CSP framework. Secondly, a framework for the use of CSPin praxis and research within the SSA context is proposed drawing on Onwuegbuzie et al.’s(2012) methodology literature analysis. Findings present an adapted CSP framework for SSA,comprising 11 tenets for asset-based research. They highlight CSP’s adaptability across contexts,underscoring its importance in SSA STEM education.Keywords: culturally sustaining pedagogy, asset-based education, exemplary teaching,inclusion, transferability, Sub-Saharan AfricaBackgroundResearch shows that teaching practices that are more contextual and inclusive of students’cultural backgrounds and experiences enhance students' learning [1]. It is this awareness ofimproved learning outcomes that paved the way for
➢ DisplacementThe test capabilities of the machine are listed as follows: ➢ Regulate RPMs. ➢ Tune applied load via PWM Controller. ➢ Distinguish the load amount. ➢ Run tests by counter. ➢ Ability to run tests by number of cycles.Design Methodology:The prototype of a tribometer was designed within ASTM Standards (ASTM D2714-94, ASTM E122-17). The machine could utilize both lubricant and non-lubricant substances fortesting block-on-ring configuration.Figure 1. A Block-on-ring testing arrangementThe prototype is operated using a steel test ring rotating against a steel block (Figure 1).(immersed/not in lubricant) Velocity of test ring is 7.9 m/min = spindle speed of 250rpm. Specimens were subjected to 68 kg normal load applied to 6.8 kg of
identify students’ misconceptions accurately, enabling them to providehigh-quality formative feedback to rectify students’ misconceptions. Following the guidance out-lined, we developed assessments for a database course. By comparing student performance withand without the high-quality formative feedback, we observed an overall improvement in RA of21%, with a 73% improvement in query creation and an 11% improvement in ER, with a 32%improvement in composing new relationship sets and/or specializations.1 IntroductionTest-based assessment is often incorporated into automated systems to provide formative feedbackon students’ work [1, 2, 3, 4]. The standard procedure of such assessments follows the build-and-test philosophy. When the system receives
, and industry certification. Thenovel of building academic preparation was reported in ASEE 2023 [1] and IMEC conferences[2]. This paper reports on the workshop and internship activities and findings that introduced andprovided hands-on activities in reverse engineering techniques, design, simulation software, 3Dprinting, and manufacturing processes.WorkshopA two-week summer bridge workshop in advanced manufacturing using drone platforms fordesigning and manufacturing processing was accomplished at ECSU in June 2023. TheEngineering Technology student participants were engaged with lectures on the introduction toUAV design, SIMNET simulation software [3], design of airframes, and prototyping andfabrication of drones. The workshop surveys were
were made to the results from previous surveys when possible.IntroductionElectives are a win-win situation for students and faculty. Students select a few courses in theirinterest areas and tend to be more motivated to learn the material. Faculty get students who havechosen to be there, probably smaller course enrollments, and a course of greater personal interestto them than with required courses. These desirable courses, electives, were the topic for theAIChE Education Division (EdDiv) Course Survey Committee’s Fall 2023 survey. This topicwas last surveyed in 2013 [1].We defined "Chemical Engineering Electives" as having all four of the following characteristics: 1. Courses offered by faculty associated with the chemical engineering
education system.This paper looks across three qualitative studies during the work-based experiences (WBEs) ofeleven undergraduate computer engineering and information technology systems students fromgroups traditionally underrepresented in STEM. In this paper, WBEs are defined as paidengagements for students as they work on solving real-world problems, while performing tasksand projects in partnership with an employer or community partner. Three types of WBEs arerepresented: internships (Study 1), apprenticeships (Study 2), and company employees (Study 3).All three studies used the Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) methodology which hasbeen established in 80 studies worldwide and over a dozen peer-reviewed publications. As amethodology
each student outcome on an individual basis.IntroductionAll undergraduate engineering programs are required to have a culminating engineering designproject. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) defines a culminatingdesign project as, “1) incorporating appropriate engineering standards and multiple constraintsand 2) is based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier coursework” [1]. The optimaldesign of a capstone should inspire students and allow for creative design opportunities, butstudents should also be given the chance to fail and learn from their mistakes [2]. Typicalprojects do not have an obvious solution and thus lead to failure during the first attempt. Studentsmust experiment and prototype providing
(SEM) isused to examine any potential direct or indirect relationships between empathy and engineeringidentity formation using survey data from Fall 2023. Results show a direct relationship betweenthe two constructs with increased strength of relationship from the beginning of the semestercompared to the end.Introduction Engineering design revolves fundamentally around meeting user needs [1], and to offersolutions that meet diverse needs, engineers need to cultivate an understanding of variousperspectives [2]. Empathy plays a crucial role in enabling engineers to consider the implicationsof their design decisions on people thoroughly [3] and employing empathy can effectivelyaddress sociocultural and political aspects of designs [4
semester-longelective course, students work through a series of design challenges within a given context (acarnival, airplanes and flight, and robotics, respectively, for 6th, 7th and 8th grades) and learnengineering content as well as practice fundamental math and science skills. This curriculum wasdeveloped and researched as part of an earlier project; in that work, course participation waslinked with increased academic achievement on state-wide math and science assessments as wellas heightened cognitive and behavioral engagement in STEM and science interest [1]. Thecurrent funded research work seeks to replicate the findings of this earlier study in a different andlarger school district while providing a more robust teacher professional
, andcollaborative learning. Owolabi et al [1] described experimental-centric pedagogy as aninstructional approach emphasizing hands-on, experiential learning to enhance studentengagement and understanding. It involves active participation in experiments, problem-solving,and real-world applications, aiming to foster critical thinking, creativity, and practical skills. Thisis one of the emerging active learning strategies that have received national and internationalrecognition for its impact on learner’s motivation, self-efficacy, and cognitive development [2],[3], [4].Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education requires a deep understanding of thephysical and natural aspects of existence, living organisms, and intricate biological processes
instructor’s guide to update their labassignments to include descriptions of the audience and their expectations. Some participantsdeveloped lab report assessment rubrics using the instructor’s guide. Although there was avariation among the materials after instructors had access to the guides, all the participating labinstructors updated their lab instructional materials to use the terms and concepts introduced inthe guides and adjusted their instructional content to consider students’ prior knowledge.1. IntroductionEngineering labs offer unique engineering experiences to students, ranging from hands-onexperiments to safety and ethics [1]. Teaching engineering labs provides unique pedagogicalopportunities for lab instructors; however, it is
learning. In addition, the instructors presentsurvey results on how students perceive the effectiveness of graphical methods in their learning of vectoranalysis.1. IntroductionEssentially all presentations of vector operations in engineering courses are accompanied by “head to tail”diagrams that illustrate the concept of vector addition or resultants. The resulting laws of vector additionare then shown - visually - to follow the laws of triangular geometry and trigonometry. While most, if notall, textbooks provide geometrically accurate figures (i.e., the illustrations depict vectors with accuratelymeasured lengths and angles) most treatments emphasize how to express vectors algebraically and toperform corresponding calculations. It is therefore
personal connections they may notshare with a more senior mentor. Near-peer mentors are often perceived as more in tune with thestruggles of their mentees [1] and more approachable than an individual who identifies as an“expert” scientist [2]. Examples of near-peer mentoring relationships in academia include anupper-level student and a first-year student, an undergraduate student and a graduate student, or agraduate student and a new faculty member. Near-peer mentoring can positively affect both the mentor and the mentee. Studentmentees have stated that they feel more comfortable asking a near-peer mentor for academic helpthan they do a professor [3] and believe access to near-peer mentors promotes success in theircoursework [4]. Students
awareness of diversity, equity, and inclusion for professional practice consistent with theinstitution’s mission” [1]. Many in the engineering community recognize the need for developingengineering skill sets that address societal impacts within the design process. Not only shouldengineers be aware of the potential negative consequences of their designs, but they should alsoseek opportunities to create value and benefits for under-served populations.The body of research on social justice in engineering design is well documented [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Inparticular, human-centered design has emerged as a favored approach for students to approach thedesign process in capstone courses[7, 8, 9, 10]. Other best practices in engineering education topromote DEI
for some students.This is because opportunities to practice drawing FBDs have traditionally been in the context ofhomework, using problems sourced from a textbook. This type of learning environment suffersfrom drawbacks because (1) the process of drawing FBDs is not scaffolded into discrete tasks(e.g. isolating the body), (2) the ability to practice only a particular task is not possible, and (3)feedback is not immediate. The lack of immediate feedback is a particularly important issue, asimmediate feedback is necessary to prevent students from reinforcing bad practices and has beenshown to be an important factor in learning [1,2].Although learning to reliably draw accurate FBDs is difficult for most students, women may beat a disadvantage
progress of important industries atrisk and threatens to have a negative impact on the US economy [1]–[3]. The Bureau of LaborStatistics data indicates that demand for engineering skills will grow by about 13% from 2023 to2031 [4], but supply does not meet the demand. Of the total number of students who express aninterest in engineering while still in high school, only about 13% complete a university degree inengineering, according to the BCG analysis [5]. Studies have shown that encouraging andmaintaining STEM interest throughout a child’s education, especially at the middle-school level,is critical to helping fill the talent gap [6]–[7].The US enjoys a rich heritage of race, gender and ethnic diversity which could contribute to theengineering
chose to participate, including both independent and peer learners.An additional motivation for this study was to inform software development efforts associatedwith a major revision to CATE. In this regard, the study should have been completed sooner!Next steps and future directions for the CATE system are discussed.This paper has 3 major parts: 1) The approach used for peer learning, 2) Why systems such asCATE are needed, and 3) Statistical analysis of the benefits of CATE on student learning.What functionality makes CATE unique?At the heart of CATE is an expert system that generates random circuit problems with detailedsolutions. Uniqueness is due to a combination of four capabilities: 1. Randomized circuit generation with millions
better solution. Our aim was to provide high qualityassignments to students while minimizing time spent on logistics.Given the limitations of existing tools such as Microsoft Word, we chose to instead develop anew system for the following reasons: • We wanted to manage problems and associated solutions in a library. • We wanted the flexibility to use any of the features of LaTeX. • We wanted to focus time on pedagogical innovation and direct student engagement rather than the details of formatting assessments.Designing assessments requires the instructor to consider the purposes, format, and other detailsof the assignment [1]. Instructors often choose Microsoft Word for creating student learningassessments. Since it is a What-You-See
. This record will be comparedwith the approximately 420 students who either were eligible or did not take part in this program.Historical data will be reviewed to determine how predictive these initial markers are towardcompletion of the degree.IntroductionScience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) occupations comprise 24% of theoverall United States workforce. Of those employed in STEM jobs, 51% have obtained abachelor’s degree or higher [1]. To help support and grow the U.S. STEM workforce, manyinstitutions of higher education are driven to increase the number of graduates within theirprograms. However, as the cost of higher education has risen, in many cases exceeding theaverage family income, students and families are left
affinity for mathematicsand science and encouraged them to pursue the profession. Other less commonly cited motivations forpursuing engineering are job prospects post-graduation, general interest in engineering, and a desire tocontribute to society. While these motivations portray a general understanding of how engineering isperceived as a job, they do not mean that they have a meaningful understanding of the profession. In fact,the literature suggests that most students do not actually understand the nature of engineering practiceupon entering a program, nor do they have any knowledge of the history of the profession (e.g., whymany practicing civil engineers need a professional license to work in the U.S.) [1-11]. For example,consider this
throughout the program’s curriculum to complete a design project. This paperinvestigates the ongoing work of restructuring a traditional one-semester, 3-credit springcapstone experience in materials science and engineering into a two-semester fall (1-credit) andspring (2-credit) experience. During the restructuring of the capstone experience, the Human-Centered Design (HCD) framework, a method to formalize the design process in discrete stages,was integrated into the course content. Due to course catalog constraints, a 1-credit fall coursewas piloted in Fall 2022 as an elective for seniors (enrollment was approximately 30% of thesenior population); the traditional 3-credit course was still required of all seniors in Spring 2023.Aspects of HCD were
material to the conveyor belt, feeding the stock material to the engraving station, andretrieving and storing the engraved material. It consists of three function modules: 1) warehouseoperation module: a Dexarm equipped with a pneumatic suction cup tool to pick stock materialfrom raw material storage, transfer the picked stock material to the conveyor belt, retrieve theengraved material from the conveyor belt, and then place it in finished material storage; 2)material handling module: a Dexarm equipped with a pneumatic suction cup tool to pick upstock material that is moved to the engraving station by the conveyor belt, feed the stock materialto the engraving station, retrieve and place the engraved material on the conveyor belt, transferthe
ofthe most important types of information is biometric signature which is usually processed in theform of digital images. Therefore, cybersecurity professionals need to develop expertise indigital image processing. The paper analyzes the role of biometric information in cybersecurityand identifies the skills to successfully design biometric recognition techniques.IntroductionWith the exponential growth of digital and Internet technologies, threats to digital information aswell as computer systems are offering critical challenges to professionals and researchers [1].Hence the demand for cybersecurity professionals is significantly higher than available trainedpersonnel. As a result, the topic of cybersecurity is no longer considered as a branch
education spans nine years, after which students can choose a program inupper secondary education (ages 16–19). One of the electable programs is the Technologyprogram, in which this project took place at the end of year two during a course on webdevelopment and back-end programming. The school is located in a mid-sized Swedish town andhas approximately 350 students and is specialized in technology and tourism. Participatingstudents were 17–18 years old. The students were enrolled in the Web development 1 course,which includes, for example, basic web development technology, the fundamentals of carryingout a web development project, coding in HTML and CSS, image and video formats,cybersecurity, and legal issues (Skolverket, 2011).The participating
moderately incorporatedinto the course with low perceived impact.IntroductionLearning is at the center of every classroom. It is the process of acquiring new information orunderstanding, storing it, and later retrieving it for application in a process often called “transfer”[1]. In the classroom, this is seen as the passing of information from instructor to student. Thisinformation is held for short periods of time and processed in the working memory space of ourbrains; it can be manipulated through thinking [1], [2]. Each distinct piece of information isconsidered an element or “chunk,” and our working memory can only hold four to sevenelements at a time [1], [2]. Unlike working memory, however, long-term memory is nearlyinfinite with information
introduce the relevancy of spatial skills to engineering, current trendsin engineering students’ verbal abilities in the US through standardized testing, and preliminaryresearch that relates to technical communication skills, represented through phonemic andsemantic fluencies.Spatial Skills in EngineeringThere are numerous studies that have linked spatial skills as key predictors of students’ decidingto major in and succeeding in STEM disciplines [1]-[5]. Spatial skills have also been found to becritical for development of expertise in STEM [6]. Other research has linked spatial skills tosuccess in computer programming [7]-[8] and solving mathematical word problems [9]. Furtherresearch has established that there are differences in spatial skill
Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Richard T. Cimino is a Senior Lecturer in the Otto H. York Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research interests include the intersection of engineering ethics and process safety, and broadening inclusion in engineering, with a focus on the LGBTQ+ community. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Initial validity evidence for a survey of skill and attitude development on engineering teamsAbstractThis research paper discusses an emerging project that 1) seeks to gather validity evidence for asurvey of engineering student teaming attitudes and skill
communities in the United StatesAbstractThis paper shares and compares the experiences of initiating and sustaining two graduatestudent-led international ethnic engineering education scholarly communities for Chinese andAfrican groups. Our goal is to reflect on our lived experiences and inspire future students andacademics to cultivate such communities to broaden participation and enhance researchcapability. We adopt the Community of Practice (CoP) as the theoretical framework and opt forcomparative ethnographic narrative analysis as the method in this paper. Specifically, we focusedon the following dimensions of two communities led by the two authors: (1) the origin andpurpose; (2) the characteristics; and (3) practices. Our findings suggest that
as Genderqueer/Gender Non-Conforming.The qualitative data was deductively coded to examine the three types of interpersonal interactions:interactions with course content, interactions with peers, and interactions with instructor. The datashowed that students’ interactions with instructors and peers positively influenced theirengagement in the online engineering courses. However, students’ interactions with the coursecontent gleaned mixed responses. Some participants said it helped them engage with the coursematerial and others said it did not help them engage in the course content.IntroductionIn recent years, college universities have seen an increase in online course enrollment [1-2]. In2005, online enrollment began to increase, with 3.2
to a certain extent, and the training mode has asignificant effect on the professional identity of PhD students in applied engineeringdisciplines, while it has no significant effect on PhD students in basic engineeringdiscipline.Conclusions: (1) There are differences in the professional identity of engineeringPhD students in through-type training and non-through training, and the professionalidentity of engineering PhD students in non-through training is higher. (2) There aredifferences in the professional identity of engineering PhD students of differenttraining types, and the higher the degree of coherence, the lower the performance ofprofessional identity. (3) There are differences in the professional identity ofengineering PhD students