citizen with the abilities to help indiminishing poverty, discrimination, and inequality, is called to be an active agent in this aim.For that, design can be an integrative area where, through practice, as well as natural and socialsciences, can come together and tackle social problems directly. But, are these professionalsprepared for that challenge? According to previous research, Colombian student andprofessionals of Chemical Engineering consider that they do not perceive themselves as activeagents in the solution of social problems like poverty or armed conflict. Alike, when it wasinvestigated, in a later study, where they think this inaction comes from, the general answer wasrelated to the weak or nonexistent education in human or social
ERCs:8 • There is a national need for education of interdisciplinary, team-oriented PhDs. There is a collective alarm at the continued production of graduates at all levels who are totally untrained in team research and often openly antagonistic to industrially relevant research. • The goal of the ERC education programs is to develop a team-based, research- inspired, and industrial practice-oriented culture for the education of graduate and undergraduate students that will produce engineering leaders for the future.We propose that our program is directed at doing exactly that – creating interdisciplinary,team-oriented BS and PhD programs in which students will design the innovative,sustainability related products
ofresearch, (4) an interactive tour of the conference hardware competition which provides concreteexamples of cutting edge research, (5) a small group Q&A with graduate students engaged inresearch, and finally (6) a panel discussion with diverse research faculty committed to post-secondary engineering education. The challenges associated with this approach to outreach, theadvantages of incorporating a STEM intervention into a technical research conference, andsuccessful methods for locating a group of underserved students are discussed. In addition, thescale and impact of the intervention are evaluated through open-ended and quantitative surveys.The survey results document the positive student reaction to this intervention. The positivestudent
math, science, computer science, and engineering teach- ing to frame his research on STEM teaching and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological
coordinator for the Depart- ment. He teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in construction management. His primary research focus area is the economic, environmental, and energy impacts of construction. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021COVID-19 Effects on Engineering Technology and Construction Management Students: A Case StudyAbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically affected higher education across the country. Manycolleges and universities responded swiftly to this outbreak by moving to remote learning in orderto cope with the pandemic. The responses varied in different education systems at national andinternational levels
program at University of Maryland has been practicing the multi-year,multidisciplinary concept for a number of years now.28 As seniors in high school, students areidentified as candidates for the program when they apply to UMD and express interest inperforming undergraduate-team research. As freshmen the students develop a research topic thatcould have a societal impact, usually in the vein of science and technology. Their sophomoreyear, the teams develop a research proposal based on an approved research question and performa literature review. In the third year, students are encouraged to study abroad and continue toperform research on their approved topic. In their final year, students are required to write athesis as a team and present their
Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. He received both his B.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Maryland – College Park. His primary research interests include Hydrodynamics, Turbulence, and Experimental Methods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Students’ Perception of a Summer Undergraduate Research Experience: Across the DisciplinesIntroductionUndergraduate research is considered one of the high impact practices, which are routinely foundon college campuses today. The outcomes from undergraduate research range from increasing astudent’s retention in the major to increased numbers of students attending graduate school [1].In
proper support or scaffolding that can minimize students' frustrationwhile guiding them in developing the necessary skills to learn and solve the given problem. This paper describes a study which investigates the perception of third year students in aclass while learning in a difficult, mathematically intensive engineering course. Although thelecturer for the class had gone through a series of pedagogical training on active, cooperative andproblem-based learning, this is the first time the lecturer implemented CPBL. This study isactually part of a larger research on training and supporting academic staff in implementingCPBL.III. STUDY DESIGN This study was conducted in a three-credit course called "Process Control andDynamics
graduate in less time than non-research active students.” Graduating in less time equates to a lower cost of obtaining a degree,and when combined with added benefit of higher retention rates, undergraduate researchprograms offer research universities the double impact of helping recruit and retain students.Of the almost 4,000 degree granting institutions, only 146 are classified as R1 universities [13]according to the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education [14], and only 131are designated as R2 universities [15]. For research universities, leveraging the researchknowledge, practices, and culture already prominent on their campus will help them retainstudents, reduce the amount of time it takes students to graduate, and also
Paper ID #18550Work in Progress: Micro-skills and Mini-habits in Engineering Student Teams:Facilitating a Confluence of Perspectives and TalentDr. Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam is an Associate professor with Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution. She teaches classes on strategic relationships for industrial distribution and distri- bution logistics. She is interested in researching on the impact of high impact practices on the learning and engagement of students in Industrial Distribution and other STEM disciplines. She is also interested in
collaboration, 3D data interoperability, and engineering design graphics standards and documentation. Nathan has taught graduate courses in the foundations of graphics in technology and instrumentation and measurement in research design. He has worked for a variety of companies in using and integrating PLM tools in the engineering design process through the development of custom training applications and materials. Nathan holds a Bachelor of Science in Technical Graphics and a Master of Science in Technology from Purdue University, and a doctorate in Technology Education from North Carolina State University.Mitchell L Springer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Mitchell L. Springer, PMP, SPHR Dr. Springer is an
understanding innovation in engineering professionals and students, and she is collaborating with a team at Purdue to create a tool to measure innovativeness among engineers.Dr. Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME. Dr. Jablokow is the architect of a unique 4
and this isthe main source they look to for information, and they also recognize the importance of using otherinformation as references in the development of an engineering design rather than creating a designin isolation. It is interesting to note, however, that resources such as design guides, standards, andother resources that a practicing engineer may look to for design guidance were not mentioned ordiscussed. This may point to an opportunity to increase students’ awareness of such resources,where to find them, and how they can be used. Theme 4. Students indicate that they would need anywhere from about an hour to over a year to solve the problem and would use this time to research, brainstorm ideas, and build and test a prototype
, with great success. Recent studies have shown that it can also be applied to a number ofmanufacturing courses, where students have expressed a positive preference for learning throughservice learning projects. The study presented in this paper provides another best practice from asubtractive manufacturing course by advancing the design and machining of a versatile germtool. The results of a student survey conducted for this purpose from the subtractivemanufacturing course were compared to data from the previous semester. It was observed thatthere was a significant improvement in student learning and the attainment of ABET StudentOutcomes, due to the integration of service learning into course term projects. Table 2: IDEA Survey results of
Education, 2013 Impact of TEAMS Clubs: An Afterschool Engineering Enrichment Program that Impacts K-12 Students and College Student LeadersAbstractMany examples of university engineering education programs designed to impact K-12 studentlearning and access are described in the literature. Unfortunately, most do not report repeatedengagement with students who are assessed over time. There is a need to better determine theresults of evolving engineering instruction in K-12 schools and the best practices forimplementation.This paper discusses a successful model for a weekly afterschool elementary engineeringenrichment program that has been in place for six years. TEAMS clubs, named after an umbrellaK
our students that are designed to build on our strengths and provide new areas of success.IntroductionMakerspaces are no longer novel or rare and are regularly being established on campuses and inurban spaces across the United States and beyond. A variety of research has been conducted tocatalog the positive impacts of makerspaces especially as it relates to engineering education. Ascampuses develop makerspaces, they have used the spaces as a type of laboratory to test theimpact of projects and courses related to making. We will build on this growing literature as wedevelop programming and policies for our Innovation Center (expected to open in the Fallsemester of 2022) that will promote an open and inclusive experience for users.New
Page 22.340.3of teaching the basic analytical, programming design as well as graphical, problem-solving,teamwork, and communication skills. ENGR0012 is a second-semester core course thatcompletes the computer programming portion of the integrated curriculum package. Thiscourse focuses on the following curricular goals: teach students a general-purposeprogramming language, promote and encourage good programming practices, and illustratethe role computers play in solving real-world engineering problems. While both coursesoriginally covered many basic programming and problem-solving skills, they did not provideenough opportunities for written and oral presentation assignments or for effective advising.Advising ConcernsThe first-year student
resident assistants, andschedule of activities. Evidence-based practices built into programming for DISTINCTIONencourage engagement and exposure to engineering at the undergraduate level and a residentialand rural college experience at a predominantly and historically white institution. Students arepaired with roommates in a residence hall on campus to encourage socialization and makeconnections in a communal setting. Residence hall activities include group activities initiated byresidents and program assistants. Outside the residence halls, students connect with facultythrough discipline, research, and student support-centered talks, with opportunities to interactclosely with engineering faculty and graduate students. Lastly, an industry
Internet as well as experienced in FIEworkshops. The author has adapted/developed evaluation rubrics to grade the reports andpresentations. Finally a rubric to evaluate the students’ performance and their projects on thefinal showcase has been developed. Graduate students, faculty, and industrial advisors have usedthis rubric now for several semesters to find the best-presented project of the showcase.The author hopes that the full set of outlines along with evaluation rubrics stimulate ideas in thecommunity to develop new and better means of teaching and evaluating the technical as well asprofessional skills needed by our graduating seniors.IntroductionSenior Design or Capstone courses are common for most engineering degrees. These coursesprovide
, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Kayla is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interest includes the influence of informal engineering learning experiences on diverse students’ attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions of engineering, and the relationship between students’ interests and the practices and cultures of engineering. Her current work at the FACE lab is on teaching strategies for K-12 STEM educators integrating engineering design and the development of engineering skills of K-12 learners.Dr. Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Assistant Professor in the School of
classroom. Many students are definingsuccess as the act of submission of an assignment, while showing little concern for its content orpresentation. A learning tool is proposed with the immediate goal of meeting higher standards instudent assignments, while lasting goals are to foster a greater sense of ownership and pride inany work that is submitted.This paper presents the results of three independent research projects to explore the use of theprofessional practice of peer review in engineering courses. This methodology was originallyinstituted as a system of mandatory collaboration in two structural analysis courses offered at theUnited States Military Academy (USMA), through forced peer review of all individualhomework. Based on the assessments
. Handelsman J, Ebert-May D, Beichner R, et al. Scientific Teaching. Science. 2004;304(5670):521-522.13. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education. Washington, DC: Author;2012.14. National Research Council. Discipline-Based Educational Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press;2012.15. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC2012.16. Hora MT
in the workforce and their daily life. She is a subject matter expert in product design/development and digital engineering/manufacturing especially from prototype or service to marketplace. Prior to joining NTID, Dannels worked for several engineering corporations.Mr. Chris Campbell, Rochester Institute of Technology Chris Campbell is a Research Associate Professor with the Center on Access Technology at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, one of the colleges at Rochester Institute of Technology. His research and development focus is on access technologies that will positively impact post-secondary educational experiences for deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals.Mr. Brian Trager, Rochester Institute of
- trical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and (by courtesy) the School of Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Pur- due. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Dr. Zoltowski’s research interests include the professional formation of engineers, diversity, inclusion, and equity in engineering, human-centered design, and engineering ethics.Dilip ChhajedRyan Paul Case ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Project-Based Approach to Integrated Business and Engineering CurriculumIntroductionThis
Out- reach. She works for the NDSU College of Engineering as the K-12 Outreach Coordinator where she plans and organizes outreach activities and camps for students in the Fargo-Moorhead area.Mary Pearson, North Dakota State University Mary is a Ph.D. candidate in biomedical engineering with research focused in the area of bioelectromag- netics, specifically designing electronics that can be used as medical devices. She obtained her B.S. and M.S. degrees at NDSU in electrical and computer engineering. Mary is also interested in STEM education research.Mrs. Grace Sangalang Ng, Biola University Grace Sangalang Ng is a researcher, pursuing her Ph.D. in Educational Studies at Biola University. Her research interests
Ph.D. levels and enter the world of research. However, some of themdo not have an appreciation for the nature of research. To remedy this situation, faculty couldrecommend to these students to visit research labs of different faculty members and volunteer toconduct a short research project. This short research project could be defined by faculty membersas a senior design project for a student team that would be conducted over two academic termsand require 10 hours work per week. The method of involvement of undergraduate students inresearch by faculty members may be one of the key determining factors to motivate them tocontinue their education. Although there are many general studies evaluating the impact ofacademic advising on the students
at Syracuse University from 2006 to 2007. He is currently working as an assistant professor in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department at Texas A&M University at Kingsville. His current research interests include adaptive array processing, signal processing, and smart antennas.Prof. Reza Nekovei, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Reza Nekovei is a Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Texas A&M University- Kingsville. He has many years of experience in developing graduate and undergraduate programs. Prof. Nekovei is currently co-PI for two NSF projects related in teaching by design research and development, one in Nanotechnology (NSF-NUE) and another in Robotics
-doctoral researcher, and (6) an African Americanpost-baccalaureate psychology student. MethodsResearch DesignThis research was drawn from a larger multiple embedded case study that sought to understandthe nature and quality of STEM doctoral mentorships. However, this work focuses on anextracted case: women STEM doctoral students. Data was drawn from a National ScienceFoundation Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (NSF AGEP) grant-fundedresearch study, which included three institutional types: (a) Historically White Insitution (HWI)-Flagship/R1, (b) Historically Black College and University (HBCU)/R2, and (c) HWI-Regional/R2. These institutions were located in the Southeastern part of
the Development of Metacognition in Engineering Students in a Problem-Based Learning Program with a Think-Aloud ProtocolThis evidence-based practice paper focuses on how an engineering education program thatpromotes self-regulated learning impacts students’ problem-solving skills. Iron RangeEngineering (IRE) is an innovative, problem-based-learning (PBL) engineering program inVirginia, Minnesota. Throughout the curriculum of this program, students learn about and applymetacognitive skills necessary for self-regulating their learning. For the past several years, wehave been conducting research funded by the National Science Foundation1 to (1) identify themetacognitive skills inherent in self-regulated
studiesarticulate how to motivate engineering faculty to interact across engineering disciplines, letalone, with non-engineering faculty such as educational experts. Therefore, the research teamsought to understand, how can we develop a culture of collaboration among STEM facultyaround the issue of implementing teaching innovation including RBIS’s? The specific guidingresearch question for the current study is how do faculty in STEM describe their experienceparticipating in the Strategic Instructional Innovations Program (SIIP) – a program designed topromote and support the implementation of teaching innovation?This qualitative study employs an exploratory phenomenological approach, using semi-structured interviews with 12 STEM faculty across academic