engineering degree programs, includes combined with an embedded computer on mobileproviding a two-semester capstone project designexperience. In a few cases, undergraduate electrical 1platforms to demonstrate automatic following Details of these technologies were received asscenarios in indoor environments.Figure 1.0 Illustration of stop-and-go and adaptive cruisecontrol (ACC) technologies. Figure 2.0 Raspberry Pi 2B Single Board Computer intriguing by
Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 7-8, 2017 MSUrespond to customer critical comments on performance. The goal was to give students authentichands-on product development and project execution experience to relate to potential internshipand professional employers.The spirit of this project is in line with previous successful efforts to expose students to“authentic” engineering experiences and environments through, for example, Service Learning[1], Learning Factories [2], Capstone Projects [3], hands-on 1st-Year Engineering Courses,Learning in Laboratory Settings [4], and Engineering courses featuring Mechanical Dissection asa learning tool [5].The current “Illuminated Umbrella” project is a continuation of the pilot “Authentic
. Students complete an integrative design project in each courseand apply presented theory into real-world engineering problems. Course deliverables includewritten reports with detailed design data and analysis, group and individual presentations, andone or more working, physical product prototypes. Projects are also used to introduce enterprisesoft skills, including various levels of communication, teamwork, professionalism, andrecognizing ethical values. The sequence is finalized by a senior level capstone “Senior Design”course that requires student participation in interdisciplinary teams to bring a product fromconceptual design through manufacture. Activities include detail design, material selection, costestimation, process planning, schedule
or capstone projects are usually the first experience college students have withexperimental or engineering design processes.4 Incorporation of authentic PBL methods to teachengineering principles with uncertain investigation outcomes to a broader group ofunderrepresented students (i.e. minorities, women) prior to research based coursework enablesthem to make connections between instruction and the real world earlier and to gain a deeperunderstanding of their course content.5-9Problem Based Learning Design and ObjectivesThe engineering practice of using models to simulate systems and interactions as a means toconstruct explanations and design solutions based on valid and reliable evidence is directlyrelatable to the instrumental analysis
“Disaster”) Robot. This four-wheeled, differential steering robotincludes a Texas Instruments LaunchPad microcontroller, wireless networking and a phone appto allow the user to control the robot remotely. Both the Krisys and DSTR robots continue to beused and improved through lab and capstone projects. The team also brings teacher enhancement experiences to the project. Faculty haveparticipated in teacher and curriculum development workshops hosted by the College ofEngineering, the College of Education, and local groups involved with preparing math andscience teacher to integrate more technology and engineering into their high school courses. Finally the research team has experience in all three of the primary areas associated
ways of thinking)” (p. 2). Theyimplemented a studio requirement each year, where project based learning, community service,and reflection are highlighted. Kellam et al.8 drew from student reflections and focus grouptranscripts in their evaluation of this long-term integration. Guthrie et al.6 used quantitativestudent self assessment and collected student comments to gauge the effectiveness of theirinterdisciplinary capstone design course. Rhee et al.9 in “A Case Study of a Co-instructedMultidisciplinary Senior Capstone Project in Sustainability” discussed a senior capstone coursewhere students engage together with specific shared projects, share classroom space and meetingtimes. Mentors from several engineering and non-engineering disciplines
faculty recognizes the benefit in combining service learning activities intobeginning engineering courses, as well as capstone courses. This is done by planning a feasibleproject with a community-based organization, having both beginning and senior level engineeringstudents engage in it over a period of one to two semesters.The paper discusses an effective approach on how to integrate learning in a reverse hierarchicalmanner. It also presents measures to evaluate both successes and failures of this approach. Theprojected longevity of the approach, tackling various projects, is integrated into the study. The twoCECM faculty members also discuss the viability of transferring this approach to other universitiesand engineering colleges.INTRODUCTIONA
that provided the projects, and one of his engineers who worked on the project.During the students’ final team design project presentations, three (3) engineering faculty, three(3) industry professionals, and six (6) students provided feedback on the level of the team’s oralcommunication skills compared to those of other young professionals. They were also asked torate the team’s oral communication via the Association of American Colleges and UniversitiesOral Communication VALUE Rubric. Students were also asked to rate their teammates via theTeamwork VALUE Rubric (Association of American Colleges and Universities 2010). Theratings were made on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 representing greatest communication or teamworkskill (i.e. capstone
higher enrollments in subsequent years. Secondly, itwould offer our students a chance to work on a real-world engineering design problem thatwould make a lasting impact on the community. Along with the transport course, the potentialwould exist for students to complete their capstone design project by continuing their work onthe evaporator. For the syrup-making program, the main benefit would be an evaporator withimproved efficiency and/or safety, making the syrup production process easier and more flexible.They would also gain some insight into how the engineering field views the world, andpotentially increase their technical and scientific literacy. This could help to improve otheraspects of production not specifically addressed by the student
four levels: Level 1: Freshman engineering. Level 2: Basic digital system. Level 3: Advanced digital system without a processor. Level 4: Advanced digital system with a processor. Level 5: Capstone projects. The level 1 is for freshman engineering students. Many schools now have an “introductionto engineering’’ course for the new engineering students. It is usually a project-oriented courseto introduce the basic engineering concepts and practices. The level 2 corresponds to the first digital system course in the curriculum, which covers thecombinational circuits, sequential circuits, and FSM 17. Unlike the first digital system course, there is no single “standard” follow-up course. Theadvanced topics
://lectroetch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gmk-grid-marking-kit.pdf11. Alan, D. J., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D., and Todd, R. H., A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 17-28, 1997.12. Lackey, L.W., Jenkins, H.E., Mines, R.O., and Schultz, S.R., Utilizing Senior Capstone Design as an Instrument for Student and Faculty Assessment of Program Outcomes, 2009 ASEE Conference, Marietta, GA, paper, 2009006MIN, pp. 1-11, April 2009.13. Todd, R.H., Sorensen, C. D., and Magleby, C. D., Designing a Capstone Course to satisfy industrial customers, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 2, April 1993, pp. 92- 100.14. Paliwal, M
, 2017 Teams and Team Building at Baylor University: Why Should We Do This and Where Should This Occur in the Curriculum?AbstractExperience with teams is a desirable outcome with employers. Academic programs often havestudent teams accomplish course, design, and lab projects starting with the freshmen introductorycourses and culminating with capstone senior design. Where do students learn about teams in thecurriculum? How do they learn to be good team members? It seems the most pervasive approachto teams in higher education is a “sink or swim” attitude where teams are allowed to form on theirown and work out any issues that arise. Little, if any, formal instruction on being a team memberis given throughout the curriculum. Even less
heavily integrated into the classroom piece whichwould be not be replicable in our project as we had no classroom piece to use to grade such. “Inengineering, there are many examples of service-learning programs ranging from freshmanintroductory courses to senior capstone courses. Despite their successes, an area that theengineering education community has yet to fully develop is the reflection component of service-learning.”3 We have made a conscious choice to keep the project housed outside the bounds of a forcredit course due to student feedback which will be specifically discussed in the results section.RESULTS The exhibits that have been created over the years have varied greatly in design and have grown in depthand complexity over that
achieve student learning outcomes at hightaxonomic levels; however, a large cohort of Civil Engineers fall short in achieving learningoutcomes at the highest levels. An analysis of course outcomes, particularly in the senior levelSustainability course and the senior capstone design course, presents the results of curricularedesign in regards to sustainability. Continuing the longitudinal study begun in 2015, there isan enhanced immersion of students in all the environmental courses with an emphasis on project-based learning; civil students are exposed to sustainability in the required Fundamentals inEngineering with a majority of civil students also taking the stand alone Sustainability course.Survey results continue to demonstrate that a focus
scrapping ECE590 and its professional development/capstone requirements and turn it into a Systems Engineering class.” • “. . . the material was relevant. It did teach us quite a bit of stuff about the business of engineering that no other classes touched on.” • “Replace with senior level design class.” • “. . . spent a bit too much time on documentation. I realize today how important it is. . .” • “Have someone with actual experience in industry teach the course so that the expectations are reasonable.” • “Cost analysis”The comments and suggestions can be summarized into these four primary points: 1. Projects should be cross-disciplinary and sponsored by either businesses or other professors. 2
test section and actively with a recirculation valve. The total cost for this projectwas approximately $3500 and required 3 months of part-time work to construct. Flow velocitymeasurements in the test section were made by simple flow visualization and found velocityranged from 0.32-0.65 ft/s within a 6”x12”x12” test section. The water flume was subsequentlyused by a senior capstone project for testing of their water turbine. Student self-evaluations wereused to assess whether their experiences reinforced fluid mechanics concepts and developed theirskills in experimental fluid mechanics. The results show that the students believed their workwith the water tunnel strongly met the learning objectives in the area of experimental methodsand
the current paper.A course in which students applied systems engineering principles to a lunar mining robotproject was described at the 2013 ASEE conference. The authors argue for the “inclusion ofsystems engineering in university-level capstone curricula to improve engineering design.”2Although this project involved an intense competition, it was limited to paper designs, whichlacked the realism of hardware-intensive projects. The claim made in the previously cited studyabout the importance of real hardware was found to ring true.Just last year, a couple of engineering educators from California made the case for integratingsystems engineering into senior design. They claim that the traditional sequence of courses inmost mechanical
offered for the first time this year, and since only fivesenior energy engineering students were eligible for capstone design projects this year, weused overlap scheduling and included those five in the same room with the 65 students inthe ME capstone course. The capstone project for the energy engineering students wasproposed by the university’s building energy systems manager – review and update thebuilding energy models for four new campus buildings built with LEED certification inmind, identify discrepancies between actual building performance and model predictions,and develop engineering proposals for projects which provide a return on investment in lessthan 3 years and that would enable the buildings to meet or exceed the energy use goals
improvement.AcknowledgementThis material is supported by the National Science Foundation under DUE Grant Numbers 1501952and 1501938. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations presented are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Wang, J., Fang, A. & Johnson, M., (2008). Enhancing and assessing life long learning skills through capstone projects. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. Pittsburgh, PA, 2008-324.[2] Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, M. & Mcgourty, J., (2005). The abet "professional skills" — can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), 41-55.[3] Earnest, J., (2005). Abet
following questions are left unaddressed: how toevaluate the effectiveness of a gamification product in education? What would students learn ifthey create and criticize gamification products? To answer the above research questions, thispaper proposes a peer-based gamification critiquing process based on peer-developedgamification products. Both the development and critique processes were applied throughCapstone projects. Capstone projects in the United States have become increasingly popularamong many engineering education programs under ABET requirements since the 20th century[19-21]. Capstone projects are different from traditional engineering courses in terms ofproviding senior-standing engineering students with experience solving “real world
Paper ID #20992A Preliminary Investigation into the Use of Audience Video Recordings to As-sess Student Engagement During in Large Lecture ClassesDr. Matthew Jason Bilsky, Lehigh University Matthew holds a BS, MEng, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Lehigh University. He is currently a Post-Doc Research Associate working on a novel snake-like robot with construction, aerospace, and res- cue capabilities through his company Impossible Incorporated LLC. The project tied for second place in the 2016 Lemelson-MIT invention competition. As part of his duties he is the professor for the Technical Entrepreneurship Capstone and
6b: A 3D printed smartphone stand designed by a freshman4. Applications in Research, Community Engagement and Outreacha. Utilizing AM in Student Research through Senior Design Capstone CourseEngineering technology curriculum of the Department of ENT at Miami University, Ohioincludes a capstone course, which consists of a sequence of two semester-long courses namely:ENT 497-Senior Design Project I and ENT 498-Senior Design Project II. The students conductmajor open-ended research and design projects utilizing their knowledge and skills acquired inearlier course work, work in teams, and incorporate engineering standards. The projects offeredin this course are chosen from real-world problems. Design projects include the establishment
capstone projects. We have noticed gaps instudents’ software engineering abilities when they begin their capstone projects. It is not alwaysthe case that students were not exposed to the necessary concepts in previous courses, but ratherthey that were not asked to apply these skills in project settings. In the past, instructors (andemployers) have relied on just-in-time learning to fill in the conceptual gaps students have whenthey begin project work.Several engineering educators regard experiential learning as the best way to train the nextgeneration of engineers. This requires engineering programs to go beyond offering industry-based capstone courses and internships. It is our belief that introducing active learningopportunities prior to the
innovations rely more on research ontechnology and problem solving based on natural sciences and engineering [13,14]. Designthinking does not exclude these, but aims to add on to the systemic thinking and to theresearch and technology-driven innovation approach by focusing on the user.There is a vast literature on learning outcomes of Capstone courses and project courses ingeneral [1,13,15]. However, educational innovations or innovations within education are aless researched area, for example what are the foundational skills and mindset that actuallyfoster the capabilities needed in order to achieve innovations. Engineering knowledge andskills are important especially in technology-driven innovation, but our argument is that theyare not enough
work from one semester to the next.Resource for Education The UAV locator problem can support education objectives in several different contexts.The material could be used to the basis for an assignment or case study in a coreelectromagnetics, communications, or systems engineering course to emphasize the interrelationamong technologies in a specific application. A design project or activity could be used in anelective antenna course to emphasize desired performance differences among antennas. Alocator system design could be the focus project for a capstone design team in which teammembers with backgrounds in electromagnetics, communications, electronics, etc. must interact.An extra-curricular activity or competition could use this
general,most CM programs offer BIM in one to three courses and limit its coverage within a singlediscipline12, 13. The implementation strategies include introducing BIM as standalone courses,utilizing cross-discipline BIM courses, adding BIM labs in capstone/project courses, andintegrating BIM into existing courses14.Pavelko and Chasey performed a survey of 59 construction programs that were members of theAssociated Schools of Construction (ASC) and the American Council for ConstructionEducation (ACCE). The results indicated that 70% of the respondents had covered BIM in theircurriculum, of which most were on 3D coordination (82%), about half on 4D scheduling (46%),and a third on 5D estimating (35%)7, 15. Becerik-Gerber et al. expanded the pool
relate to potential internship and professionalemployers. Although guided at arms-length by industry-experienced staff, the overwhelmingemphasis was for the Engineering Team to reach their own designs, experience their own failuresand successes in earning their own know-how, resolve their own communications and schedulingconflicts, and to respond to customer critical comments of prototype product performance.The spirit of this project is in line with previous successful efforts to expose students to“authentic” engineering experiences and environments through, for example, Service Learning[1], Learning Factories [2], Capstone Projects [3], hands-on 1st-Year Engineering Courses,Learning in Laboratory Settings [4], and Engineering courses featuring
be continuing to develop new ways to fund these experiences and working withother collaborators to continue to add value to the exhibits.ReferencesChua, K. (2014). A comparative study on first-time and experienced project-based learning students in an engineering design module. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39, 556-572.Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession. Educational Technology Research and Development, (1), 65-85.Fitzgerald, H., Bruns, K., Sonka, S., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2015). The centrality of engagement in higher education. APLU Council on Engagement and Outreach. Retrieved from http
Paper ID #19939Introduction and Application of Lean Manufacturing Techniques in Mechan-ical Engineering Senior Design PracticumMr. Jamison Taylor Bair , Colorado State University Jamison Bair is a Graduate Student pursuing a Masters of Science in Mechanical Engineering at Colorado State University. He received his BS in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University in May 2016. Jamison is one of the GTAs for MECH-468, the senior design capstone class at CSU. He is also the Project Manager for the CSU Vehicle Innovation Team competing in the intercollegiate automotive engineering competition EcoCAR3 and the
medicalresearch are available in the market such as EnvisionTEC 3D-Bioplotter, however they areusually extremely expensive. Collaborating with the medical school, this project will design andbuild new extruding systems on a low-cost RepRap machine. One RepRap Prusa i3 printer ismodified able to extrude independently two different hydro-gels dedicated to the stem cellresearch. The modification is expected to utilize other 3D printing methods to create parts. Thisis a team's Capstone Design Project with students involved to promote and extend theapplications of 3D printing. Student working processes of design, hardware modification, as wellas testing procedures will be observed and recorded. The project activities, the testing results,and the students