opportunities such as participating in after-school tutoring and clubs, coaching andjudging academic teams, partnering with teachers on classroom projects, and hosting workplacevisits and apprenticeships. Our focus is on increasing the quantity and quality of our STEMprofessionals’ engagement; therefore, we promote STEM volunteering opportunities as well asprovide sessions with a group of STEM mentors that require less time commitment and buildtrust for future opportunities. This, in effect, mentoring of mentors, will reduce the anxiety ofnew mentors and expand the acceptance of mentoring into the "new normal" of quality, highimpact STEM mentoring. Additionally, to raise the level of ethical responsibility of the mentors,mentors are required to review
EducationBodnar and colleagues [1] conducted a systematic review of game-based learning withinengineering. Through an inclusion/exclusion filtering process, 191 studies were included in theprimary review set, of which 62 included studies on learning outcomes [1]. The reviewdemonstrated games have been used in a variety of engineering disciplines ranging from first-year programs to core disciplines to specific topics within engineering such as ethics and design.However, the most frequent published use of games was in computer, mechanical, electrical, andfirst-year engineering disciplines. There was also a diversity of the types of games being used inengineering classrooms, including gamification methods, board/card games, and digitalimplementations, with
ethic that is inherent in these teams.In the Fall semester of 2005, student 5 transferred to our university in her senior year. Sheimmediately demonstrated a strong mathematical background. She also indicated an interest ingraduate studies. Because of her math aptitude, we thought it appropriate to find a simulationproject for her. With our encouragement, she decided to work on the development of imageprocessing techniques for facial recognition. This effort resulted in a presentation at theNational Conference for Undergraduate Research [6].In the Fall semester of 2006, student 6 transferred to our university in his senior year and likestudent 5 immediately demonstrated a strong mathematical aptitude. He also expressed aninterest in graduate
illustratehow this benefits the student’s ability, “to design a system, component, or process to meetdesired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.” The symposium described wasfilmed making it available to use at another time or institution.IntroductionLearning outcomes for aerospace design students often stress the practical application of studentknowledge. For example, aerospace programs are asked to show that students have “an ability todesign a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability
returning to school for his doctorate he spent 20 years in engineering, engineering management, and general management in a wide range of industries.Jane Humble, Arizona State University Jane Humble holds BS and MS degrees in engineering and a PhD in business from Arizona State University. She is Associate Professor of Technology Management at Arizona State University. She has been a member of the faculty at Arizona State University for about 15 years with teaching and research interests in the areas of project management, ethical issues in technology, quality management, research techniques, and managerial decision making. Prior to and during her assignments in academia Dr. Humble has worked in
the final presentation at the conclusion of program. 5. Ethics in Engineering Research. Is held in first week with the following main goals: (i) Familiarize with the grey area of ethics; (ii) Discuss ethical decisions using a board game with presented situations; (iii) Discuss the difference between a legal resolution to a problem, a moral solution, and ethical solution; and (iv) Ethics in research. The topics covered familiarize the participants with the ethics and problems that arise when researching. Ethics case studies are presented using an Ethics Challenge Board Game, which involves group discussions of real life situations and the course of actions, whether
hours of course work. These 123 credit hours include 36 credithours general study, 45 credit hours of Computer Science core requirements, and 42 credit hoursrequirements for student graduating in Database Area of Specialization listed as follows: General Study (36 Credit Hours) All students graduating from XXX must complete the following 36 credit hours general study. ≠ ENGL 1010 Introduction to Writing 3.0 ≠ ENGL 2020 Intermediate Writing 3.0 ≠ PHIL 2050 Ethics & Value 3.0 ≠ ECON or HIST or PLSC
engineersdedicated to education. The curriculum follows the modular international engineering educationcurriculum that attends fully the education rules for the university level of formation in thecountry. It is a very dynamic and rich program, developed in modules, followed in severalcountries in the world. It follows the trend of global formation of professionals, mainly to attendthe need of a prepared engineering educator to act in the several different cultural environments,which mobility has imposed as a fact of life for researchers and teachers at graduation level. Newcompetencies of educators are needed such as: evaluation management; developmentcompetencies; communication skills; teamwork; ethics and intercultural competencies. Thisengineering
. Login procedures are learned, e-mail is practiced, and the world of face-to-computer- screen IS oper.ed. Some studer.ts come w.+h favorite word processors; others simply need to bepointed in the direction of something that will work well for them. Lastly, the internet opens a whole newavenue of exploration, but exploration that must be carefully used so as not to consume too much of thestudent’s time. Ethics is a subject that has become critical in an engineer’s life; therefore, this too isinvestigated by the students. Discussion will range from how do you handle illegal, but ethical activities toillegal and unethical activities onto legal but unethical activities. These can be exercised in groups or byindividual thinking. Communication
remaining twelve modules were equally divided amongelectrical, mechanical, and automated manufacturing topics. The students assembled and tested electronicscircuits; designed, made, and tested a small mechanical part; and programmed robots and operated anautomated manufacturing system. The course was taught by six faculty and used six different laboratories. The course provided the students with an engineer’s view of engineering problem solving. Itincluded the engineering approach to the design of products and processes, engineering heuristics, anddiscussions of engineering ethics. The course included structured, engaging laboratory sessions, and thisexperiential learning aspect of the course was particularly well received by the students
. Entrepreneurship12 John Pomery Prof., Management Ethics (Part I)13 Chuck Harrington Technician, ECE Machine Shop ECE Machine Shop14 John Pomery Prof., Management Ethics (Part II)15 Ralph Webb Prof., Communications Technical Presentations16 EPICS Teams Final Report PresentationsPhase 4 - System Design and Development: Starting from week five of the first semester of a project, theProject Team’s goal is to produce a prototype of the hardware/software systems discussed in the proposal.Interaction with the Project Partner continues in order to ensure that the
posting. The culvert allows a 100-year flow to pass, and accommodatesthe one-foot freeboard requirement. The intersection design included improved sightlines andsignage, and grading which eliminated guardrails. The wingwalls were designed to avoid therelocated water line, and riprap was extended to cover the waterline location. A localizeddrainage problem was resolved by extending a corrugated metal pipe to discharge directly intothe stream.ABETA number of ABET outcomes were measured in this class, including ‚ ethics (f): the ASCE/NSPE ethics workshop was utilized as a formal training event. Students complete assignments using NIEE ethics cases. ‚ communication skills (g): the students made a formal design presentation to the senior
education include service-learning, sustainable engi- neering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Fourth Year Engineering Students’ Descriptions of the Importance of Improving Society Through their Engineering CareersAbstractAs engineering students graduate and enter the workforce, they gain significant responsibility forindividuals and society through their future decisions. Problematically, multiple recent studieshave shown that over their time in college, students tend to become more disengaged from theimpact of their work and their feelings of social responsibility decrease. The question explored inthis research was to determine the
and affective domains in the CEBOK3 [3, 5, 6, 9]. Onereason behind this was the deemed importance of civil engineers internalizing a sense of valuefor the people served by the profession and for their human experience.The CEBOK3TC initially considered including the affective domain for all of the CEBOK3outcomes. While possible, the committee ultimately felt it best to formally introduce theaffective domain into the CEBOK for a selection of outcomes only. The sustainability outcomeand all of the professional outcomes (communication, teamwork and leadership, lifelonglearning, professional attitudes, professional responsibilities, and ethical responsibilities) wereselected by the task committee as being the most appropriate to including in both
• Track II: Construction Management”MS in Technology Management program outcomes [15] are listed as: 1. “Graduates will have knowledge and competency in the field of technology management with an emphasis on engineering technologies. 2. Graduates will have the knowledge and skills necessary to be imaginative, critical thinkers who are able to discover problems and questions, develop logical answers, and apply effective solutions in the practice of technology management. 3. Graduates will have knowledge of ethical behavior in professional positions in all aspects of technology management. 4. Graduates will have competency in the management and leadership of technology in global
. Studentsurveys conducted at two different institutions show why students select to become engineers andtheir preference for the different course components.Introduction “Introduction to Engineering” is a core course given to freshmen students of all engineeringdisciplines. The course aims to familiarize students with the engineering profession, the differentengineering disciplines, the design process for exploratory projects, the work in interdisciplinaryteams, the ethics and professional behavior, the lifelong learning, the written and oral presentationof technical concepts, and problem solving. As curriculum often changes, an online research wasconducted on the most current catalogs (2018-2019) of 182 higher education institutions offeringdegrees in
-defined engineering technology problems appropriate to program educational objectives e. An ability to function effectively as a member or leader on a technical team f. An ability to identify, analyze, and solve broadly-defined engineering technology problems g. An ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non- technical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature h. An understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development i. An understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity j. A knowledge of the impact
/her area of work, builds the hardware, tests, and documents his/her work.Throughout the build and test stages, students record video evidence of their work. Near the end of theterm, each student presents (defends) his/her work through an online seminar to other students andfaculty. Each student's capstone project is assessed for integrative learning of the functional areas ofelectrical engineering technology, mastery of the science and technology fundamentals, experimentation,oral and written technical presentations, engineering ethics in design and practice, self-directed learning,and continuous improvement.Through this capstone project experience, the student outcomes are geared to: Work in a team, brainstorm, research, identify, and
businesses. 3. Analyze various energy sources and evaluate their advantages and disadvantages. 4. Calculate energy use, cost, and rate of depletion of energy sources under varying scenarios. 5. Obtain an essential understanding of the political, economic, environmental, and social issues related to energy production and consumption in the contemporary world. 6. Discuss U.S. and global trends on energy and sustainability related to policies, ethics, economics, politics, environment, and society. 7. Identify and locate the appropriate types of information for review, evaluate the information, and use the information effectively, ethically, and legally.DescriptionTopics for the course include the following: The
example study; and, Critically examine how the framework was used in these studies to explore, plan, Page 26.303.3 implement, reflect on, document, and demonstrate research quality.Ethical validation as a sixth validation construct and core aspect of research qualityBased on conversations at the first longitudinal workshop, over the past two years the authorshave collaborated with Dr. Alice Pawley from Purdue University to pursue the idea of ethicalvalidation as an additional, sixth dimension of the quality framework. These explorations wereprompted by the recognition in our own work that: i) ethical considerations extend
blaming the crisis on a recent change of the water sourcefrom Detroit’s water system to the Flint River, the timing of which coincides with the elevatedlead levels. Reading about the revelations in Michigan brings to our minds the discovery andattempted cover-up of lead in the Washington D.C. water supply, which Drs. Donna Riley andYanna Lambrinidou wrote about in their 2015 ASEE paper, “Canons against Cannons? SocialJustice and the Engineering Ethics Imaginary” [5]. Similar to in Washington D.C., Flint Stateofficials are being accused of failing to act soon enough and in the best interests of the citizens.Both of these cases highlight the inherent socio-technical nature of engineered systems – afeature of engineering which, we and many others
engineering through case studies rather than abstract examples helps students see the societal impact of engineering and relate works of engineering to the social, political and cultural contexts in which they arose [5]. For example, in a new lecture developed on the topic of Ethics in Engineering, we cover the story of the 1978 Citicorp Center Crisis. We incorporate video clips from a BBC documentary on this incident, as well as audio from 99 Percent Invisible podcast [6] interviewing Professor David Billington and his former student, Diane Hartley, whose undergraduate thesis work identified the critical flaw in the building’s design. In lecture, we pose students the question of whether the public should have been informed of the impending
leader on a technical team f. An ability to identify, analyze, and solve broadly-defined engineering technology problems g. An ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non- technical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature h. An understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development i. An understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity j. A knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global context k. A commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvementThe
performance, butdata analysis is ongoing (due to ethics considerations the data were only recently released foranalysis). A major weakness of the blended model is the capacity of students for self-directedlearning and so we have identified a need for the course to address metacognitive outcomes – inessence, the course needs to provide support to help students “learn how to learn”. Some studentsstated that they could not learn using online content and “needed to be taught,” as if this is aninherent fact rather than a skill that can be developed. In particular, sections who traditionallystruggle with this course did not find the online content effective for learning and were lesssatisfied with the blended model. Future course offerings may include a
andcomplete an ethics component related to their studio projects.Preparedness for what lies ahead is essential to making meaning of the ArchitecturalEngineering Technology curriculum and academic experience. Through our third yeardesign studio we successfully help prepare our students for the professional ahead.College Mission:The mission of the College of Engineering, Technology, and Architecture is to a deliver ahigh-quality education and prepare individuals for professional careers in engineering,technology, and architecture, or for further graduate studies. Preparing individuals tofunction as effective members of a global society, our programs promote technicalexcellence, reasoning ability, communication and interpersonal skills, and
career as a structural engineer. She was a founding board member, and the first chair elect of the Hampton Roads Green Building Council. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Engagement in Practice: Adopting Service Learning and Community Engagement as a High Impact Teaching Strategy in Geotechnical EngineeringIntroductionTo meet the high calling of professional engineering ethical cannons and civil engineeringprofession vision to establish safe, healthy, equitable, and vibrant communities; undergraduateeducation programs need to prepare graduates to be well-rounded leaders in planning, design,and construction of public infrastructure and built environment
of engineers as empowered leaders who understand theimplications of their own underlying values, assumptions, and beliefs and theirsubsequent connection to the sustainable design and operation of complex systemsenhances societal sustainability. This paper proposes a case study analysis structuredeveloped to connect the role of the underlying values, ethics, assumptions, and beliefs ofpeople who lead, manage, and work in complex engineering projects towards theenactment of a sustainability culture or a safety culture or both. The proposed case studystructure reinforces engineering education outcomes, the United Nations sustainabledevelopment goals, and Risk Based Process Safety (RBPS) management in order tofurther develop technical and
0.23Q4 My ``hands-on'' skills improved because of the dissection activity. 1.1 0.54Q5 I learned more about manufacturing from the dissection activity. 1.3 0.68Q6 I learned more about economics from the dissection activity. 1.2 0.62Q7 I learned more about ethics in engineering from the dissection activity. 0.0 0.89Q8 My future designs will be different because of what I learned in the dissection 0.5 0.72 activity.Q9 Preparing the dissection journal helped me to become a better technical writer. 0.3 1.12Q10 Preparing the dissection journal helped me to better understand my product's 1.3 0.46 operation and design.Q11 I learned more about
information; determine any restrictions, limitations, and/or constraints; develop aresearch topic list and organize the project using project management tools and techniques. Allof these tasks were to be performed with consideration given to the economic, social, political,ethical, technical, health, and safety aspects of the project environment.In the Second IPR students developed a few courses of action (COAs) and used a specificprocedure, modeled after the military decision making process (MDMP), to evaluate the COAsand select the best one. Students performed some preliminary calculations to help determine thefeasibility of their COAs.For the third IPR, students provided their design description and specifications and performed allthe necessary
Islands. The NCEES Strategic Plan describes several issues that representchallenges to maintaining an effective licensure process. The document, which is periodicallyupdated by the board of directors, specifies goals associated with each of the issues and describesstrategies for achieving these goals [NCEES, 2012]. Vision The vision of NCEES is to provide leadership in professional licensure of engineers and surveyors through excellence in uniform laws, licensing standards, and professional ethics for the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare and to shape the future of professional licensure. Mission The mission of NCEES is to advance licensure for engineers and surveyors in order to