Freshman Engineering and Mechanical Engineering courses, namely Materials Science and Engineering, Statics and Dynamics, and Materials Characterization. Dr. Dawan’s expertise is in micro and nanofabrication of materials and his research involves advanced manufacturing of multi-functional composites for application in energy, aerospace, and personal healthcare. Patent-pending proprietary technology derived from his research includes a nanotube enhanced 3D solar cell, and a 3D-printable carbonated polymer. He is currently the Director of the US Department of Energy-funded Energizing Minds through Advanced Clean Energy Education (EMACE) Inspires and Partnership programs and an Air Force Office of Scientific Research
. Hill, E. Tran, S. Agrawal, E. N. Arroyo, S. Behling, N. Chambwe et al., "Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 6476-6483, 2020. 9. D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press, 2014. 10. L.S. Vygotsky and M. Cole, Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, 1978. 11. V. Tinto, "Through the eyes of students," Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 254-269, 2017. 12. D. Verdin, A. Godwin, A
Paper ID #12268The Impact of a Neuro-Engineering Research Experience for Undergradu-ates Site on Students’ Attitudes toward and Pursuit of Graduate StudiesDr. John D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. John D. Carpinelli is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has served as coordinator of activities at NJIT for the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and as a member of the Coalition’s Governing Board. He previously chaired NJIT’s Excellence in Teaching Awards Committee and is Past Chair of the University Master Teacher Committee.Linda Hirsch, New
Paper ID #38058Board 327: Investigating Role Identities of Low-Income EngineeringStudents Prior to Their First Semester of CollegeDr. Ryan Scott Hassler, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Associate Teaching Professor of MathematicsDr. Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University Catherine Cohan, Ph.D. has been a research psychologist for over 20 years. Her areas of expertise include engineering education, retention of underrepresented students, measurement, and assessment. She is currently an Assistant Research Professor and coorDawn Pfeifer Pfeifer ReitzJanelle B Larson, Pennsylvania State University
Paper ID #30929A Tale of Two Universities: An Intersectional Approach to ExaminingMicroaggressions Amongst Undergraduate Engineering Students at an HBCUand a PWIMeghan Berger M.A., North Carolina A & T State University Meghan is a PhD student in the Rehabilitation Counseling and Rehabilitation Counselor Education pro- gram at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. Her broad research interests include exploring the experiences of marginalized groups and multicultural competency in counseling. In the clinical setting, she focuses on culturally relevant therapeutic interventions with African-American and
, many of the students would have been taught relatively little of theCalculus material covered in Math 231. As students in Math 231 are learning much ofthe material for the first time, they may approach the PLTL groups in a more open-minded fashion, and may be more receptive to the learning tools and additional work thatthey are gaining in the groups. Whereas, if students in Math 116 believe that they alreadyknow much of the material, they may be less interested in devoting effort to incorporatingPLTL group activities into their studies and achieve less benefit from the groups. Asmentioned previously, facilitators in Math 105 PLTL groups have frequently encounteredthis attitude. Engineering freshmen in Math 105 often believe that they fully
Paper ID #8492Analysis of the Impact of Participation in a Summer Bridge Program onMathematics Course Performance by First-Semester Engineering StudentsDr. John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Dr. John R. Reisel is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee (UWM). He serves as associate director of the Center for Alternative Fuels, and co-director of the Energy Conversion Efficiency Lab. In addition to research into engineering education, his research efforts focus on combustion and energy utilization. Dr. Reisel was a 2005 recipient of the UWM Dis- tinguished
://www.cecs.wright.edu/cecs/engmath/.Textbook information28 is available at http://www.wiley.com/college/rattan.Bibliography1. Kerr, A.D., and Pipes, R.B., 1987. “Why We Need Hands-On Engineering Education.” The Journal of Technology Review, Vol. 90, No. 7, p. 38.2. Sarasin, L., 1998, “Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom.” Madison, WI: Atwood.3. Gardner, H., 1999. “Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century.” New York: Basic Books.4. Joyce, B., and Weil, M., 2000, “Models of Teaching.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.5. Brandford, J.D., et al., Eds., “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,” Expanded Edition, National Academy of Sciences, 2000.6. Klingbeil, N., Molitor, S., Randolph, B
engineering student population at some institutions [1].With these issues in mind, the research team is starting to develop an engineering orientation-style seminar for SVSM and nontraditional students. The purpose of this semester-long seminaris to support SVSM and nontraditional students in developing a community and provide bothfaculty and peer mentoring throughout the semester, as well as learning supports for studentsstarting or transitioning into an engineering degree. Supports will likely include math and writinghelp sessions, connections to faculty/industry mentors, career preparation activities, info sessionsfrom the veteran resource office, in addition to other resources identified by students. Thisseminar is being developed using a design
developed for the program support ESP’s goals to: 1) create a diverse andwelcoming STEM climate on the FCC campus through events and media that encourage broaderparticipation, 2) increase participation in engineering among economically disadvantaged studentsthrough targeted outreach and recruitment, 3) increase persistence of engineering students alongdiscipline specific pathways to transfer and graduation from four-year universities through a seriesof structured support interventions, and, 4) establish on-going collaborative transfer supportprocesses between the FCC engineering program and CSU-F.With these goals in mind, ESP’s success is evaluated based on achieving the following objectives: 1. Increase engineering degree and/or certificate
Paper ID #16566Hands-On Made 4 ME: Deploying, Using, Developing and Evaluating Desk-top Computer Numerical Controlled (CNC) Systems in the Engineering Class-roomMr. Farhan Azhar, University of Massachusetts Lowell Graduate Research Assistant- Mechanical Engineering at University of Massachusetts Lowell.Mr. Kristofer Tite, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Undergraduate mechanical engineering student at University of Massachusetts Lowell.Dr. Stephen Johnston, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Stephen P. Johnston is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Plastics Engineering at the UMass Lowell. His research interests
working at the pickle plant—to help support the family and her husband’s wages from working for the railroad and a grocerystore. Even though neither of her parents graduated from college, it was never a doubt in her orher brother’s mind that they would since her parents had insisted as such since they were verysmall.For Julie, the appeal of engineering was that it would provide a good job and an opportunity tohelp other people. Both she and her brother ended up at Mines after an engineer at her father’sworkplace told them that it was the best engineering school. After graduating with a degree inmechanical engineering, she had multiple interviews in varying industries but took a job at anengineering firm that was expanding the public lightrail
they learn fromthe textbook and what they are expected to do in the actual Civil Engineering field.Additionally, those students who were taking the lab course simultaneously found this courseextremely helpful because they had more exposure to the use of the knowledge.A more formal presentation of the qualitative feedback will be included in a subsequent journalpaper. The results from this study also suggest that students who are self-regulated, keep theirgoals in mind, know what they are doing and why they are doing it, feel competent to do whatthey are supposed to do, and do their work as expected will do well in the class. The implicationsof these findings suggest the importance of motivation, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in
completemy case study. Clarity was brought through the help of a faculty member from anthropology,Rebecca, and my mentor from engineering/technology two. For my thesis work, I utilizedinterviews, conducted participant observation, and analyzed some co-teaching documents. Dueto the collaborative nature of this team, people bring different perspectives to discussions in bigand smaller groups. The team comprises people from liberal arts, business, and engineeringtechnology. All these different minds working together allow innovation to arise. Severalresearch team members have taken on mentoring roles, with four actively collaborating with meon my thesis. As I presented my thesis proposal to the diverse committee, comprised ofindividuals from the
Paper ID #42082Board 365: Relating Sociocultural Identities to What Students Perceive asValuable to their Professional and Learning Efficacy When Engaging in VirtualEngineering LabsDr. Kimberly Cook-Chennault, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Kimberly Cook-Chennault is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at Rutgers University. She holds BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and Stanford University respectively; anAhmad Farooq, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
those involved when choosing to return toparticipants for further consent. The research design of the SDA project was presented at theAmerican Indian Science and Engineering Society (AISES) National Conference [2]. Theimportance of positionality of the researchers is further explored in [3].Lessons from the Mini-ProjectsOverall, three significant results have emerged from the work to date: 1. Ethical considerationsNeither original research study was designed with SDA in mind, leading to extendednegotiations with university review boards. Ideally, researchers could plan for SDA prior to datacollection, first carefully considering whether the planned data could and should be available forSDA and, then, as appropriate, defining the project scope
Paper ID #45718BOARD # 228: Can we improve student success and retention by trainingundergraduate civil engineering majors in effective self-regulation of learning?(NSF IUSE:EHR ESL Level 1 Grant)Dr. Ann (Beth) Wittig, City College of New York at City University of New York (CUNY) Dr. Beth Wittig is a licensed professional environmental engineer and LEED Accredited Professional, with a Ph.D. in chemical engineering. After years as a consultant and field engineer, she is now an Associate Professor at The City College of New York, the chairperson of the Department of Civil Engineering, and an ABET program evaluator
application of individual research methods [5; 17].With these characteristics of the field of engineering education research in mind, the goal at theoutset of this project was to build on an initial theoretical understanding of research quality withthe view to developing a quality framework that reflects the practices of engineering educationresearchers. This goal was to be achieved through two streams (see below) of integrated datagathering and educational workshops and the qualitative analysis of the data using iterativecoding methods of constant comparison [19; 20; 21; 22; 23]. Page 26.303.2 Stream A: In-depth longitudinal workshops
, specialized faculty support the instructors in each course. Elements supportingeach of these threads exist in each of the courses, increasing in maturity across the first threecourses, and culminating in application of these skills in the fourth-year course: Capstone Design.RQ2: What pedagogies appear to be more effective in advancing multiple learning objectivessimultaneously? To address this question, individual instructors are given the opportunity to engage withspecific pedagogies identified to support holistic engineers and EM: problem-based learning, the3Cs of entrepreneurially minded learning, value sensitive design, and story-driven learning.Problem-based learning is an approach to problem solving that is primarily student-driven and
Paper ID #26899Board 58:Need-Based Scholarship Program: Who is Applying, Who is Suc-cessful, and Who is Not Applying?Dr. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell University Anastasia Rynearson is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University. She received a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education and a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her teaching experience includes outreach activities at various age levels as well as a position as Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Kanazawa Technical College and Future Faculty Fellow teaching First
Conference Proceedings.[3] ASME, 1995, “Integrating the product Realization Process (PRP) into the Undergraduate Curriculum,” (a curriculum development project of the ASME Council on Education, ASME, December 1995.[4] Brancaccio-Taras, L., Mawn, M. V., Premo, J., & Ramachandran, R. (2021). Teaching in a Time of Crisis: Editorial Perspectives on Adjusting STEM Education to the “New Normal” during the COVID-19 Pandemic.[5] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (eds.). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.[6] C. Chaplin, ‘Creativity in Engineering Design – The Educational Function,” The Education and Training of Charted Engineers for the 21st
validation, financial knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy, and social support[1], [3], [4]. The research questions are designed with TSC in mind and to support achievementof the purposes of the project. The research questions guiding this grant are: RQ1: What are assets, factors, and strategies that enable access for two- year college students to engineering transfer pathways? RQ2: Do assets, factors, and strategies vary in magnitude and/or presence across student demographics, locations, institutions, or intention to transfer? RQ3: How does use of digital learning tools and resources impact transfer outcomes for pre-transfer engineering students? RQ4: To what extent can transfer outcomes be
, technology integration, online course design and delivery, program evaluation, and assessment. Dr. Lux’s current research agenda is STEM teaching and learning in K-12 contexts, technology integration in teacher preparation and K-12 contexts, educational gaming design and integration, and new technologies for teaching and learning.Dr. Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University Dr. Brock J. LaMeres is a Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Mon- tana State University (MSU) and the Director of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center (MEERC). LaMeres is also the Boeing Professor at MSU where he is responsible for initiatives to im- prove the professional skills of engineering
Across Academic Disciplines. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 2016. 30(1): p. 23-41.2. Jensen, K.J. and K.J. Cross, Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion. Journal of Engineering Education, 2021. 110(2): p. 371-392.3. Whitwer, M., S. Wilson, and J. Hammer. Engineering Student Mental Health and Help Seeking: Analysis of National Data from the Healthy Minds Study. in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2023. IEEE.4. Hargis, L.E., C.J. Wright, M.E. Miller, E.E. Usher, J.H. Hammer, and S.A. Wilson. Relationship Between Mental Health Distress and Help-Seeking Behaviors Among Engineering Students. in American Society
people with different forms of expertise working on multiple facets orcomponents of the project. To ensure a diverse sample in terms of personal andacademic/professional background, we were also mindful of a number of diversity criteria in ourrecruitment and selection of participants, including in participants’ level and type of engineeringexperience, field of engineering, and sociodemographic traits such as race, ethnicity, and gender.Students were recruited from two universities – one a selective public research university andanother regional public university. Professional engineers were recruited locally from a varietyof industries. Interviews were conducted in person and lasted approximately 60 to 90 minutes byone member of our research
: ● Introduction to Library Resources & Literature Review – Typically condicted at the beginning of the program, this session brings engineering librarian specialists to introduce students to library and online resources available to researchers. Students conduct a literature review with guidance and feedback from mentors. ● Mind Mapping/Systems Thinking – This workshop introduces Mind Mapping [9] as a tool for Systems Thinking. Participants use both software and pen-and-paper methods practice systems level understanding of not just technical, but societal, ethical, and global implications of their topic. They visualize and situate their research in the context of the vision of the Center as well as the broader
creation and in an ethical context of society.Notable throughout is the concentration on big picture ideas. There was very little discussionabout material in engineering or sustainability education that causes problems or issues, butmuch more discussion on the framing of sustainability in the first place, the structural positioningof sustainability thought within the existing educational and academic paradigms (or, often, incontrast to the existing paradigms) of science and engineering, and the relationships ofsustainability (an, in fact, science) to values, ethics, and epistemology.The comments had an almost-universal anti-reductionist current. Several posts pointed out theneed to move beyond traditional reductionist approaches and frames of mind
other new transfer students in engineering. The C/Mstudents suffered no statistically significant lowering of their average GPA, while the otherstudents suffered about a half point (0.445 grade). The much higher graduate rate was alreadymentioned. A survey showed that 70% of the students in the C/M program now headed forgraduate school, had not intended to go to graduate school when they entered the C/M program.The information, encouragement, and word-of-mouth from C/M students who are now ingraduate school changed their minds. The director of this program has researched, presented,and published over 170 papers on transfer students, CC transfer students, Academic SuccessClasses, and other related topics. Due to these papers, schools nationally
Paper ID #47030BOARD # 323: An S-STEM Program for Commuters at a Regional, PublicUniversityProf. Joan Remski, University of Michigan - Dearborn Joan Remski is the Associate Provost for Faculty Development and Digital Education and a Professor of Mathematics at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Retaining Students in STEM on a Commuter Campus: Early Results from an S-STEM Program at a Regional, Public University Affiliation: University of Michigan-DearbornIntroductionRetention
) situated within the transfer transition, and one (Trying to Fit the Full-time Profile)situated at UMKC.MCC ObstaclesUncertainty about Engineering Major and/or UMKC referred to the reality that MCC studentswere often unsure of which major to select. Even if they selected engineering as a major, theysometimes struggled to select an engineering specialty. As study participants described: [A barrier is] the length of time that people can be spinning in the washing machine without deciding exactly what they want to do, without completing all the prerequisite coursework to get into a particular major … If you do a transfer major, you are basically taking general education classes, which both means that you can change your mind