://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0013189X211027528[10] Goldman, A. (2019), “Interpreting Rural Students’ Stories of Access to a Flagship University,” The Rural Educator, National Rural Education Association, 40(1).[11] Miller, P., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2012), “Early academic skills and childhood experiences across the urban-rural continuum.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 234–248.[12] Gattis, C., & Adams, P., & Delgado Solorzano, X., & Popp, J., & Lo, W., & Muralidhara, D. (2023 June), Helping Rural and Underrepresented Students Succeed in STEM, Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD.[13] Adams, P., & Delgado Solorzano, X., & Lo, W., & Gattis, C
, Engineering,and Medicine—is undertaking to raise awareness of, stimulate interest in, and inspire action oncultural, ethical, social, and environmental responsibility in engineering (CESER). It outlines thehistory of the consideration of these impacts by the profession, cites some current efforts,summarizes NAE’s earlier programs, and details the development, goals, and status of the newprogram.Importantly, the paper also serves as a call for the membership of the ASEE to share theirknowledge and experience, and provide their input on the effort at the 2024 annual conference.The CESER advisory committee is formulating its initial activities and would welcome input onsuggested areas of focus and opportunities to bring attention to crucial issues
, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education. Springer International Publishing, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2.[10] A. Kramer, C. Wallwey, G. Thanh, E. Dringenberg, and R. Kajfez, “A Narrative-Style Exploration of Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Beliefs about Smartness and Identity,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Covington, KY, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2019, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028388.[11] M. Morris, R. Hensel, and J. Dygert, “Why do students leave? An investigation into why well-supported students leave a first-year engineering program,” presented at the ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings, 2019.[12] M. Meyer and S. Marx, “Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative
also provide access to specific dietary needs,and finally lower the pressures of engineering so students can eat. One finding we did nottalk about and should also be addressed is that folks should provide instruction on cooking.We found many students did not know how to cook or what to cook and that that issuemade planning a meal more strenuous. Provide cooking classes if your campus canmanage.That’s the end of my presentation. Thank you. Questions? 19 ReferencesBirmingham, Lucy. “In Search of the Next Meal.” ASEE Prism, vol. 28, no. 8, 2019, pp. 24–29.https
Conference & Exposition, 2018.3 David M Feinauer and Laura R Ray. Board 52: The Fidget Car—Outcomes from Small Group Learning Activities in Systems and Controls Courses. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.4 Michael D. Robinson. The Factorem: A Microcontroller Board for Engineering Education. In Preparation. 6 Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education5 Michele Bristow, Kaan Erkorkmaz, Jan Paul Huissoon, Soo Jeon, William S Owen, Steven L Waslander, and Gordon D Stubley. A
. Maloney and J. Kim, ”15 Fall Scenarios”, Inside Higher Ed, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/blogs/learning-innovation/15-fall-scenarios. [Accessed: Jan. 30, 2022].[2] B. J. Beatty, ”Hybrid-Flexible Course Design”, 1st ed. EdTech Books, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex. [Accessed: Jan. 30, 2022].[3] N. Milman, V. Irvine, K. Kelly, J. Miller and K. Saichaie, ”7 Things You Should Know About the HyFlex Course Model”, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://library.educause.edu/resources/2020/7/7-things-you-should-know-about-the-hyflex- course-model. [Accessed: Jan. 30, 2022].[4] Zoom Meetings, [Online]. Available: https://zoom.us [Accessed
concepts learned from lecture into a firmunderstanding of how a controller interacts with a system and vice versa. 4. AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the Eastern Michigan University School of Engineeringfor their time spent supporting students in their program. Their support directly prepares the nextgeneration of engineers. Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2023, American Society for Engineering Education 11 5. References[1] Plasoianu, Gheorghe. Two variations on the SEPIC converter. 13 8 2019. https://www.radiolocman.com/shem/schematics.html?di=600381. 9 1 2023.[2] Mohan, Ned. Power Electronics: a First Course. n.d.[3
industry, system engineering, robust design, modeling, simulation, quality control, and optimization. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Flipping a Course in Engineering TechnologyAbstractAs more technologies are used in high educational institutions, many universities are exploringthe flipped classroom methodology. The College of Engineering at Texas A&M University isinvesting heavily in new technologies in education. A new engineering building was recentlycompleted with classrooms equipped with new technologies that are designed for active learning.The engineering technology programs are taking steps to develop courses that use the flippedclassroom approach. While there are
, meet the program educational objectives of an institutionof higher learning, and make informed decisions on allocating resources for program improvement.Another important purpose is to meet established standards of teaching and learning towardsachieving accreditation from organizations such as ABET1. Many undergraduate engineeringprograms2,3,4,5 around the world apply for ABET accreditation every year. ABET, which is based inthe USA, follows a rigorous process to ensure programs meet its accreditation criteria6. It specifies aset of student outcomes7 (SOs) that a program must achieve for its graduates. These outcomes cover Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
working,as reflected by the 26.5% increase in female enrollment in undergraduate-level engineering programs inCanada between 2015 to 2019 [7]. There are, however, discrepancies in this representation acrossdifferent engineering disciplines. Specifically, the representation of women in CAD-reliant engineeringfields, such as mechanical engineering, remains low; not only below gender parity, but also below that ofengineering more generally. This gap is illustrated with recent statistics; for example, in 2015, a reviewwas conducted of authors publishing in the American Society for Mechanical Engineers and found that ofthe approximately 100,000 authors publishing in mechanical engineering disciplines, only 15.6% of themwere women [8]. According to the
). Assessment of STEM e- Learning in an immersive virtual reality (VR) environment. American Society for Engineering Education. [53] Lopez, C. E., Ashour, O. M., & Tucker, C. (2019, June). An Introduction to the CLICK Approach: Leveraging Virtual Reality to Integrate the Industrial Engineering Curriculum. In ASEE annual conference & exposition. [54] Carruth, D. W. (2017, October). Virtual reality for education and workforce training. In 2017 15th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.[55] Salah, B., Abidi, M. H., Mian, S. H., Krid, M., Alkhalefah, H., & Abdo, A. (2019). Virtual reality- based engineering education to enhance manufacturing
University of Texas at Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25897Carolyn Nichol, Rice University Dr. Carolyn Nichol is a Faculty Fellow in Chemistry and the Director of the Rice Office of STEM En- gagement (R-STEM). R-STEM provides teacher professional development to elementary and secondary teachers in science and math content and pedagogy, while also providing STEM outreach to the Houston Community. Dr. Nichol’s research interests are in science education and science policy. She received her B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Paper ID #27089Application of a Computerized Method for Evaluating Systems-Level Think-ingDr. John Krupczak Jr., Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technological Literacy Division; Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division; Senior Fellow CASEE, Na- tional Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010; Program Officer, National Science Foundation, Division of Undergraduate Education 2013-2016.Dr. Ali Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University A. Mehran Shahhosseini is an Associate Professor in the Department of Applied Engineering and Tech- nology
Immersion and a Focus on Identity,”Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City,UT: ASEE 2018.[3] Y.-L. Han, K. E. Cook, G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and J. Turns, “Engineering with Engineers:Revolutionizing a Mechanical Engineering Department through Industry Immersion and a Focuson Identity,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,Tampa, FL: ASEE 2019.[4] Y.-L. Han, K. Cook, G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and J. Turns, “Engineering with Engineers:Fostering Engineering Identity through Industry Immersion,” 2020 ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition, Montreal, Québec, Canada: ASEE 2020.[5] Y.-L. Han, K. Cook, G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and J. Turns, “Engineering with
your skills and grow in your career. Courses taughtonline provide students the flexibility to learn on their own schedule, instead of a mandatory classtime. Online courses, including those taught at Drexel cost less than traditional on-campus courses,making them more affordable. Virtual courses give students more selection in their courses. In aface-to-face setting, courses taught at the same time force students to choose between courses theylike. Lastly, virtual learning gives students access to classmates all around the world, providingnetworking opportunities you can’t get through an on-campus program.”In the last few years, online courses or classes have been more and more present and Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf
which is a high-stake design-build-test whose themevaries from term to term. This paper describes three semesters of the course: Term 1 is Fall 2018, 1Term 2 is Spring 2019, and Term 3 is Fall 2019. The course currently underway is Spring 2020and referenced as Term 4.Students are tasked with a design-build-test of a mechanical device for the end-of-term“competition” to showcase their high-stake design project. This class employs a team of 20undergraduate teaching assistants (TAs) to help facilitate various aspects of the course and tostaff the laboratory around the clock during business hours. Two to three graduate TAs are alsoassigned to the course
, demonstrating its benefits and challenges, and enabling it to beeffective, efficient, and capable of generating sufficient electric energy to meet West Virginia’sdemands. West Virginia’s economy heavily relies on coal-fired electric power, despite theaccelerating decline in coal demand1,2. With the dramatic decline in coal energy and thedevastating health and economic repercussions in communities across West Virginia, the demandfor alternative energies has become even more pressing3. As a result, citizen education, training, Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education
2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Comprehensive Case Study of Project Based Learning in Engineering Hamzah Mousa1, Margarita Orozco Genes1, Adam Carlton Lynch2 1-Wichita State University – Department of Industrial Systems and Manufacturing Engineering 2- Wichita State University – Department of Applied EngineeringAbstract In the contemporary engineering education system, project-based learning is now seen as aninnovative pedagogy that maintains the constructive collaboration of content knowledge and real-world practice. PBL exposes students to real-life problems, increases the practice of problem-solving coupled with teamwork, and the fundamental skills
]. Available: https://apm.byu.edu/prism/uploads/Members/Hedengren2023.pdf[4] L. A. Barba et al., Teaching and Learning with Jupyter, Creative Commons, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://jupyter4edu.github.io/jupyter-edu-book.[5] L. A. Barba, "Engineers Code: Reusable Open Learning Modules for Engineering Computations," Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 26-35, 2020, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2020.2976002.[6] J. A. Lyon, A. Jaiswal, and A. J. Magana, "The Use of MATLAB Live as a Technology- enabled Learning Environment for Computational Modeling Activities within a Capstone Engineering Course," in ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/35380.[7
the lower-level properties. For the human brain, the total mass of allthe neurons is a resultant, while consciousness is an emergent [32]. Although a requirement forthe Macro-level, emergence exists across all hierarchical boundaries (Micro-Meso and Meso-Macro).Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Flows Between the Micro, Meso, and Macro levelsDynamics within each of the Micro, Meso, and Macro levels are influenced by the conditions ofthe other levels. A high Micro-level of thriving might prevent a decrease in Meso thrivingfollowing a disruption at the Macro-level. For example, a community of resilient individualsmight have minimal disruption to their ASEE student chapter meeting schedule during theCOVID pandemic due to shifting their meetings
, 2019, p. 173.[5] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020-21," 2 November 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/E001-17-18-EAC- Criteria-10-29-16-1.pdf. [Accessed 6 March 2021].[6] B. J. Swenty and M. Swenty, "The Impact of EAC-ABET Program Criteria on Civil Engineering Curricula," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[7] B. G. Crawford, J. W. Steadman, D. L. Whitman and R. K. Young, "Using the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Examination as an Outcomes Assessment Tool," 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ncees.org/wp-content/uploads/FEOAT-white-paper- 2020_final.pdf. [Accessed 3 March 2021].[8] J. Bowen, "Efforts to
.[27] "ABET accreditation," Abet.org, 2019.[28] P. Wankat and K. Haghighi, "Multidisciplinary Engineering– Flexibility and ABET Accreditation," ASEE Annual Conference, pp. 1761-1770, 2009.[29] "Building America’s Skilled Technical Workforce," National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2017.[30] I. Verner, D. Cuperman, T. Romm, M. Reitman, S. K. Chong and Z. Gong, "Intelligent Robotics in High School: An Educational Paradigm for the Industry 4.0 Era," The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education,, vol. 916, pp. 824-832, 2019.[31] P. Maloney, W. Cong, M. Zhang and B. Li, "The Broader Impacts of an Additive Manufacturing Course at Three
that its use and transfer into the classrooms are low (Berger et al., 2022; Laursen,2019; Stains et al., 2018).Recent developments in theories of change around faculty development programs point to theneed to adopt research-based instructional strategies (Henderson et al., 2011; Henderson &Darcy, 2007, 2009) in several key areas: (a) the linkage between learning theories and specifiedin-class activities (Borda et al., 2020; Manduca et al., 2017); (b) alignment between specificresearch-based instructional strategies to culture and context (Lund & Stains, 2015); (c) facultycommunities of practice (Borda et al., 2020; Lave & Wegner, 1991); and (d) faculty beliefs andidentity (Bouwma-Gearhart, 2012; Brownell & Tanner, 2012). Yet
is raised on nuestro impacto (our impact) in thepractice of engineering education.IntroductionTo support higher education Faculty Development Programs (FDP), national entities,universities, and individual colleges invest large amounts of resources and money to train,mentor, support, and coach these faculty to learn about evidence-based practices for classroom-based activities and interventions (Borrego et al., 2013; Freeman et al., 2014; Prince, 2004).Even though faculty development programs are viewed as integral to support classroominnovation and the scholarship of teaching and learning, there is still a wealth of evidencesuggesting that its use and transfer into the classrooms are low (Berger et al., 2022; Laursen,2019; Stains et al
equityEngineering and research, while crucial for technological advancement, cannot exist in avacuum, divorced from the society that those advancements impact [1]–[5]. The work ofengineers and researchers has human implications, both beneficial and detrimental, as well asequitable and inequitable [2]. Artificial intelligence, for example, is an area of research in whichadvancing technology can perpetuate harm when development is not paired with rigorous equitystandards. A 2019 study found that a popular healthcare algorithm used to assess risk levels ofpatients was racially biased; sicker Black patients were measured as equivalent to healthier whitepatients, resulting in reduced levels of care for some Black patients [6]. The algorithm usedhealthcare costs
with the NASA Johnson Space Center. He received the IEEE Third Millennium Award, and projects he helped lead re- ceived the NSPE Outstanding Engineering Achievement Award and R&D 100 Award. He is a Registered Professional Engineer and earned the Project Management Professional Certification.Prof. Dennis Arthur Conners c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Systems Thinking Concepts and Applications for Engineering Leadership DevelopmentAbstract Many important and worthwhile initiatives in engineering leadership development focus onthe development of communication, social, and business skills among engineers [1]. Theobjective of this paper
–61, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1145/3330794.[3] R. T. Javed et al., “Get out of the BAG! Silos in AI Ethics Education: Unsupervised Topic Modeling Analysis of Global AI Curricula,” J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 73, pp. 933–965, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1613/jair.1.13550.[4] L. Tuovinen and A. Rohunen, “Teaching AI Ethics to Engineering Students: Reflections on Syllabus Design and Teaching Methods,” 2021.[5] J. Lönngren, “Exploring the discursive construction of ethics in an introductory engineering course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 44–69, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20367.[6] R. F. Clancy, Q. Zhu, and Philosophy Documentation Center, “Why Should Ethical Behaviors Be the Ultimate Goal of Engineering Ethics Education?,” Bus. Prof
Engineering Education, 85, 2, 93-96.[6] Jalali, Y., Matheis, C. (2019). Imagining relationally: a critical bridge between theory andpractice, AAC&U Transforming STEM Higher Education, Chicago, IL, Nov. 7-9.[7] Jalali, Y., Civjan, S. A. (2020), Many Facets of Imagination: What Really Matters inEngineering Ethics Instruction? Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual ConferenceContent Access, Virtual On line. 10.18260/1-2—34951[8] Royce, Josiah. (1885). The moral insight, In The religious aspect of philosophy: A critique ofthe bases of conduct and of faith. 131-170. Boston, MA, US: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.[9] Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.[10] Anzaldúa, G.E. (2015). Light in the dark: Rewriting identity
twentieth-century America, New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.[29] C. Peters, "Veterans Educational Benefits: Post-9/11 GI Bill's Impact on African American Men," Los Angeles, 2018.[30] C. Mobley, J. B. Main, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord and M. M. Camacho, "Pride and Promise: The Enactment and Salience of Identity Among First-Generation Student Veterans in Engineering," International Journal of Engineering Education, 2019 (in press).[31] R. C. Atkinson, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, J. B. Main and M. M. Camacho, ""I Never Played the Girl Card": Experiences and Identity Intersections of Women Student Veterans in Engineering," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[32] C. Cate and T. Davis
. vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 200-205, Sept. 2010, doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.507714.[8] S. Claussen and V. Dave, “Reflection and metacognition in an introductory circuits course,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., (Columbus, OH), June 2017, pp. 1-15, doi: doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28788.[9] R. M. Clark, S.J. Dickerson, “The use of SPICE simulation to promote reflection and metacognition in a microelectronics course,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., (Salt Lake City, UT), June 2018, pp. 1-14, doi: 10.18260/1-2--31133.[10] W. Roldan, J. A. Turns, A. Arif, G. Tesoriero, and Y. Xu, “Students’ engagement with reflection: Insights from undergraduates,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., (Tampa, FL), June 2019, pp. 1-13