Electromagnetic Induction Problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 215.Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45-76. doi:10.1002/jee.20038Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 694.Gainsburg, J., Fox, J., & Solan, L. M. (2016). Argumentation and decision making in professional practice. Theory Into Practice, 55(4
interfacing with the office of research of the institution Member/s facilitating the different aspects related to the Scientific Core Expert research being proposed and the connections with gaps in literature Educational Core Member/s facilitating the different program of study for Expert students involved in the proposal effort Recruitment Many programs require a plan for the recruitment of Coordinator students and the support from the institution to achieve it Member/s reviewing and editing the draft in consultation Review and
criteria during the 1996 reform effortknown as “Engineering Criterion 2000” (EC 2000). Also, because of EC 2000’s architects’decision to embrace outcomes assessment—but to do so only in part—ABET’s programevaluators (PEVs) were placed in the difficult position of having to balance the goals ofeducational standardization, improvement, and innovation across the diverse spectrum ofinstitutions through which we deliver engineering education in the United States.The case study is also significant because outcomes assessment has been part and parcel to theexpansion of neoliberal modes of governance not only in engineering education, but highereducation as a whole. Indeed, EC 2000 served as an important stepping stone for the generalimplementation of
theirorganization.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1730137. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The authors would like to thank the CyberAmbassadors project team, facilitatorFellows, and participants, as well as the company that hosted the training described here.References[1] R. Bancino, “Soft Skills: The New Curriculum for Hard-Core Technical Professionals,” Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers (J1), vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 20–22, May 2007.[2] K. Litchfield, A. Javernick‐Will, and A. Maul, “Technical and Professional Skills of Engineers
universaldesign for learning and quality improvement, as described in this work, will be increasinglyimportant.References:[1] J. Allen, I. Elaine|Seaman, “Digital Compass Learning: Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017.,” Babson Surv. Res. Gr., May 2017.[2] F. Martin and S. Kumar, “Frameworks for Assessing and Evaluating e-Learning Courses and Programs,” in Leading and Managing e-Learning, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 271–280.[3] “Quality Matters Rubric.” [Online]. Available: https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa- resources/rubric-standards/higher-ed-rubric. [Accessed: 16-Oct-2019].[4] M. G. Moore, “Three types of interaction,” Am. J. Distance Educ., 1989.[5] T. Anderson, “Getting the mix right again
wide range of projects. I am interested in exploringavenues to democratize this form of education to help more students from all backgrounds haveaccess to these opportunities. References [1] Vosniadou, Stella. How Children Learn. Educational Practices Series, I nternational Bureau of Education, 2001. [2] S. Bell. Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83:2, 39-43, 2010. [3] Y. Li, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. A. diSessa, A. C. Graesser, L. C. Benson, L. D. English, and R. A. Duschl. Design and Design Thinking in STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2: 93–104, 2019. [4
energy for the transformation (c) Transmission- or energy distribution system that distributes energy to the system component (d) Control system, Composed of sub-systems for controlling, supervising and inspection of other systems’ state and performance, creating man/machine interface, and establishing the human safety system (e) Frame system that keeps the whole system together in space, and (g) Helping system(s) that Solves different necessary helping tasks [15]. The design process using this method starts with the identification of the sub-systems needed for the
communication courses: https://bulletin.engin.umich.edu/courses/techcomm/ Students are required to take Exposition and Argumentation (English 1120) during the freshman year. Students are also required to take one of four communication-related courses: Engineering Communications and Computations Missouri University of (CIV ENG 2003), Writing and Research (English 1160), Technical Writing Science and Technology (English 3560), or Principles of Speech (SP&M S 1185). http://catalog.mst.edu/undergraduate/degreeprogramsandcourses/environmentale
Yes 3 model(s) did your Did you update yourElectrical Engineering group use? Other project plan often, 4 Did you ever have (Select all that based on new
”, Cambridge University Press, 2018.[2] L. Hellsten, S. Martin, L. McIntyre and A. Kinzel, ”Women on the Academic Tenure Track: An Autoethnographic Inquiry”, International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011.[3] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, ”Survey of Doctorate Recipients”, National Science Foundation, 2015.[4] J. Roy, ”Engineering by the numbers”, American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.[5] Y. Yang and D. Carroll, ”Understanding Female STEM Faculty Experiences of Subtle Gender Bias from Microaggressions Perspective”, in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Expo, 2016.[6] A. G d’Entremont and H. Gustafson, ”PANEL: Gender bias in student evaluations of
. A. Mason, “Online Mathematics Homework Increases Student Achievement,” AERA Open, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 233285841667396, 2016, doi: 10.1177/2332858416673968.[10] R. A. and T. Williams, “The Effectiveness of Online Homework in an Introductory Science Class,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 28–31, 2006.[11] S. Hauk, R. A. Powers, and A. Segalla, “A Comparison of Web-based and Paper-and- Pencil Homework on Student Performance in College Algebra,” Primus, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 61–79, 2015, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2014.906006.[12] J. T. Callahan, “Assessing Online Homework in First-Semester Calculus,” Primus, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 545–556, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2015.1128501.[13] P. G. Larose
analysis/design principles for UAVs are very similar to the principles developed over the years andused successfully for the analysis/design of manned aircraft. A UAV designer need to know how to integratecomplex, multi-disciplinary systems, and to understand the environment, the requirements and the designchallenges. A UAS is much more than a reusable air vehicle or vehicles. The UAS includes five basicelements: 1. The Environment in which the UAV(s) or the Systems Element operates (e.g., the airspace,the data links, communications system). 2. The air vehicle(s) or the Air Vehicle Element. 3. The groundcontrol station or the Mission Control Element. 4. The payload(s) or the Payload Element. 5. The launchand recovery systems which includes the
experiential learning to beginbuilding patterns in their minds about how water moves past objects.Hands-On Demo. The streamline visualization activity is described to students asDesign-Build-Test-Communicate (DBTC) practice: • Design: a visual that shows how water flows around an ROV to help determine center of drag (aka center of pressure) • Build: prototype using dominoes falling as the ”streamlines” around the ROV • Test: use a rod to start all lines of dominoes falling at once; record video; note where the dominoes fall “slower” around the ROV; interpret how the shape and orientation of the ROV contributes to “slower flow” and increased drag • Communicate: make 1-2 slides on why you chose this design; picture(s) of the
thesis, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, April 2019.[10] S. Holder, and J. Lange, “Looking and listening: A mixed-methods study of space use and user satisfaction,” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, vol.9, no.3, pp.4-27, 2014.[11] Y. Lee, E. Young, T.H. Lee, and L. Velez, "Planning library spaces and services for millennials: An evidence-based approach," Library Management, vol.34, no.6/7, pp. 498-511, Aug.9, 2013.[12] J. Briden, “"Photo surveys: Eliciting more than you knew to ask for," in Studying Students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester, Editors, N. F. Foster, and S.L. Gibbons, Association of College & Research Libraries, 2007. [Online
inEngineering,” Worcester Polytechnic Institute Digital WPI, May 2014, Retrieved fromhttps://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all/345[6] R.A. Reiser and W. Dick “Instructional planning: a guide for teachers,” Boston: Allyn andBacon. 1996. 2nd ed.[7] G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding By Design, Published by Association forSupervision & Curriculum Development, 2005, 2nd Expanded Edition.[8] Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/[9] S. L. Ash, and P.H. Clayton, “Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The powerof critical reflection in applied learning.” Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, vol.1, no 1, pp. 25-48, 2009.
,” J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1 pp. 156-62. Mar. 2016.[5] A. M. Depelteau, et al., “SYMBIOSIS: development, implementation, and assessment of amodel curriculum across biology and mathematics at the introductory level,” CBE Life Sci Educ.,vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 342-7. Fall 2010.[6] J. S. Krim, et al., “Models and Impacts of Science Research Experiences: A Review of theLiterature of CUREs, UREs, and TREs,” CBE Life Sci Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. ar65. Winter2019.[7] E. Afgan, et al., “The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborativebiomedical analyses: 2018 update,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. W1, pp. W537–W544,July 2018.[8] “Endicott College Bioinformatics: VCF2FA ,” Endicott College November 26, 2019.[Online
more help with? Is there a team member, advisor, or other person who can help you with those things?3rd Term Questions:Backward-looking (before you started the project): 25. What process did you go through to produce this piece? 26. Does this work tell a story? 27. What area(s) of growth are you most proud of?Inward-looking (how you feel about it right now): 28. What were your standards for this piece of work? Do you feel you met those standards? 29. What does this piece of work reveal about you as a learner, or about how you learn? 30. What did you learn about yourself as you worked on this piece?Outward-looking (how you think others feel about it right now): 31. What grade would you give yourself for this work? 32. If
, doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7.[5] M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, and C. Gonnerman, “On the nature of cross-disciplinary integration: A philosophical framework,” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part C Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci., vol. 56, pp. 62–70, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.10.003.[6] D. Ellis, “Changing the lens: The role of reframing in educational development,” Improve Acad., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 142–150, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1002/tia2.20067.[7] B. K. Jesiek, L. K. Newswander, and M. Borrego, “Engineering education research: Discipline, community, or field?,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01004.x.
, I 100% and easy to follow solution process, including required Meets Minimum diagrams and figures Competency Incorrect answer due to one or two minor errors but II 80% supported by a correct solution process (as in Level I) Does Not Meet Minimum III 0% Incorrect answer due to conceptual error(s) CompetencyIn Level II scores, there are two necessary conditions for classifying an error as minor:1. The mistake is a minor algebraic error, computational error, error in units or significant digits, or other human mistake such as misreading a value in the problem
Engineering Students using Classification and Regression," in 6th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Memphis, TN, 2013.[6] "My Student Support Program," [Online]. Available: http://www.uwindsor.ca/studentexperience/500/my-student-support-program. [Accessed 9 February 2020].[7] "TAO Office of Student Experience," n.d.. [Online]. Available: http://www.uwindsor.ca/studentexperience/358/tao. [Accessed 19 March 2020].[8] "Self Help Resources (Campus Wide & Groups) Checklist," February 2019. [Online]. Available: https://filer01.taoconnect.org/index.php/s/DnZzBvYrsyFLERx?path=%2F1.%20Self- Help%20Resources%20(Campus-Wide%20%26%20Groups)%2FTAO%20Pathway%20Checklist. [Accessed 31 March 2020].
. AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful for support provided by the Engineering Information Foundation. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Engineering Information Foundation. Work CitedAeby, P., Fong, R., Isaac, S., Vukmirovic, M., & Tormey, R. (2019). The impact of gender on engineering students’ group work experiences. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(3), 756–765.Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.Dryburgh, H
, 2019.7. Shuman, L.J., M. Besterfield-Sacre and J. McGourty (2005). The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed. Journal of Engineering Education, 41-55.8. Davis, W.J. and D. Michalaka (2015). Teaching and Assessing Professional Skills in an Undergraduate Civil Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle Washington.9. Al-Bahi, A. M., M.A. Taha and N. Trkmen (2013). Teaching and Assessing Engineering Professional Skills. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy 3(3), 13-20.10. Conrad, S. (2017) A Comparison of Practitioner and Student Writing in Civil Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 106(2), 191-217.11. Conrad, S., W. A
response when the task was framed as “draw an engineer” vs.“draw yourself as an engineer.”AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the children who participated in this research study andthe SEEK mentors and site coordinators who worked with the children and supported our datacollection. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science FoundationDivision of Research on Learning under Grant Numbers DRL-1614710, 1614739, and 1615143.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Wealso would like to thank Christopher Wright for their feedback and input on earlier versions ofthis
institutional progress.With each year, the summit improves and has growing interest across the United States. Byfocusing on the experience of past participants of the summit, the blueprint will continue to beimproved and ultimately transferrable for others to implement for years to come.AcknowledgmentsWe sincerely acknowledge Dr. Dannette Gomez Beane, Dr. Catherine Amelink, Dr. Jack Lesko,Dean Karen DePauw, and Dr. Christian Matheis for their key roles in the creation, development,and execution of the HBCU/MSI Research Summit.ReferencesBrinkmann, S., Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, SAGE.Ghee, M., Collins, D., Wilson, V., & Pearson, W. (2014). The Leadership Alliance: twenty years of
,and no method was viewed as a one size fits all solution. For example, completely eliminating alab(s) would increase free time; however, learning would most likely decrease. Filming the labswould require a significant amount of effort from the instructor and/or staff and there was noevidence that learning would increase. Finally, identifying available online multimedia proved tobe difficult for many of the remaining course topics, time-consuming, and costly for mass access;however, some forms of online multimedia promoted remote, individualized, and self-pacedlearning. This paper discusses the challenge of creating an ad hoc individual remote lab experience toenforce and expand upon additive manufacturing knowledge gained from assigned
. (2009). The Development of Devlopmental Neurosceince. the Journal of Neurosceience: The official Journal of the Socienty for Neuroscience, 12735-12747.Chein, J. A. (2011). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14:F1–F10.Konijn, E. A. (2018). Media Use and Brain Development during Adolesence. Nature Communiations, 588.L., S. (2004). Risk Taking in Adolescence: What changes, and why? NY Academy of Science, 51-8.Laidlaw, E. (2012). Plato's Neurobilogy. Philosopy Now, 18-19.Renate Kahike, K. E. (2018). Constructing Critical Thinking in Health Professional Education. Perspectives on Medical Education, Jun; 7(3): 156-165.
addition to expanding this work to more faculty,comparing the assessments between institution types would help determine if the difference incourse delivery is salient.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation EngineeringEducation and Centers under Grant Number DUE-1644138. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] J. Roksa and B. Keith, “Credits, Time, and Attainment: Articulation Policies and Success After Transfer,” Educ. Eval. Policy Anal., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 236–254, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.3102/0162373708321383.[2] D. Grote, D. B
classroomsReferences[1] D. P. Crismond and R. S. Adams, “The informed design teaching and learning matrix.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101.4, pp. 738-797, 2012.[2] J. Estell and J. B. Hylton, “Incorporating the Constraint-Source Model into the First-Year Design Experience,” in First-Year Engineering Experience Conference, Daytona Beach, FL, USA, August 6-8, 2017.
/s15326985ep2501_2[4] K. Morehead, M. G. Rhodes, and S. DeLozier, "Instructor and student knowledge of study strategies," Memory, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 257-271, doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.1001992[5] J. A. Susser and J. McGabe, "From the lab to the dorm room: metacognitive awareness and use of spaced study," Instr. Sci., vol. 41, pp. 345-363, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9231-8[6] J. M. Case. “Students’ perceptions of context, approaches to learning and metacognitive development in a second year chemical engineering course,” Ph.D dissertation, Monash University, Australia, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226658485_Students'_Metacognitive_Developmen