Asee peer logo
Displaying results 24721 - 24750 of 25098 in total
Conference Session
Accreditation and the BOK
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
to working as a civilengineer requires passing two exams (FE and PE) and M/30 that other engineeringdisciplines do not require. So more clear communication on these issues is important.Clearly outlining the necessity for requiring an M/30 prior to professional licensure will beimportant. The reasons that students used in their writings may provide insight into thearguments that they found most compelling. It is important that this message comes fromindustry and practicing engineers rather than academia. A number of the seniors usedlanguage that reflected their belief that the M/30 requirement was motivated by greedyuniversities. Some students proposed changes in the BS degree or changes in the PE examthat could ensure competency. There
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University; Laura Ann Gelles, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Marialuisa Di Stefano, Utah State University; Buffy Smith, University of St. Thomas; Renetta G. Tull, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Anne Therese Hunt, Hunt Consulting Associates; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Gery W. Ryan, Pardee RAND Graduate School in Policy Analysis
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
tofirst reflect upon and identify HC and then to respond and react to HC from an emotional, self-efficacy, and self-advocacy standpoint.C. Preliminary considerations for appropriate interventions for HC in engineeringRecent literature has indicated that when engineering educators and students fail to recognize thepersistence of a cultural influence in engineering education, undesirable consequences can result[51]. For example, a lack of culturally-responsive and holistic curricular content may limit students'understanding of their future professional roles [52], which may hinder students’ sense of"ownership" (i.e., self-efficacy) of their professional actions and beliefs [53], [54]. In addition, a lackof social capital for underrepresented groups
Collection
AEE Journal
Authors
Claire Dancz; Kevin Ketchman; Rebekah Burke P.E.; Troy Hottle; Kristen Parrish; Melissa Bilec; Amy Landis
intellectual behavior withinthe student homework assignments (“knowledge,” “comprehension,” “application,” “analysis,” “syn-thesis,” or “evaluation”) (Anderson, Krathwohl, and Bloom 2001, Bloom et al. 1956). McCormick etal. 2014 utilized Sustainability Links to evaluate the linkages between the three pillars of sustain-ability, including “concepts” (societal, economic, environmental), “crosslinks” (societal-economic,environmental-economic, societal-environmental) and “interdependency” (societal-economic-environmental) (McCormick et al. 2014b). McCormick et al. 2014 did not include a “no evidence”response option; the authors added this option. Table 1 reflects these three approaches to assessDimensions of Sustainability, Bloom’s Taxonomy, and
Collection
AEE Journal
Authors
Cheryl Bodnar; Matthew Markovetz; Renee Clark; Zachari Swiecki; Golnaz Irgens; Naomi Chesler; David Shaffer
-parametricstatistical analyses in this work, and their results were in general agreement. Another limitation to this work relates to the pre-constructed questions and responses built intothe focus group design. The space from which students could draw questions relevant to their designwas constrained in a manner that may not be reflective of what they might ask in a true industrial set-ting. This could be remedied by an open question format; however, this is difficult to regulate withinan epistemic game environment. It would be possible to further determine student valuation of thedesign metrics through qualitative analysis of the notebook logs students maintained during theseactivities. This work is currently underway and should serve as useful feedback
Conference Session
PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only
Collection
2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Mohammad N Amin, National University; Ronald P. Uhlig, National University; Pradip Peter Dey, National University; Bhaskar Sinha, National University; Shatha Jawad Jawad, National University
Tagged Topics
Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions
Grover [48-53]. Hopefully, studentswill develop adequate knowledge for the class of problems knows as BQP (bounded-errorquantum polynomial time) [54, 72, 73]. Students will also be provided a free Quantum DevelopmentKit [QDK] to write some quantum computing programs in order to gain some hands onexperience before graduation. Reflections on our experience will be disseminated widely toNorth American universities (using emails, flyers etc.) so that others can learn from ourexperience. Will Knight reported [16] that Isaac Chuang suspects “. . .that the revolution will notreally begin until a new generation of students and hackers get to play with practical machines.Quantum computers require not just different programming languages but a
Conference Session
DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nathan John Washuta P.E., The Citadel; Patrick Bass, The Citadel
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
above the neutral response of 3.0, which indicates that students felt that thesemodules had a positive impact in both the short and long term. The highest ratings came from theimportance of developing an elevator pitch, while the lowest ratings, including the only ratingamong this group below the neutral response, involved participation in the business competition.The higher ratings associated with developing an elevator pitch could again be due to thestudents’ higher level of comfort with oral presentations. The lower ratings associated with thebusiness competition do not reflect the student self-assessment of learning outcomes, and theseratings seem to depend heavily on whether the students advanced past the initial paperwork-onlyround of the
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum I
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Bruce Oestreich, Rowan University; Ted Howell, Rowan University; Jennifer Tole, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Paper ID #30141Integrating Entrepreneurial Mindset in a Multidisciplinary Course onEngineering Design and Technical CommunicationDr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and
Conference Session
Key Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession - and ASCE - Part 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Stephen J. Ressler P.E., Dist.M.ASCE, F.ASEE, U.S. Military Academy; Thomas A. Lenox , Dist.M.ASCE, F.ASEE, American Society of Civil Engineers
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
nature of the ABET organization—a federation of professional societies—and its resourcing model. In April 2017, despite ASCE’s opposition, the Board of Delegates approved the natural sciences initiative and formally changed the names of the Applied Science Commission and the Applied Science Area Delegation to reflect their expanded scope of responsibilities.• Major criteria revisions – In 2009, the ABET EAC initiated a major revision to Criteria 3 and 5 of the EAC Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs—the first such change since the Engineering Criteria 2000 initiative of the late 1990s. The EAC disseminated the first draft of this revision to Member Societies as a “pre-proposal” in July 2014. Revised draft
Conference Session
Teaching and Learning in Online Environments
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Javeed Kittur, Arizona State University; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
-sampling and down-sampling strategies depending on the class. SMOTE creates syntheticcases for a minority class by randomly selecting the nearest neighbors. Once we are satisfied withthe dataset itself, the features selected from the random forest output will be ultimately combinedwith associative classification to discover relationships between student-LMS interactions andpersistence decisions.AcknowledgementsThis paper is based on research supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under AwardNumber 1825732. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References1. Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jacob Kelter, Northwestern University; Jonathan Daniel Emery, Northwestern University; Uri Wilensky, Northwestern University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
of diffusion better, but thecurrent curriculum structure and learning activities leave room for improvement in helpingstudents understand the connection between all the representations of diffusion.5. AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible through generous support from the National Science Foundation(grants CNS-1138461, CNS-1441041, DRL-1020101, DRL-1640201 and DRL-1842374) andthe Spencer Foundation (Award #201600069). Any opinions, findings, or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of thefunding organizations.6. References[1] R. G. Christianson and K. M. Fisher, “Comparison of student learning about diffusion and osmosis in constructivist and traditional
Conference Session
Perceptions, Projects, and Practical Approaches
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ryan Solnosky P.E., Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
Conference Session
New Areas of Ethical Inquiry
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kenneth Stafford Sands II, Florida Gulf Coast University; Annie R. Pearce, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida; Min Jae Suh, Sam Houston State University; Christine Marie Fiori, Drexel University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
exemplars to reflect ethical culture, using case justice studies, using problem-based learning (diii). Mulligan [25] Discusses topics of hazardous waste/pollution, Suggests the use of lectures (diii), textbooks, Not discussed culture/multiculturalism, global awareness, and videos, and magazine articles from environmental impact Engineering New Record (ENR) (dii). Killingsworth Discusses topics of codes of ethical Suggests integration of ethics throughout the Discusses use of the adapted version [26] conduct/practice, construction safety, law, curriculum
Conference Session
Mental Health of Graduate Students
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Amanda C. Arnold, Arizona State University; Kerrie G. Wilkins-Yel, University of Massachusetts Boston; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University; Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University; Madison Natarajan, University of Massachusetts Boston; Ashley K. Randall, Arizona State University ; Roxanna Francies, Arizona State University; Chinwendu Elyse Okwu, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
pursuing the same type of degree… I feel like they couldn't understand what it was I had to bring with me emotionally every day. That was a really discouraging time.Witnessing unsupportive interactions experienced by other students also impacted participants’perceptions of support. For example, Erin reported that other female colleagues’ experiencescaused her to lose trust in her program and contributed to an unsupportive climate. She stated, Some of my fellow female students have encountered some issues that I feel reflect poorly on the program and has kind of made me lose a little bit of respect, a little bit of faith in what they're doing. And them not being supported kind of makes me feel like… if I needed to go
Conference Session
Instruments and Methods for Studying Student Experiences and Outcomes
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
David Reeping, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Cherie D. Edwards, Virginia Commonwealth University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, quantitative data collected from initial drafts of our survey instruments were incorporated into the instructor interviews. Instructors were allowed to see this student response during the interview and were asked to reflect on and interpret this numerical data.” [50, p. 15]This method of integration could be represented in the mixed column and explicitly referencednear the end of the design as shown in Figure A1 in Appendix A. They could also refer to such aprocess as blending across strands [2] as they used one type of data to elicit additional data aselaboration.While Shekar et al. [50] showed how one could situate their study as a methodologicalcontribution, a component of Faber and Benson [32] we would like to highlight is the idea
Conference Session
First-year Programs: Student Perceptions and Perspectives
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Joanne Kay Beckwith, University of Michigan; Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Conference Session
Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Younkyeong Nam, Pusan National University; Jina Yoon, Pusan National University; Jeanna Wieselmann, Southern Methodist University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
discussions than thosewomen in groups with more men or an equal number of men and women [23]. In contrast tomonological approaches often taken by men, women’s communication tends to be more interactive[24], with girls asking more probing questions than boys [25].Building on these considerations, the primary objective of this study was to examine how genderaffects students’ decision-making process in an engineering-based SSI context related torenewable energy. Duschl suggested that we need to move beyond structured dialogue toward aframework that reflects how evidence is constructed and supported by reasoning [10]. Tounderstand how a student's context (gender) shapes their reasoning and decision-making, students’argumentative practices were
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Robin O. Andreasen, University of Delaware; Shawna Vican, University of Delaware; Yvette A Jackson, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
years (as described in theprevious section). It follows that when we discuss the perceptions and experiences of womenfaculty who have departed, it is largely about women of color. And, of course, when discussingthe perceptions and experiences of male faculty who have departed, it is largely about whitemales. The reader should also keep in mind that the experiences of faculty who have departedmay differ from those who remain at UX. It is, therefore, an open question whether and to whatextent the perceptions and experiences of faculty who have exited UX are reflective of thebroader population of faculty at UX.Why Faculty LeaveFaculty who leave their institutions do so for a variety of reasons. Some of these factors relate tothe appeal of the new
Conference Session
Approaches to Curriculum and Policy
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Venugopalan Kovaichelvan, TVS Institute for Quality and Leadership ; Calvin Sophistus King Ph.D., Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Assessment Tools and Practices
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
sufficient justification. X d. Collects feedback and data from many customers and customer segments. X e. Recognize and explore knowledge gaps. XCuriosity f. Critically observes surroundings to recognize opportunity. g. View problems with an open mindset and explore opportunities with passion. 1. h. Be able to self-reflect and evaluate preconceived ideas, thoughts, and accepted solutions. X i. Explores multiple solution paths
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
sameer prabhu, The MathWorks; Zachariah Chambers, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Liz Callanan, The MathWorks; Marc Herniter, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Conference Session
How to Effectively Teach Using Teams
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristopher Lengieza, Weitz Golf International; Jennifer Caffrey, Pennoni Associates Inc.; Gerard Lennon, Lehigh University; John Ochs, Lehigh University; Joe Sterrett, Lehigh University; Vincent Munley, Lehigh University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nathan Klingbeil, Wright State University; Kuldip Rattan, Wright State University; Michael Raymer, Wright State University; David Reynolds, Wright State University; Richard Mercer, Wright State University; Anant Kukreti, University of Cincinnati; Brian Randolph, University of Toledo
Conference Session
Knowing our Students, Part 1
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gary Lichtenstein, Stanford University; Heidi Loshbaugh, Colorado School of Mines; Brittany Claar, Colorado School of Mines; Tori Bailey, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
major in Chemical Engineering. Many of the seventeen students weinterviewed expressed a definite disinterest in pursuing Chemical Engineering, based on theirexperiences in college chemistry. Interestingly, this choice is not reflective of the quality ofteaching; a number of students who made this assertion praised their chemistry professor andclaimed that it was their own inability to visualize the material that made it an unattractive coursefor them.MT has recently introduced a biological engineering minor and a humanitarian engineeringminor. A third, long-standing minor option is in public policy, although students must apply tothe program in the fall semester of their first year to be accepted; many students who mightgravitate toward the
Conference Session
Case Studies & Engineering Education Around the Globe
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Waddah Akili, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
International
method atthe appropriate time. Understanding the pros and cons of the lecture method is a helpful startingpoint.Lectures have a number of characteristics that does make them, for the right subject matter,desirable in the classroom. (14) It does, to a great extent, depend on the abilities and experience ofthe lecturer. An able and committed lecturer can accomplish the following: 1. Relate the material proficiently and effectively, in a manner that reflects lecturer’s personal conviction and grasp of the subject matter; 2. Provide students with a thoughtful, scholarly role model to emulate; 3. Supplement the subject matter with current developments not yet published, or interject lecturer’s own views derived from his/her own
Conference Session
Problem Solving and Misconceptions
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University; Carla Firetto, Pennsylvania State University; Lucas Passmore, Pennsylvania State University; Peggy Van Meter, Pennsylvania State University; Kelli Higley, Pennsylvania State University; Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University; Francesco Costanzo, Pennsylvania State University; Gary L. Gray; Stephen Turns, Pennsylvania State University; Jonna Kulikowich
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Conference Session
Technical Capacity Bldg for Developing Countries & Service Learning
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vinay Kumar Domal, University of Western AustraliaUWA; James Trevelyan, University of Western Australia
Tagged Divisions
International
orPakistan.On reflection, the reason for this gap in the research literature might be explained by therelatively small number of people with appropriate research skills and tools and, at the sametime, enough first-hand experience to understand the language and concepts of engineeringpractice. The question “What do engineers do?” seems obvious with hindsight. Even thoughone of the authors had most of the required skills and 20 years of first-hand experience indifferent fields of engineering, the question did not seem important. It was the apparentcontradictions in South Asia (mentioned above) that resulted in a serious search forexplanations from 2003 onwards.There are several comparative studies of engineering in different countries. The
Conference Session
MentorNet
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary Jo Wellenstein, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Sandra Courter, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Susannah Sandrin, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh; Karen Showers, Wisconsin Technical College System; Leslie Wilkins, Maui Economic Development Board; Jennifer Chou-Green, MentorNet; Carol Muller, MentorNet; Laurie Mayberry, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Ann Bloor, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Isla Yap, Maui Economic Development Board
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
over the next three years growing to the point where today it servesthe nine public institutions in the state, seven community colleges and two universities,ixproviding their students with access to MentorNet programs. Between the start of thepartnership in 2000 and January 2007, 236 students across these nine institutions have beenmatched in mentoring relationships through MentorNet’s One-on-One program. Recruitmentefforts are spearheaded by a program manager from the sponsoring Women in Technologyproject who cultivates a local campus representative to provide ongoing recruitment. Eachcampus reflects its unique community, so it has been important that recruitment strategies arecustomized to meet differing campus needs. Faculty, staff and
Conference Session
K-12 Programs (Co-sponsored by K-12 Division)
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary Virnoche, Humboldt State University; Elizabeth Eschenbach, Humboldt State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Conference Session
Educational Software
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeff Joines, North Carolina State University; Stephen Roberts, North Carolina State University; Dianne Raubenheimer, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
areneeded which can only be accomplished by programming. Observation 7: Modeling and programming must be integrated into an introductory computing course.Any introductory computing course in systems engineering needs to have both a modeling and aprogramming component. The modeling needs to reflect the way the discipline approachesproblem-solving while the programming needs to support problem-solving. Therefore, we donot want to simply substitute a more appropriate language for Java and then teach it in the samemanner. Therefore, we are arguing that we need develop a problem based approach that requirescomputing to solve these problem (i.e., teaching modeling and programming within the contextof discipline specific