suggest that participants’intrinsic motivation, sense of belonging, and perception of campus climate were not statisticallydifferent among mentoring modalities (PAIR, GROUP, and GOAL). Furthermore, a positive linearcorrelation was found between intrinsic motivation and sense of belonging.IntroductionImplementing meaningful retention strategies is a priority for changing the current climate towardswomen in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields. Mentoring programshave been established to assist students in career planning, boost engagement, and improveacademic performance 1 . Mentoring occurs when a dynamic relationship provides guidance andsupport from a senior person (mentor) to a less experienced person (mentee) 2,3
technological tools andbeing attentive to updates of those technological advances. These are very important since thesuccess of these resources in learning depends on their practical and appropriate use.Maybe the most advanced and established program in instructor training for COILexperiences in the world is the agenda of the Suny COIL Center of the Purchase Collegecampus at the State University of New York. This program was a pioneer and initiallydeveloped a COIL Course Orientation (CCO) of 5 weeks, introducing COIL designs and aseries of recommendations about what works and what does not in COIL [18]. In addition,this same center offers diverse training options for developing a COIL course for customizedor group online classes, support for planning
Paper ID #36577The Influence of Engineering Curriculum Alignment on the Success ofTransfer StudentsDr. Marino Nader, University of Central Florida Marino Nader Marino Nader is an Associate lecturer in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering De- partment at the University of Central Florida and has been working on digitizing courses and exams, creating different course modalities. Dr. Nader obtained his B.Eng.,Dr. Harrison N Oonge, University of Central Florida Dr. Harrison N Oonge is an assistant dean for academic planning in the College of Undergraduate Studies at the University of Central Florida (UCF). Harrison
Central Florida Dr. Harrison N Oonge is an assistant dean for academic planning in the College of Undergraduate Studies at the University of Central Florida (UCF). Harrison leads articulation and the curriculum alignment effort of 53 gateway courses between UCF and DirectConnect partner institutions. Prior to joining UCF, Har- rison worked for three years at West Virginia University (WVU) as a project specialist in Undergraduate Academic Affairs and an adjunct professor in WVU’s College of Education and Human Services where he taught undergraduate and graduate-level courses. Harrison holds a B.A. in Education (Kenyatta Uni- versity, Kenya), a M.A. in Special Education (WVU), and Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction (WVU
system. The Development team willneed to pilot test the system, and at the end of the first cycle of development, the team will needto have users validate that the system works as anticipated. Finally, near the end of this cycle, thedesign team and content experts verify that the planned scenario meets the specified requirementsfor the target users9,10,11.Speech DatabaseThe ASR modules in the system have to deal with the disordered speech from children, which isnotoriously harder to recognize than the standard speech. One of the barriers to developing ASRmodels that can handle disordered speech is the scarcity of datasets publicly available for trainingand testing, especially for young children. The Speech Exemplar and Evaluation Database (SEED
students selected “expert knowledge” for all categories as well aspre-/post-experience, which is likely not a realistic response to the survey. Thus only four of thesix quantitative results were used to compute an average measure of their knowledge acquisition.The categories and their averages are reported in Table 1. Pre-Experience Average Post-Experience Average A: Modern robotics software frameworks, e.g. the Robotics Operating System middleware (ROS) 1.75 3.25 B: Autonomous robot “sense , plan, act” cycle 1.75 2.75 C: Biometric recognition and biometrics- based
(Appendix). The purpose of thisconnection was to teach the students how to build team dynamics through planning andexecuting a project.While the regular project allowed the students to propose a solution based mainly on functionalassessment, the EM project asked them to consider technical feasibility, customer value andeconomic viability as well. In the process of searching for technical feasibility, the studentslearned how to integrate information from many sources to gain insight. In this project, it wasshown that a carefully designed strut composed of elastic elements can provide the needed springaction (Solid Mechanics connection), and an actuator with a proper orifice can provide adequatedissipation of energy (Fluid Mechanics connection
an engi-neering student mentor. Several of the students, as well as their engineering student mentor, wereparticularly interested in music and partnered with a thirteen-year-old girl with cerebral palsythat loves to listen to music. The girl is confined to her chair, is nonverbal, and struggles withfine motor skills. The team visited the girl and had an opportunity to interview her mother andnurse. Both expressed a desire for the girl to be able to independently control her own music ei-ther through her TV or Alexa.The team brainstormed ideas and developed an ambitious design plan (see Figure 5a) that in-volved a control unit with large assistive buttons connected to a micro-controller based MP3player and speaker that can give eight distinct
inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meetobjectives” as a required student outcome supporting the program educational objectives [5].Engineering educators who endeavor to teach inclusive teamwork skills to enable their studentsto work productively and inclusively, however, often discover what organizational theorists havepreviously observed and documented: that teaching people to work productively in diverse teamenvironments is a challenge [1].Historically, many diversity-related educational interventions in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) environments attempt to prepare the marginalized personto cope with the unwelcoming cultures in which they are situated [2]. With NSF support, aresearch team used a
howto integrate STEM disciplines using a biomimicry context with engineering design as highschool students would experience in an integrated lesson. Teachers also collaborated during thesecond week of the PD to create their own integrated STEM units co-taught the next school year.The following school year, researchers, educators, and industry partners collaborated to providea variety of STEM learning opportunities to support these teachers in unit plan implementation.A total of 43 STEM teachers participated in the project, and 20 integrated STEM lessons wereimplemented in 47 STEM classrooms over three years (2016-2019 academic years).TRAILS researchers learned much from the participants of the TRAILS 1.0 program within amidwestern state
-prepared to perform research(1.0) My students were well-prepared to make technical presentations(0.6) My students had sufficient experience in computing to support their workLessons Learned and Planned ActionsThe formative evaluation of Year 1 of REU-PATHWAYS as well as the grant teams revealedsome interesting insights:• There is need for REU participants to feel they belong to the program. We will add a home room meeting every morning in Year 2 and Year 3.• Given that the community college students all commute to campus, a physical space is needed as a “homebase” to provide a communal location for interactions outside of their research labs.ConclusionsBased on the results from this final program evaluation, the REU-PATHWAYS program
effectiveness of validated instructional practices across five diverse institutions. This research will identify ways to support engagement and conceptual learning of diverse populations of students, within the contexts of the educational systems (i.e., institutional contexts, instructor and student histories, beliefs and practices, and the innovation – the CW). 4. Promote and track propagation of the enhanced CW via targeted community building in ME. This will be accomplished through workshops, implementation of an Action Research Fellows Program, collaboration with professional societies in ME and outreach efforts to two-year colleges. 5. Continue to develop and refine a sustainability plan for continued
Transportation Research. His research interests include systems modeling, analysis and control, data analysis and decision support in healthcare, infor- mation systems and engineering education research. His work has been funded by federal organizations including National Science Foundation and Army Office of Research and medical device manufacturing industry. He has taught courses in the areas of systems modeling and performance analysis, information systems design, production planning, facilities design, and systems simulation. He co-authored the 2006 Joint Publishers Book-of-the-Year textbook, Design of Industrial Information Systems, Elsevier.Dr. Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh Renee Clark serves as the Director
engineering and science experiences. The survey was administered by ourexternal evaluator, who also removed identifying information and sorted the data for thefaculty team to examine. In this paper, we analyze student responses by multipledemographic categories: gender, race and ethnicity, and scholarship status (a proxy forsocioeconomic status, given that recipients must meet particular income and financialneed requirements). We did not conduct a statistical analysis due to the small sample size(n=13). In future work, we plan to combine descriptive statistics with qualitative analysisof student interviews.ResultsBelongingnessThe most significant difference in student reporting of undergraduate belongingness wereby socioeconomic status, as students
for the CST majors the CS3 course is a mandatory one. Also, no recoveryafter the end of the pandemic (in Fall 2021) is recorded for the CS3 enrollment numbers.Figure 4 summarizes Table 3 and demonstrates that COVID-19 affected the enrollment numbersfor students across all ethnicities. However, it can be observed that different ethnicities havedifferent patterns of when students of those ethnicities were affected most. We cannot explain whythe timelines of the changes in the enrollment numbers for different ethnicities vary. However, thisis an interesting phenomenon that we plan to investigate in our future work.Figure 2. Enrollment For CS1, CS2, and CS3 Courses for Men and Women: Overall Enrollment for CST and non-CST
Commission and, as commissioner, served as chair for two terms. She also chaired the Driver’s Education Advisory Committee and the Motorcycle Safety Advisory Com- mittee for the Michigan Department of State—work that resulted in new legislation for Michigan. She began her career as an engineer for General Motors Truck Group and has been nationally recognized in higher education as both an American Council on Education Fellow and a New Leadership Academy Fellow. Currently Dr. El-Sayed serves on the Bloomfield Hills Board of Education, serves as a director on the BHS Foundation Board and serves on the Advancement Committee for the Society for College and University Planning (SCUP). She is married and has three adult
to work on and frame the problem by creating design criteria for the problem. They must identify at least one social, economic, and environmental design criteria.Step Three: Explore Lots of Using their design criteria developed in step two, the groups use a multicriteriaOptions assessment tool to explore solutions and how well they solve the problem using the design criteria to measure success.Step Four: Justify your Students justify what solution idea solves their problem most effectively andRecommendation comes up with an implementation plan for their solution including predicted
for evaluation, corresponding to particular student competencies the authors hope toimprove.Student creativity and comfort with uncertaintyAs described above, the redesign of ENGGEN 115 attempts to strike a new (for the course)balance between concrete and open-ended design problems in PBL. Yang found that sketchvolume generated in the first quarter of the design cycle correlates significantly with designoutcome.[5] To assess students’ willingness to sit in uncertainty at the beginning of a designproject, a study is planned focused on the number of initial concepts a student or student teamgenerates before moving on to concept selection and prototyping.Teaching staff surveysBecause performance in ENGGEN 115 helps determine the rank order in
making whatever he sayssound condescending. If I ever ask him a question he won't let me finish my question beforespeaking over me which results in him answering something I wasn't asking.” The second phasespanned primarily years two and three and was comprised of learning how to work with a widerrange of people with different communication and interaction styles. The third phase spannedprimarily years four and five and was comprised of transitioning into supervision and managementroles. As one participant explained: I've learned that it takes a lot of planning to have people under you, maybe even outside of work hours…Throughout the whole day I'll be having to go and teach them how to do certain things, they have lots of
engineering students to work effectively in teams, writing that“because of the increasing complexity and scale of systems-based engineering problems, there isa growing need to pursue collaborations with multidisciplinary teams of experts across multiplefields” [1, pp. 34–35]. ABET has similarly dedicated one of its seven student outcomes toteamwork, wording it as: “An ability to function effectively on a team whose members togetherprovide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks,and meet objectives” [2]. Research studies have also repeatedly underlined the importance ofdeveloping engineering students’ abilities to work in teams to meet industry needs [3], [4].As a result, there has been an increased
Black, Latine, women, LGBTQ+, and other underrepresented scientists. ” 2 Focus on improving the "The research plan is integrated with the education and well-being of LGBTQ+ outreach plan which includes: 1) recruitment, training, and populations is a mentoring of undergraduate and graduate students from diverse substantial facet of the backgrounds including women, URM, and LGBTQ groups through project, but is not the in-depth research experiences..." essence of the project 3 Focus on improving the “These analyses will shed new light on the ways in which
, auxetic systems, and additive manufacturing.Dr. Michael Preuss, Exquiri Consulting, LLC Michael Preuss, EdD, is the Co-founder and Lead Consultant for Exquiri Consulting, LLC. His primary focus is providing assistance to grant project teams in planning and development, through external eval- uation, and as publication support. Most of his work is on STEM education and advancement projects and completed for Minority-Serving Institutions. He also conducts research regarding higher education focused on the needs and interests of underserved populations and advancing understanding of Minority- Serving Institutions.Ovais KhanYi Ren ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Design
inclusion (20 items), 5) mentorship experience (18 items), 6) programsatisfaction (11 items), 7) STEM-related future plans (4 items), and 8) demographic information(7 items). An additional ninth section was designed to capture the unique experiences undertakenby RET participants [13]. MERCII survey has gone through a number of iterations in an effort tocreate a set of tools applicable for all [11].Sections 2 through 6 of the survey were analyzed for this study. These sections consisted ofLikert-type questions with the following scale: not at all =1; very little = 2; somewhat = 3; quitea bit = 4; a great deal = 5.Data CollectionThe instrument was administered to six ERCs between Summer 2021 and Spring 2022. Theinstrument was shared with center
., whether supportiveor not to learning) differed from student to student.6. ConclusionsOur preliminary research on perceived “surroundings” in the classroom is part of a larger studyof the impact of systematic, repeated reflection on the development of metacognition, self-regulatory skills, and academic performance in engineering education. We plan to continue ourinvestigation of students’ reflections regarding their “surroundings” as part of our larger researchstudy. Upon conducting a focus group with these students one year later, their notion of peersand instructor as “surroundings” persisted. In fact, these students further named the “vibe” in theclassroom as their “surroundings,” with the vibe defined by the energy of the people and
engagement guide based on patterns found in the pilotsurvey data, the research team plans to implement stakeholder interviews with students to gainfeedback and further insights into their decision-making processes and what they believe wouldimprove the usefulness of a co-curricular engagement guide. The interviews will allow the researchteam to explore and test preliminary hypotheses about what factors students consider when makingengagement decisions.Preliminary Survey ResultsWe present preliminary patterns of common pilot survey responses in Table 2 and Figure 2.Table 2. Common responses in sections of the survey. Participants could select multiple choices. Parenthesisindicates number of respondents. Co-Curricular Categories Academic or
group presentation at the end of the semester.Table 2. Mindset interventions planned for specific homework problems. Content of the Hypothetical scenario Instructions for the students chosen problem Generation- You perform this analysis while working in a chemical Write a response for addressing your consumption company and present it during a group meeting. Your supervisor’s feedback after watching analysis supervisor thinks that although the analysis is good, the a YouTube video on accepting presentation quality is poor. He provides you
itprovides a basis for building communities. I will return to the idea of creating an SELaware classroom in part 5 of the framework.Part 1: Intentional Grouping Almost every career-oriented role requires collaboration skills; setting studentsup for success using intentionally created student-selected groups is an essential startto any culturally aware STEM classroom. Intentional grouping involves several differenttools that help teachers ensure student success. Brown, et al, write: “When teachers aremindful of the important aspects of group dynamics, such as size, ability, gender, andrace, and plan teams accordingly, every student—particularly those from marginalizedbackgrounds—is set up for success [5].” Teachers need to consider the
Workshop today. I hadto let you know how much she enjoyed it. She talked about it all the way home and then repeatedeverything to her mom. She has been talking about becoming an engineer for several yearsnow. The one volunteer who worked for NASA during her career really impressed her as she isinterested in mechanical engineering, especially robotics. She said all the engineering studentteachers were wonderful. Congrats on a job well done!”Program ContinuationThe overall success of the first year of the SWEET Program is very promising for the workshopleaders and engineering students involved. In future SWEET workshops, the team looks forwardto hosting additional in-person workshops at Rowan University. The workshop team plans toincorporate the
-code.html (accessed Jan. 12, 2023).[37] A. Stych, “Science: STEM badge planned, Girl Scouts CEO says,” bizwomen, May 19, 2017. https://www.bizjournals.com/bizwomen/news/latest-news/2017/05/science-stem-badge-planned- girl-scouts-ceo-says.html?page=all (accessed Jan. 12, 2023).[38] J. E. Stake and K. R. Mares, “Evaluating the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescents’ science motivation and confidence: The splashdown effect,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 359–375, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1002/tea.20052.[39] S. Lopez and W. Goodridge, “The State of Engineering Integration in K-12 Science Standards: Five Years After NGSS (Fundamental),” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City
, testing its movements, andpicking up/dropping off/transporting objects using the Workcell. The laboratory work wascarried out by the students in groups of two. The school of engineering provided completesupport in terms of equipment and software required for the program.The weekly plans of the robotics program are shown in Table 2. Students worked onAutonomous Vehicle for four times (12 hours), Robotics modeling for five labs (15 hours), andeight labs for VEX Robot (24 hours). One of the challenging factors that we encountered wasfaculty involvement. Since the participating faculty already had a full teaching load during theSummer, it was difficult to arrange lab content in a way that was both meaningful and coherent.As a result, the program