Displaying results 2461 - 2490 of 2536 in total
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division (WIED) Technical Session 5 - Careers and Professional Identity
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Kristin L Schaefer P.E., University of Houston; Jerrod A Henderson, University of Houston
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering Division (WIED)
-by-the-Numbers-3.pdf[11] K. L. Schaefer and J. A. Henderson, “Who Earns Engineering Degrees? Detecting Longitudinal Data Trends with Infographics,” Eng. Rep., In Production, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12886.[12] NSPE, “NSPE Position Statement No. 09-173: Licensure Exemptions,” National Society of Professional Engineers, Alexandria, VA, USA, Committee on Policy and Advocacy Professional Policy No. 09-173, Jan. 2023. Accessed: Feb. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/issues-and-advocacy/professional-policies-and-position-statements/licensure-exemptions[13] M. Swenty and B. J. Swenty, “A Comparison of Licensed Engineers’ Conduct Requirements, the ASCE Code of Ethics, and EAC-ABET
- Conference Session
- Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Pallavi Singh, University of South Florida; Luis Miguel Quevedo, IEEE Educational Activities; Grisselle Centeno, Florida Southern College; Wilfrido A. Moreno P.E., University of South Florida; Liliana M. Villavicencio, University of South Florida
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
manufacturing.Luis Miguel Quevedo, IEEE Educational ActivitiesDr. Grisselle Centeno, Florida Southern College Dr. Grisselle Centeno is the Lyons Endowed Chair in Logistics and Professor of Supply Chain and Analytics at Florida Southern College. She holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from UPR in Mayag¨uez and a master’s and Ph.D. from the University of Central Florida. Dr. Centeno’s research and teaching focus on optimization-based modeling in service industries including healthcare, education, transportation, and entertainment. She has been recognized for her innovation in teaching and her efforts to promote women and ethics in STEM. In 2022, she was inducted as an IISE Fellow, which recognizes outstanding
- Conference Session
- Engineering Equity: Challenging Paradigms and Cultivating Inclusion in Technical Education
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- R. Jamaal Downey, University of San Diego; Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Gordon D Hoople, University of San Diego
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
overcome any obstacles that they might havefaced. This is evident when looking for reasons why engineering students drop out. To nosurprise, there are a plethora of pitfalls an individual can make, with no recognition of theinstitutional hurdles that act as gatekeepers in perpetuating the current makeup of engineering as“pale and male” [62, p. 9]. As listed by industry and blogger articles, reasons that students dropout of engineering programs include: poor work ethic, inability to deal with failure, and lackingthe engineering mindset [63]. It is common talk among engineers that when trying to explain the dearth of women andPOC in engineering, meritocracy is used to justify by stating things such as “they aren’t cut outto be an engineer” or
- Conference Session
- Advancing Equity in Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Dayna Lee Martínez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc.; Liliana González, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc.; Kimberly D Douglas P.E., Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc.; Andrea D. Beattie, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc.; Esther Gonzalez
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)
professional journey includes extensive experience in K-12 support services and fostering collaborative partnerships across sectors. Liliana is based out of Houston, and currently serves as a board member within the University of Houston Hispanic Alumni Network and on the City of Seabrook Ethics Review Committee.Dr. Kimberly D Douglas P.E., Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Over 25 years of experience as an engineering educator and administrator developing and funding programs for increasing the persistence and degree completion rates of STEM students. Particular expertise in creating mutually beneficial partnerships and proAndrea D. Beattie, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Andrea D. Beattie
- Conference Session
- Empathy and Human-Centered Design 1
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Cristian Eduardo Vargas-Ordóñez, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Design in Engineering Education
essential for the creation of attitudesrelated to solving social problems as well as for developing the abilities that could help them. This vision has been appropriated for American engineering curricula considering thatengineering can have a humanistic approach through specific courses or methodologies, theassessment of their activities from a perspective of the ethics, and the reflection about therelationship between engineering and technology, including its impacts [8]. In that sense, themain objective is deconstructing engineering from a utilitarian perspective, based on effectivityand loyalty to institutions, to reconstruct it in a libertarian or communitarian perspective based
- Conference Session
- Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 8: Professional Development for Graduate Students
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Rachel Elisabeth Gehr, Purdue University; Emily Garcia, Purdue University; Suzanne Swaine, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Stephen McBride, Purdue University; Joseph Vincent Rispoli, Purdue University; Christopher Greg Brinton
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
thedocument if one focuses on the research and scientific skills of statistical analysis, creativity andinnovation, ethical research, and technical skills (Figure 1). Figure 1: An example of how to write an IDP for research and scientific skills, taken from the Purdue University College of Engineering Individual Development PlanThe third step is for the student to meet with their PhD advisor to discuss the IDP and identifyguidelines for their relationship. Brief paragraphs are included for what makes a good researchmentor and mentee to remind each party about honesty, communication, and mutual respect(Figure 2). During this meeting, the student and advisor should answer each of the seven sets ofquestions to
- Conference Session
- Reimagining STEM Transitions: Bridging Gaps and Building Resilience in Post-Pandemic Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Alexis Daniels, The Johns Hopkins University; Michael L Falk, The Johns Hopkins University; Rachel E Durham, Notre Dame of Maryland University; Alisha Nicole Sparks, The Johns Hopkins University; Allison Reigel, The Johns Hopkins University; Margo K Williams, The Johns Hopkins University; Karen Watkins-Lewis, Morgan State University; Emily J Yanisko, American University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
’ effects, a convergent parallel mixed methods research design 3was employed based upon Lent and colleagues’ Social Cognitive Career Theory [24]. Theguiding research questions were: • RQ1: What effect does program participation have on math proficiency, as indicated by mastery of the algebra I benchmark skills targeted? • RQ2: What effect does BOAST have on students’ math self-efficacy? • RQ3: What effect does BOAST have on students’ STEM choice goals? • RQ4: What are the effects of math self-efficacy on change in STEM career goals?3 Randomization of students and schools was infeasible, due to school leaders’ ethical concerns about encouragingstudents to apply to the program without knowing ahead of time what
- Conference Session
- Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 5.A
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Friday Emmanuel James, Kansas State University; Joshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University; Nathan H Bean, Kansas State University; Russell Feldhausen, Kansas State University; Michelle Friend, University of Nebraska - Omaha; Robert Stewart, Kansas State University; Carrie Grace Aponte; David S. Allen, Kansas State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Computers in Education Division (COED)
“strongly agree,” which eventually helped in measuring teachers’ attitudes in the role of being computer science teachers.Lastly, the survey incorporated items from Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Computational Thinking(TSECT), which is meant to capture a sense of students’ self-efficacy in utilizing programmingand Computational Thinking [4]. All of these instruments were put together to providea comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the teacher training program in expandingComputer Science Education.3.4 Ethical ConsiderationsParticipants in the study were informed prior to the commencement of the program aboutthe purpose of the study, what it entails and their right to opt out at any time.Identifiable information was collected for the purpose of
- Conference Session
- Building Engineering Identity and Practice in Rural and Pre-College Contexts
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Natasha Wilkerson, Vivify, LLC; Joanne K Olson, Texas A&M University; Justin Wilkerson, Texas A&M University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
: Engineering Design: Problem Framing, Project Management, Ideation, Engineering Prototyping, Decision Making, Design Methods, Engineering Graphics, Design Practices Communication Material Processing: Manufacturing, Management & Precision, Fabrication, Classification, Casting, Molding & Forming, Separating & Machining, Joining, Conditioning & Finishing, Safety Quantitative Analysis: Computational Thinking, Data Collection, Analysis & Communication, System Analytics, Modeling & Simulation Professionalism: Ethics, Workplace Behavior & Operations, Intellectual Property, Technological Impacts, Role
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 10: Institutions and Structures
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Saskia van Beers, University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
Paper ID #47634Illustrating Meritocracy: (How) Do Canadian Engineers See Social Structure?Ms. Saskia van Beers, University of Toronto Saskia van Beers (she/her) is a current MASc. student studying engineering education under the supervision of Dr. Cindy Rottmann. Her research interests include engineering culture, cultural reproduction and transformation, and structural inequity within engineering.Dr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Leadership Education at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, ethics, and equity in the
- Conference Session
- Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Micheal Oketunde Okegbola, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Olushola V. Emiola-Owolabi, Morgan State University; Julius Ogaga Etuke, Morgan State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)
- Conference Session
- Preparing Future Chemical Engineers
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Sourojeet Chakraborty Ph.D., EIT, Johns Hopkins University; Daniela Galatro, University of Toronto
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
towardsthe Society 5.0 global vision. Coupled with the use of conscious, ethical Artificial Intelligence tools (ChatGPT, JasperAI, Copilot, Gemini, etc.) and learning modalities (active/experiential/inquiry-driven, flipped-classroom, etc.) willempower students to individualize learning experiences/outcomes. However, e-learning must be supplemented byopen discussions [13], and project-based/textbook-based learning, especially for foundational subjects. Withinchemical engineering, core subjects and topics like calculus, transport phenomena, chemical thermodynamics,separation processes, and plant/process design (undergraduate capstone) must be taught through a mix of pedagogicalstrategies. Our results reveal an increase (especially since 2017
- Conference Session
- ERM Technical Session: Equity & Accessibility in Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Kaitlyn Anne Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Kelly J Cross, Georgia Institute of Technology
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
., 2017.[8] K. A. Thomas, A. Kirn, and K. J. Cross, “A Systematic Literature Review of Women’s Epistemologies in Engineering Education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2022.[9] M. Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power & the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.[10] D. Montfort, S. Brown, and D. Shinew, “The personal epistemologies of civil engineering faculty,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 388–416, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20050.[11] L. Benson et al., “Assessing Students’ Researcher Identity and Epistemic Cognition,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2017.[12] L. Benson et al., “Interactions Between Engineering Student Researcher Identity and Epistemic Thinking,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo
- Conference Session
- Track 3: Technical Session 1: Bridging Educational Equity Gaps: A Systematic Review of AI-Driven Tools for Students Living with Disabilities in Engineering and STEM Education
- Collection
- 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
- Authors
- Kevin Zhongyang Shao, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Eric Kyeong-Min Cho, University of Washington; Sophia Tang, University of Washington; Hanlin Ma, University of Washington; Sep Makhsous, University of Washington
- Tagged Topics
- 2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity
by improving social interactions and personalized learning. Italso discusses the limitations of existing AI tools, emphasizing the need for future developmentsto focus on personalization to cater to individual learning needs more effectively while takingprivacy and ethical considerations into account.Rather than focusing purely on NDDs, Bhatti et al. [17] analyzed diverse applications of AItechnologies aimed at assisting students with not only dyslexia and dyscalculia but also a widerspectrum of learning disabilities. Similar to the review by Barua et al., this study also examinedliterature involving facial expressions and eye-tracking analysis to monitor students’engagement. The authors highlight the potential of AI to provide personalized
- Conference Session
- Track 7: Technical Session 4: Diversity in STEM: Strategies of Professional Engineering Organizations in Recruiting and Retaining Women from Minority-Serving Institutions
- Collection
- 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
- Authors
- Rebeca Petean, Society of Women Engineers; Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers
- Tagged Topics
- 2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity
additional questions thatprompt questions aimed to explore individual experiences and capture nuanced recruitmentexperiences.The study's protocol was submitted for Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and was exemptfrom full review. To ensure the confidentiality of all participants in this study, the researchersexplained the interview's purpose and format, obtaining consent for recording, and consent toparticipate in the study. Moreover, a direct line of contact information was provided forfollow-up inquiries, and participants were given the verbal option to omit or add any informationwithin two months from the start of the interview. Adhering to ethical standards and privacylaws, all participants were fully informed about the terms of their
- Conference Session
- ME Division 3: Modern Tools and Methods in Structural Analysis and CAD
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jamie Szwalek, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Christopher Carducci, The University of Illinois at Chicago
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)
work together. It is unclear if these students, the majority of whom areGeneration Z, tend to think of themselves as self-reliant or if the COVID-19 pandemiclockdowns have made lasting effects of isolationism in their work ethics. Another possibleexplanation comes from students lacking confidence in the advice or feedback from peers, as onecomment stated (Q18).3.3 Perceived Design and CAD Skills and Students’ Benefits After Design ReviewMore than half of the students agreed with the statement that they had strong CAD and designskills coming into the course, much higher than anticipated when examining the Part II surveyresponses. The question then becomes about who benefits from design review and how. Basedon the students’ perceived design
- Conference Session
- STEM Education and Intercultural Competence
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton; Leanne Petry, Central State University; Elizabeth Generas, Wright State University; Amy Anderson; Marjorie Langston Langston; Douglas Picard, Greene County Career Center; Camryn Lanise Justice, University of Dayton
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Community Engagement Division (COMMENG)
- Conference Session
- Innovative Pathways in K–12 STEM: Bridging Emerging Technologies and Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Daniel Alejandro Gonzalez, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Science and Technology Studies; Emily Liu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; James Olson, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
regarding the nature of the decisions requested [52]. Examples of this areexperiments [53], medical procedures [54], and the use of data from digital technologies [55]. Whendeveloping processes of consent, participants must be informed of the different consequences upondeciding [56]. This notion arose from the development of ethical principles while performing researchexperiments that involved human subjects and has been translated into frameworks such as theBelmont Principles [57]. A crucial aspect in the process of informing is the development of methodsthat provide individuals and communities with sufficient and useful information to understand therisk and benefits of their decisions [58]. However, many of these interactions are based on the
- Conference Session
- Innovations and Inclusion in Pre-Service and Pre-College STEM Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Marcelo Caplan, Independent Researcher; Aaron Cortes
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
empower them toevaluate both the positive and negative impacts of their projects. This not only enhances their technicalabilities but also nurtures a sense of social responsibility. Tools like the computational action toolkit helpstudents analyze the ethical implications of their designs, fostering a deeper connection between theirwork and societal outcomes. The Computational Action Toolkit provides structured tools to guidestudents through problem-solving, design, and project management. It includes: • Ideation Tools: A mind map for brainstorming meaningful problems. • User Research Tools: Templates for user research, user personas, and a collaborative analysis framework. • Design and Impact Tools: An impact matrix, a
- Conference Session
- International Division (INTL) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Xinfeng Quan, Westlake University; Jing Wang
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- International Division (INTL)
- Conference Session
- Programmatic Design and Resiliency Among Women Engineers
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jing Zhang, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Hou Xie; Rosie Ruoci Shen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Valeri Werpetinski, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign; Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Yuting W. Chen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering Division (WIED)
were very “humane”. She elaborated that they had more “commonsense” in areas such as professionalism, nondiscrimination, mutual respect regardless of gender,and maintaining a gender-neutral perspective. While acknowledging individual differences inmaturity and behavior, A003 emphasized that this group of engineers stood out for their maturityand humanity. Additionally, her fellow interns supported her by addressing a situation in which amale colleague was not contributing—they spoke to him and “forced” him to collaborate withher. A003 attributed this support to her personality rather than her gender as she consistentlydemonstrated a strong work ethic. Similarly, A016 reported that her colleagues in her coreengineering team were very supportive
- Conference Session
- First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 4: Fostering Belonging - Identity, Self-Efficacy, and Retention
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Brian Patrick O'Connell, Northeastern University; Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University; Richard Whalen, Northeastern University; Constantine Mukasa, Northeastern University; Susan F Freeman, Northeastern University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- First-Year Programs Division (FPD)
students experiencehow engineering knowledge coalesces to create practical solutions.The curriculum focuses on learning the principles of engineering and design, which is accomplishedthrough active learning in areas such as problem definition, conceptual design, preliminary and detaileddesign, design communication and implementation, and engineering ethics. The courses emphasizetechnical communication through report writing and presentations related to the projects. There is astrong emphasis on applying technical knowledge, developing problem-solving and decision-makingskills, and using computer-aided design (CAD) to communicate graphically.Algorithmic thinking and programming with C++ and Mathworks’ MATLAB are introduced along withthe basic use
- Conference Session
- Military and Veterans Division (MVD) 1 - Access and Integration
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Alyson Grace Eggleston, Pennsylvania State University; Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Military and Veterans Division (MVD)
. Although each branch has its own list of characteristics such as, theArmy leader characteristics [19], Professional Ethics [20], and individual values called the 4 C’s.These service branch characteristics allow their military members to serve others whileaccomplishing the mission of the nation. Even though stated differently with slightly differentfocus by each branch of service, all have the same general focus to guide military members toserve honorably the ideals of the nation.Lifestyle insightsThe military asks service members to sacrifice much while they serve. Generally, they: • Live on military locations throughout the world that are many times in need of upgrading to meet expected (desired) living conditions • Live
- Conference Session
- Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Micheal Oketunde Okegbola, Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Abiola Olayinka Ajala, Morgan State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators (NEE) Technical Session 3 - Professional and Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gracie Kerr, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Hayden J Wulf, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
transparency between instructors and students in higher education has notable positiveimpacts on student success, particularly among underrepresented populations [25]. Transparencycreates opportunities for students to feel more involved in their education and prepared for thestructure of a course while requiring minimal additional effort on the part of the instructor.Expectations. Establishing expectations within a syllabus, particularly regarding the level andtypes of effort required of students to perform well in a course, allows instructors to betransparent about a class’s workload immediately. Emphasizing effort in a classroom also createsan environment where students are able to benefit from increased work ethic, regardless of innateability [26
- Conference Session
- Systemic and Policy Issues affecting Women Engineers
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Juliette Sweeney, University of Toronto
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering Division (WIED)
onparticipant demographics at each school. Participants represented both research and course-baseddegrees and various levels of study. Recruitment of students was done via emails sent byadministrators within the engineering faculty and recruitment of faculty was done directlythrough departmental emails found on websites. Students were given a $30- gift card tocompensate them for their participation. Data collection activities during this study wereapproved by Ethics Review Boards (the Canadian equivalent of an IRB in the US) at theUniversity of Toronto, Donnybrook University, and Benmiller University.All interviews followed a semi-structured format, were approximately an hour long, and wereconducted in 2022 over Zoom [39]. At the beginning of data
- Conference Session
- New Approaches and Leadership Development Frameworks
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Victoria Kerr, University of Toronto; Brandon Aldo Lista, University of Toronto; Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)
, with an additional $25 provided if the studentparticipated in all three interviews.All interviews were recorded and transcribed via Zoom. Following the interviews, the researchermanually edited the automatic transcription to ensure accuracy. At the beginning of eachinterview, the researcher read through the ethics protocol with the students, reminding them thattheir interview was entirely voluntary and confidential. Semi-structured, open-ended interviewprotocols were developed for use in this study. The protocols were aimed at understanding if andhow internal and external factors including, but not limited to, leadership and leadership identitydevelopment, affected the dynamics of students within the project team. This work is part of alarger
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Accessibility and Empathy in Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Krina Patel, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Kara Brooke Stark, University of Michigan; Corey T Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Jutshi Agarwal, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
].Research shows that early experiences shape students’ STEM career perspectives andinterests [44], making early exposure a critical factor in their future pursuit of STEMpathways [43]. When students engage with design practices, they develop the ability tosystematically tackle complex, socially relevant problems [45] while promoting habits of mindlike creativity, persistence, and ethical reasoning [39]. These experiences help K-12 studentsbuild perspective-taking abilities and learn to consider more diverse stakeholder viewpoints intheir design solutions [2].While engineering design projects provide rich learning opportunities, implementing suchpractices is often challenging. Elementary educators often cite the lack of preparation, materials,and
- Conference Session
- International Division (INTL): Measuring and Assessing Outcomes and Impact
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jose Texier; Maria Mercedes Larrondo-Petrie, Florida Atlantic University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- International Division (INTL)
, and representatives from universities, research centers, civilsociety, and the private sector met to formulate a declaration and action plan to build consensus aroundpolicies, projects, and other solutions focused on governance, regulatory, and institutional frameworks forthe safe, trustworthy, and ethical development of AI in the Americas.Using the results of the commissioned foresight study, LACCEI identified its initial area of focus assemiconductor and chip materials, design, and manufacturing, considering it strategic for security andeconomy in the Americas. In 2022, the United States enacted the CHIPS and Science Act [22], with $280billion in funding to support domestic research, manufacturing, and workforce development in this
- Conference Session
- Undergraduate College Industry Partnerships
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Craig M. Spears, Texas A&M University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)