education limiting their motivation andsuccess in math and statistics. Mathematics and Statistics serve as foundation for all programs inScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM); therefore, lower success inmathematics can also affect their decisions to follow a STEM career [12], but also underminetheir success in engineering courses [13], [14]. The issue of anxiety and lack of confidence intheir abilities can be worse for female students who are often raised under the stereotypic viewthat females are not good at math [15].Enhancing math problems with RL examples can provide deeper understanding of math conceptsand skills [5], [3]. It can also motivate students to learn more about how math can be used in reallife, experiencing a
Paper ID #21529An Evaluation of an Engineering Design Class using Mixed Methods Tech-niquesMs. Martina Margaret Moyne, University College Dublin Martina Moyne is a PhD candidate in the School of Mechanical and Material Engineering, University College Dublin (UCD) and a Lecturer in Product Design in the Institute of Technology Carlow. She received her BDes in Industrial Design and MSc in Medical Device Design in the National College of Art and Design (NCAD) and ME in Management in UCD. She is also a part time lecturer in UCD and prior to pursuing her PhD, she worked for six years in Nypro Healthcare as a Senior Product
, exploring subgroup variations.Mariana Tafur, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mariana Tafur is a Ph.D. candidate and a graduate assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She has a M.S., in Education at Los Andes University, Bogota, Colombia; and a B.S., in Electrical Engineering at Los Andes University, Bogota, Colombia. She is a 2010 Fulbright Fellow. Her research interests include engineering skills development, STEM for non-engineers adults, motivation in STEM to close the technology literacy gap, STEM formative assessment, and Mixed-Methods design.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue
the American Society of Engineering Education.Dr. Margaret E. Beier, Rice University Margaret Beier is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Rice University in Houston, TX. She received her B.A. from Colby College, and her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Margaret’s research examines the predictors of performance in educational and occupational settings. In particular, she is interested in the effects of examining gender, age, ability, personality, motivation, and self-regulation on a range of outcomes. She is a member of the American Educational Research Association and a Fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychologists. c
/Ecobricks-transforms-plastic- MS-ETS1-3 Engineering Design: Analyze data from tests to waste-to-building-blocks/ determine similarities and differences among several design Materials + Technology solutions to identify the best characteristics of each that can be combined into a new solution to better meet the criteria for success. ● Engineering design process visual aid for easy reference Students will be able to… ● A copy of Rosie Revere, Engineer OR Computer and
. Thissentiment is one that has resonated with me. It drives me to find ways to connect the nextgeneration to STEM and higher education. Therefore, the prospect of supporting andstrengthening Native connections and engagement to science, technology, engineering, arts, andmathematics (STEAM) is a powerful motivator for me.My involvement in an ongoing study titled, CAREER: Engineering Design Across NavajoCulture, Community, and Society [20] inspired me to explore Tohono O’odham culturalconnections to engineering. Although I will draw from my CAREER research experience, I mustallow any Tohono O’odham connections to emerge without imposing results from myinvolvement in Dr. Jordan’s study.The relationship I would like to foster between community and
Paper ID #25231Work in Progress: The Impacts of Scholarships on Engineering Students’MotivationMs. Emily Bovee, Michigan State University Emily A. Bovee is a doctoral candidate in Educational Psychology and Educational Technology at Michi- gan State University. Her current research is focused on understanding and supporting college student success, particularly in engineering disciplines.Ms. Amalia Krystal Lira, Michigan State University Amalia (Krystal) Lira is a doctoral student in Educational Psychology and Educational Technology at Michigan State University. She is interested in addressing STEM attrition among
Paper ID #24443Design Practica as Authentic Assessments in First-year Engineering DesignCoursesDr. Christopher McComb, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Christopher McComb is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs with courtesy appointments in the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engi- neering and the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. He earned dual B.S. degrees in Civil and Mechanical Engineering from California State University Fresno as well as M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University
Paper ID #35690McMillan Water Treatment Plant DC: embedding culture in civil engineeringProf. W. M. Kim Roddis, The George Washington University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 McMillan Water Treatment Plant DC: Embedding Culture in Civil EngineeringThe McMillan Water Treatment Plant (WTP) in Washington, DC is a case study I use in thecourse CE 1010 Introduction to Civil and Environmental Engineering taught at the GeorgeWashington University (GW). The course not only surveys 100 years of urban drinking watertechnology, but also
were removed as they had notcompleted both questions, leaving 13 male and 12 female respondents. For each of these 13skills the male and female responses were separated into perceptions of the Engineer’s Skill Setand Own Skill Set. Details of five of these skills are found below in Figures 4 through 8. Theremaining data will be included in a future publication. Figure 4: Perception of engineering and self-proficiency with technology by genderEngineering Skill Comparison: Both male and female students perceive engineers to haveExceptional proficiency with technology.Own Skill Comparison: There is an indication that female students perceive their technicalproficiency to be Average, significantly lower than their expectations of the
: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low- income youth.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 325-338, 1997.[5] C. Papadopoulos, and J. R. Reisel. “Do students in summer bridge programs successfully improve math placement and persist? A meta-analysis,” in Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: ASEE, June 22-25, 2008.[6] J. R. Reisel, M. Jablonski, H. Hosseini, and E. Munson. “Assessment of factors impacting success for incoming college engineering students in a summer bridge program.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 43, no
Brass, St. Paul Academy and Summit School Director of Instructional Technology, St Paul Academy and Summit School K12 Collaboration Liaison, Center for Engineering Education, St. Thomas University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Cross Cutting Concepts in an Informal Engineering Setting (Fundamental)AbstractThe participation gap between men and women in the E - Engineering component of STEMsectors is persistent. This gap may be traced back to several complex issues including perceivedcultural concerns in engineering and young women self-selecting out of engineering career pathsearly in the middle school years [1]. Informal education settings may allow for a countermeasureto the
, retain, andprepare students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields to addresschallenges facing the 21st Century. This paper describes a method for integrating behavioralinstinct learning modules into freshman engineering classes. The method includes an onlineinstinct assessment, in-class activities created to illustrate instinctive behavior related toengineering tasks, practicing awareness through class projects, and reflective writing toencourage students to critically think about this awareness for future classes, activities, andcareers. The effectiveness of the methods described herein will be evaluated through the use ofsurveys, reflective essays, and interviews with faculty and students. The assessments have
curricula. He is currently conducting research on an NSF project led by Dr. Stephen Krause, focused on the factors that promote persistence and success for undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Aca- demic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Cen- ter for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the
Paper ID #13361Assessing the Success of Programs for Women in EngineeringDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley, ASEE Fellow, is the Director of Women in Engineering and The Engineering Place for K-20 Outreach and a Teaching Associate Professor in the Colleges of Engineering and Education at NC State University. She teaches an Introduction to Engineering class for incoming freshmen in the College and Children Design, Invent, Create, a course for elementary education students that introduces them to engineering design and technology as well as various electrical engineering classes. In
Paper ID #14476Educating Construction Engineering and Management Students Through RealUniversity ProjectsDr. Carla Lopez del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez Carla Lopez del Puerto, Ph.D., Associate Professor Construction Engineering and Management Depart- ment of Civil Engineering University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez email: Carla.LopezdelPuerto@upr.edu http://cem.uprm.eduDr. Omar I. Molina-Bas, University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez Omar I. Molina Bas, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Unit Coordinator Construction Engineering and Man- agement Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying University of Puerto Rico
Filters (August; n = 10) and No BonesAbout it: Designing Knee Braces (January; n = 9). Although the kits were different according totraining session and grade level, it is important to note that EiE workshops emphasize thatalthough the science content may change from one EiE curriculum kit to the next, thephilosophies behind understanding the nature of technology and the engineering design processare consistent across kits. Further, each EiE curriculum kit follows the same structure, whichmakes it easy for teachers to learn one kit and then translate this knowledge to another. Tomaximize shared resources, the purchased kits and refill materials were made available forcheckout at the Interlocal Cooperative so participating teachers could continue
analysis. He has chaired multiple national and municipal grants in mechanical engineering. He was a recipient of the ICED’13 Reviewers’ Favorite Prize in 2013 and the ICED’11 Top 5% Paper Awards in 2011.Miss Houzhi Liu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Houzhi Liu received her Bachelor’s degree in Nuclear Engineering and Technology from Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2019. She is going to study for a Master’s degree in Nuclear Energy at Cambridge in Oct. 2020. Her research interest includes heat transfer and engineering design.Dr. Lu Chen, Shanghai JiaoTong UniversityMiss Yaxin Huang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Yaxin Huang received a Bachelor’s degree in English language and literature from Hohai University of China
need to research and implement innovative interventions for retention andcareer readiness of underrepresented students in science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) [1,2]. In 2017, a four-year curriculum was developed to elevate an existingsupport program for undergraduate women in STEM into an academic honors program. Thisrenewed Women In Science and Engineering (WISE) Honors program at Stony BrookUniversity (SBU), a public research institution, recruited its first new cohort in 2018. Thepurpose of this paper is to present formative findings of the research and evaluation plans thatexamined the effectiveness of one of the new courses, WSE 381: Service Learning in STEM.Theoretical FoundationHigh-impact practices, the educational
Paper ID #43293Understanding the Workplace Transition Experiences of Undergraduate QueerEngineering StudentsAnimesh Paul, University of Georgia Animesh (He/They), originally from India, is presently a Ph.D. Candidate at the Engineering Education Transformations Institute, University of Georgia. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Technology, specializing in Electronics and Electrical Engineering from KIIT University. Animesh’s academic focus delves into the complexities of the school-to-work transition, through an asset-based perspective. He is deeply dedicated to promoting inclusive engineering programs, motivated by his
Paper ID #44011Identifying the Parenting Approaches of Parents of Women in EngineeringNiloufar Bayati, North Carolina State UniversityDr. Cameron Denson, North Carolina State University Cameron Denson is an associate professor of Technology and Engineering Design Education (TDE) in the Dept. of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education at N.C. State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1Identifying Parenting Approaches used by Parents of Women in Engineering
struggles against all forms of domination andoppression.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (Award#2233622). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.The authors would like to thank Max Skorodinsky for his helpful comments on a draft of thismanuscript. References[1] A. Menier, R. Zarch and S. Sexton, “Broadening gender in computing for transgender and nonbinary learners,” 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT
. engineering knowledge. Innovativeness Solution and or alternatives lacks Solution and or alternatives The solutions and alternatives creativity. The application, considered arepotentially innovative, considered are innovative. Team design or proposed solutions are but more work is needed; does not considered or demonstrated: a new readily available. illustrate potential for improved use of an existing technology, use of outcomes. material, manufacturing, or changes
. He aims to help students improve intercultural competency and teamwork competency by interventions, counseling, pedagogy, and tool selection to promote DEI. In addition, he also works on many research-to-practice projects to enhance educational technology usage in engineering classrooms and educational research. Siqing also works as the technical development and support manager at the CATME research group.Amirreza Mehrabi, Purdue University I am Amirreza Mehrabi, a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette. Now I am working in computer adaptive testing (CAT) enhancement with AI and analyzing big data with machine learning (ML) under Prof. J. W. Morphew at the ENE department. My
communications is a fundamental skill for most engineers.Typical engineering documents are visual, however simply seeing the document is not enough tobe able to interpret, reason, and communicate with it. The engineer must be able to internalizethe information into a mental map of some sort and appropriately interpret the features.This case study examines how a blind mechanical engineering student was taught and learnedbasic concepts of engineering graphical representation. Assistive technologies replaced theubiquitous computer and paper visual interfaces. The course was intended to enable the studentto develop basic mental imagery capability in engineering graphics. These capabilities provideda foundation for engineering thinking for the student and
. After 10 years working in industry, he returned to school, completing his Ph.D. in Computer Science Engineering at the University of Louisville’s Speed School of Engineering in 2008. Since com- pleting his degree, he has been teaching engineering mathematics courses and continuing his dissertation research in cyber security for industrial control systems. In his teaching, Dr. Hieb focuses on innovative and effective use of tablets, digital ink, and other technology and is currently investigating the use of the flipped classroom model and collaborative learning. His research in cyber security for industrial control systems is focused on high assurance field devices using microkernel architectures.Dr. Patricia A
Paper ID #13460Opportunity Thinktank: Laying a foundation for the entrepreneurially mindedengineerProf. Robert Gettens, Western New England University Rob Gettens is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and the Director of the First Year Engineering Program at Western New England University.Prof. Jose Antonio Riofrio, Western New England University Jos´e A Riofr´ıo received his B.S. in Engineering Physics from Elizabethtown College in 2003, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Vanderbilt University in 2005 and 2008, respectively. At Vanderbilt, Jos´e focused his research in controls
Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics and Control Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a GK-12 Fellows project, and a DR K-12 research project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and control system technology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach
Paper ID #41650Summer Bridge Programs for Engineering Students: A Systematic LiteratureReviewDr. Julie M. Smith, CSEdResearch.org Dr. Julie M. Smith is a senior education researcher at CSEdResearch.org. She holds degrees in Curriculum & Instruction and Software Development. She also completed a doctoral program in Learning Technologies at the University of North Texas. Her research focus is computer science education, particularly the intersection of learning analytics, learning theory, and equity and excellence. She was a research assistant at MIT’s Teaching Systems Lab, working on a program aimed at improving equity
Paper ID #34692Using Rapid Prototyping to Realize Design: Mindset and EngineeringSelf-EfficacyDr. Andrea T. Kwaczala, Western New England University Andrea Kwaczala is an assistant professor at Western New England University in the biomedical engineer- ing department. She teaches Biomechanics, Biomedical Engineering Laboratory Courses, Senior Design and Prosthetic and Orthotic Design. She focuses on hands-on labs centered on student engagement and project based learning. She works in collaboration with Shriners Hospitals for Children where her re- search focuses in the design of assistive technologies to help people with