learnabout a topic at home through pre-class assignments, and then the class time is used for activitiesand interactions with others to strengthen the learning [9]. Well-known benefits of the flippedclassroom format include increased peer interactions through in-class group activities [10], morefrequent and engaging faculty-student interactions[11], and flexibility that allows students tolearn at their own pace through pre-recorded lectures [12]. Naturally, flipped classrooms are agreat avenue for promoting collaborative learning [13], [14], active learning [15], and problem-based learning [16]. As a result, several studies have demonstrated enhanced studentperformance in courses offered as flipped classrooms compared to traditional lecture
also up to three times morelikely to ultimately earn STEM degrees than their peers that do not [10], [12]. Additionally,middle school kids who have experienced hands-on STEM related activities have immediatelyshown an increase of interest in STEM, claiming that they find them “fun and engaging” [10].For these reasons, it becomes imperative that there are interventions at this stage in theireducation to promote future diversity within the field.Impact of Project-Based Learning Methods on Engineering IdentityStudies have shown that implementing active, collaborative project-based learning methods intocourses can positively impact students’ self-efficacy in the field of engineering while alsoincreasing the quality of student’s performance
at their new institution. As such, colleges and universities offer manytransition-support programs for the purpose of boosting retention rates across and beyond these firstsemesters. Common transition initiatives include orientation programs, peer mentoring programs,common reading programs, living-learning communities, and first-year seminars [1]. Two of the mostcommon types of first-year seminars are extended orientation seminars that center transition to collegelife (e.g., time management) and introduction to the major seminars [2]. The Georgia Tech (GT) DanielGuggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering (AE) first-year course is an introduction to the major stylecourse.The first assignment in the GT Intro to AE course is a major-focused
a student encountering other students with diverse backgrounds, it does notguarantee a high-quality interaction. Gurin et al. [1] discuss two other forms of diversity:informal interaction diversity and classroom diversity. The former involves interaction withdiverse students outside of the classroom, and this is where most meaningful interaction happens,while the latter involves learning about diverse people and interacting with such peers in theclassroom. Informal interaction diversity and classroom diversity generate the impact oneducational outcomes, but structural diversity is required for the other two to exist.Piaget [3] states that encountering diverse students results in differing perspectives and equalityin relationships, and both
Du Boisian double-consciousness as black French colonial subjects—and counteract it with both awareness and education about the systems that impacted the ways in which they interacted with the white world and other black people. (p. 31)Davis explains how Fanon identified the social structure of his patients as the root of theirpathology, and he sought to raise their consciousness by helping them understand this socialstructure and pursue changing it. Fanon’s location of the dysfunction within the society and notthe individual is significant because he’s writing in a colonized society, and in that context anydisplay of dysfunction by the colonized people justifies their subjugation in the eyes of thecolonizers. Moreover
classroom design project. Inaddition to engineering, finance, human resource and management personnel were involved in theproject in their respective roles. 6. P.E InvolvementTwo of the faculty members involved in the inter-disciplinary senior design project are registeredProfessional Engineers (P.E). All the faculty members have relevant industry experience.Similarly, all three industries had professional engineers helping the teams. Table 3 shows a list ofthe titles of industry professionals (names withheld) involved in the project, in addition to the twoacademic PEs, that helped students throughout the projects. Their help included but was not limitedto designing robots, writing code, reviewing and critiquing drawings, reviewing presentations
week, amonth, or a year. This is indeed a very interesting idea.Analysis of Student Self-Reflection DataStudent self-reflection is critical in developing their understanding of how they learn andgauging the efficiency and impact of the knowledge building approach. Hence, following thesubmission of their final report, students were asked to: (1) write several paragraphs about whatthey learned, why they were more engaged, the challenges they encountered and how theytackled them, and the usefulness of various classroom activities and tools and (2) rate the qualityof their learning experience in reference to the course learning objectives. In their writing,students often cited that the knowledge-building project reinforced their understanding of
used in chemical engineering instruction, in part because oftheir availability through learning repositories like LearnChemE.com and AIChE ConceptWarehouse. ConcepTests evaluate the readers’ understanding by integrating the concepts intoquestions that force the learners to evaluate their own arguments for certain multiple-choiceanswers while selecting one final answer. Thus, the learners’ considered reasoning before selectingan answer allows for evaluation of conceptual understanding. However, few ConcepTests havebeen developed for Process Control courses.As an extra credit assignment in a Process Control course at Northeastern University, studentswere given the opportunity to write ConcepTest questions of their own for use with
learning environment,specifically making connections with professors and peers. Here, we focus on how studentsadapted to online education and their perceptions of the teaching and learning activitiesemployed in online courses. In particular, we report on student experiences pertaining to: (1)office hours, (2) synchronous online lectures, and (3) asynchronous recorded lectures.2 - Theoretical frameworkThis study is grounded in Weidman's socialization model. Weidman posed a process model thatasserts a student's engagement with their learning environment leads to various degrees ofintegration into the existing culture. To elaborate, he writes, "there is a pervasive consensus onnorms and expectation for students in higher education that is driven by
theworld of work and education vis-a-vis guest speakers and interaction with university faculty. This paperpresents the implementation of the pilot and discusses the initial findings, challenges and lessons learned.MethodologyThe program activities were designed to emphasize self-efficacy and belonging and will be describednext. Faculty researchers developed partnerships with local organizations working with young womenwith a focus on women of color, in grades 6-12th. Based upon partner scheduling and the academiccalendar a twenty week/year program was developed. Students will attend an in-person session (two and ahalf hour duration) every other week, with take home materials the week after. The hands-on exercises arebased on peer reviewed
report writing skills.Materials and MethodsThe experiment reported was performed by students in a 1st year undergraduate engineeringcourse entitled Introduction to Biomedical Engineering. This course is comprised of fourmodules covering key topics in Biomedical Engineering. Each module integrates lectures with alaboratory. The microfluidic lab described is in the Biofluids module. A class typically of 45students is divided into groups of 3 to 4 students, and the lab is taught in three sections with 4groups in each section. Prior to the lab, lectures on fluid flow in pipes, vascular flow andocclusion, and microfabrication were delivered to provide context. The lab was carried outduring a 3-hour class period and the students were given three weeks
Students are noticeably engaged through note-taking, 4.7 3 questioning, and responding. Students use or demonstrate reading skills by following 4.5 3.1 written instructions or project directions, reviewing print and digital resources, and asking questions about what they have read. Students rely on writing skills to organize lab reports, 4.4 2.7 posters, and presentation materials. Students interpret the verbal and nonverbal communication 4.33 3.1 efforts of others and follow and take directions from teachers or peers. Average Value
areas of afterschool programming, youth leadership, college counseling and youth workforce development. Through these varied experiences, Gabe has gained significant appreciation for the importance of clearly-defined, structured, and supported pathways for program participants. Gabe has a Bachelor's degree from San Francisco State University in English; Creative Writing. He lives in the East Bay and enjoys exploring kayaking with his family and playing soccer whenever he can.Gary Barnak (Grant Project Manager) An Air Force veteran with eight years experience managing federal and state grants including Department of Labor, National Science Foundation, and California veterans credit for prior learning. Private sector
critical approaches were scaffolded in class concurrent withguidance and support from both supportive faculty and peers (p. 879).Professional IdentityProfessional identity frames the importance of one’s work to the self and is foundational foroverall personal development [46]. While a number of models exist to describe it (e.g., [47]),Lave and Wenger’s [48] Community of Practice (CoP) model has emerged as a usefulframework for understanding the engineering profession [e.g., 27, 49, 50]. This model is basedon historical apprenticeship models and the identity transformation often resulting from thisprocess. This study has adopted the CoP model to explore professional identity. The CoP modelframes a profession as a community of experts surrounded by
/or “veterans” and “engineering” by mining references from an unpublished grantproposal for research with military students [9]. This process was repeated as each subsequentpaper was located until no new references were found. Next, EBSCOHost was used to search thefollowing databases: ERIC, Academic Search Ultimate, and APA PsychInfo in tandem withGoogle Scholar. Finally, a search was conducted on ASEE’s PEER database. Key words forsearching these databases were developed by selecting common key words from the previouslyobtained literature, as well as through consultation with a university librarian whose expertise isin educational research. Key words included “military”, “veteran”, “student”, “engineeringeducation”, and “undergraduate
hosted onCoCalc [18], students were encouraged to only have one or two members actually writing code,one projecting the content to the table monitor, while the entire group discussed how to solve theproblem. This helped prevent groups from simply "splitting" the notebook amongst themselves,defeating the point of a collaborative environment. Of the 14 sessions of this pilot course, 9 werereserved for the collaborative notebooks while the rest were dedicated to a project, where studentswould propose their own application of linear algebra and present it to their peers. Examples offinal projects included image classifiers and stock market predictors. Due to the restrictionsimposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the course moved to a fully online format
engineeringstudents, improve passing rates, and increase retention in their programs. Active learning [2],increased class time [3], recitation [4], project-based learning [5], and peer tutoring [6] are just afew of the methods chosen to enhance traditional lecture-based courses. However, studies forsome of these methods point to mixed results when integrated into the main Statics course [3],[5]. Some show that the results are statistically insignificant when compared to previous lecture-based approaches, and that any improvement can be attributed to factors such as studentattendance, participation, and course satisfaction [5], [7], [8].Additionally, active learning and other innovative pedagogies have barriers which preventinstructors from embracing
Design & Learning, Florida Atlantic University Ed.S. 1980 Administration and Supervision, Florida Atlantic University M.S. 1970 Biology/Secondary Science, State University College of New York at Buffalo B.A. 1965 Biology, State University College of New York at New Paltz PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2019-Present: Affiliate Faculty: Florida Atlantic University - College of Engineering and Computer Science. Activities include collaborative grant writing, serving as PI or Co-PI on federally funded grants, collaborative projects across departments, supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. serving on college committees. 2018-Present: Director: FAU STEM Collaborative - Florida Atlantic University. Currently
serves in leadership on multiple academy and professional service committees, most notably as Chair of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Sustainable Infrastructure Standard Committee, a national-level committee charged with creating and maintaining ASCE 73: Standard of Practice for Sustainable Infrastructure. His research interests include sustainable infrastructure development, sustainable concrete materials, composite materials and structures, and engineering education. Lt. Col. McCoy’s research is published in numerous peer- reviewed journals, refereed conference proceedings, and technical reports. Additionally, he has given multiple invited lectures, featured presentations, and panel discussions for
where future work may have the most impact.MethodsScopeAs the premier forum of its kind, the American Society for Engineering Education’s (ASEE)annual conferences serve to distill the overall research and programming activities of theengineering education community year after year. As such, its proceedings offer an optimalenvironment for an exploratory analysis of the content and focus of AI/AN engineeringeducation research on a national level. Towards this end, a systematic search of the ASEE Paperson Engineering Education Repository (PEER) from 2005 to the present was conducted; thistimeframe was chosen to coincide with the introduction of the theoretical framework used as theanalytical lens for this literature review (see “Theoretical Lens
and then peer- or self-graded the rehearsal based on the grading rubric. Thisallowed the students to have practice at solving a new problem and evaluating the work just asthey would be evaluated for by the instructor on the assessment. The list of the mastery objectivesin each course, examples of what was included for each objective, and the grading rubric withdescriptions were discussed with the students and made available to students for the entiresemester.The SA came immediately after every module assessment when the students were asked toevaluate how their solution to the problem compared to the posted instructor solution. The duedate to complete the SA was prior to the posting of the instructor grades for each assessment, sostudents had
• System(s) are identified with boxes with dashed lines FF Perform material • Write the overall mass balance for the entire system 02.04 balances on a multi- • Write a full set of component mass balances for the entire unit process without system recycle and bypass • Write the overall mass balance for each unit in the system streams • Write a full set of component mass balances for each unit in the system • Identify whether the problem is solvable (degree-of- freedom analysis) • Select, with
-based professional competencies (includingcommunication, critical thinking, and collaboration).To reach these outcomes, the course was redesigned to create continuity of connection throughout theyear to support university efforts to improve first-to-second year retention rates [25]. Reflection andpersonalized feedback are integrated into class discussions and all assignments, including e-portfolioassignments to support students’ competency development [26]. Each class section is co-facilitated by analum, staff or faculty member and a student in the second year or later. The peer facilitator role isimportant for generating first-year student engagement and buy-in for the value of e-portfolios, reflectivepractices, and story-driven learning in
construction,requirements analysis, security, verification, and validation; ...” The program determined that itsapproach to security was not at a sufficient level to address this program criteria, and so adopteda program-specific student program outcome pertaining to security. To address this new outcome,the faculty sought to find and use a course from the University’s significant catalog ofcybersecurity courses, only to find that no course met the criteria to address the outcome – orspecifically, the courses reviewed focused more on Information Technology and to a certainextent Information Science perspectives, and not sufficiently from the perspective of SoftwareEngineering. We also reviewed courses from peer institutions, including the Rochester
list of design materials which were provided for the teams to selectfrom for the construction of their design. The results of this project (fall 2020) will be comparedto (fall 2021 – under a less restrictive COVID protocol) and pre-COVID (2002, 2008 and 2011)semesters – when this project was used in a first-year introduction to engineering design course.Introduction At our institution, first-year engineering students (~700 students) have a common first year,which includes chemistry I & II, physics I & II, calculus I and II, ENGCMP I and II (which arefocused on writing for engineers – taught by the English department specifically for ourengineering students), an introduction to engineering analysis and a computing class. The
interaction and grant writing Inception 7/1/2020 strategies provided by experienced Principal Investigators to support development of DUE# 2000281 Micro Nano related ATE grant proposals and new Principal Investigators. Website: https://micronanoeducation.org/ Mentor Up Mentor Up offers a 2.5-day intensive workshop accompanied by on-on-one Inception 9/1/2020 mentoring with experienced Principal Investigators and past NSF Program Officers DUE# 2032835 for the purpose of increasing the quality and quantity of ATE proposals. Website: https://atementorup.org Pathways to Innovation Building Pathways to Innovation builds on the ATE
enough for constructioncompanies? Second, what are the primary skills that the construction companies are looking for?Third, do our students know how to express their opinions in a meeting, write a report, make apresentation, work in a team, and finally, know about ethics and compliance? IntroductionSimilar to engineering, construction management is about providing better, safer products andservices; being trusted, while following clients’ expectations and specifications andcontemplating the triple constraints (scope, time, and budget) [1]. This translates to completingthe project within the planned schedule and budget while keeping the stakeholders satisfied withthe final delivery. It is unique within
ask themto describe a teacher who impacted them.From the first day of class, students learn that our course goal is to equip them with the ability tocultivate conversations about ethics amidst their daily lives (personal, political, professional). Weearnestly call this “hosting STS parties”; during the course, as they grapple with the intensity andintractability of the large-scale problems that technology has perpetuated (misinformation,polarization, war, white supremacy) they learn that their agency is related to their ability tosurface difficult questions with their peers, subordinates, or superiors. This simultaneouslylowers the bar for what it means for them to be agentic in the context of ethics, while takingseriously the issue that
Zoom. Thegroup final design projects did not go as well.Project groups were formed in Canvas [20], which provided a group workspace, discussionboard, and conferencing area. Without exception, the student groups chose to set up a group inDiscord and do their work there. Designs were completed using Altera Quartus II, andsimulations were used to demonstrate the functionality of the projects. While this effectivelydemonstrated the success of the groups’ projects, the presentations were dry and harder tofollow. Digital timing diagrams are no substitute for blinking LEDs, 7-segment displays, andbuzzers. Peer evaluations of the final project presentations shown in Table 2 show a significantdrop in student perceptions of the presentations.Table 2
Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. degrees in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published dozens of peer-reviewed works related to her interests in engineering education and graduate student success, and has been recognized as a Master Facilitator by the National Research Mentor Network. She is also co-PI for two NSF-funded projects that enhance graduate student success: one is a professional development program offering training in communication, teamwork, leadership, and mentoring skills for interdisciplinary work; the other is a joint effort with Spelman College (a historically black institution serving women) to expand opportunities and increase