” demonstrates that the REU site experience was beneficialin promoting the inclusion of these students in engineering, regardless of its perceived impact ontheir academic performance. Because the REU site was heavily focused on research, it is importantto understand what specific aspects of conducting research the participants preferred, to understandhow to implement these factors in future programs and in the existing engineering curriculum.Therefore, participants were asked to indicate how much they agreed or disagreed with a series ofstatements following the prompt “One of the best things about doing engineering research is beingable to…” (Table 3). Table 3. Descriptive statistics for responses to the prompt “One of the best things about doing
responsibility, develop and implement complex systems,communicate and function within multidisciplinary groups, and understand impacts of theirdesigns in different societal and environmental contexts.Achieving these outcomes requires a pedagogy that not only holistically broadens non-technicalaspects of engineering design, but provides a conducive learning environment that is responsiveto the changing professional industry landscape. At our University, we have endeavored tofacilitate innovation and professional efficacy by closely tying our capstone course with currentindustry practice. The course begins with as a traditional lecture course in parallel with theproblem-based learning format during the first five weeks to rapidly prepare learners for
graduated with a Mechanical Engineering degree and Aerospace Engineer- ing and Mathematics minors from Kennesaw State University in December of 2017. As a student at Kennesaw State, Andrew volunteered as a member of the Kennesaw State Aerial Robotics Competition Team where he founded the SAE AeroDesign Team and served as SAE Team Captain, and Team Pilot. Under Andrew’s leadership, the SAE AeroDesign Team designed, built, tested, and flew several large- scale radio-controlled airplanes capable of carrying a substantial payload. Additionally, Andrew served as Structures Designer and Pilot for the Sting One Owl Mascot Project where he designed, built, and flew a five-foot by five-foot hexa-copter drone designed to emulate
populations ofengineering students. Overall, the goal of this paper is to recount the creation, testing, andvalidation of the survey measure before it was used with a national population. We hope thispaper will contribute to the discussion of survey development best practices within engineeringeducation, as well as act as a future resource for the GRADS project as data and results areshared. MethodMeasuresSurvey Item Development. Two surveys were developed to explore EDS’s engineeringidentities and how their identities impacted motivation in their doctoral programs. Items weredrawn from existing research, specifically Godwin's (2016) work on engineering identity andOyserman's (2015) theory of identity-based
biomedical engineering from Marquette University and Rensselaer at Hartford respectively. Her doctorate is in higher education administration from the University of Phoenix. She conducts research in the clinical applications of radio frequency identification technologies (RFID) as well as STEM student retention.Mr. Joe Tabas, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Joe Tabas is a lecturer of Engineering Technology at the IUPUI school of Engineering Technology. His areas of research include digital electronics and data communication for medical devices and industrial control systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 When Emerging Technologies Cross Academic
and engineering, and the views of both teachers and students as they enact and complete interdis- ciplinary curricula.Mr. Richard Lie, Purdue University, West Lafayette Richard Lie is a graduate student in the Department of Biological Sciences and graduate research assistant in the School of Engineering of Education at Purdue University. He received his BS/MS in Biology from the University of California, San Diego. His interests include usage of primary literature in undergraduate biology courses, STEM integration, and science process skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering Design Professional Development as a Mechanism for Changing Science
Maria response.Mr. Zachary Lewis Martin Zachary L. Martin graduated from Mercer University with a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering as well as a Master’s degree in Engineering Management. He has volunteered with Mercer on Mission as an assistant with researching health and water sanitation practices (WASH) for families in eastern Madagascar. He currently works for Burns & McDonnell, a consulting engineering firm, in the Aviation & Federal industry.Ms. Katelyn C.N. Dimopoulos, Mercer University Katelyn Dimopoulos was the captain of the Mercer University Division 1 Women’s Soccer team and recently earned her BSE in mechanical engineering from Mercer University in 2017. She traveled to Madagascar
undergraduate degree program inrobotics. At that time, there were only a handful of universities worldwide offeringundergraduate Robotics programs, none in the United States, although many universitiesincluded robotics within a discipline such as Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, orMechanical Engineering. WPI took a decidedly different approach. We introduced Robotics as amulti-disciplinary engineering discipline to meet the needs of 21st century engineering. Thecurriculum, designed top-down, incorporates a number of best practices, including spiralcurriculum, a unified set of core courses, multiple pathways, inclusion of social issues andentrepreneurship, an emphasis on project-based learning, and capstone design projects. Thispaper provides a
Program at The University of Texas at Austin. Dr. White is also the director of an outreach program called Design, Technology, & Engineering for All Children (DTEACh) which has reached more than 1000 teachers and 85,000 students. She is the lead inventor on a patent for assistive technology. Her current research includes global competencies, innovative design-based peda- gogy, humanitarian engineering, and ways to attract and retain traditionally underrepresented groups in engineering education.Dr. Renetta G. Tull, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Renetta Garrison Tull is Associate Vice Provost for Strategic Initiatives at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC: An Honors University in
Paper ID #23456Enhancing a Real-time Audio Laboratory Using the MATLAB Audio SystemToolboxMr. Kip D. Coonley, Duke University Kip D. Coonley received the M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, in 1999 and the B.S. degree in Physics from Bates College, Lewiston, ME, in 1997. Following graduation from Dartmouth, he developed electronically controlled dimmers for fluorescent and incan- descent lamps at Lutron Electronics, Coopersburg, PA. From 2001 to 2005, he was a Research Engineer at RTI International, where he designed high-efficiency thermoelectrics using epitaxially grown super
) Fellowship, Aggies Commit to Professional Student Educational Experiences, Graduate Teaching Lecturer Fellowship, and Climate Award. She was also the only academic recipient of the Texas and Louisiana Engineering News Record (ENR) Top Young Professional Award in 2017. Dr. Kermanshachi is currently directing a very vibrant construction engineering and education research group and advising several Ph.D. and Master’s students c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Analysis and Assessment of Graduate Students’ Perception and Academic Performance Using Open Educational Resource (OER) Course MaterialsMs. Thahomina Jahan Nipa, University of Texas at Arlington Ph.D. Student, Department of Civil
unique perspectives that each author brings, in terms ofethnicity, culture, gender, sexual orientation, and class [13], [14] also helps ensure that the datawas cross-checked amongst the team for rigor and trustworthiness of the findings.MethodsA qualitative case study design was used to explore the experiences and understanding of ethicalmentoring principles for eight graduate students and four faculty within science and engineeringusing research mentoring relationships as a developmental factor [15]. The ethical mentoringprinciples were used to inform selection of vignettes or ‘case studies’ from Johnson’s mentoringguide for higher education faculty [3]. This vignette technique was selected because it allowsparticipants explore the attitudes
of learning from school into professional practice as well as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Ms. Allyson Jo Ironside, Oregon State University Ally Ironside is a recent graduate from LeTourneau University where she studied Water Resources in Civil Engineering. She is currently fusing her technical background with her passion for education in pursuing a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering while conducting research in Engineering Education at Oregon State University. Her research interests include the adoption of teaching best practices in engineering and the personal epistemology development students.Dr. Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia Nathaniel
engineering and development of an interest in STEM topics in K-12 students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Assessing the Impact of Educational Factors on Conceptual Understanding of Geotechnical Engineering TopicsIntroductionA commonly accepted assessment instrument used for both diagnostic and formative purposes isthe concept inventory [1], [2], which refers to any kind of research-based assessment techniquethat measures conceptual understanding [1], [3]. The usage of concept inventories helpsinstructors measure the effectiveness of their teaching [1], [3] and determines if students have thecorrect understanding of important concepts on a topic. When the same set of questions is
who mentor the civil engineering design projects. The projects expose the civil engineering students to real world design problems. The students gain first hand experi- ence communicating professionally, developing schedules, meeting deadlines and preparing professional quality reports and presentations. Prof. Brunell is the director of the Water Resouces graduate program. She also teaches Fluid Mechanics, Surveying and Water Resources.Dr. Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology Dr. Keith G. Sheppard is Senior Advisor to the Dean in the Charles V. Schaefer, Jr. School of Engineer- ing and Science and a professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science. His research interests have
-disciplinary Approach to Project Based LearningMeta-disciplinary or interdisciplinary learning provides a platform for students to gaincollaborative teamwork skills that are transferrable to their professional career. The courseprovided an encouraging environment for students to collaborate and develop common eco-district design vocabulary and protocols. Student teams researched and prepared formal casestudies of exemplar eco-district design projects, and identified best practices used in the designprocess. They discovered why an interdisciplinary approach is a necessity for successfulplanning, implementation, and management of high-performance districts.The interdisciplinary process of the course emphasizes creating a collaborative environment
of knowledge” from the American Academy of EnvironmentalEngineers and Scientists (AAEES) and Army doctrine. The interaction of these two professionalaspects, and how they are integrated into the engineering design project, will be presented. Thedeliberate blending of these critical components from each perspective to meet both the needs ofthe engineering profession and the needs of active duty military service will be discussed.Although meaningful assessment of the impact of this educational approach is not borne out untilstudents have graduated, the faculty at our institution have assessment data that demonstrate thevalue of this approach for future personal and professional growth.Introduction One of the common attributes of a
Paper ID #213292018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Social Enterprise Model for a Multi-Institutional Mentoring Network for Womenin STEMDr. Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College Dr. Sara A. Atwood is an Associate Professor and Chair of Engineering at Elizabethtown College in Penn- sylvania. She holds a BA and MS from Dartmouth College, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley. Dr. Atwood’s research interests are in creativity, engineering design, first-generation and low-income students, internship
formal hypotheses [11]. Conducting research as a team of social scientistsand practitioners creates regular opportunities to practice abduction. We discuss initialimpressions before analysis, share research results, discuss potential interpretations, and dialogueabout what initial impressions and theories still fit. In particular, the practitioners help the teammaintain closeness to theories of change, and the social scientists help the team probe for wheretheory does not fit the data. Collaboration on interpretation introduces validity checks, as theteam must work towards agreement on the best-fitting descriptions or explanations, andcreativity to arrange and re-arrange ideas and interpretations through the writing process,resulting, hopefully
covers basic RF design to broadband device and system design. Boththeoretical concepts and practical laboratory experience span RF/microwave measurement theoryand techniques to 10’s of GHz. SystemVue is also used by multiple teams within the GeorgiaElectronic Design Center (GEDC) which is a cross-disciplinary electronics and photonicsresearch center with more than 15 active faculty and over 100 graduate and undergraduatestudents. SystemVue enables the researchers to explore architectures and algorithms for a widevariety of communications systems including wireless and optical links which include RF,Optical and DSP subsystems. Research efforts have application in both commercial and defensesystems.As the largest electrical engineering program in
for temporary structures,and in addition, propose a course format for teaching temporary structures.2. Literature ReviewIn construction, the contractor chooses the best construction methodology to get the job done.Those construction methods include resources such as labor, equipment, and material.Temporary structures are part of those tools that a contractor must use in order to construct thepermanent structuresIn practice, the contractor is responsible for making sure that temporary structures are capable ofcarrying, supporting and resisting loads that they are exposed to. As such, the contractor isresponsible for temporary structures, the design and the selection of a design firm to design thesystems.The question then is why should a
Swarthmore College in 1980. She went on to earn an MS in Operations Research from Stanford University in 1981 and a Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University in 1984. After 30 years at Georgia Tech in a variety of roles, Donna became the Executive Director of the new Institute for STEM and Diversity Initiatives at Boise State University in January 2015. Donna’s current interests center around education issues in general, and in particular on increasing access and success of those traditionally under-represented and/or under-served in STEM higher education.Ms. Ann Delaney, Boise State University Ann Delaney graduated in 2016 with her Masters in Materials Science & Engineering with an interdisci- plinary
Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering students’ identity devel- opment. She is the recipient of a 2014
questions:How are school counselors prepared to offer advisement for engineering career preparation? Inwhat ways and to what extent do school counselors interact with students to impact pre-collegepreparation for post-secondary engineering study and careers? In an effort to establish baselinedata to answer these research questions, a professional development for school counselors wasoffered at Stony Brook University to provide preliminary training in STEM preparation for post-secondary academic success. Data were collected from a group of participants to understandingcurrent counseling practices and how university-based training might improve their knowledgebase to impact student participation and preparation for STEM in higher education.Study Design
and diversity in bothacademia and the workplace. The instructor attended a Society of Women Engineers (SWE)conference in 2016 and became inspired to prepare engineers for embracing diversity andunderstanding the challenges that women and underrepresented minorities face in the workplace.The instructor had been a woman engineer in industry and in academia for many years, and hadexperienced many of the same challenges discussed in the research literature. The coursedevelopment was highly supported by the Dean of the School of Engineering (SoE), theEngineering Management, Systems and Technology Department chair, the EngineeringManagement Graduate program coordinator, the SoE’s Diversity and Inclusion program, and theother department chairs
from the University of California at Berkeley. Dr. Atwood’s research interests are in creativity, engineering design, first-generation and low-income students, internship experiences, and criterion-based course structures.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as
during class time. They guide the students through best practices for team formation andare prompted with thought questions for team norms, motivation, goals and performancemeasures. Mid-way through teaming for the term, a team refinement activity is designed to havethe students analyze their team experience and functionality, as well as self-reflect on their ownbehavior. In addition, the teams revisit their performance definitions to adjust as necessary.The initial team formation activities were also repeated for Winter 2018 courses, and a conflictresolution module series has been incorporated to build on the Fall 2017 activities (Table 1). Themodule consists of an initial conflict handling mode training workshop, a mid-term conflictresolution
private colleges; comprehensive universities, dedicated engineering schools, andliberal arts colleges; and rely on an articulated system of education that includes communitycolleges and extends into various, non-standardized opportunities for continuing professionaldevelopment and graduate work. We can add to this the fact that we have 50 separate statesystems for higher education, significant regional variation in industrial capabilities and theirattendant workforce needs, and a variety of federal policies and programs not the least of whichis the federal commitment to scientific and engineering research. While scholars such as KenAlder (1997) have noted how institutional diversity exists even in state-centered systems ofengineering education as
York University in Toronto, Canada and a Bachelor of Education from McGill University in Montreal, Canada.Mr. Michael A. Carapezza, Hk Maker Lab Michael Carapezza is the Hk Maker Lab Program Coordinator. Michael graduated from Columbia Uni- versity with a B.S. in biomedical engineering in 2013, focusing on medical imaging technology. After three years working in biomedical research laboratories, Michael joined the World Science Festival where he managed their digital education initiative and produced their live science lecture series, World Science U. He joined Hk Maker Lab in 2016. Michael is passionate about science and engineering education, and feels that hands-on learning and student-driven inquiry are the best
improve quality of life. Experience with financial auditing for state Congress, government projects, and universities in the U.S. demonstrate diverse work and skills. Mission: Global diversity and inclusion in STEM fields. Presence: U.S., Latin America, Caribbean and Asia.Ms. Denise Nicole Williams, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Denise N. Williams is a third year Chemistry PhD candidate at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) as a member of Dr. Zeev Rosenzweig’s nanomaterials research group. She is currently a National Science Foundation AGEP Fellow, a Meyerhoff Graduate Fellow, and a research associate of the Center for Sustainable Nanotechnology. Prior to her time at UMBC, Denise earned a