andvalues the cultural experiences and identities of students and incorporates theseexperiences into the curriculum and teaching practices [17]. This approach has beenshown to be particularly effective in increasing the retention of
website can serve as a simplemethod to facilitate an accessible and inclusive learning environment for students.KeywordsTeaching/Learning Strategies, Accessibility, Inclusivity, Distributed Learning Environments,Online learning, Course design1. Introduction1.1 BackgroundThe use of Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) have enabled us to organize learningresources and disseminate information to students with positive impacts in their motivation tolearn [1], [2]. Importantly, analytics from VLEs such as clickstream data can be used topredict at-risk students [3], [4] as well as academic performance of students [5], [6]. VLEsare primarily used as a repository for teaching materials but recently, integration withapplications such as Turnitin, VLEs
Paper ID #38033RVfpga: Computer Architecture Course and MOOC Using a RISC-V SoCTargeted to an FPGA and SimulationDr. Sarah L. Harris, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Dr. Harris is a Professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) in the Electrical & Computer Engineering Department. She earned her M.S. and Ph.D. at Stanford University and has worked at Hewlett Packard, Nvidia, and the Technical University of Darmstadt. Before joining the UNLV faculty in 2014, she was a faculty member at Harvey Mudd College for ten years. Her research interests include embedded systems, biomedical engineering, and robotics, and she
/03043797.2023.2171852.[5] J. L. Plass, B. D. Hommer, and C. K. Kinzer, "Foundations of game-based learning," Educational Psychologist, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 258-283, Feb 2015, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533.[6] S. Domagk, R. N. Schwartz, and J. L. Plass, “Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1024–1033, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.003.[7] E. Andersen, “Optimizing adaptivity in educational games,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, Raleigh North Carolina: ACM, May 2012, pp. 279–281. doi: 10.1145/2282338.2282398.[8] D. Leutner, “Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: Effects of
Paper ID #40015Redesign of an Engineering Failure Course to Incorporate LearningObjectives in Diversity, Ethics and InclusivityDr. Gary P. Halada, Stony Brook University Dr. Halada, Associate Professor in Materials Science and Chemical Engineering at Stony Brook Uni- versity, directs an interdisciplinary undergraduate degree program in Engineering Science. He designs educational materials focused on nanotechnology, advanced manufacturing and engineering adaptation for climate change. He also works with faculty from other disciplines to explore the integration of STEM and liberal arts education
Furterer is a Professor of Practice in the Integrated Systems Engineering Department, within the College of Engineering at The Ohio State University. She is also Lead Faculty in the Engineering Tech- nology program across the regional campuses. She has applied Lean Six Sigma, Systems Engineering, and Engineering Management tools in healthcare and other service industries. She previously managed the Enterprise Performance Excellence center in a healthcare system. Dr. Furterer received her Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering with a specialization in Quality Engineering from the University of Central Florida in 2004. She received an MBA from Xavier University, and a Bachelor and Master of Science in Industrial and Systems
, a single kit was developed to be purchasedby students upon entering the ME major, with all the components needed for subsequent requiredcourses. Meanwhile, an online repository with sample code, descriptions of components, andtutorials was compiled [4]. This online repository can enable cross-curricular learning, allowingstudents to link knowledge from different courses. Faculty teaching ME courses can use thesesources as supplements for their teaching material—easily implementing hands-on assignmentsthat reinforce theoretical concepts in the course. We formally assessed the use of these kits andonline repository using a pre-post semester survey of students. To capture how the kits impactstudent learning objectives across the curriculum
strength of materials courses for 12 years and has been leading the efforts focused on support, global engagement, and academic integrity as Assistant Dean since 2014. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Development of an innovative undergraduate engineering academic advising modelThis work in progress describes the re-imagination and re-design of the Pennsylvania StateUniversity’s College of Engineering undergraduate academic advising model. Currently, themajority of in-major students are advised exclusively by faculty members. To improve supportfor students while also better supporting and engaging faculty with academic advisingresponsibilities, the
skills and collaborative and inclusive teams into the curriculum. Dr. Rivera-Jim´enez graduated from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez with a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. She earned an NSF RIEF award recognizing her effort in transitioning from a meaningful ten-year teaching faculty career into engineering education research. Before her current role, she taught STEM courses at diverse institutions such as HSI, community college, and R1 public university. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Social Responsibility Views in Science and Engineering: An Exploratory Study Among Engineering Undergraduate
are prepared to work in ourincreasingly global society [10]. A characteristic that describes global engineers is their ability totranslate engineering work to a business context which can be done with an EM.The Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) is here to meet this need. KEEN is apartnership of engineering faculty across the nation dedicated to integrating the EM intoengineering coursework [11]. Within KEEN, an EM is achieved through Entrepreneurial MindedLearning (EML) and applies what are known as the 3Cs: Curiosity, Connections, and CreatingValue. Since joining KEEN in 2017, The Ohio State University College of Engineering hasintegrated EML into the standard and honors course sequences of its First-Year EngineeringProgram
introduced into the curriculum in the form of a semester long project. QFT engagesstudents to develop their own personalized questions for research as opposed to classes that relyon the instructor simply assigning questions or topics for research. QTF focuses on the studentsdeveloping an essential – yet often overlooked – lifelong learning skill of asking and creatinggood questions. The goals of this proposal are to generate curiosity and elicit connections forstudents on subjects they may have less exposure in and further develop students' soft skills. Theproject consisted of five prompts periodically spread out over the course in the form of an in-class activity. The students formed groups of 3-5 and generated questions that would then turninto an
which the curriculum tends to focus on the science ofengineering much more than the application. The traditional design capstone sequences result inpaper designs, leaving students wanting more experiential learning. This experimental projectscapstone course sequence is an attempt to address that in a more engaging way for the studentsthan a traditional senior lab course series. Due to the research focus of the capstone, EML wasan obvious choice for improving the course sequence. The core concepts of the EM frameworkwere already in the courses, so it mainly required adjusting the terminology.ImplementationLike most capstones, AE 4510-11 already requires more work than the students wish. Animportant aspect of this implementation of EML was to
. She is a member of the instructional team of the Fundamentals of Engineering Development course. She earned her undergraduate degree in Communication Studies at William Paterson University, her Master’s degree in Education Administra- tion and Supervision at Montclair State University, and her Doctorate in Educational Leadership, Higher Education from Saint Peter’s University.Prof. Lucie TchouassiDr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an application-oriented course for engineering students placed in pre-calculus courses. He has
Paper ID #40512Photovoltaic Design Projects as an Innovation in Our Fundamentals ofElectric Circuits CourseDr. Peter Mark Jansson, Bucknell University Professor Jansson currently is engaged as an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Bucknell University where he is responsible for pedagogy and research in the power systems, smart grid and analog systems areas. His specialties include grid integration of large scale renewables and research of novel sensor and energy technologies.Devin Connor Whalen, Bucknell University Devin Whalen is a graduate student at Bucknell University, pursuing a master’s degree in
the College of Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. His focus is on project-based learning. He earned his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Louisiana Tech University in Spring of 2004.William C. Long ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Thermoelectric Cooling Project to Improve Student Learning in an Engineering Technology Thermodynamics CourseAbstractMany engineering technology courses incorporate hands-on experiences to build intuition offundamental topics and industry-relevant skills. A project was developed to enable theapplication of thermodynamic principles in a sophomore-level Instrumentation and ControlSystems Engineering Technology (ICET
Figure 3 - Distribution of Participant answers for prompt 4: Stakeholder Involvement4. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONSOur study’s findings show that over 90% (35% scored 3 points while 56% scored 2.2 points) of studentparticipants can identify multiple stakeholders when prompted with a specific question to identifystakeholders (prompt 3). Fewer of them can consider stakeholders as an integral part of the solutiondevelopment process when this aspect is not emphasized in the question (prompt 4). Fifty percent of theparticipants discussed getting input from more than one stakeholder, and only 27% went beyond and madethem part of the team seeking to find a solution to the problem.Stakeholder awareness has been a relevant topic in engineering education
current curriculum 85 should be modified to include activities and assignments geared towards soft skill 86 development17,18. Problems may arise if one or several group members are not well-developed in 87 core soft skills, creating tension within a group. 88 89 Research indicates the degree of team success is highly dependent on the attitude that each member 90 has towards other members and the overall goals of the group, with factors such as gender and 91 group size directly affecting individual attitudes and overall group effectiveness19,20. One of the 92 most common problems that student groups experience is a member not meeting base group 93 expectations. The group dynamic of an ideal team would present all members equally
was around the concept of belonging. Asmentioned in Sense of Belonging: A Vital Mental Health Concept, sense of belonging is “theexperience of personal involvement in a system or environment so that individuals feel themselvesto be an integral part of that system or environment” [24]. “I have heard at least most if not all my engineering female friends share that they feel they don’t belong in engineering. This is more universal amongst women from all backgrounds. In fact I had a boss, a woman, who suggested I leave engineering and consider other careers. This is after I already had received my PhD and had a string of accomplishments, patents, and scientific publications to my name. Unwrapping all these
IEcourses for four consecutive semesters (Fall 2021 - Spring 2022) by creating a set of hands-onlearning experiments and using affordable equipment to actively engage the students in "thoughactive demonstration with the hands-on engagement learning platform." The inclusion of theECP concept in the two IE undergraduate courses was done to show better how scientifictheories like the theories of thermodynamics and Hooke's law are applied in actual situations.According to Cox's research [5], a standard set of tools is frequently utilized in an undergraduateengineering curriculum to give students practical experiences with basic machine sciencetheories that serve as the foundation for automation and robotics. Theories presented in class areintegrated
Paper ID #40217Board 159: Developing An Assessment Toolkit for Pre-college SummerEngineering Workshops (Works-in-Progress)Dr. Tamecia R. Jones, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Tamecia Jones is an assistant professor in the STEM Education Department at North Carolina State Uni- versity College of Education with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and infor- mal and formal learning environments.Dr. Leah Bug, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Leah Bug has over 35 years of experience teaching both formal and informal K-20 STEM education, with over 20 years in designing and
begiven in the morning if we visited an offshore oil company later in the day. The combination of lectures,company visits, and travel required adaptation in every student to fully synthesize our learnings. Included in the program were language and history classes, taught one to two times a week bymembers of the Brazilian community. A prominent objective of the program was to immerse students in aforeign culture and allow them to appreciate the engineering curriculum in a new space. These languageand history classes allowed us to do just that. By learning the basics of Portuguese, we could acknowledgethose showing us generosity throughout the visits. A simple greeting and thank you went a long way, andin the end, the experience would not