psychologically realisttheories of ethics, concerned with how people actually think about matters of right and wrongrather than merely how they should [48], [49]. For example, as a pluralist theory of ethicalreasoning, MFT helps to explain how different, competing goods can conflict, resulting in thekinds of conflicts of interests that are central to engineering ethics and other forms ofprofessional ethics [1]–[3].Planned analyses and hypothesesIn this study, MFQ and ESIT scores were treated as outcome variables, and education anddemographic information – such as gender, age, and field of study – were treated as inputvariables. Since relatively few studies have used the ESIT [17], [32], [50] – and only one hasused the ESIT in conjunction with the MFQ [33
mentorship programs.IntroductionWithin graduate education, there is a lack of proper mentorship and mentoring programs atinstitutional and college levels [1]. Mentorship is so highly correlated to student success andprogram satisfaction [2], as such, there is a critical need to establish and improve mentorshipprograms at these institutions. The National Academy of Sciences suggests that with improvedmentoring, “students' educational experience, morale, career planning and placement, andprofessional competence” [3, p. 65] will be enhanced. However, for this mentoring relationshipto flourish and be satisfactory, it requires effort by both parties which would ultimately create a‘mutually beneficial’ partnership between the faculty mentor and the
mentors are now required to create a SMART (Specific, Measurable,Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goal [15] for each mentee and develop a plan to implementthat goal in the academic year. The SMART goal and plan should be completed by the end ofOctober. Project PIs now meet with mentors to discuss the goals for their mentees to make sure itis reasonable. In addition, we survey mentors monthly to document their activities and meet withmentors once a month to gather feedback, identify potential problems, and share successfulstories or tips. Based on the monthly report from peer mentors during the 2020-2021 academicyear, we have observed positive changes between mentors and mentees.4.2 Research ExperienceUndergraduate research is one of the thirteen
study through the act of teaching and mentoring youth in STEM outreachprogramming, and so it was determined that this phenomena was worth exploring further. It wasalso through a discussion with program directors that led to the second reflection question onchallenging assumptions, as they identified this as part of the learning experience for theirinstructors.A summary of key questions and themes is outlined in table 5, below, and the full reflection andinterview protocol is available upon request.Table 5: Interview and Reflection Protocol June: Interview 1 ● Why did you pursue this opportunity? ● How does it link to your future plans/field of study? ● What training did you receive this summer? What additional training would you like to
110) instead of the Calculus, at least one semester delay in thegraduation can occur. Additionally, if a student fails one or more of these pre-requisite chains,the student’s graduation will be delayed by at least one more semester. Another factor thataggravates this situation is that most of the higher division courses are only offered once a yearat CSU Chico and are not offered during the summer or at other universities across the nation.Therefore, the importance of passing the math courses at the scheduled semester is evident of thestudy plan to reduce the time-to-graduation.About 19.1% of the incoming freshman and transfer students in the College of Engineering andComputer Science did not enroll in Calculus as their first math course in
; Conklin’s article. Representational images include a flower, raindrops, and people inconversation. Relational seed shapes and page forms include dotted lines, squares, and circles.]Workshop demonstration 3: Ideating arguments using VPFsWhen beginning my dissertation in 2018, I (Erica) began to use VPFs to ideate my ownarguments and dissertation plans (see Figure 7). As mentioned in our Visualizing Arguments andSketchnotes section, the affordances of VPFs are both rhetorical and epistemological; they helpnew scholars, like myself, think across purposes and make new knowledge and developconcepts.When drawing visual metaphors or using VPFs to ideate their own arguments for the first time,students face two particular struggles: 1) thinking with the
or schematics of potential solutions 12. Account for potential future impacts in developing a solution 13. Prepare technical communication, including written and oral reports or use of figures to represent work 14. Demonstrate social awareness, empathy, and self-awareness in interactions with others 15. Follow proper data collection procedures 16. Account for ways natural environment may affect or be affected by one's work 17. Interpret data, such as results from modeling, validation, and other data processing 18. Develop plans and procedures for experiments 19. Build tangible artifacts as models, prototypes, or working products 20. Consider ethical responsibility 21. Negotiate
engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Mr. Joseph Murphy, University of California, Los Angeles Joseph Murphy is a graduate student of Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles whose research interests include the mobilization of college knowledge, and the role of institutional agents in promoting college access to STEM programs. He received a B.S. in Sociology from Clemson University.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy
and the conducting of evidence-based interventions in school environments.Dr. Darryll J. Pines, University of Maryland College Park Darryll Pines became Dean and Nariman Farvardin Professor of Engineering at the Clark School on Jan- uary 5, 2009, having come to the school in 1995 as an assistant professor and served as chair of the school’s Department of Aerospace Engineering from 2006 to 2009. As dean, Pines has led the devel- opment of the Clark School’s current strategic plan and achieved notable successes in key areas such as improving teaching in fundamental undergraduate courses and raising student retention; achieving suc- cess in national and international student competitions; giving new emphasis to
Paper ID #240942018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Quantitative Analysis of Barriers to Completion of Engineering Degrees forFemale-Identifying and Under-Represented Minority StudentsNancy Mariano, Seattle University Nancy Mariano is a first generation college student, of Pacific Islander heritage, attending Seattle Uni- versity. She is currently majoring in Computer Science and minoring in Mathematics and is scheduled to graduate in June 2018. Upon graduation her plans are to spend two years gaining industry experience as a software engineer
peer mentors are rising sophomores, juniors, andseniors, most of whom have previously participated in a similar summer bridge program and whoshare common academic interests and life experiences with PTG participants.Peer mentoring activities include the completion of weekly one-on-one and small group meetingsof mentors and their assigned participants. Mentors follow weekly discussion guidelines toencourage participants’ learning and reflection; topics include syllabus review, study planning,goal setting, time management, and networking on campus, among other topics.In addition to formal peer mentoring activities, the bridge program environment provides frequentopportunities for participants to create informal connections with one another and
propensity for innovative problem solving. The ESCPII is used as a predictivefactor and then a dependent variable in our research to determine whether students’ creativityand propensity for innovation predicts their college persistence or if the pedagogical practicessupport and cultivate creativity and propensity for innovation in community college engineeringand science students. Structurally, the CPPI-R is a questionnaire in which students respond toclose set questions associated with socio-demographics, type, duration, frequency, and usage ofpedagogical practices categorized as the three sub-constructs of (1) classroom and programperformance support, (2) college attendance support, and (3) program planning and executionsupport. These practices
activities on campus. In fact, several InVenture Challengeparticipants, frequently girls and as young as 6th grade, are already pursuing patentingopportunities. The competition has continued to grow; the 2016-17 cohort has reached morethan 2000 students in 15 counties with 80 teams planning to present their inventions at the statefinals.In the IC, students are free to work on a project of their choosing—there are no required themesor disciplines. We believe that keeping the projects in a currency of the students’ choosing helpsboost student engagement and willingness to see a difficult challenge through to completion9.Different teachers approach project selection or problem finding differently; this is an importantskill for innovation and something
themselves and frequently underestimated the amount of timethat would be needed to execute various phases of the project—particularly those with whichthey had less comfort or familiarity (e.g., user research). These existing gaps in ability toeffectively plan a project and manage available time were exacerbated by the move to individualwork, leaving students with less ability in this area feeling anxious and overwhelmed. In thissection, we identify several challenges that arose in relation to time management, including atension between viewing project work as concurrent v. linear, the feeling that more time wouldresult in positive outcomes, and the introduction of classroom-driven and personally-driven toolsto manage time more
research infrastructure and educational opportunities to ensure an innovative and productivescience and engineering enterprise, and supports the advancement of our nation’s most pressingchallenges, as reiterated in the most recent strategic plan “Empowering the Nation throughDiscovery and Innovation—NSF Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2011-2016.” The strategic plansupports NSF’s mission, providing programmatic and operational underpinnings, and setting thecontext for a broad, balanced NSF portfolio2,3.To maintain its high standards of excellence and accountability, in 1997, the National ScienceFoundation incorporated a policy that would evaluate proposals submitted to the agency under twoMerit Review criteria: Intellectual Merit and Broader
[10].MotivationAfter the introduction of the fall break in 2016, one of the authors noted that midterm grades fortheir first-year programming course were low. In an earlier investigation into what could becausing this drop, the authors identified that students who regretted how they spent their breakperformed worse than their peers who showed no regret, and that inexperienced, strugglingstudents had the highest odds of showing regret [11].Thus, the following year, to mitigate the perceived harmful effects of the fall reading break onthese students, the authors planned an academic and social intervention during the two-day studybreak in fall 2018. During the intervention, instructors and TAs held a collection of one-hourcourse-specific
appropriatetechnology workshops, class discussions, guest speakers, site visits, and online material. In itsfirst pilot, it had thirty-eight students completing the course [1]. Running in parallel to thecampus mode in 2015, the first immersive CDE incorporated the two-week EWB HumanitarianDesign Summit in Cambodia. Eight students, six of whom were supported by the AustralianGovernment New Colombo Plan (NCP) short-term scholarships, completed the course in thismode [1].In 2015, a total of 46 students undertook the course, from which eight undergraduates off-campus and 33 undergraduates and three postgraduates (Master of Engineering) on-campus [20].All students were enrolled in engineering courses, either as a single four-year bachelor degree oras a five-year
mandatory and credited IL course for graduate students.Timeline: First Information Literacy Course for PhD Students Is Offered by the Library(Fall 2002)The course was created following the École Polytechnique's Action Plan 1999-2003 thatincluded the specific objective of "providing students and researchers with training inbibliographic research" [23, 24]. In addition, some professors, who had noticed the positiveimpact of the Library IL training at the undergraduate level, requested similar training forgraduate students [24]. Moreover, the rapid development of specialized bibliographic databasesled to an increase in the number of reference questions received at the Library, even though theengineering students were accustomed to using information
the United States, would be a cheap, viable resource touse in the remediation of heavy metals in water [45]. Melissa saw that there has been littleresearch into corn as a bio-sorbent for heavy metal, and saw the potential of it being used as anadsorbent. Thus, she proposed testing corn cobs for their effectiveness at removing Cadmiumfrom water.The proposal was approved by the NASA Space Grant Committee at NAU and Melissa startedworking on her research. While our study focuses on just one student, her situation is applicableto many others, who are more than likely experiencing similar struggles.Melissa has been meeting with her mentor once, every two weeks to discuss the plan. Mentorand mentee came up with a tentative schedule, plan for
?” Student Immigration into and within Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 2008. 97(2): p. 191-205.24. Trenor, J.M., et al., The relations of ethnicity to female engineering students' educational experiences and college and career plans in an ethnically diverse learning environment. Journal of engineering education, 2008. 97(4): p. 449-465.25. Brainard, S.G. and L. Carlin, A six‐year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 1998. 87(4): p. 369-375.26. Bell, A.E., et al., Stereotype threat and women's performance in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 92(4): p. 307-312.27. Foor, C.E., S.E. Walden, and D.A. Trytten, “I wish that
several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Martin A. Watkins, University of New Mexico Martin A. Watkins is a PhD student in Educational Linguistics at the University of New Mexico. He earned his BA degrees in Deaf Studies (ASL/English Interpretation) and Linguistics from California State University, Northridge, and his MA degree in Linguistics from Gallaudet University. His research em- ploys critical ethnography and discourse analysis to investigate language ideologies and language plan
and areas for improvement. ExCEEd Teaching Workshop SeminarsI Learning to Teach: Justifies importance of formally learning to teach and introduces a model instructional strategy that will be a road map for the ETW.II Principles of Effective Teaching and Learning: Introduces Lowman’s3 two-dimensional model of teaching and provides a compendium of learning principles.III Introduction to Learning Styles: Examines Felder’s Learning Style Dimensions4 and discusses how to accommodate all styles of learners.IV Learning Objectives: Introduces Bloom’s taxonomy5 of educational objectives and shows how to write appropriate and useful learning objectives.V Planning a Class
Chair or Chairperson To man (verb) to staff, to run, to operate Man-hours Work hours, hours worked, staff hours, person hours, hours Mankind Humanity, human race, human beings, people Manmade Artificial, synthetic, manufactured, crafted, machine made Manpower Work force, labor force, personnel, workers Guys Everyone, people, folks● Plan ahead. Include statements about inclusion and diverse learning needs in your syllabus.● Embrace diversity in content and practices ○ Assume students are diverse in ways you can’t see. Race, national origin, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, physical and
actionable components 6. Guide students in refining problems X 7. Guide students in planning investigations to better understand X different components of problems 8. Provide opportunities for students to gather information about X problems or issues of importance 9. Provide students with opportunities to explore multiple X solution pathways for problems 10. Guide students in weighing the pros and cons of different X solution pathways 11. Provide opportunities for students to test their solution X pathways 12. Guide students in evaluating the results of their solution X pathways 13. Provide
both its content (Section 3.2) and form (Section 3.3). To illustrate theproposed typology, we also provide numerous examples of actual feedback comments providedby students and the instructor. We conclude this paper with a general discussion and a plan forhow the developed feedback typology will be used to categorize and analyze the rich feedbackdata collected thus far (Section 4).2. Review of existing typologies of feedback2.1 The design processDesign, as a high form of problem solving20, is generally regarded as essential knowledge for allof the professions. Indeed Simon21 reminds us that design is the core of all professionaltraining, and that “it is the principal mark that distinguishes the professions from thesciences”(p.111). It is
Advancing Engineering Education through Technology Driven Teaching InnovationsAbstractWith the proliferation of technologies that are able to overcome the obstacles of time and space,it is inevitable that change would transform and reshape the traditional ways of doing things. Inhigher education, the impact of educational technologies and their potential to enhance theteaching and learning experiences as well as improve learning outcomes is yet to be felt in anytangible way. This is mainly attributed to the lack of motivation by faculty to utilize newtechnologies in their classrooms. To further motivate faculty to introduce and integrate digitaltechnologies into the classroom as teaching aids, a comprehensive plan was
sixgroups by less than 5 degrees; much less than the control box. The winning group’s design wonbased on both temperature change and cost. Figure 1. Design specifications for the base Figure 2. Planning, measuring, and structural unit, a 6” by 12” box (part 1) beginning to build (part 2) Figure 3. Building a house prototype that Figure 4. Testing and gathering data (part 2 focuses solely on convection (part 2) & 3) Figures 5-7. Examples of final designs with data analysis (part 3)Participants. The study was conducted with a single teacher, Janice (pseudonym), whoparticipated in a one-day professional development (PD) workshop. During this PD workshopJanice was exposed to, interacted with, and learned
,professional insight was not limited to the explicit training provided by the workshops. Forexample, many Latina/o participants spoke of learning how to present themselves asprofessionals by observing and interacting with their peers.Participants spoke of organizational development training designed to help them learn theknowledge and skills related to the daily operation of the organization that would also translateinto the workplace. Through their membership and experiences within NSBE and SHPE, AfricanAmerican and Latina/o engineering students develop skills such as planning and businessmanagement skills. Furthermore, the responsibilities they shouldered in their leadership positionsfrequently put them in control of situations that challenged them
)accepted the invitations. Camper participant selection was based on a personal statement on theapplication form: Please tell us about yourself including your interests (academic and nonacademic) and why you wish to attend this program. What do you expect to learn from attending (the camp)? We are also interested in your plans for college and career. Where do you intend to attend college and what major are you most interested in?Applicants whose personal statements showed a clear interest in computers, cyber security,programming, and technology as well as beginner- or intermediate-level experiences with suchareas were given preference.2015 was our second year co-designing and –implementing summer computer camps together
research professor in instructionaldesign, had designed and taught the course for five previous semesters. In addition, a graduatestudent in human-centered design was present in each of the classes as well as in planningsessions with the instructors to observe and offer additional support. As the course also aimed toget students to engage in cross-disciplinary discussions, it was critical to offer a variety ofperspectives and areas of expertise. As such, the instructors created a list of guest speakers toperiodically visit class. These guests included representation from industry (strategy planning,user experience, design, marketing) as well as other departments (industrial design, business,library science).To help move through the design process