Internal Combustion Engine Laboratory 5 Yes YesProjects tend to fall into a number of categories. Certain courses in the curriculum did notinitially have a lab component connected to them. Projects 3,4,7,8, and 11 in Table 3 fall into thiscategory. The Internal Combustion Engine course originally had no hands on components. Theprofessor who teaches this course also advises capstone design teams, and thus was in a uniqueposition to champion a series of projects that would directly benefit his course. This course hadvery little physical space that could be dedicated to lab equipment. This is also an electivecourse, with a maximum of 30 students per offering, which means that there was not a lot ofinstitutional
inacademia was a concern that was brought up by multiple participants. More specifically, theparticipants noted that there are inconsistencies in what credits transfer from military experienceinto an engineering curriculum. A couple of the assets that were brought up during the sessionincluded, “vet populations are diverse and understand diversity,” and that student veterans are“very task-oriented compared to peers.”Funding. Another concern for SVEs surrounds funding. Some of the participants brought up the“lack of transparent alternate funding,” and “only 36 months of funding (initially)”. Oneparticipant brought up “GI Bill Logistics” as a barrier to academic success for SVEs. Thiscomment sits in juxtaposition with the comments noting VA
theundergraduate engineering curriculum are: (1) an authentic performance task in the form of ascenario and prompts to elicit the ABET professional skills; (2) establishment of initial reliabilityand validity of the measurement instrument – the Engineering Professional Skills Rubric (EPSRubric) (Appendix A); and (3) a dedicated community of 40+ engineering faculty using directassessment to evaluate the efficacy of their own programs, and to plan and implementimprovement at both course and program levels.The EPSA method is a discussion-based performance task designed to elicit students’ knowledgeand application of the ABET professional skills. In a 45-minute session, small groups of studentsare presented with a complex, real-world scenario that includes
time this course will beoffered.Project ObjectiveThe UW College of Engineering funded development of a series of distance-learning courses tosupport its Engineering Co-op Program and make it easier for chemical engineers to participate.Students, potential employers, and our faculty agree that co-op can be a valuable part of anengineer’s education. Students may accept a summer-only assignment or they may extend theirtime-to-degree by working on a co-op assignment during the academic year.The HTOL course was designed to resolve the problem that few students in the Department ofChemical Engineering participated in the engineering co-op program because it hinderedprogress through the department’s curriculum. Some required courses are offered only
concepts to studentsin the electrical engineering major. The course is unique in the following ways: it is modular instructure; computational nanotechnology has been made an integral part of the course; itprovides hands-on experience with real samples and equipment; High Performance ComputingCluster (HPCC) has been used for modeling and simulation. It was followed by a designprojects course in which students designed and implemented a nanoelectronic device. Wedeveloped the Nanoelectronics Concept Inventory (NCI) to assess student learning offundamental concepts in the first course. The assessment can be used to improve and enhancepedagogical techniques employed. The assessment can be supplemented by the observation ofstudent performance during the
to achieve an experience that enhances their qualityknowledge and skills during their capstone projects. As Wm. A. Wulf, president of the NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE), has noted, for the United States to remain competitive in a globaltechnological society, the country as a whole must take serious steps to ensure that we have adiverse, well trained, and multicultural workforce [2]. To support undergraduate minority studentsenrolled in STEM fields, TAMUK promotes the Senior Design / Capstone Mini-Grant (SDMG) tosenior students developing capstone projects as an integral part of their course program to completeits academic degree. The SDMG activity has an objective to help participants improving the seniordesign/capstone project
from allthat is available is problematic. Similar to our counterparts in the industry, educators must selectsoftware which satisfies a number of often competing requirements. Our software acquisitionsmust compliment the curriculum, integrate with the technical capacity of the institution, andprovide sufficient challenge to students, all the while reflecting current industry standards. Weare thus presented with a shared dilemma: how do both educators and industry decide whichsoftware application(s) to acquire?Software acquisition and adaptation decisions often involve comparing alternatives of severalcriteria. However, the end users of the software systems may not necessarily be familiar with theoverall decision-making criteria. To address this
and teaching thecourse since they likely took a course with similar content in their academic preparation giventhat the content largely remains the same.The authors aim to extend this investigation and attempt to correlate the findings of the facultysurvey with what the construction industry considers as “static” and “dynamic” courses, andevaluate what industry professionals perceive as topics that need constant update, and whattopics require the teaching of the fundamentals alone. The results can be used to evaluate thestatic/dynamic nature of an academic program as a whole.References1. Hartman, J.C. Engineering economy: suggestions to update a stagnant course curriculum. in Proceedings of the 1998 Annual ASEE Conference, June 28
,learning and communications that are not found in conventional U.K full-time under-graduateprogrammes. These teaching methods range from text-based to internet-based delivery and havea strong emphasis on employment-based project work.The undergraduate course provides a ‘mainstream’ first degree in chemical engineering forindustry-based students who have some prior qualifications and experience. The postgraduatemasters-level courses are designed for a wider range of professionals with backgrounds inengineering and/or chemistry. They provide a technology-based version of an MBA and featurea strong multi-disciplinary theme that integrates advanced process technologies, managementand business (with a strong emphasis on the process of innovation) and
. Ressler P.E., United States Military Academy Stephen Ressler, P.E. Ph.D., Dist.M.ASCE, F.ASEE is Professor Emeritus from the U.S. Military Academy (USMA) at West Point. He earned a B.S. degree from USMA in 1979, a Master of Science in Civil En- gineering from Lehigh University in 1989, and a Ph.D. from Lehigh in 1991. As an active duty Army officer, he served for 34 years in a variety of military engineering assignments around the world. He served as a member of the USMA faculty for 21 years, including six years as Professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. He retired as a Brigadier General in 2013. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia, a Distinguished Member of
of novice teachers’ epistemological framing ofengineering learning and teaching. The inclusion of engineering design at all grade levels in theNext Generation Science Standards calls for efforts to create learning opportunities for teachersto learn to teach engineering. In our research on the role of engineering in elementary teacherpreparation, we ask, what learning goals do new elementary teachers take up when asked to doengineering design themselves, and what learning goals do they establish when setting upengineering design tasks for students?We conducted an interpretive comparative case study with two purposefully selected cases,chosen to unpack contrasting epistemological framing of engineering. Ana and Ben participatedin the same
Paper ID #8664Development of On-Line Lecture and Preparation Resources for ElectricalEngineering Laboratory CoursesDr. Susan C. Schneider, Marquette University Susan Schneider is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI. She is also the Director of Undergraduate Laboratories for the Electrical Engineering program. Dr. Schneider is a member of ASEE, the IEEE, Sigma Xi and Eta Kappa Nu.Dr. James E. Richie, Marquette University James Richie received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Pennsylvania in 1988. He is presently associate professor
power engineering elective courses.However, at many universities the field of power engineering is seen as a mature field with noexciting problems to solve or work on in the 21st century.This paper and presentation will outline a joint effort between Mississippi State University andSchweitzer Engineering Laboratories (SEL) to develop several demonstrations for introductoryEE courses and laboratories for the first power engineering course using a microprocessorcontrolled relay set-up. The goal of the project is to provide other universities with a set ofdemonstrations and laboratories to help integrate other electrical engineering concepts into thepower curriculum to show students that power really involves many areas of core
the Development of Metacognition in Engineering Students in a Problem-Based Learning Program with a Think-Aloud ProtocolThis evidence-based practice paper focuses on how an engineering education program thatpromotes self-regulated learning impacts students’ problem-solving skills. Iron RangeEngineering (IRE) is an innovative, problem-based-learning (PBL) engineering program inVirginia, Minnesota. Throughout the curriculum of this program, students learn about and applymetacognitive skills necessary for self-regulating their learning. For the past several years, wehave been conducting research funded by the National Science Foundation1 to (1) identify themetacognitive skills inherent in self-regulated
state of Illinois. In the Innovate Now: Report on Innovation, Pistrui provided a series ofrecommendations for educators to employ to build the Metro Chicago and state of Illinois talentpool [18]. Table 9 provides an overview of the recommendations from the report. Table 9 - What Universities and Community Colleges Can Do BetterThe following seven-point action plan to support the development of entrepreneurship and theinnovation talent pool: 1. Make entrepreneurship and innovation education a priority on every campus. 2. Develop and support a group of “innovation champions.” 3. Demand cross curriculum and interdisciplinary collaboration between students, faculty, universities and industry. 4. Invest in educating and
highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up a large part of that vision and our future.Mr. Hugo Gomez, University of Texas, El Paso Mr. Hugo Gomez works as an Instructional Technologist at the University of Texas at El Paso, he is focused on expanding the professional and technical skill
institutions, such as applying educational theories in acourse design [13], implementing an intervention [14], [15], [16], and redesigning a streamlineof curriculums [17], [18], [19]. There is a lack of comprehensive, evidence-based researchdepicting the overall experiences of sophomore engineering students and how these experiencesinfluence retention and other academic success indicators.In reviewing the literature, we found Tinto’s Model of Student Departure offers a valuabletheoretical lens for examining the sophomore experiences of engineering students and theirimpact on students’ decision to drop out vs. persist [20], [21] (Appendix A). This model positsthat student retention is influenced by the interplay of academic and social integration
engineering and technology students.For example, the following constitute a sample of effective practice furthering our students’propensity for, and capability with, technological innovation:Phase 1 Ideation: In an introductory freshman class using creative brainstorming of howtechnological problems are addressed differently in various regions of the world.Phase 2 Development: Implementing a vertically integrated capstone project that teams studentsfrom each year of the baccalaureate program on an industry-based problem. Senior studentsmentor junior ones to develop advanced skills.Phase 3 Realization: Students work with entrepreneurs, for example in the university’stechnology park or incubator, in implementing an innovationInteraction with Context
sensor is a laser trimmed thermoset polymer capacitive sensing element with on-chipintegrated signal conditioning. As the relative humidity level changes, so does the capacitivevalue. This is translated into a change in the voltage output of the sensor.Air and Refrigerant Flowrates MeasurementsAir and refrigerant flowrates are measured, respectively; at location 8 and location 5 (refer to Fig. 1and Table). The air flow sensor is the DAM1, which is an integral vane anemometer. This deviceincludes a digital display unit. The refrigerant flow sensor is the Gems FT110 which is a turbineflow rate sensor. A separate display is used to view the resulting data.V. Interface and Control SystemFigure 3 illustrates how the data acquisition board is
, and the multilingual support it offers. Itmay be ideal for educational institutions and businesses of all types and sizes. Popular users areTripAdvisor and Booking.com. However, it does not support HTML5 based courses and it isalso very expensive. Learning paths in LearnUpon are a bit cumbersome.BlackboardIt gives the students an LMS that will provide a flexible learning environment that is suitable forboth academic institutions and businesses. Throughout the courses, it engages the students with arange of social and combined learning features. It has the advantages of use with a mobileapplication such as iOS and Android and it integrates with social channels and videoconferencing tools easily. However, it has the disadvantages of having
“a holistic approach to education, conservation, and community development that uses the local community as an integrating content for learning at all ages” (p 83) Proceedings of the 2011 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 3 In project-based learning, there are several variations ranging from teacher-controlled to student-controlled methods; see Table 3.Table 3. Variations of Project-Based Learning* Type of Project Guidelines 1. Teacher-controlled: part of curriculum unit
preparation, to define andsolve open-ended problems. The authors reflected on recent academic reaction to these feelings,and the relationship to Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive Objectives. They see a need to reachdifferent styles of learners, to make each student into an independent learner. They suggest a newapproach, based on experiential learning proposed by D. A. Kolb.Kolb observed patterns of learning new concepts. An immediate experience creates in the learnera need for learning. This is accomplished by reflective observation of the experience. This isassisted by the teacher via the introduction of new concepts (or by the new application of oldconcepts) that integrate this new experience into what the learner already knows. This becomesan
voltage in steps of 0.5 V until the desired lighting wasachieved.Student feedback on project experienceThe process of developing, implementing, and testing a project from scratch was an excellentexperience for most students. The majority of students were pleased with the project structure,though a few suggested that the project duration within the instrumentation and data acquisitioncourse be extended to at least six weeks instead of the currently allocated four weeks.Qualitative feedback from students is presented below through their comments. Liked working with software and hardware integration Enjoyed working with partner Applying classroom knowledge to real-world examples was interesting Great to have specification
past several decades, there has been an increasing emphasis on the importance of engineerspossessing important professional skills, including global readiness or awareness. In 2004, theNational Academy of Engineering (NAE) described the Engineer of 2020 as being proficient in“interdisciplinary teams [with] globally diverse team members” (p. 55).1 As the NAE stated,“While certain basics of engineering will not change, the global economy and the way engineerswill work will reflect an ongoing evolution that began to gain momentum a decade ago.” (p. 4).Engineering graduates will be called to solve increasingly global problems and to work in teamsthat contain members who are either from international locations or are globally distributed.Across the
professional development. ProjectCREATE met or exceeded all of its objectives. The project completed the local, regional,and state curriculum development and approval processes and began offering 30 newengineering/manufacturing/electronics/ information technology associate degree andcertificate programs. These curricula resulted in 105 new courses integrating academicand vocational subject matter with industry skill standards and/or competencies.The CREATE Regional Centers, which evolved out of Project CREATE’s successes,established objectives, activities, outcomes, and timelines designed to target the sevenchief areas of need or goals that the CREATE project identified. These areas includeteacher preparation, high school feeder linkages, articulation
the undergraduate curriculum of the Electrical and ComputerDepartment, the Engineering Technology Department and the Computer Science Department.Our proposal, “Deep Space Exploration using Smart Robotic Rovers”, was selected for fundingand we established our first interdisciplinary team of students and faculty to develop a smartrobotic rover.During the last two years, students and faculty participating in this program have developed arobotic rover that has successfully accomplished the initial goals of the project. The rover iscapable of climbing 30o inclines, rotating about its center axis, strafing, and maneuveringdiagonally while maintaining stability. It was also designed to protect the vital internalcomponents from outside contaminants
models as well as tointeract with users and the database. The RLAB infrastructure has been ported to a mechanicallaboratory site at University of North Florida (UNF), Jacksonville, during the past two years andis now used in its engineering curriculum, thereby offering access to some further real worldmodels and gaining synergy from an international cooperation. To properly run such remote laboratory several aspects need to be considered. New usersneed to be registered at the system. The availability of experiments needs to be managed. Forinteractive work with one of the experiments, time slots need to be reserved in advance, and theattempt to access the experiments must be verified against the reservations. The experiments'parameter settings
.3. Programs and Courses that Participated in the Study3.1. Electronics and Computer Engineering Technology at Cal Poly Pomona. This programis housed in the Department of Engineering Technology. This program consists of a rigorousintegrated four-year curriculum, designed to prepare graduates for technical careers on the“engineering team.” The program currently enrolled about 375 students at the time of this study.At Cal Poly Pomona, two courses participated in this study during fall quarter 2000. These were: ETE 310 Applied Network Analysis/Lab (3/1). This was an upper-division math-intensive technical course for juniors that included Laplace transforms, transfer functions, the s-plane, stability, and time/frequency response of
matriculation status on major selection,” Proceedings of the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, October 18-21, 2009.[15] B.M. Olds and R.L. Miller. (2004). “The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 23-35.[16] M.K. Orr, C.E. Brawner, M.W. Ohland, and R.A. Layton. (2013). “The effect of required introduction to engineering courses on retention and major selection,” Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013.[17] V. Bhuria and R.K. Dixit. (2015). “Selection criteria of college and course in engineering education
robots and introduce them to the technician associated with the facility. The resultat the end of a semester was usually an impressive stacking or sorting program on one of theyellow Fanuc robots in this facility. The technician would introduce them to the Fanuc trainingmanual (from the Fanuc School series4 and they would achieve a commendable outcome in asingle semester. Impressive!Then, there were purchased a number of the yellow Fanuc robots by our institution and two ofour number (myself included) had training on these robots with the possibility of teaching acertified course on Fanuc. The other individual completed the certification and the courses(Robotics and Robotics with Vision) became staples in the curriculum. The local