Paper ID #12113Teaching Teamwork: A Training Video Designed for Engineering StudentsMadeleine Arvold, Seattle Pacific University Madeleine Arvold is a second year industrial-organizational psychology master’s student at Seattle Pacific University. Madeleine is interested in organizational and team cultures, and particularly on the effects of those cultures on the attraction and retention of women in the technology industry.Mr. Steven David Mow, Seattle Pacific University Steven D. Mow is and Industrial-Organizational Psychology M.A. student at Seattle Pacific University. He has four years of formal leadership and
forthe course.Bibliography 1. Johnson, C.D., 2006. Process Control Instrumentation Technology (8th Edition). Pearson, Prentice Hall. Columbus, OH. 2. Northrop, R.B., 1997. Introduction to Instrumentation and Measurements. CRC Press, NY. 3. Webster, J.G., 1999. The Measurement, Instrumentation, and Sensors Handbook. CRC and IEEE Press., Baca Raton, FL. 4. Nachtigal, C.W., 1990. Instrumentation and Controls, Fundamentals and Applications. John Wiley and sons, NY. 5. Mitchell, B.W., 1983. Instrumentation and Measurement for Environmental Sciences. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI. 6. Dally, J.W., W.F. Riley, and K.G. McConnell, 1993. Instrumentation for
Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) for the 12 institutions in the University System of Maryland, and Co-PI Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) Bridge to the Doctorate at UMBC. Dr. Tull has worked with thousands of students from Alaska to Puerto Rico, and in Latin America through graduate school preparation workshops that have been sponsored by AGEP, The National GEM Consortium, National Society of Black Engineers, Society for Hispanic Pro- fessional Engineers, Society for the Advancement of Chicano, and Native American Scientists, American Indian Science and Engineering Society, and the Alliance/Merck Ciencia Hispanic Scholars Program. She has presented workshops on graduate school
in Engineering Education Symposium, Bogotá, Colombia., 2017. 11. E. D. Tate and M. C. Linn, “How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students?” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 483-493, 2005. 12. K. L. Tonso, “Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world,” Cultural studies of science education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 273-307, 2006.13. N. H. Choe, L. L. Martins, M. Borrego, M. R. Kendall, “Professional aspects of Engineering: Improving Prediction of Undergraduates’ Engineering Identity,” in American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019.14. M. R. Kendall, M. Denton, N. H. Choe, L. M. Procter, M. Borrego, “Factors
inequities. In addition, she is interested in technology and how specific affordances can change the ways we collaborate, learn, read, and write. Teaching engineering communication allows her to apply this work as she coaches students through collaboration, design thinking, and design communication. She is part of a team of faculty innovators who originated Tandem (tandem.ai.umich.edu), a tool designed to help facilitate equitable and inclusive teamwork environments.Christopher Brooks, University of Michigan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Analyzing Patterns of Pre-Semester Concerns in First-Year Engineering StudentsAbstractThis complete research
programs of high academic recognition and international positioning. 10 years of business experience in financial and administrative areas, leading organizational change management processesJose Daniel BallenMILTON JANUARIO RUEDA VARON, Universidad EanDouglas Lee Robertson, Florida International University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Associating Sustainability Literacy with educational level of Industrial Engineering StudentsSustainability Literacy has become crucial in promoting Education for Sustainable Development(ESD). Embedding ESD in the design of global engineering courses implies the incorporation ofSustainability Literacy into
Paper ID #36891Say Yes to the Stress: Escape Rooms in Civil Engineering ClassroomsMajor Brett Rocha, United States Military Academy MAJ Brett Rocha is a second year instructor at the US Military Academy in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from USMA in 2012, her M.S. in Engineering Management from Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2016, and her M.S. in Civil Engineering from University of Central Florida in 2021. She teaches mechanics of materials, design of steel structures, and design of concrete structures.Dr. Kevin Francis McMullen, United States
groups historicallyunderrepresented in STEM. Mentors will have strategies and tools to facilitate meaningfulrelationships and mutual understanding of individuals whose life experiences are very differentfrom their own. They will be invested in the success of individual students and overallbroadening participation in STEM education and the workforce.Why Mentoring Matters in STEM. As stated in the National Academies’ recent report onmentoring undergraduate researchers, [a]n enterprise-wide commitment to effective mentorship in [science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM)] could lead to high-quality, and sustainable mentoring relationships at all career stages, and it could increase student
, elementary, and middle school curriculum and teacher professional development. Her recent book, Engineering in Elementary STEM Education, describes what she has learned. Cunningham has previously served as director of en- gineering education research at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Educational Outreach, where her work focused on integrating engineering with science, technology, and math in professional devel- opment for K-12 teachers. She also directed the Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) project, the first national, longitudinal, large-scale study of the factors that support young women pursu- ing engineering degrees. At Cornell University, where she began her career, she created
. Sydney: University of Technology, 1998.[2] W. J. Baumol, “Education for innovation: entrepreneurial breakthroughs versus corporate incremental improvements,” Innov. Policy Econ., vol. 5, pp. 33-56, 2005. doi: 10.1086/ipe.5.25056170[3] K. Kazerounian and S. Foley, “Barriers to creativity in engineering education: A study of instructors and students perceptions,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 129, pp. 761-768, 2007. doi: 10.1115/1.2739569[4] T. Armstrong, (2017). “Neurodiversity: the future of special education?” Educ. Lead., vol: 74, pp. 10–16, 2017.[5] J. L. Haney, “Reconceptualizing Autism: an alternative paradigm for social work practice,” J. Prog. Hum. Serv., vol: 29, pp. 61–80, 2018. doi: 10.1080
. Pearson, and H. Schweingruber. 2014, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 180.10. Kőycű, Ü. and M.J. de Vries, What preconceptions and attitudes about engineering are prevalent amongst upper secondary school pupils? An international study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2016. 26: p. 243-258.11. Holland, D., et al., Identity and agency in cultural worlds. 2001: Harvard University Press.12. Ahearn, L.M., Language and agency. Annual review of anthropology, 2001. 30(1): p. 109-137.13. Bandura, A., Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. 1986, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.14. Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Professional Engineers, the Society ofWomen Engineers and Out in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, to name a few.Training is also available for faculty and staff on diversity, equity and inclusion. In 2018, aDiversity, Equity and Inclusion Council was established to provide leadership within the collegeand to promote and achieve a culture that values diversity, equity, and inclusion, especiallyracial/ethnic and gender diversity. It is comprised of faculty staff and students and began meetingmonthly at its inception, though meetings have somewhat become more intermittent since then.The first author performed the coding of this material and used frameworks primarily fromsociological literature. She discussed and refined key themes she
Paper ID #37256Board 39B: Navigating Intersectional Identities in Civil EngineeringEducation and PracticeElliott Clement, Oregon State UniversityDr. Renee M. Desing, The Ohio State University Dr. Renee Desing is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University in the School of Civil and Construc- tion Engineering. Her research interests include diversity, equity, inclusion in the engineering classrooms and workplaces. Dr. Desing graduated from Ohio State with her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, and also holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering
research interests include decision making under uncertainty and partial information, machine learning, and rein- forcement learning, with applications in healthcare, environmental engineering and sustainability, intelli- gent transportation systems, manufacturing, and maintenance optimization.Dr. Angelica M Palomino, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Dr. Angelica Palomino is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She joined UTK in January 2012. Dr. Palomino received her BSCE, MSCE, and Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology, specializing in Geotechnical Engi- neering. She remained at Georgia Tech for one year as a post-doctoral
.: ‘Engineering faculty drawing the line: A taxonomy of boundary work in academic engineering’, Engineering Studies, 2012, 4, (2), pp. 145-16911 Mejia, J., Revelo, R., Villanueva, I., and Mejia, J.: ‘Critical Theoretical Frameworks in Engineering Education: An Anti-Deficit and Liberative Approach’, Education Sciences, 2018, 8, (158), pp. 1-1312 Mejia, J.A., Revelo, R.A., and Pawley, A.L.: ‘Thinking about racism in engineering education in new ways [Commentary]’, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 2020, 39, (4), pp. 18-2713 Valencia, R.R.: ‘Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice’ (Routledge, 2010. 2010)14 Valencia, R.R.: ‘Conceptualizing the notion of deficit thinking’, The evolution
, 2018.[30] E. Zerbe, G. Sallai, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Surviving, thriving, departing, and the hidden competencies of engineering graduate school,” J. of Eng. Educ., vol. 112, no.1 pp. 147-169, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20498.[31] E. Zerbe, G. M. Sallai, K. Shanachilubwa, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Engineering graduate students’ critical events as catalysts of attrition,” J. of Eng. Educ., vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 868–888, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20481.[32] K. Jwa, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Development of a longitudinal method to measure attrition intentions,” in 2022 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., 2022.[33] American Society for Engineering Education, “Engineering & engineering technology by the numbers 2019,” Amer. Soc
Paper ID #34149Redefining Assessment Formats to Replicate Real-world AerospaceEngineering ApplicationsDr. Amelia Greig, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Amelia Greig has degrees in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and Science from the Univer- sity of Adelaide, and a PhD in Physics from the Australian National University. She currently leads the small satellite and propulsion research activities at the University of Texas at El Paso as part of the Center for Space Exploration and Technology Research (cSETR). Dr. Greig has been interested in engineer- ing education research since learning how effective humor can
over 32 years of experience, earned a 5-year accreditation nationwide, and appearsranked internationally by recognized world rankings. Specifically, in the engineering faculty,focusing on female construction engineering students. This is a prestigious program that last yearobtained a double 5-year accreditation (up to 2025) by an international and a national agency,Acreditatora de Chile and CONAN, respectively.The Construction Engineering undergraduate course at this university lasts ten semesters or fiveyears. It includes 50 courses, including Basic Sciences (Physics, Mathematics, and Chemistry), aformation in Economics, General Training on Communication Skills, Information Technologies,Social Responsibility, English Language, and
. van der Toorn, “Other duties not assigned: Experiences of lesbian and gay student affairs professionals at small colleges and universities,” J. Divers. High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 268–278, 2018, doi: 10.1037/dhe0000046.[60] S. S. Starobin and F. S. Laanan, “Influence of Precollege Experience on Self-Concept Among Community College Students in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 209–230, 2005, doi: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.v11.i3.10.[61] S. S. Starobin and F. S. Laanan, “Broadening Female Participation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Experiences at Community Colleges,” New Dir. Community Coll., vol. 142, pp. 37–46
.). (2011). Handbook of Identity Theory and research. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_1Silver, C., Garver, A., & Watkins, L. (2011) Unpacking the apprenticeship of professional identity and purpose: insights from the Law School survey of student engagement. Journal of the Legal Writing Institute, 17, 373-408.Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, 18 CA: Benjamin Cummings.Subotnik, R., Orland, M., Rayhack, K., Schuck, J., Edmiston, A., Earle, J., ... & Fuchs, B. (2009). Identifying and developing talent in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): An agenda for
research also describes some of the experiences that women in engineering uniquely face.Generally speaking, engineering education and engineering practice both can serve as a “chillyclimate” for women, enforcing a sense of non-belonging and hindering women’s acclimation(and/or desire to acclimate) to engineering communities [11], [12]. Cech’s research shows howengineering students’ reasons for identifying with the field are gendered: women are more likelyto value the social consciousness of identifying with engineering, and men are more likely tovalue technological leadership [3]. Ayre, Mills, and Gill find that persistence in the chilly climateof engineering depends on women having a strong sense of belonging to engineering; thus, itdepends also
volunteered at numerous STEM outreach activities on and off of the Boise State campus throughout her time as a student and is passionate about increasing diversity in STEM and helping girls and women to recognize that STEM is a path that is open to them if they want to take it.Ms. Sonya Cunningham, University of Washington Director of STARS Program Diversity & Access College of EngineeringProf. Pamela Cosman, University of California, San Diego Pamela C. Cosman received the B.S. degree with Honor in electrical engineering from the California Institute of Technology in 1987 and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from Stanford University in 1993. In 1995 she joined the faculty of the Department of Electrical and
the moreself-directed aspect is I put a lot of my time and energy into this team in order to help them besuccessful, and I want to continue helping them do that as much as possible.” Dedicating muchof her undergraduate experience reminds her now that, “I want to see that my time and effortswere not wasted on a team that’s going to fall apart as soon as I leave.”For participating women students, ESPTs offer many important experiences roughlycorrespondent to those of professional engineering practice. Students learn how to generate aproduction schedule, to adhere to a budget, to raise funds, to design and test and redesignintricate technological equipment. They also provide students, specifically these women, with theexperience of becoming an
: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, 2nd Edition," ASCE, 2008.4 N. Canney and A. Bielefeldt, "A Framework for the Development of Social Responsibiltiy in Engineers," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 414-424, 2015.5 G. A. Rulifson, A. R. Bielefeldt and W. Thomas, "Understanding of Social Responsibility by First Year Engineering Students: Ethical Foundations and Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.6 E. Cech, "Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?," Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42-72, 2014.7 A. R. Bielefeldt and N. E. Canney, "Impacts of Service-Learning on the Professional Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering
. Ecklund, A. E. Lincoln, and C. Tansey, “Gender Segregation in Elite Academic Science,” Gend. Soc., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 693–717, Oct. 2012.[16] C. Hill, C. Corbett, and A. St Rose, Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. ERIC, 2010.[17] E. Cech, “Engineers and Engineeresses? Self-conceptions and the development of gendered professional identities,” Sociol. Perspect., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 56–77, 2015.[18] A. Green and D. Sanderson, “The roots of STEM achievement: An analysis of persistence and attainment in STEM majors,” Am. Econ., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 79–93, 2018.[19] A. C. Wilkins, “Race, Age, and Identity Transformations in the Transition from High School to College for Black
issues.[8] As increasing technology allows engineers to learn more about existing andemerging problems, it also provides opportunities to develop solutions like never before.[9]Consequently, engineers must be successful in idea generation[8, 10] by fully exploring solutionspaces through the generation of multiple and diverse ideas[11]. Considering a wide spectrum ofideas at the front end of the design process is important in order to consider strong aspects ofconcepts to develop while filtering out other aspects. Generating diverse ideas to consider requiresdivergent thinking,[4, 12] while engineering methods focus on converging on a single solution.While experienced designers appear to use strategies in their idea generation process[13, 14
Science Foundation Engineering Advisory Board. He currently serves on the Pubic Policy Committee of the ASEE Engineering Deans Council. Professor Washington received his BS, MS and PhD degrees from NC State.Prof. Kyu Yon Lim, Ewha Womans University ¨Dr. Christian Fischer, University of Tubingen, Germany Christian Fischer is an Assistant Professor in Educational Effectiveness at the Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology at the University of T¨ubingen, Germany. His research examines path- ways to improve STEM teaching and learning. In particular, he is interested in how digital technologies can be used to improved learning processes
student tuition, therehas been growing concern with attracting and retaining students to traditional programs. This isespecially true in engineering, which requires students to have an arsenal of advancedmathematical and analytical skills and a broad background in science and technology [1].Unfortunately, many of the students who enroll in engineering programs may find themselvessignificantly unprepared for the academic rigors and personal challenges of collegiate life. Inresponse, educators have sought to identify key factors that aid not only in the retention ofstudents, but also maximize the resources necessary to guide those students to successful degreecompletion.One area of investigation has focused on the characteristics of the student
engineering education [4], it is essential to explore the learningoutcomes of international engineering students. In this work-in-progress, we tried tounderstand international engineering students’ learning outcomes and the associatedlearning experiences.Literature ReviewThe number of international students engaged in higher education has been continuallygrowing, from 2 million in 1999 to 5 million in 2016[5]. Also, nearly one-third ofOECD study-abroad students at tertiary education level were enrolled in STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields of study, with 17% of themin engineering, manufacturing, and construction [5]. Hence, the investigations of thelearning experiences of international engineering students have continued
State.Monika B Kwapisz, Montana State University Monika Kwapisz (they/them) is an undergraduate at Montana State University studying Industrial and Management Systems Engineering with a minor in Mathematics. Monika is the president of MSU’s chapter of Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (oSTEM), a cross-country ski coach, and an avid outdoors-person. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Exploring the Relationship Between Students’ Engineering Identity and Leadership Self-EfficacyAbstractIn order to lead the social process required to solve society’s grandest challenges and ensure thatthe capabilities of an expanded engineering workforce are