Conference Session

Research on Engineering Design Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Gül E. Okudan Kremer, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University; Hyun Kyoung Ro, Penn State University; Alexander Yin, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, Page 22.221.6race/ethnicity, parents’ education, class-year, disciplines, and SAT scores) and then on measures 
of six academic (classroom and curricular) and ten out-of-class student experiences that theliterature indicates are related to learning and skill development18, 19.Variables UsedThe Design Skills scale is the criterion measure for this paper. This scale contained 12 items(alpha = .92) reflecting engineering students’ reports of their self-assessed ability on design skills.Table 1 gives this scale’s item-content and descriptive statistics.Four sets of independent variables are used: sociodemographic (Table 2); classroom experiences(Table 3); curricular experiences (Table 4); and out-of-class experiences (Table 5

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division - General Technical Session 1

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Marie Dowling, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Morgan M Hynes, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Directorat the Center of Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts University. Hynesreceived his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2001 and his Ph.D. inEngineering Education in 2009 (both degrees at Tufts University). Inhis current positions, Hynes serves as PI and Co-PI on a number offunded research projects investigating engineering education in theK-12 and college settings. He is particularly interested in howstudents and teachers engage in and reflect upon the engi- neering designprocess. His research includes investigating how teachers conceptualizeand teach and how students engage in engineering through in-depth case study analysis

Collection

2024 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Katherine Robert

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 13

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marjan Naghshbandi, University of Toronto; Sharon Ferguson, University of Toronto; Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

CS.Next, the theme of collaboration was also found to be beneficial for students’ formation of bondsin CS. This result is reflected in prior work whose results suggest that the long-term impacts ofproject-based learning in STEM transcend traditional learning outcomes to also includeprofessional advancement and friendships [60]. Further, authors demonstrate that students’exposure to collaborative assignments are a significant, positive predictor of their persistence inCS [26]. Interestingly, however, the more recent work of Lehman et al. [32] found that students’exposure to collaborative pedagogy in introductory CS courses was a significant, negativepredictor for persistence. In their discussion, they suggest that the surprising result may

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna Li Coffman, University of Oklahoma; Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

betelling of how students approach learning with the affective domain [14]. Also, returning to theidea that the domains are connected is reflected in the fact that many of studies found focus on twodomains at a time instead of only one domain at a time [4-7], [14-19]. Several studies exist thatresearch the domains, but they focus on testing a specific class within engineering or non-engineering majors [4-6], [9], [14-16], [18], [20]. Similarly, the studies that focus on math orchemistry classes may not have tested solely engineering students, which could still distort or skewresults towards conclusions that may not apply to engineering students overall [4-5], [21]. Theproblem with these studies is that their findings cannot be generalized for all

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 4 Conference

Authors

Conference Session

Edifying Engineering Education through Multidisciplinary Efforts

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Behnaam Aazhang, Rice University; Randal T. Abler, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jan P. Allebach, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); L. Franklin Bost, Virginia Commonwealth University; Joseph R. Cavallaro, Rice University; Edwin K. P. Chong Ph.D., Colorado State University; Edward J. Coyle, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jocelyn B. S. Cullers, Boise State University; Sonya M. Dennis, Morehouse College; Yingfei Dong, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; Prasad N. Enjeti, Texas A&M University; Afroditi V. Filippas, Virginia Commonwealth University; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University; David Garmire, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; Jay George; Brian E. Gilchrist, University of Michigan; Gail S. Hohner, University of Michigan; William L. Hughes, Boise State University; Amos Johnson, Morehouse College; Charles Kim, Howard University; Hale Kim, INHA University; Robert H. Klenke, Virginia Commonwealth University; Magdalini Z. Lagoudas, Texas A&M University; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University; Yung-Hsiang Lu, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Kevin James Lybarger, University of Washington; Stephen Marshall P.E., University of Strathclyde; Subra Muralidharan, University of California, Davis; Aaron T. Ohta, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; Francisco Raul Ortega, Florida International University; Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington; David M. Rizzo; Candace Renee Ryder, Colorado State Univerisity; Wayne A. Shiroma, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; Thomas J. Siller, Colorado State University; J. Sonnenberg-Klein, Georgia Institute of Technology; Seyed Masoud Sadjadi, Florida International University; Scott Munro Strachan, University of Strathclyde; Mohsen Taheri, Florida International University; Gary L. Woods, Rice University Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Brian C. Fabien, University of Washington; Phiilp Johnson, University of Hawaii at Manoa; Robert Collins, Univesrity of Strathclyde at Georgia Tech; Paul Murray

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

level students as they graduate. To supporttransitions between quarters or semesters, students maintain rigorous documentation of theirefforts, typically in the form of VIP notebooks or institution-approved electronic portfolios. VIPprograms also involve peer evaluations, reflecting the team-based nature of the course. GeorgiaTech has developed a web-based peer evaluation tailored to VIP, which will soon be piloted witha handful of consortium members.Cost EffectiveAlthough VIP projects are not limited by quarters or semesters, the VIP program is curricular,with all students participating for a letter grade. This differentiates VIP from paid researchexperiences, as students do not receive stipends or hourly wages. This makes the program cost

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division (WIED) Technical Session 8

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rita Manco Powell, University of Pennsylvania; Henry Towsner, University of Pennsylvania; Brett Frankel, University of Pennsylvania

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

, 63% minored in Math, CS and/or arelated discipline. Some respondents indicated that they had earned two or more minors intargeted programs. 11% of respondents had earned a Masters in Math, CS or a related discipline.Analysis of survey questions yielded the following results:Respondents were given a checkbox question with a list of statements, and asked to check allthat apply:Question: What did you think of your PESP experience? Check all that apply.Responses: The following are the 5 most endorsed statements out of 16 statements. Thestatements that were endorsed by the 102 respondents are reflected in percentages of respondentsbelow. 1. PESP was fun–selected by 84% of respondents 2. PESP gave me insight into the types of problems that

Conference Session

Energy Conversion, Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Huiye Yu, UNSW Sydney; Hua Chai, University of New South Wales; Jayashri Ravishankar, University of New South Wales

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE), Energy Conversion

interface or application. Thus, Python, with strong compact ability across this area, is mostrequired. Fortran is second on the list mainly due to its efficiency in math calculation, whichmade it suitable to simulate large physical systems, and the existence of legacy code in theindustry practice. In short, while policy and investment fuse the growth of the electric power industry, theworkforce, however, is facing growing skills shortages [5, 6]. On the other hand, academicshave seen the need to renew the power system engineering curriculum and attempts to integrateup-to-date knowledge into the curriculum are reflected in the literature [30, 31, 34, 39, 40, 42-44].4.3 Soft Skills The resulting ranking of soft skills extracted from the job ads

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ha Pho, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Hsien-Yuan Hsu, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

selecting items from the MCA that aligned with targeted five out of sixcompetencies and created additional items to reflect the content in the online module [17]. Asmentioned earlier, Young and Stormes (2020) discussed a unique mentor program at CSULB asa two-semester operation. In the first semester, faculty mentors attended a 10-week hybrid-training format with one in-person meeting and 8-week online sessions focusing on the learningobjectives of the EM curriculum. In the second semester, the mentors would practice their skillswith students in mentor-related projects. Based on the learning goals of the tailored EM trainingand the critical aspects of the mentor-mentee compacts from the projects, the researchers selectedand modified items in each

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 9: Identity & Belonging 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia Wonch Hill, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Lance C. Pérez, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Sohrab Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; David Jones, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Zachary George Short, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Jennifer N. Rutt, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

round of interviews was scheduled to take place in the spring of 2020. Due to theCOVID-19 pandemic, and the abrupt switch to online learning in March of 2020, data collectionfor the first cohort was delayed until mid-summer. We also needed to update IRB protocols toinclude remote interviews as well as update the interview protocol to ask about any positive andnegative experiences the students had due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, weinterviewed cohort 2 (AY 2020-2021) in the spring of 2021. We then interviewed students fromcohort 1 (AY 2019-2020) in the fall of 2021. Although these students were entering their thirdyear of college (typically junior level), we used the same protocol and asked them to reflect ontheir first year. Finally

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Z. Dymond, Northern Arizona University; Davis Ray; Joshua T. Hewes P.E., Northern Arizona University; John Tingerthal P.E., Northern Arizona University; Robin Tuchscherer, Northern Arizona University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

interviews contained seven questions intended to allow instructors to reflect upon andsuggest improvements for anchor deployment: 1. How many anchored lessons did you offer in your course this semester? 2. What did a typical anchor look like in your course? 3. How difficult was it to add anchored lessons into your existing curriculum? 4. What were some challenges you faced when implementing anchored lessons? 5. How did you perceive the students’ opinions of the anchored lessons? (i.e., Did they seem to like the content? Did they ask good questions? Were they attentive?) 6. Do you feel that the anchored lessons added positive value to your class? In what way? 7. Any suggestions on how to improve anchors in future semesters

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martha Cervantes, Johns Hopkins University ; Sydney Danielle Floryanzia, University of Washington and Johns Hopkins University; Jackie Sharp; William Roberts Gray-Roncal; Erik C. Johnson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)

relative to their peers - reflecting opportunity gaps but notdeficits in capability. To normalize each applicant, students summarize their skills and interestsin an application consisting of demographic information, short answers, and eight 200-500 wordessays. The essays focus on the lived experiences of each student, offering students an opportunityto demonstrate their qualifications for the CIRCUIT program in their (1) potential for leadership 3 Table 1: A summary of the CIRCUIT pillars and benefits to stakeholdersPillar Description Student Benefit Nation BenefitHolistic Student selection Critical enabler for Evidence-driven

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 2: Innovative Approaches to Teaching and Learning in Engineering Graduate Programs

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alana Teresa Smith, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Emi Aoki, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Mahsa Ghandi, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Jasmina Burek, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Charles Thompson Ph.D., University of Massachusetts Lowell; Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

authors acknowledge partial support of this research from the National Science Foundation In-novations in Graduate Education in Cyber-Physical Systems Engineering under Grant No. #2105701.Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.The authors thank Prof. Susan Tripathy and Prof. Trina Kershaw for providing valuable resources ontechnical communication and teamwork during the IGE workshops. R EFERENCES [1] E. F. Barkley, K. P. Cross, and C. H. Major, Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons, 2014. [2] M. Dollinger, J

Conference Session

Energy Conversion, Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hua Chai, University of New South Wales; Huiye Yu, University of New South Wales; Kuthsav Thattai, University of New South Wales; Jayashri Ravishankar, University of New South Wales

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE), Energy Conversion

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 5: Exploring and Re-Examining Ideas in Engineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sanjeev M. Kavale, Arizona State University; Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

School: Youth Reflect on Mentoring Their Younger Peers,” J. Early Adolesc., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 332–362, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0272431620912472.[49] T. Ngoma, “It is not whom you know, it is how well you know them: Foreign entrepreneurs building close guanxi relationships,” J. Int. Entrep., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 239–258, 2016.[50] D. K. Dutta and M. M. Crossan, “The Nature of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Understanding the Process Using the 4I Organizational Learning Framework,” Entrep. Theory Pract., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 425–449, Jul. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1540- 6520.2005.00092.x.[51] S.-Y. Liu, C.-S. Lin, and C.-C. Tsai, “College students’ scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 4

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fadhla Binti Junus, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division (WIED) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saiyn Kurmankulov, Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan; Dinara Dikhanbayeva; Asma Perveen; Mariza Tsakalerou, Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

, that access to supportive networks, such as mentors andpeers, can provide encouragement and help women navigate the challenges ofstudying and working in STEM fields.Since the interviewees are students at an advanced university in Kazakhstan, the learningenvironment is substantially competitive, especially for undergraduate students. It also leadsto toxicity as was mentioned by some respondents. Moreover, the presence of a gender gapand the absence of women in both classrooms and faculty reflect on female students in STEM(Q32, 33, 34). “There are few girls in CS. Male peers usually group together, while girls stay alone. It was difficult for me to find female friends from CS, all my friends are from different majors. Moreover, at

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey James Kado, Florida Polytechnic University; Elisabeth Kames, Florida Polytechnic University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Conference Session

Diversity Trainings, Inclusive Learning, and Distance Learning

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sujit Varadhan, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Xiuhao Ding, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Delu Louis Zhao; Ananya Agarwal, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; David Dalpiaz, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Chrysafis Vogiatzis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Yun Huang; Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Hongye Liu, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

Conference Session

Reviewing Methods for Educational Research

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Khondhaker Al Momin, University of Oklahoma; Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma; Tahrima Rouf, University of Oklahoma; Arif Mohaimin Sadri, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Technical Session 12: Prerequisite Skills and Knowledge

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arkasama Bandyopadhyay, Texas A&M University; Haejune Kim, Texas A&M University; Phapanin Charoenphol, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

studytime solving textbook problems [1, 2]. In undergraduate engineering courses, most of thesetextbook problems (and course assessments designed by instructors to include these textbookproblems either verbatim or a variation of these problems) are designed to evaluate the ability ofstudents to recall facts and basic concepts, and apply these concepts in various contexts to solvenumerical problems (Please refer to Tables A.1 and A.2 for sample questions). Students mightdevelop problem-solving skills, partially through pattern-based recognition, by completing theseassignments and also be able to achieve good grades in the course. However, these grades (andoverall GPAs) are often not an accurate reflection of their understanding of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division (WIED) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Najme Kishani Farahani, University of Toronto, Canada; Aimy Bazylak, University of Toronto, Canada; Jason Bazylak, University of Toronto, Canada

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Developing Graduate Students' Competencies and Identities

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret E.B. Webb, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

Science Foundation under Grant No.1735139. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] Deters, J., Webb, M., Paretti, M., and Menon, M. "Building a Sustainable University-Wide Interdisciplinary Graduate Program to Address Disasters." 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[2] O’Meara, K., and Culpepper, D. "Fostering collisions in interdisciplinary graduate education." Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 163-180, 2020.[3] Welch-Devine, M., Shaw

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division (WIED) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah Boyce, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Madeline JoAnna Szoo, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

chemistry and grades were comparable between genders [16]. Self-confidence canalso be reflected in student expectations for a course, as well as the grade threshold at which theyseek help (with a high grade-threshold corresponding to a greater willingness to seek SI). Kesselsand Steinmayr reported that female students generally have better attitudes towards, and lessavoidance of, help than male students, despite both genders exhibiting equal acknowledgementof the benefits from receiving help [17]. However, regardless of the ability or decision to seekhelp, the impact of SI has gendered differences as well. Academic performance has been foundto be positively correlated with SI attendance in female students but negatively correlated with SIattendance

Conference Session

AERO 1: Rocketry and Space Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Juhyun Kim, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Timothy Plomin, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Heather Ruth Arnett, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Luisa-Maria Rosu, I-STEM, (Illinois Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) Education Initiative; Joshua Rovey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

future publication. Figure 6: Students’ Response to Career Interest Question in College ImplementationAcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Defense Education Program (NDEP)for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education, Outreach, andWorkforce Initiative Programs under Grant No. HQ00342010040. The views expressed inwritten materials or publications, and/or made by speakers, moderators, and presenters, do notnecessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Defense nor does mention of tradenames, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.References[1] J. Foust, “Space industry struggling to attract more skilled workers,” SpaceNews, Apr

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 6: Challenges and Coping Strategies of Engineering Graduate Students

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Liesl Klein, Villanova University; Greg J. Strimel, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

style works best for them, as can advisors. When deciding on joining aprogram, students and advisors can reflect on their styles and determine if theworking relationship would be beneficial.6.1 Engineering EducationIt should be noted that there are no, to the authors’ knowledge, specific studieson graduate student well-being as it relates to engineering and engineering-technology programs. However, STEM students commonly have to interfacewith their advisors more than non-STEM students due to the nature of howSTEM research projects are developed and managed. Often, advisors have spe-cific projects and grants that they must fulfill and the graduate students areassisting with those goals. This requires more communication

Collection

2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

sunil Dehipawala, City University of New York, Queensborough Community College; Dimitrios S. Kokkinos, City University of New York, Queensborough Community College; Rex Taibu; George Tremberger Jr; Tak Cheung

Vazgen Shekoyan PhD for discussion. We thank Eric Cheung MD atUniversity of Rochester Medical Center for discussion on neuroscience. We thank theanonymous reviewers for the suggestions and the ASEE Conference Chair Ashish BorgaonkarPhD for organizing the Conference.References1 I Gusti Ngurah Pujawan, I Putu Pasek Suryawan, Dewa Ayu Ari Prabawati. The Effect of Van Hiele Learning Model on Students’ Spatial Abilities. International Journal of Instruction 2020 Vol. 13 No. 3, pp461-474 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1259453.pdf2 Eric Machisi . Grade 11 Students’ Reflections on their Euclidean Geometry Learning Experiences. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2021, 17(2), em1938

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bailey Bond-Trittipo, Florida International University; Stephen Secules, Florida International University; Nivedita Kumar, Florida International University; Tiana Solis, Florida International University

student participants had at least 500 dollars ofunmet financial need. Moreover, all participants received a Pell Grant for the 2021-2022 schoolyear. It is important to note that the vast majority of Pell Grant recipients’ income falls within thelowest 50th percentile of household incomes in the United States [34]. Hence, most recipients arelow-income or lower middle class. Given this information, we describe the participants in ourstudy as lower-income students.In addition to financial support, Flit-GAP offers a variety of co-curricular opportunities toparticipants, including the selection of a career pathway experience that reflects their interests.Each participant has the opportunity to explore either an internship (professional pathway

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erick Vasquez, University of Dayton; Erick Ramos

stewardship to global learning experiences at many universitiesworldwide. Broadly, these should cover four significant aspects: (a) collaborations with studentsin other countries with other backgrounds and cultures, (b) engagement through online interactionsfor assignment completion or lectures, (c) development and assessment of students’ globalperspectives and competencies, and a (d) reflective aspect of learning and education.This study reviews previous COIL implementations in the literature, emphasizing chemicalengineering and other STEM courses. To our knowledge, COIL implementations are widespreadin social sciences; however, few reports highlight these practices in engineering courses. Wereview perspectives, methodologies, challenges, and