begun planning inter-threadevents for the upcoming semester.5.4 MIT levelEvents organized included lab tours, graduate student and postdoc presentations from variousparticipating labs, individual mentoring by the faculty co-leads and most notably a Lunch & Learn serieswhere interested students got to have lunch and chat in an informal setting with faculty members fromthe seven majors currently in the thread. We organized a panel-based information session addressingtopics surrounding the graduate school application process for the broader MIT undergraduatecommunity. Attendance of thread students was much lower than we had anticipated; the main reasonturned out to be conflicts with the classes they were taking. Going forward, we will
engineers as peers and see that their own interestsand personality are consistent with their idea of an engineer [61], [73]–[75]. Both concepts havebeen determined to be important for persistence among engineering student populations. Ahandful of qualitative studies have indicated that both engineering self-efficacy and identity areassociated with greater engineering workforce persistence [61], [64].Interest in engineering is a personal factor that can be more complicated than it might seem. Itseems quite expected that some people’s interests change over time and this might lead, quiterightly, to a career change, whether early or later in the career pathway. Some women neverwork in engineering after earning their degree; in one study 30% of these
Business Administration, in Marketing and Economics from Western Michigan University. David Pistrui, Ph.D. e - pistruda@udmercy.edu m - 312-371-8190Dr. Darrell K. Kleinke P.E., University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Kleinke has over 25 years of industry experience in the design and development of electro-mechanical systems. As a tenure-track faculty member and Chair of the University of Detroit Mercy Mechanical Engineering department, he has developed a program of instruction that promotes student-lead design of assistive technology products for people with disabilities. The guiding principle is that student project work is more meaningful and fulfilling when students have the opportunity to experience interaction with real
the natural sciences, math and technology. During these years Lena developed her pedagogical skills and competence in the pedagogic field and besides leading the activities she organised pedagogical training for teachers, pupils and university students. Between 2011 and 2016 Lena was the head of the new Department of Learning at the School of Education and Communication in Engineering Sciences (ECE), KTH. Lena was then responsible for building up a new strong research environment in engineering and technology education, K-12 to university level. 2016-2017 Lena was the Dean at the ECE school at KTH. As this School was merged with another School in 2018, from January 2018 Lena has a research position as an
exploring thespace between the world of theory and the experience of practice” [8]. In order to support ourproject-based learning strategy, we advocate for the use of evidence as a tool to inform bothlearning and decision-making. The evidence to be used will be provided by previous casesrelated to the impact of natural events to the infrastructure in Puerto Rico, using the case-basedlearning method. We use the definition stated by [9] in which a case study is “an intense study ofa single unit with the purpose of a larger class of (similar) units”, and with the pedagogicalpurposes cases have been used in academia following the methods originally pioneered byChristopher Langdell in which cases are used as instances to understand situations that later
development of systems thinking and innovative thinking skills in engineering students. Before returning to graduate school, Kirsten worked for several years as a project manager and analytics engineer in the transportation industry.Dr. Alejandro Salado, Virginia Tech Dr. Alejandro Salado is an assistant professor of systems science and systems engineering with the Grado Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on unveiling the scientific foundations of systems engineering and using them to improve systems engineering practice. Before joining academia, Alejandro spent over ten years as a systems engineer in the space industry. He is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award, the
to SpatialVisualization (SV) training specifically in the area of providing feedback hints to students whenperforming freehand sketching exercises on touchscreen devices.SV is the ability to visualize and manipulate 2D and 3D shapes in one’s mind. This skill has beentied to success in many careers, yet this skill is undertaught or not typically taught in most K-12and engineering curricula. A seminal study by Sorby [1] showed that SV skills can be taught andcan result in a significant increase in GPAs and graduation rates. 7000 students were tracked forover 15 years showing similar results [2]. The increase in graduation rates is especiallysignificant for women and other underrepresented minorities in STEM [3], who may have hadless experience
]investigated that how much gender affected the satisfaction about studying engineering andhow much this satisfaction influenced students’ choice for working as an engineer in thefuture. Ohland et al. [4] compared two success measurements (eight-semester persistent andsix-year graduation rate) of engineering students in different institutions based on differentrace and gender. Pawley, Schimpf, and Nelson [5] analyzed the content of papers thatpublished in the journal of engineering education from 1998 to 2012 to understand how muchthese papers connected gender theories to engineering education. Even without consideringthe results from these studies, we can see authors exploring various issues related to race andgender in the undergraduate years.However
for high school faculty to bring energy training into their classrooms, developing programming around emerging energy technologies, promotion of career awareness activities, and working on diversity challenges in the energy industry workforce. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Managing a Multi-Institution Block Grant for Renewable Electricity Research1. BackgroundThe Renewable Development Fund (RDF) was originally established in 1994 by the State ofMinnesota. Funds are provided by Xcel Energy ratepayers in exchange for an allowance to storespent nuclear fuel from two nuclear generating plants in the state. The RDF funds are intended“to increase renewable energy market penetration
and navigational capital are less likely to know they should pursueprofessional opportunities or how to do so. FGC students often have less knowledge ofuniversity resources [15], and fewer mentors [22]. The lack of mentoring is a predictor of URMstudents’ decision not to pursue graduate work in STEM [23]. For students with the navigationaland academic capital that enables them to apply for these opportunities, the benefits multiply.From knowing to reach out and how to reach out, they develop relationships with faculty thatlead to letters of recommendation, referrals, or industry contacts. This knowledge can become a‘rich get richer’ effect, where students who did not know the importance of an opportunitydiscover it too late and do not develop
proposed solutions [20].Research ContextThe U.S. Department of Energy Race to Zero Student Design Competition is an annualcompetition that challenges students to create zero energy buildings (ZEB). In the 2018 Race toZero, teams could choose between two different types of ZEB: residential (single or multi-unit)or institutional (elementary school) buildings. The 2018 RTZ Purdue team comprised sevenstudent team members, one student team leader (STL), two faculty advisors and one facultyleader. Six student team members were selected jointly by the faculty leader and STL. Theseventh member (landscape architect) was chosen after the development of the project hadalready been initiated. The team also counted on the collaboration of industry advisors
the purpose of helping provide insight for further research direction ofculturally contextualized STEM curricula for Tohono O’odham students. The research questionguiding this work is:How do Tohono O’odham Wa:k community members perceive engineering in the context oftheir community and culture?Researcher RoleMy life experiences and beliefs shape my research role. I am a Tohono O’odham woman, bornfor the Diné (Navajo). I am a first-generation college graduate, an engineer, an engineeringeducation PhD student, and a mother. Growing up on the Navajo Nation, my parents and eldersencouraged me and other Native people to pursue higher education. We were encouraged topursue education for the purpose of helping Native people, community, and culture
support. In fact, design courses, in general, have emerged as a means for students to beexposed to some flavor of what engineers actually do; and also, could learn the basic elements ofthe design process by being involved in real design projects. There have even been formalproposals for curricular goals and assessment measures for design-based curricula. Thisargument is driven by a widespread notion that the intellectual content of design is consistentlyunderestimated [1].This paper reviews research on design thinking as it relates to how designers think, learn andmake decisions, which is an important reason why design is not easy to teach. Design thinkingis, in general terms, complex processes of inquiry and learning that designers perform in
career consultation.Ms. Sharlane Cleare, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)Mr. Justin Charles Major, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Justin C. Major is a second-year Engineering Education Ph.D student and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow at Purdue University. Prior to graduate school, he completed Bachelor’s de- grees in both Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Mathematics Education at the University of Nevada, Reno with a focus on K-12 Engineering Education. Justin’s research and service focuses on the experi- ences and attitudinal development of low-socioeconomic students. Through his work, he hopes he can bring light to the
scholars willremain in engineering. Assuming the students do earn their BS in an engineering field, the statisticssuggest that the scholarship program is doing a better job attracting underrepresented groups toengineering that the average national program.2.1.2 Professional Development: To develop community, all scholars enroll in the University 301in the first year of the program. During this one credit-hour course, scholars engaged in a widerange of enrichment activities. Career Services conducted workshops on writing resume/CV,exploring career opportunities online, preparing for career job fairs and interviewing skills.Scholars engaged in interactive sessions on responsible conduct of research, identifying andengaging with mentors, technical
very clear in its messaging about balancinginstitutional strengths in teaching, research, and engaged scholarship, but how this translated intoactual policies, systems, and decisions regarding promotion was strategically left ambiguous toallow for flexibility in interpretation over time. Strategic ambiguity had enabled MU to maintaingrowth without doing the difficult work of exploring whether the existing promotion system wasworking to support and recognize faculty members’ diverse strengths in teaching, research, andcommunity-engaged work. The COACHE survey data, however, pointed to weaknesses in thisapproach and ushered in an intense period of negotiation.In this section, we will show how the process of negotiation involved three
Elective CoursesMany of the senior-level elective courses begin to cover industry-grade analysis software tools andindustry-level design skills that directly translate to the students’ resumes with the aim ofenhancing students’ chances of finding internship positions and consequently engineering jobs.This is one of the fronts that opens up at the FAU EE program. Another front is that of possiblypursuing graduate studies in EE. The better students may enroll in an accelerated BS to MSprogram, allowing up to three of their senior level elective courses to apply to their MS degreeprogram as well. A third front that is open to the top 5% students is that of the InnovativeLeadership Honors Program (ILHP) involving personal guidance by members of the
decision matrix poster focusing on one user perspective from the three designs documented in the previous assignment (group gallery walk, stakeholder randomly assigned).Assessment and analysis methods. The project was qualitatively assessed through analysis ofreflections collected over two years from the faculty teaching the course, the graduate teachingassistant, a community volunteer who organizes mobile produce markets for the local foodbank,and undergraduate student participants. What follows is in their own words. 23. ResultsFaculty reflections. I wanted to introduce more active learning to a course that is traditionallytaught via lecture, and was encouraged by my participation in a
, imagination and practice3.2.2 “Pedagogy” Dimension: Teaching the Ideas, Knowledge and Skills of InclusiveInnovative to Engineering Students(1) Interdisciplinary coursesIn order to ensure that a series of interdisciplinary courses can be established with highquality, D-Lab courses are taught by faculty and lecturers from across the Institute – fromengineering to architecture and planning to management. At the same time, D-Lab classesfeature instructors from a rich range of backgrounds – an instructor could be a socialentrepreneur, an industrial designer, a humanitarian aid worker, a public-school teacher, anengineer, a social scientist, or a coastal ecologist. D-Lab instructors have taken many pathsthrough their careers and bring complex, fascinating
practice can be difficult for students as they attempt tobuild a cohesive understanding of the subject. It also poses a challenge for faculty trying toconvey dense, text-heavy technical information using either the conventional chalkboard orpresentation software. It is easy for the underlying beauty of the concepts to stay hidden underthe jargon-filled landscape. Notes written on the whiteboard or chalkboard by faculty focus onconveying technical content to students, and these may make only limited used of graphicaldesign ideas that can be leveraged for communicating information more effectively. What isneeded is a mechanism for engaging both the students’ imagination and technical skills whilebuilding an understanding of concepts, using
requirements, there are morecompelling reasons for studying ethics. As Michael Davis notes, ethics is inherent inengineering: “Knowing engineering ethics is as much a part of knowing how to engineer asknowing how to calculate stress or design a circuit is.”2 In that sense, every engineering decisionis also an ethical decision, every design change involves ethical deliberation, and everyengineering action has an ethical companion.In fact, students studying engineering and engineering technology already have achieved amodicum of ethical reasoning courtesy of their technical curriculum. They are familiar with anethical decision-making pathway due to the design process. They are familiar with alterativeactions and the need to examine the viability of each
do the a number of Capstone projects. One of the most successfulvast majority of the courses have a lab, but now over fifty examples of this approach to Capstone is a competitivepercent of the courses have an open-ended project that is applied research project funded by NASA’s eXplorationoften sponsored by industry. Most importantly, the Habitat (X-Hab) Challenge. The faculty team of researchersCapstone course sequence taken by students in their senior translated a portion of the research project into a Capstoneyear has undergone many changes over several years and is project that was accomplished by a four-person team. Thenow considered to be the pinnacle of the curriculum. From Capstone project
from judges drawn from both Education and Engineering faculty, along with advisoryboard members and programming laboratory assistants. These reviews also use the SAE Rubricfor providing written feedback to the teams. Teams are required to record and submit a summaryof the oral comments made by all judges, and then use the MVP process to prioritize app changesto be implemented in the week between the CDR and final app submission. As part of the finalsubmission, an oral presentation is made to the class, a set of reflective questions are individuallyanswered, and peer evaluations are performed.Sample Student WorkTo better illustrate what student teams have proven themselves capable of through thecornerstone design project, two software
faculty at her Alma Mater in 2015, Robin has been coordinating and teaching the Cap- stone Senior Design program in Mechanical Engineering while pursuing graduate work in Engineering Education.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication
thedifferences is available in Appendix B). Key concepts for successful partnerships ([13] and [14]) include engagement of communitypartners and students, personal interactions, faculty members visit to the community basedorganization, shared ownership and collaboration through ongoing interaction andcommunication, and defined community needs (see Appendix C for more details). In order to design a successful partnership and building collaborative relationships, partners inservice-learning should have a shared vision and clearly articulated values, tangible incentives forpartners (acknowledging self-interests as well as shared interests), a sense value for the bondsalready formed among people, means for allowing frequent and open communication on