Asee peer logo
Displaying results 211 - 240 of 1050 in total
Conference Session
Communication and Literacy
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christina Kay White, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Lori Breslow, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Daniel E. Hastings, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
complementary, and both are necessary if engineers are to helpsolve the most serious problems our societies face [3-4]. This call for engineering education toposition itself so students can meet modern challenges was laid out by the leaders of the NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE) in their influential reports, The Engineer of 2020 [5-6]. There isnow a need to reflect on how engineering education has positively changed in the decade sincethose reports, and to consider what still needs to be tackled.Our research aligns with one of the key recommendations of The Engineer of 2020: to developengineers whose communication skills will allow them to become successful professionals and,who, in turn, will drive technological and social change. Specifically
Conference Session
Mathematics Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emre Tokgoz, Quinnipiac University
Tagged Divisions
Mathematics
step-by-step instructions on how to perform the operation... Process: When an action is repeated and the individual reflects upon it, he or shecan make an internal mental construction called a process which the individual can think ofas performing the same kind of action, but no longer with the need of external stimuli... Object: An object is constructed from a process when the individual becomes awareof the process as a totality and realizes that transformations can act on it... Schema: Individuals collection of actions, processes, objects, and other schemaswhich are linked by some general principles to form a framework in individual’s mind... In APOS theory, concepts are constructed on different concepts and schemas
Conference Session
Engineering Economics New Frontiers
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Simon Thomas Ghanat P.E., The Citadel; Kenneth Brannan, The Citadel; Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel; Kevin C Bower P.E., The Citadel
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
essential to incorporate teaching and learningmethods that adequately address the different learning styles in the classroom, and to developways to promote student motivation6 and engagement. As stated in the literature, engineeringstudents are predominantly active, visual, and sensing learner types 6- 9. However, most teachingmethods in engineering are geared toward reflective, verbal, and intuitive learner types6. This isthe exact opposite of the suggestions made from multiple learning style studies stated in theliterature 6-9. Teaching in engineering is generally more focused on theory, verbal, and passivelearning, as opposed to deductive learning supported by Felder as the preferred learning methodusing practical applications, visual
Conference Session
Research to Practice: STRAND 4 K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum Design (Part 2)
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ayora Berry, Boston University; Don DeRosa, Boston University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
architects of change, (b) provide a professional learning vehicle foreducators to reflect on practices and develop content knowledge, (c) inspire a sense of ownershipin curriculum decision-making among teachers, and (d) use an instructional approach that iscoherent with teachers’ interests and professional goals. This preliminary study evaluates theeffects of a CDB professional development program, the PTC STEM Certificate Program, ontwenty-six K-12 teachers who participated in 62 hours of engineering education professionaldevelopment over a six month period. Participants learned about industry and educationengineering concepts, tested engineering curricula, collaborated with K-12 educators andindustry professionals, and developed project-based
Conference Session
Supporting Diversity through Co-curricular Programming
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University; Julie M.W. Rojewski, Michigan State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
among graduate students of the range of choices, opportunities, and challenges that women must navigate, and of the impact of culture, community, and context on women, whether in their personal lives, in higher education, or in the workplace. 2. Encourage and support the development of community among graduate students.The first goal is more specific, and reflects a desire to promote Michigan State University’s corevalue of inclusiveness.4 Graduate students participating in this program were encouraged toreflect on the unique choices and challenges posed to women in STEM fields, and to considertheir own goals and measures of success. The second goal reflects broader efforts within theCollege of Engineering and Michigan State
Conference Session
Non-Canonical Canons of Engineering Ethics
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Donna M Riley, Virginia Tech; Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
, emotional, and self-reflective livesof engineers themselves that fail to “fit into” prevailing professional paradigms of thought andpractice.Cannons refers then not only to military annihilation but also to the systematic drowning out ofvoices/perspectives that diverge from, challenge, or oppose the engineering status quo. Wepropose that these voices and perspectives are essential for the development of technically andmorally robust engineering research and practice. In fact, they are the very thing that wouldenable engineering to truly hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public, andrealize philosopher Charles Harris’ proposed ideal of bettering “the material basis of humanwell-being or quality of life.”3This paper engages in a
Conference Session
Assessing Social Responsibility & Sustainability
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Justin L Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology; Richard A House, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Alexander T. Dale, Engineers for a Sustainable World
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods, Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
implement the SSDS and illustrate the findings when usingthis survey pre- and post- course with students who participated in WPSI across threeuniversities during the Fall of 2014. Results from these components are triangulated withstudents’ end-of-semester written reflections and participating instructors’ course experiences.This qualitative component allowed us to consider how WPSI might be improved in future Page 26.508.3iterations, as well as broader implications of the SSDS and WPSI for engineering educationcourses and curriculum.For anonymity, throughout this paper we will refer to course offerings as Course 1, 2, and 3. Thisframing puts the
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Technical Session 4: The Best of the All: FPD Best Papers
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; David Reeping, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
on a four-stage cycle shown in Figure 1 that, while it can beentered into at any stage, is explained as follows. Concrete Experience (Facts) Active Reflective Experimentation Observation (Futures) (Feelings) Abstract Conceptualization (Findings) FIGURE 1. KOLB’S CYCLE OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING.First
Conference Session
Examining Social Ties and Networks
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Megan Kenny Feister, Purdue University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David Torres, Purdue University; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
each other (and to themselves).”3 Thesedefinitions reflect the complex social and communicative processes that need to be unraveled tooffer a complete understanding. While student design contexts differ in important ways fromprofessional practice,4-5 the program-based engineering education context represents animportant space for novice engineers to learn about and develop understandings that will impacttheir future engagement in design. In the context of design, there are many different values, such as innovation or a primaryconcern for safety, that guide design decisions and processes and can impact how designers thinkabout the ethical issues related to their designs and the implications of their “everyday” ethicaldecisions. This is
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shiyu Liu, Pennsylvania State University; Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Irene B. Mena, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kirsten S Hochstedt, Penn State University; Tricia Bertram Gallant, Rady School of Management, UC San Diego
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
they implemented the new instructionalplans in the semester following the workshop. Three major themes emerged from inductiveanalysis of interview transcripts. First, all participants reported that the workshop helped thembecome more aware of the importance of incorporating academic integrity into their teaching andwere more reflective on how to effectively discuss this critical issue with their students. Second,after the workshop, participants made several changes in their courses and applied a variety ofstrategies to incorporate academic integrity into four aspects of their teaching: course syllabus,classroom discussion, assignments, and exams. Last, participants discussed several challengeswhen incorporating academic integrity into their
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Pre-college Student Experiences
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lynsey Mitchell Kissane, Ryerson University; Liping Fang, Ryerson University ; Ruth Jean Silver, Groundswell Projects
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
to making it better, faster, or more efficient. • Engineers help shape the future. They use the latest science, tools, and technology to bring ideas to life. • Engineering is essential to our health, happiness, and safety. From the grandest skyscrapers to microscopic medical devices, it is impossible to imagine life without engineering.These and other recommendations to “change the conversation” or “embrace a broader vision” ofengineering bespeak a realization that the profession is not well understood or reflective of thesociety it serves. Organizations in the engineering community have tested female-inclusiveapplications and strategies in outreach and awareness efforts with limited success. The authenticadult (i.e. Baby
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Student Issues as Related to Culture
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julie Rojewski, Michigan State University; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
as a frameworkfor promoting professional development and community building for graduate students.Building on the themes of the book, this program sought to promote reflection amongparticipants about the choices and actions that women can take to position themselves forsuccess—and encouraged exploration of students’ personal vision of success. Results of pre-and post-tests, along with observational data gathered by the facilitators, indicated that studentswere concerned largely by two topics: concerns about how to balance their career ambition andtheir goals for a fulfilling personal life (whatever that may be), and how to have positive andbeneficial relationship with mentors or advisors. Students also shared their challenges andfrustration
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Technical Session 12: Teaching and Advising Students in that Critical First Year
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Iryna Ashby, Purdue University; Marisa Exter, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
requirements, the process for obtaining eachbadge included at least the following: introduction to the new topic (e.g., participation and animpromptu classroom presentation or discussion, hands-on activity in class); reflections on thedesign and development of the project and on their own learning; application of new materials;and finally, the final project itself accompanied by the narrative/reflection and artifact(s). Whilesome projects were to be completed independently, for others, students were encouraged orrequired to work with peers. In addition, some projects could be in part used to meet sub-competencies across multiple badges. Students completed projects on their own timeframe and inthe order they preferred. While there were soft deadlines
Conference Session
Utilizing Digital Technologies in Classroom and Distance Learning in ET Programs
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Usman Ghani, DeVry University, Addison, Illinois; Ahmed S. Khan, DeVry University, Addison
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
feedback, and provoking reflection. Packet-Tracer provides scaffolding inthe form of corrective feedback. According to Jaehnig and Miller the types of corrective Page 26.581.6feedbacks commonly used are:24 1. Knowledge-of-Response (KOR), which simply indicates that the learner’s response is correct or incorrect. 2. Answer-Until-Correct (AUC), it requires learner’s to remain on the same test item until the correct answer is selected. 3. Knowledge-of-correct-response (KCR), which identifies the correct response i.e. it directs the student to the correct responseAccording to Moreno15 “The importance of feedback in promoting
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Megan Kenny Feister, Purdue University; David Torres, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
, and specifically engineering design, is increasingly understood to be a socialactivity, engineering education’s understanding of ethics needs to reflect this developingawareness. Within engineering and design teams, engineering educators are concerned not onlywith how individual students develop ethically, but also how everyday ethical decision-makingemerges during team interactions and becomes integrated in design solutions. Furthermore, theseethical decisions often do not present themselves as traditional dilemmas, but are issues that areconfronted in the everyday process of design, and are influenced by team members’ cultural anddisciplinary backgrounds and the ethical climates of the team and the organization.In considering engineering
Conference Session
Best of Computers in Education
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Borjana Mikic, Smith College; Al Rudnitsky, Smith College; Annick Jade Dewald; Anjali Karina Desai, Smith College
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
temperature differential? Students are encouragedto generate and post their ideas and theories about the topic and build directly on the ideas ofothers. This discourse is supported through a computer- based asynchronous collaborativelearning environment such as Knowledge Forum (KF)10. The workspace preserves an on-goingrecord of the discourse so that participants can return to earlier ideas for reflection, synthesis, andrefinement. In the process, students develop a questioning attitude, learn to identify personal andcollective gaps in knowledge and understanding, become self-directed learners who are capableof bringing in new sources of authoritative information, viewing such information from multipleperspectives in support of theory-development
Conference Session
Software and Programming
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Krista M. Hill, University of Hartford; Ying Yu, University of Hartford
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
10.1was the last to include a graphical test bench generator tool. In the Fall 2013 semester weupgraded to ISE version 13.2 and discuss later how despite the introduction of test benches, our Page 26.1252.4students prefer the improved stability of the software.In this paper we consider the usefulness of our tutorial as a reference as well as pedagogy topicsrelated to test benches. In reviewing the literature, Colburn1, Hawkins3, and Kolb7 each outlinephases of the learning cycle model and suggest that experiential learning involves reflection toallow for accommodation of new knowledge. We feel that perhaps the lecture and homework canbe used as
Conference Session
Civic Engagement and Volunteerism in Engineering
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David A. Delaine, Universidade de São Paulo and IFEES; Jose Roberto Cardoso, Universidade de São Paulo; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
Executive Director of FUSP - The Foundation for Supporting the USPDr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Cheryl Matherly, The University of Tulsa; Lisa Benson, Clemson University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
., university, major, QPA), travel abroad/international experiences (e.g., level of interest in international issues, foreign languageproficiency), and characteristics of the international experiences (e.g., programmatic elements ofexperiences such as duration, amount of reflection, and comfort zone). The background surveyitems also provided independent predictor variables to help explain the results of the outcomeinstruments (EGPI and GPI). Samples (from each of the four partner institutions) of seniorengineering students, each of whom had engaged in an at least one international experience wereinvited to complete the set of instruments (EGPI, GPI, and background survey). In addition tosampling seniors with international experiences, each campus also
Conference Session
Research on Design Learning
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington; Janet McDonnell, Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London; Ryan C. Campbell, University of Washington; Jim L Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington; Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Paper ID #11935Using Design Process Timelines to Teach Design: Implementing Research Re-sultsDr. Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington Cynthia J. Atman is the founding director of the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the newly-formed Consortium for Promoting Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by a $4.4 million grant from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. She was
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University; Nichole Ramirez, Purdue University; Trina L. Fletcher, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jake Davis, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
force.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank the National Science Foundation for support of this research research (Award1329283: Access to Cooperative Education Programs and the Academic and EmploymentReturns by Race, Gender, and Discipline), as well as Eckhard Groll, Stephen Wanders, TinaAlsup and the SPHERE Lab for their helpful feedback and assistance. The views expressedherein are solely the authors’.References Cited1. Haddara, M., & Skanes, H. (2007). A reflection on cooperative education  : from experience to experiential learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 8(1), 67–76.2. Edgar, S., Francis-Coad, J., & Connaughton, J. (2013). Undergraduate reflective journaling in work integrated learning  : Is it relevant to
Conference Session
Aerospace Technical Session 2
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Antonette T. Cummings P.E., Purdue University; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
26.840.2The content reflects the commonly held understandings that multiple leading universitiesdocument in their course descriptions. The assessment strategies reflect the varied results thatstudents may generate with higher level thinking. The pedagogy reflects the established trend ofcooperative learning as the “best” form of active, student-centered learning, where the instructorscaffolds the student’s learning process and develops the student’s ability to pursue self-guidedinquiry, which is the highest goal of teaching.It is expected that the institutional setting will be an ABET-accredited engineering college thatoffers aerospace engineering at the bachelors level. For example, the rotorcraft centers ofexcellence are Georgia Tech, University of
Conference Session
Faculty Development II
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Louis Nadelson, Utah State University; Kimberly Kristine Hardy, Boise State University; Dazhi Yang, Boise State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
motivational goals for learning with respect to course favoritism are reflective of a statedependence rather than a trait the students hold with respect to the way they approach learning.Thus, motivational goals of engineering students are likely to shift, some substantially, based ontheir affinity for a course. The implications for our findings are such that if students favor acourse they are more likely to engage in learning at the mastery level and seek deeperunderstanding and develop more complex knowledge of subjects based on intrinsic factors. Incontrast, if students disfavor a course they are likely to be driven by external factors, like grades,or simply passing and getting through, and are much less likely to develop and retain deep
Conference Session
A Virtual Community of Practice for Developing and Implementing Evidence-based Pedagogies
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida; Amber L. Genau, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Brittany Nelson-Cheeseman, School of Engineering, University of St. Thomas; Cheryl A Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh; Joseph De-Chung Shih, Stanford University; Daniel Lepek, The Cooper Union; Lindsay Corneal, Grand Valley State University; Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley; Richard E Eitel, Stevens Institute of Technology (SSE)
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering, Materials
VCP.Leadership VCP The leadership VCP comprised 6 weekly sessions which prepared five pairs of faculty leadersto facilitate their own VCPs in different subject areas. These sessions, led by Karl Smith andCynthia Finelli, were conducted weekly and lasted approximately 1.5 hours; there were also twofollow-up sessions after the faculty leaders began leading their own VCPs. The six sessions pro-vided an introduction to the VCP and training in research-based practices of active learning, en-hancing motivation, learning objectives and Bloom’s Taxonomy, as well as student teams and Page 26.132.4cooperative learning. Final sessions focused on reflection
Conference Session
Subjects in Renewable Energy and ET
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenan Baltaci, University of Wisconsin, Stout; Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University; Andy S. Peng, University of Wisconsin, Stout; Ulan Dakeev, University of Michigan, Flint
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
fortified through reflection papers, classdiscussion, and student presentations that require students to represent mathematical informationsymbolically, visually, numerically, and verbally. Through in-class studies and assignments,student will be given raw data about a specific problem and asked to effectively use arithmetic,algebraic, geometric, logical, and/or statistical methods to model and solve real-world problems.Since students in the course will come from a variety of majors and will hold different skills inreading course materials, assignments will be kept in a level that is both challenging andachievable for each student.Several case study assignments will be included in the course content to meet this objective. Thecase studies are
Conference Session
Non-Canonical Canons of Engineering Ethics
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Xiaofeng Tang, Penn State University; Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
employment of another engineer, nor does he indiscriminately criticize another engineer’s work. 13. The Engineer endeavors to extend public knowledge, and to promote understanding of the contributions and achievements of engineering and the alternatives offered by modern technology. 14. The Engineer gives credit for work to those to whom credit is due, and recognizes the proprietary interests of others. 15. The Engineer advertises his work or merit in a dignified manner, and avoids conduct or practice likely to discredit or unfavorably reflect upon the dignity or honor of the profession. 16. The Engineer is guided in all his professional relations by the highest standards of integrity, and acts in professional matters for each
Conference Session
Discussions on Research Methodology: ERM Roundtable
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Karen Sweeney Gerow, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and creativity into the environmental engineering program at the University of Georgia. Page 26.1184.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Narrative Inquiry in Engineering Education Research: Exploring Ways of Constructing Narratives to have Resonance with the Reader and Critical Research
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University; Thomas A. Lenox , Dist.M.ASCE, F.ASEE, American Society of Civil Engineers; Richard O. Anderson P.E., Somat Engineering, Inc.
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
determine if the current ABET CivilEngineering Program Criteria (CEPC) should be changed to reflect one or more of the 24 outcomesof the second edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge published in 2008. After twoyears of work, a proposed CEPC has been approved by the relevant ASCE committees andforwarded to ABET for approval and incorporation into accreditation criteria. A paper chroniclingthe committee’s efforts through a review of the literature, the committee’s methodology andprocess, and the key issues that emerged was presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference inIndianapolis. This paper updates that effort by presenting the resulting proposed criteria, thechanges generated by constituency feedback, progress on the Commentary, the
Conference Session
Circuits and Systems Education 1
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
students who participatedin the survey did not benefit from the help rendered by the video based coaching problems andtutorials.Figure 2, Q5 received 3.6 out of 5 demonstrating that a good portion of our students benefited byusing Mastering Engineering online tool homework assignments and instant feedback. 4.00 Figure 2 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 q3 q4 q5Figure 3, Q6 reflects the students’ view regarding the important question of this study and surveywhether “the mastering engineering helps you to master the electrical circuit concepts ”. Themajority of the students, about 78%, felt that mastering engineering helps them to learn
Conference Session
Continuing Professional Development Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeffrey S. Goss, Arizona State University; Philip Regier, Arizona State University; Scott Pitasky, Starbucks
Tagged Divisions
Continuing Professional Development
experience that promised no restrictions on employment following thecompletion of a degree. It became very apparent that Starbucks is as committed to its partners asASU is to the welfare of our students and how they succeed at the university and beyond.The partnership would be one of mutual shared impact. It needed to work at scale, whichStarbucks provides. Starbucks partners are relatively young, but demographically reflectAmerica. The partners were hit hard by the Great Recession, and they collectively reflect thedegree attainment crisis facing the United States. They offered ASU the opportunity to prove thatits initiatives in partnership and online learning at scale would work in service to a large numberof students that reflect the diversity