creativity is essential for addressingcomplex modern problems. The discussion includes the contributions of E. Paul Torrance, a pioneer increativity research, whose work emphasizes that creativity can be nurtured and developed in students.Relevant educational frameworks are briefly reviewed. Drawing on their experience in teaching courseslike Creative (Product) Design and Capstone Design, the authors outline strategies for fostering creativitywithin engineering education. These strategies include collaborative reasoning, project-based learning, andthe application of creative tools such as brainstorming and ideation notebooks. While many engineeringschools have embraced this approach, others must adopt it to prepare students for the challenges of
use of the Analog Discovery Board (ADB). Additionally, the leadershipteam supported program participants in addressing matters related to sustainability at the local andHBCU collaboration level. This included topics related to additional funding for instruction,developing and funding shared research efforts, and development of a broader leadership group.This section presents results related to the overall Year Three grant goals and activities.Finding: The majority of the grant participants expressed satisfaction with their project experience, noting that participation was beneficial for them professionally and personally, and would definitely impact their students. Positive outcomes included increased knowledge of
has been successful in obtaining funding and publishing for various research projects. She’s also the founder and advisor of the first ASEE student chapter in Puerto Rico at UPRM. Currently, she serves as Academic Senator and Faculty Representative at the Administrative Board at UPRM. Her research interests include investigating students’ understanding of difficult concepts in engineering sciences, especially for underrepresented populations (Hispanic students). She has studied the effectiveness of engineering concept inventories (Statics Concept Inventory - CATS and the Thermal and Transport Concept Inventory - TTCI) for diagnostic assessment and cultural differences among bilingual students. She has also
long term interest in pursuing coding careers, we hypothesize that longercamps spread over one or more academic years to be ideal.Acknowledgement:The authors would like to thank Texas Workforce Commision for funding the camp and the staffof Good Samaritan Community Center, San Antonio, Texas for providing space to hose thesummer campReferences[1] National girls collaborative alliance https://ngcproject.org/statistics Retrieved Dec 3, 2019.[2] Best time to build a love of STEM? It’s after the school day ends, research sayshttps://hechingerreport.org/school-programs-can-boost-interest-stem-research-shows/ Retrieved Dec 22, 2019[3] Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2016, February). Factors influencing computer science learning in
efforts that acknowledge learner diversity, and understand their effects in students performance. Isabel received her professional degree in biological engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile and her MA in policy, organizations and leadership studies at Stanford Graduate School of Education.Dr. Constanza Miranda Mendoza, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile Constanza Miranda holds a PhD in design with a focus in anthropology from North Carolina State Uni- versity. While being a Fulbright grantee, Constanza worked as a visiting researcher at the Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering Department, at Stanford. Today she is an assistant professor at the P.Universidad Cat´olica de Chile’s
, Miami.Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her graduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech (PhD) and Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (UVa). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Proposing a Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy Research Framework in Sub- Saharan African STEM Education: A Paradigm Shift from Deficit to Asset- Based PerspectivesAbstractResearch shows that
outcomes, international students in engineering, and cognitive sciences. She holds a B.S. in Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering and an M.S. in Geological Sciences.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair of the Engineering Education Research Program at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024WIP: The Role of Classroom Teaching Practices on the Academic Success ofEngineering College Students with ADHDAbstractAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurological
], and proposes an alternative way to think about the role of self-efficacy in careerchoice development. The motivation of this paper was a quantitative study that produced resultsmisaligned with SCCT and a follow-up qualitative study of the same population that usedPVEST to explore underlying reasons. While empirical studies generally support the SCCTmodel (i.e., mathematics self-efficacy is correlated positively with mathematics performance[2]), research with minoritized youth is much less consistent [3], [4], [5], [6]. For example, Blackstudents had higher mathematics self-efficacy compared to White, Hispanic, or Asian peers, butthat did not translate to performance [7], [8]. Using PISA 2003 data, researchers even found asignificant negative
in the context ofcomputer programming was both related to and distinct from this notion of the functions of aproduct.)At some point, someone signed “so, it’s what the thing tells you about itself?” and there was anelectric moment in the room. “Yes, that! It’s what the thing tells you about — how you can useit, what it’s for…” And so, with several grammatical and production tweaks, our signedprototypes for affordance theory was born.The signs for “affordance” and “to afford” reveal (or rather, afford) exploring aspects ofaffordance theory that may be less obvious in English. For instance, when these signs wereshown to a hearing non-signer who uses affordance theory in their research, they began to usethe signs as tools with which to think
interactive engagement, potentially fostering critical thinking andinquiry-driven approaches. For example, chatbots can guide students through structured learningpaths, making STEM concepts more accessible and engaging [1,2]. Nonetheless, using AI ineducational settings does not guarantee that students will be critically aware of the AI systemsthey interact with.Critical AI education focuses on equipping students with the skills to evaluate these widely usedAI systems critically, emphasizing digital literacy, ethical reasoning, and collaboration to usethem better. As AI systems increasingly shape societal structures, integrating these educationalobjectives has become vital to preparing students for technology-driven futures. AI for Education(AI4EDU
tookplace at a selected HBCU in US for an overarching goal of improving students’ learningexperiences and outcomes. For this purpose, authors have proposed a project to widen theimplementation of evidence-based pedagogies in STEM education at an HBCU in US andsystematically capture the changes in STEM faculty’s approaches to teaching and understandingof their students’ learning. The project was funded by the department of education and initiatedin 2015. The purpose of the study we present here was to explore and document the changes inSTEM faculty’s approaches to teaching and understanding of learning because of theirparticipation in the project activities.Literature Review Widening research-based pedagogies in higher education and
their bachelor’s degreesin Engineering Physics; are either research assistants or research assistant professors of Physics;are members of the Physics Education Research group; and are engaged in a broad range ofeducational research, mostly at “the intersection of ethnic studies, critical pedagogies, and STEMteaching and learning” (author’s biographical sketch) with a focus on engineering design andequitable change in STEM programs.The diversity of the authors’ expertise and interests was reflected in the qualities that theselection committee for LEES best paper focused in in explaining its choice of this paper. “Theexamination of student engagement with ethics and ethical reasoning builds on past work on themismatch between engineering-science
Supplementary Instruction (SI) in STEM gateway coursesThe basic premise of our retention effort is a focused, institution-wide effort rather than fragmented(departmental) and/or diffused initiatives. Attrition is a multi-variant phenomenon that requiresimproving students’ life and learning experiences. An extensive body of research identifies severalmechanisms to promote students to persist and graduate. Promoting retention in a college settingis attributed to (i) effective and personalized advising; (ii) a social and academic supportiveenvironment; and (iii) an atmosphere that fosters collaborative and cooperative teaching andlearning. Our retention activities are facilitated through STEM Supplemental Instruction (SI)program.Over the past four years
researcher], and [our social scientist] come into play because I think [the faculty are] going to be more receptive to reaching out to them, talking to them, and also summarizing what students are thinking through the focus group meetings and they can bring back what the students are overwhelmingly saying. This approach is not working for the majority of the students and maybe that presents a strong enough reason to change.Similarly, a social scientist at another institution said of their teammates: [They] are not small actors in having created an environment where people felt like they could contribute and do interesting things. They're understated heroes in that regard. They're trusted
of Connecticut as a part of the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF-RED) project, ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. In her time at the University of Connecticut she has also worked as a Research Assistant for NSF CAREER project ”Promoting Engineering Innovation Through Increased Neurodiversity by Encouraging the Participation of Students with ADHD” and has served as Program Assistant for the related summer program for middle school students with ADHD. Prior to join- ing the University of Connecticut, she spent eight years as a public school teacher in Connecticut, where she maintained a focus on providing a varied learning environment and differentiated
sustainable energy technologies. She holds a BS and MS in Engineering Mechanics and a PhD in Biomedical Engi- neering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Robin Dawn Anderson, James Madison University Robin D. Anderson serves as the Academic Unit Head for the Department of Graduate Psychology at James Madison University. She holds a doctorate in Assessment and Measurement. She previously served as the Associate Director of the Center for Assessment and Research Studies at JMU. Her areas of research include assessment practice and engineering education research.Cheryl Alyssa Welch Alyssa Welch is a Psychological Sciences master’s student in the concentration of Experimental Psychol- ogy, and a Graduate Teaching Assistant in the
Paper ID #43149Identifying Curriculum Factors that Facilitate Lifelong Learning in AlumniCareer Trajectories: Stage 3 of a Sequential Mixed-Methods StudyNikita Dawe, University of Toronto PhD student in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto, Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education.Amy Bilton, University of TorontoMs. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching and Associate Director, ISTEP (Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice) at the University of Toronto. Her research focuses on
outstand- ing publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison.Patricia Clayton, University of Texas at AustinGabriella P. Sugerman, University of Texas at Austin Gabriella Sugerman is a queer, white, female graduate student in biomedical engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. In addition to her research in biomechanics, she is focused on expanding participation in difficult dialogues around equity and inclusion within engineering higher education.Cassandra Prince, LGBTQ+ STEM Issues and Advocacy
theunknown motives and actions of the other team members. While effective and appropriate teamleadership is often identified by students as a major factor in team success, a more fundamentalattribute of a successful team is trust among its members.This research study will identify and explore the role of trust in the dynamics of successful firstyear engineering design teams at our multidisciplinary university in the eastern United States.We are using a conceptual framework for the formation of trust in a team-based environment,which has been formed by studies of successful business, technical and sports teams. Despitedifferences in maturity and experience, engineering students have a lot in common with theseolder team members, because both groups
students (which isvaluable), nor faculty-student relationships (which is also valuable), but also amongstfaculty as an essential component of post Covid education.In the past ten years, this single online, pre-engineering collaborative accounts for theequivalent of over 2% of Native American engineering students annually graduating witha bachelor’s degree in engineering [9], accomplished through building trust andcommunity. Throughout the program's tenure, student-student relationships, student-instructor relationships, and instructor-instructor relationships were all intentionallyfostered through the structure of the collaborative. The students are very capable andthe program supports their efforts through a culturally-appropriate emphasis
community engagement. Moreover, the curriculum incorporateshuman-centered design and key engineering processes to foster engineering habits of mind suchas systems thinking, optimism, and ethical consideration in engineering as well asentrepreneurial mindsets such as the three C’s (creativity, collaboration, communication).Throughout EPICS High, students continually explore potential problems in the community thatcan be solved by the skills they are learning in the classroom. Ultimately, students learn to workwith members of the community to create engineering solutions that are designed to address real-world problems. Preliminary research shows that EPICS High promotes positive outcomesamong high school students9,10. In a small study on an
community organization such as the YMCA or Boysand Girls Club. These projects engage students in STEM activities for early exposure toengineering. Projects can focus on specific ranges such as K-8, K-12, grades 5-8, or grades 9-12. Mentoring-centered projects represent mentorship among various levels such as near peermentoring between undergraduate and high school students, graduate and undergraduatestudents, graduate student peer mentoring, and mentoring of graduate students by faculty andcollege administrators. Professional development projects provide training to enhance specificskills (e.g., research and academic skills, experiential learning opportunities, allyship, orinclusive language). Accessibility-focused projects develop tools in
encounters with the Other. (This is most obvious in her latest new course, A Global State of Mind.) Whatever the subject, her courses are grounded in accountability–to the text, to oneself, and to one’s fellows.Ms. Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder Robyn Sandekian is the Managing Director of the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Com- munities (MCEDC) at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder). She joined the Engineering for Developing Communities Program (now known as the Mortenson Center) in spring 2004, just as the first EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the
to show the basic retention numbers andthen allowed for further deeper exploration of student retention by showing the retention brokenout by many different subcategories of students.IntroductionLearning communities have a long history including the Meiklejohn “Experimental College” atthe University of Wisconsin in 1920. In the past couple of decades they have emerged as a wayto improve the retention for first year students.During the 1980’s and 1990’s there was a renewed interest in improving undergraduateeducation in the United States. The Boyer Commission in 1998 released its report, ReinventingUndergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities1, on the state ofundergraduate education. It recommended 10 ways to
mechanics and bioprocess engineering. She began her position as Director of Community Programs and Diversity Outreach at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences in 2003. In partnership with faculty, postdoctoral fellows, and graduate students, she develops and implements programs for K-12 students, teachers, un- dergraduates, and families that are designed to increase scientific and engineering literacy, and to inspire people with diverse backgrounds to pursue science and engineering careers. At the undergraduate level, she directs a Research Experiences for Undergraduates program that brings students to Harvard for 10 weeks to work in research laboratories. This program hosts between 45-70
students and parents were excited about the hands-on, student-centered approach,concerns were raised about employability, the ability to seamlessly transfer back to traditionalprograms, and ability to develop the same skills and knowledge as students in traditionaltechnology programs would. The use of badges instead of grades caused further confusion anddistress among students, especially during the first few weeks of the program. Program facultyattempted to ameliorate these concerns through transparency and by providing additionalstructure, with mixed success. Along with the findings, potential implications for similarprograms and areas for future research are discussed.IntroductionThis exploratory case study offers insights into the excitement
need for longitudinal studies and for exploring the transition to college. Other recommendations include collaborating and communicating between researchers, clinicians, and educators and developing/testing interventions such as ADHD coaching and psychosocial support strategies.Study 3Study 3 involves in-depth interviews with STEM college students with ADHD to gain a more in-depth understanding of our results and better understand the role classroom teaching practicesplay in the academic success of engineering students with ADHD. It aims to answer thefollowing questions: (1) How do engineering college students who have ADHD perceive howtraditional lecture-based courses influence their collegiate experiences (academic adjustment,classroom
achieve higher grades,use cooperative learning strategies, and be intrinsically motivated, while boys are more likely toengage in competition and challenging activities, use problem-solving strategies, and beextrinsically motivated. Understanding the effect of gender on student learning and motivation inclassrooms is important to promote equity and improve performance in the Sciences.THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKLearning is a dynamic and individual process. It is critical for educators to understand how newskills are developed, new knowledge is acquired, and new behaviors, morals, attitudes, and valuesare instilled. Learning theories describe the structure of how people learn. Research has beenconducted to discover how people learn, and theorists have
of low enrollment and even more serious problem of high dropout in bothprograms. Researchers of science, technology, engineering and math, also known as STEM, [1]propose that one of the problem for student’s retention and recruitment in STEM program is thatthey are not able to associate themselves to this area. Institute of Electrical and ElectronicEngineers (IEEE) and the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) support engagementamong school and university students [8]. A pilot study reported in [9] of beginner studentsindicates that students in Computer Science and other related fields reason, engage and relate tothe knowledge content of the discipline.In [2] authors present a model named Supporting Collaboration and Adaptation in a
other factors. Workers hired after thenew scheme was implemented were on average 28% more productive than the ones hired in theold regime.Experimentation is an effort that requires collaboration among Science, Product, andEngineering teams which means it is typically multi-disciplinary in nature. Experiments typicallyhave three phases: the pre-experiment planning, the implementation and monitoring, and thepost-experiment analysis. During the pre-experiment planning, Science, Product, andEngineering work together to translate the business problem at hand into testable hypothesis,make ethical and legal considerations and submit the research proposal for review if applicable,define the details of the intervention, design the randomization, define