Conference Session

ConstDiv Technical Session 5 - Pedagogy & Accreditation II

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina A&T State University; Robert B. Pyle, North Carolina A&T State University; Iyshea Borders-Taylor; Christian A. Bock Hyeng, North Carolina A&T State University; Tony E. Graham, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 24 - 27, 2018 [Online]. Available https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/106/papers/21489/view [Accessed June 28, 2018].[16] R. Kegan, The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1982.[17] F. W. Hafferty, “Professionalism and the socialization of medical students” in Teaching Medical Professionalism, R. L. Cruess, S. R. Cruess, J. D. Boudreau, and Y. Steinert, eds. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2009.[18] B. Burford, “Group processes in medical education: Learning from social identity theory,” Medical Education, vol 46, pp.143–152

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt P.E., Lafayette College; Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. Shirley Ann Jackson [4] noted that “[s]ince that time, there has beencontinuing concern that engineering education does not sufficiently incorporate liberal studies…As engineering and the technological revolution continue to transform our world, we must assurethat those who steer these changes understand the totality of the human condition, and that bringsus back to the liberal arts.” The chorus of calls for change has included soul-searching reportssuch as that by Grinter (1955) [5], which was soon overwhelmed by the urgency of Sputnik andthe Space Race insisting on the primacy of purely technical competence, and Olmsted [6].Olmsted’s 1968 ASEE Report Liberal Learning for the Engineer praised a few exemplarystudent-driven, socially

Conference Session

High-Impact Teaching and Learning

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Simon Thomas Ghanat P.E., The Citadel; James Kaklamanos, Merrimack College; Tanya Kunberger P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Corrie Walton-Macaulay Ph.D., P.E., Saint Martin's University; Suresh Immanuel P.E., University of Evansville; David A. Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth; Brock E. Barry P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Shawn Griffiths, University of Wyoming; Craig M. Shillaber, Northeastern University; Chris Swan, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. This would reduce institutionalbias, especially if the grading is done through a ‘double-blind’ process. Additionally, responsesfrom all participating institutions can be reviewed by a single (or small group of) ‘knowledgeexpert(s)’ who are not implementing the instrument at their own institution. This latter strategyplaces a higher level of consistency in grading and providing increased reliability in theinterpretation of results, though they may come from variable sources.In undergraduate geotechnical engineering courses, future research may be needed on bias andprecision in instructor grading on high-stakes assessments such as examinations. Ultimately, thegoal is to work towards reducing bias and increasing precision in instructor grading

Conference Session

Construction Division Technical Session 2: K-12 through Adult Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Torres, Texas State University; Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University; Kristin Marie Kibling, Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

questionnaire questionsPresentation Questionnaire1. Instructor explanations were clear and carefully explained.2. The instructor(s) was knowledgeable in the subject matter.3. The use of a "roaming" lecturer helped me learn the software.4. This topic is very important to my career.5. I preferred the use of peer teachers to learn Microsoft Project.5. Results and AnalysisData collected from the pre and post questionnaires show that there was a large increasein preference of peer teaching over more traditional learning. In general all questionsdemonstrated an improvement after the intervention of the peer teaching methodology.Table 3 and Figure 1 summarize the results of the teaching group pre and postquestionnaire

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin D McPheron, Roger Williams University; Charles R. Thomas, Roger Williams University; William J. Palm, Roger Williams University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

–118.[10] L. Aagaard, T. Conner, R. Skidmore. “College textbook reading assignment and class time activity.” J. of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 14:3, August 2014, 132-145.[11] Lei, S. A., Bartlett, K. A., Gorney, S. E., & Herschbach, T. R. (2010). Resistance to reading compliance among college students: Instructor’s perspectives. College Student Journal, 44(2), 219-230.[12] M. French, F. Taverna, M. Neumann, L. Kushnir, J. Harlow, D. Harrison, R. Seranescu. “Textbook use in the Science and its Relation to Course Performance.” College Teaching. 63: 171 -177, 2015.[13] G. Ragusa. “Science Literacy and Text Book Biases” Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Paper ID

Conference Session

FPD and DEEDs Joint Postcard Sessions

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jillian Beth Schmidt, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, First-Year Programs

with member(s) who had completed themodule and incorporated a microcontroller board into their design was also compared to the restof the class by comparing average final project scores. Final project scores for the RubeGoldberg machines were assigned based on performance, complexity, and professionalappearance. The performance score was based on how well the task was carried out and includedpoints for the precision of the device’s timing and for successfully completing the final step(unlocking the door). Project complexity was assessed by counting the number of different stepsin the process from device activation to the door being unlocked. Finally, projects were expectedto be professional in appearance with the team’s name, logo, and theme

Conference Session

Track: Learning Spaces, Pedagogy & Curriculum Design Technical Session 10

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Heather Doty, University of Delaware; Shawna Vican, University of Delaware; Robin Andreasen, University of Delaware; Sue Giancola, University of Delaware

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Learning Spaces, Pedagogy & Curriculum Design

Smith from the Lerner College of Business and Economics forpartnering with us on this exciting project and for instructing the UD ADVANCE Women’s LeadershipProgram.References[1] ACE, “Pipelines, Pathways, and Institutional Leadership: An Update on the Status of Women in Higher Education,” American Council on Education, 2017. Available: https://www.acenet.edu/news- room/Documents/Higher-Ed-Spotlight-Pipelines-Pathways-and-Institutional-Leadership-Status-of- Women.pdf. [Accessed 29 November, 2018].[2] C. Bilen-Green, K. Froelich, S. Jacobson, “The Prevalence of Women in Academic Leadership Positions, and Potential Impact on Prevalence of Women in the Professorial Ranks,” WEPAN Conference Proceedings, 2008.[3] C. Bilen-Green

Conference Session

PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only

Collection

2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Xi Zhou, Northern Arizona University; Fang Lei, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications; Delbert D Willie, Northern Arizona University; Andrew Chrysler, Northern Arizona University; Liangbo Xie, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications; Phillip A Mlsna, Northern Arizona University; Jie Yang, Northern Arizona University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions

Transnational Education: From the Perspective of Administrators and Students," British Council, 2017.[2] J. K. Y. C. Cedrick Kwuimy, "A first time flipped classroom experience: Measure of outcomes and challenges," in ASEE Proceedings, Southeast Section Conference, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[3] S. H. P. B. L. D. G. Z. J. Jeongkyu Lee, "Toward Success of Collaborative Program In School of Engineering Between the US and China," in ASEE International Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[4] S. I. Segalewitz, "Seven Years of Success in Implementation of a 3 + 1 Transfer Program in Engineering Technology Between Universities in China and the Unites States," in 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Technical Session 2: Teaching and Learning

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

D. Cenk Erdil, Sacred Heart University; Darcy Ronan, Sacred Heart University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Review, 84, 191–215.Brown, S. D. & Lent, R. W. (1996). A social cognitive framework for career choice counseling. The Career Development Quarterly, 44, 354–366.Carpi, A.C.; Ronan, D.M.; Falconer, H.M. & Lents, N.L. (2017). Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self‐efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 169-194.Code.org. (2019). Computer Science Principles. Retrieved from https://code.org/educate/csp.Cordes, D.; Parrish, A.; Dixon, B.; Borie, R.; Jackson, J. & Gaughan, P. (1997). An integrated first-year curriculum for computer science and computer engineering. 3. 1354-1358 vol.3 10.1109/FIE

Conference Session

High-impact Learning Practices

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kelly Brumbelow, Texas A&M University; Luciana R. Barroso, Texas A&M University; Greg Stadter, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

). Rubrics are oriented toward performance ofthe required work, but not necessarily quality or depth of that work; that is, a reflective essay thatexhibits shallow or misdirected learning can be as equally valid for course completion as one thatshows a career-changing experience. The key concern is for authentic and conscientious work onthe deliverables; this is an important course characteristic in light of the varying quality of HILPmentoring and experiences outside the control of the academic faculty. Deliverables deemedunsatisfactory are returned to the student with a one-week opportunity for a single revision. If allthree deliverables (including revisions) are satisfactory, the student receives a grade of “pass.” Ifunsatisfactory deliverable(s

Conference Session

Maker Spaces in Design Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jenny Wang, Georgia Institute of Technology; J. Auston Ferrarer, Georgia Institute of Technology; Gabrielle E. Lonsberry, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kentez Lanier Craig, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

hands-on experience with fabrication tools/processes,and learned how to evaluate them with respect to a certain functional need. Additionally, studentslearned to use prototyping methods to solve design problems, incorporate user feedback, anditerate their designs in a meaningful manner. Figure 5: Course Elements in Relation to Bloom's TaxonomyAcknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy /National Nuclear Security Administration under Award Number(s) DE-NA0003921.Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the UnitedStates Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any oftheir employees, makes any warranty

Conference Session

Introduction to the Field of Biomedical Engineering - June 25th

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Christine E. King, University of California, Irvine; Beth A. Lopour, University of California, Irvine

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

- Cost Brain Computer Interface TechnologiesAbstract:Advancing an interest and literacy in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)fields in high school students through summer and after school programs has been widelypopular since the 1990’s, and these programs are effective at improving retention and persistenceafter graduation. However, there still remains a lack of designing programs to increase interestand literacy of biomedical engineering (BME) related applications that are scalable at otherinstitutions. This is typically due to the challenges of providing costly resources that areavailable only in specific laboratory settings and require graduate level expertise to operate. Toprovide a low-cost and scalable approach to

Conference Session

Emphasizing Communication and the Humanities in Environmental Engineering

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; David Robledo, Texas Tech University; Francesco V. Donato, Texas Tech University; Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University; Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University; Danny D. Reible, Texas Tech University; Chongzheng Na, Texas Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

predictions for4 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/naivebayes/naivebayes.pdfWeek 1/Art 1 (i.e., row 1, columns 2-5, shaded in blue), suggest that three students (S3, S4, S9)carried forward (repeated) significant content from Art 1 (Week 1) into subsequent essays. Asimilar pattern appears for S7, whose essays were nearly all classified as Week 3, suggesting thatthere was very little change in what this student was reporting across the homework essays.Basically, the algorithm could not detect significant shifts in the content of that student’s essays.Table 1. Confusion Matrix for Naïve Bayes Predictions for the Week Students ComposedArt and Narrative Essays. Students are shown as S#, e.g., S1. ACTUAL

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 15

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah Hug, Colorado Evaluation and Research Consulting; Suzanne Eyerman, Fairhaven Research and Evaluation; Trina L. Fletcher, Florida International University; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University; Michael A. Soltys, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

design of the face to face workshops in 2019 were influenced by Techbridge Girls’ expertiseand bank of curricular resources, feedback provided in one-on-one interviews with the firstcohort of Ambassadors in 2018-2019, and EngineerGirl staff and evaluators’ impressions ofcohort 1’s struggles. For example, the difficulty one Ambassador had in securing space for anevent led to the recommendation to have a project management workshop for cohort 2. Table 2below highlights the list of workshop topics that were discussed during the 2019 event. Workshop Workshop Topic Component 1 Icebreakers 2 Gender Responsiveness

Conference Session

Inventive Opportunities for Research and Exposure

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Inez Hua, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Loring Nies, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Lindsey B. Payne, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

Semester(s) Taught (*to be taught) 1 Direct Potabilization Spring 2016, Spring 2017 2 Recover Value from Solid Waste Spring 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2018 3 Discovering Green Chemistry Spring 2016 4 The Internet of Sustainability Fall 2016, Fall 2017 5 Data Analytics for Energy Fall 2016, Spring 2018 6 Modeling Complexity Fall 2016, Fall 2017, Spring 2019* 7 Deconstructing a Garbage Gyre Spring 2017 8 Environmental Impact in Automotive Systems

Conference Session

Professional Issues and Opportunities for Engineering Librarians

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael Fosmire, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/02763915.2012.812920[8] C.A. Erdmann and B.A. Harding, “Leveraging the Internet and limited on-campus resourcesto teach information literacy skills to future engineering practitioners.” Paper presented at the2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, Ky. https://peer.asee.org/16479[9] C. A. Erdmann and B. A. Harding, “Information literacy: Needs – Skills –Assignments.” In Proceedings of the 1988 ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. vol. 5, p.2073-2078, 1988.[10] A. S. Van Epps, M. Sapp Nelson, M. Fosmire, and B. Harding, "Nextgeneration of online tutorials: Finding technical information at Purdue." In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on Engineering Education, Coimbra, Portugal, September 3-7, 2007

Conference Session

Approaches to Assessment and Student Reflection

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kenya Mejia, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Wendy Roldan, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

: Insights from Undergraduates.”[2] J. Dewey, Experience And Education. Simon and Schuster, 2007.[3] D. A. Schön, The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.[4] A. R. Carberry, T. S. Harding, P. J. Cunningham, K. R. Csavina, M. C. Ausman, and D. Lau, “Professional and personal use of reflection by engineering faculty, students, and practitioners,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018, vol. 2018-June.[5] L. Boswell, “The structure trap: students’ perceptions of reflection on a co-curricular immersion service-learning trip,” Thesis, Humboldt State University, 2010.[6] G.-D. Chen, C.-C. Liu, K.-L. Ou, and M.-S. Lin

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Cornucopia #1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joshua L. Hertz, Northeastern University; Richard Whalen, Northeastern University; Constantine Mukasa, Northeastern University; John Sangster P.E., Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Characteristics to Dimensions of Student Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness,”Coll. Stud. J., 2006.[4] S. Liaw and K.-L. Goh, “Evidence and control of biases in student evaluations ofteaching,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., pp. 37–43, 2003.[5] C. Kim, E. Damewood, and N. Hodge, “Professor Attitude: Its Effect on TeachingEvaluations,” J. Manag. Educ., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 458–473, 2000.[6] J. S. Pounder, “Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analyticalframework for answering the question,” Qual. Assur. Educ., 2007.[7] T. Hinkin, “The Effects of Time of Day on Student Teaching Evaluations: Perceptionversus Reality,” J. Mangement Educ., 1991.[8] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton,“Persistence

Conference Session

Embedded Systems and Cybersecurity in ECE

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Asmit De, Pennsylvania State University; Mohammad Nasim Imtiaz Khan, Pennsylvania State University; Karthikeyan Nagarajan, Pennsylvania State University; Abdullah Ash Saki, Pennsylvania State University; Mahabubul Alam, Pennsylvania State University; Taylor Steven Wood, Pennsylvania State University; Matthew Johnson, Pennsylvania State University; Manoj Varma Saripalli, Pennsylvania State University; Yu Xia, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Swaroop Ghosh, Pennsylvania State University; Kathleen M. Hill, Pennsylvania State University; Annmarie Ward

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Demonstration in Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST), 2016, Online: http://www.hostsymposium.org/host2016/hardware-demo-list_2016.php[3] A. Holst, J. Jang and S. Ghosh, "Investigation of magnetic field attacks on commercial Magneto-Resistive Random Access Memory," 2017 18th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Santa Clara, CA, 2017, pp. 155-160.[4] CSAW Embedded Security Challenge, https://www.csaw.io/esc[5] Berrett, Dan. "How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture." The chronicle of higher education 12 (2012): 1-14.[6] Furman, Burford J. "The un-lecture: a computer-assisted curriculum delivery approach for the effective teaching of mechanical design

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: REU 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

of systems approaches on biological problems in drug discovery. Nature Biotechnology, 22:1215-1217.2. Emmert-Streib, F., S-D Zhang, and P. Hamilton. 2015. Computational cancer biology: education is a natural key to many locks. BMC Cancer, 15:7.3. Janes, K.A., P.L. Chandran, R.M. Ford, M.J. Lazzara, J.A. Papin, S.M. Peirce, J.J. Saucerman, and D.A. Lauffenburger. 2017. An engineering design approach to systems biology. Integrative Biology, 9(7):574-583.4. Dunn, M.C. and P.E. Bourne. 2017. Building the biomedical data science workforce. PLoS Biol., 15(7):e2003082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.20030825. Hood, L., R. Balling, and C. Auffray. 2012. Revolutionizing medicine in the 21st century through systems approaches

Conference Session

Star Tech: Bringing Data Science and Technologies into the Classroom

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sotiria Koloutsou-Vakakis, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. 423-451, 2004.[8] R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/, 2013.[9] P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar, "Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning," Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 369-398, 1991/06/01 1991.[10] E. H. Fini, F. Awadallah, M. M. Parast, and T. Abu-Lebdeh, "The impact of project-based learning on improving student learning outcomes of sustainability concepts in transportation engineering courses," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 473- 488, 2017.[11] J. S

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sana M. Syed, Saint Louis University; J. Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University; Shannon M. Sipes, Indiana University; Traci Aucoin; Adrienne Enriquez, Oregon GEAR UP; Kelsey Z. Musa, Saint Louis University; Rachel Bultas

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

seminar was supported bythe Oregon GEAR UP program in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Education, throughthe GEAR UP program, grant No. P334S140033. The opinions expressed are those of theauthors and do not represent the views of the GEAR UP program or the U.S. Department ofEducation.References1. States, N.L., Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States, Education, Editor. 2013, The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.2. Yoon Yoon, S., M.G. Evans, and J. Strobel, Validation of the Teaching Engineering Self‐ Efficacy Scale for K‐12 Teachers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Engineering Education, 2014. 103(3): p. 463-485.3. Board, N.S., Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. 2016: Arlington, VA.4

Conference Session

Course Design, Course Projects, and Student Perceptions in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joshua A Enszer, University of Delaware; Catherine A Fromen, University of Delaware

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. Boice, Advice for new faculty members: nihil nimus, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.[2] P. C. Wankat, The effective, efficient professor: teaching, scholarship, and service, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2002.[3] J. Price and S. R. Cotten, "Teaching, research, and service: expectations of assistant professors," The American Sociologist, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 5-21, 2006.[4] B. G. Davis, Tools for teaching, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.[5] T. Huston, Teaching what you don't know, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.[6] W. J. McKeachie and M. Svinicki, "Countdown for course preparation," in McKeachie's teaching tips: strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 2006

Conference Session

Alternative Methods of Teaching and Learning Mechanics

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, Rice University; Samuel Garcia Jr., Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

twosentences that the intention is to ‘understand how a steel, circular bar, loaded under torsion,behaves until failure.’For the second section of improvement, the preceding lab manual mostly contained experimentalprocedures in paragraph format, as shown in Figure 2, which made it difficult for students to followand understand. Thus, the authors decided to reformat the procedures in a numbering, hierarchicalscheme such that each step would be followed accordingly (Figure 3). This modificationeliminated the need of having to search in multiple paragraphs for necessary information anddeciding what to implement. In addition, the revised manual specified exactly the type of table(s)needed for recording experimental data. This allowed students to include

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Student Thought

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Erika A. Mosyjowski, University of Michigan; Javiera Espinoza von Bischhoffshausen, University of Michigan; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

of these dimensions, are represented in their ecological model thatincludes a cognitive dimension within an interpersonal dimension, within a broadersocietal/cultural dimension.Our team’s larger study builds uponthe work of these researchers whohave characterized different elementsof systems thinking. We representour working definition of systemsthinking in Figure 1, where the“component” is in the center, whichrepresents a potential solution orsolutions to the engineering problembeing explored. The expandingcircles represent the contexts that canand should be considered in makingdecisions about the solution(s) andtheir appropriateness. Many times Figure 1: Elements of Systems Thinkingthis component is part of a largersystem, thus

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in the Sophomore Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Uchenna Asogwa, The University of Toledo; Matthew W Liberatore, The University of Toledo; Timothy Ryan Duckett, The University of Toledo; Gale A Mentzer, Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1712186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. This work was completed within the framework of University of Toledo protocol202214.References1. Crimson. Top 10 Jobs in 2030: Skills You Need Now to Land the Jobs of the Future: Future Skills. 2018 [cited 2019 January]; Available from: https://www.crimsoneducation.org/us/blog/jobs-of-the-future.2. Vest, C.M., Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. 2012.3. Daigger, G.T., et al., Real World Engineering Education Committee. 2012.4

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: First-year Experiences

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Elizabeth Pluskwik, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Yuezhou Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation, First-Year Programs

Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2012.[3] B.J. Tewksbury, “Specific Strategies for Using the “Jigsaw” Technique for Working in Groups in Non-Lecture-Based Course,” Journal of Geological Education, 43(4), pp. 322- 326, 1995.[4] D. Fitzgerald, “Employing think–pair–share in associate degree nursing curriculum,” Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 8(3), p. 88-90, 2013.[5] D.E. Allen, R.S. Donham, and S.A. Bernhardt, Problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol 128, pp. 21-29, 2011.[6] S. Freeman, et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23) pp. 8410-8415, 2014.[7] S. Martin, D

Collection

2019 ASEE Zone I Conference & Workshop

Authors

Lisa Greenwood; Mark Indelicato; Miguel Bazdresch; Mike Eastman

established by the United Nations in 2015.Students had to identify a firm on which to base their project, and then determine which of the17 goals would be most relevant and appropriate for their firm to support, based on its context.This was intentionally open-ended, and could include, for example, the firm’s environmental,social, and economic impacts, sphere of influence, stakeholder interests, and how the firmcould affect or be affected by the issue(s) related to each goal. Students worked in small teams to identify and contextualize the problem associatedwith the selected goal, and then to develop a set of proposed objectives, targets, and actionsfor the firm to contribute to the global goal over the next five years, and present the

Collection

2019 ASEE Zone I Conference & Workshop

Authors

Elena Brewer; Anthony Dalessio; Sarah Giersch; Nancy Louwagie

semester ifthey plan to work in the vacuum industry or to enhance their skillset in this area. However, theonly way vacuum course(s) can currently be incorporated into the EET program is as technicalelective course(s) taken during the fourth semester. A result of this mis-alignment in sequencingbetween institutions was that some parts of the Introduction to Vacuum Technology course weretoo rudimentary for fourth semester students. As a result, the EET department has since maderevisions to the program that allow for one technical elective course during the third semester.This will allow students to take the introductory vacuum course during third semester and one ortwo advanced vacuum courses during the fourth semester. This will also allow for the

Conference Session

ECCD Technical Session 4: Energy and Analysis

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jennifer Brinker, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College; Kenneth Walz, Madison Area Technical College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

and the City ofFreiburg im Breisgau for their help in facilitating the CREATE Germany program.6. References[1] L. Quitzow, W. Canzler, P. Grundmann, M. Leibenath, T. Moss, and T. Rave, "The German Energiewende–What's happening? Introducing the special issue," ed: Elsevier, 2016.[2] W. Fischer, J.-F. Hake, W. Kuckshinrichs, T. Schröder, and S. Venghaus, "German energy policy and the way to sustainability: Five controversial issues in the debate on the “Energiewende”," Energy, vol. 115, pp. 1580-1591, 2016.[3] L. Gailing and A. Röhring, "Germany’s Energiewende and the spatial reconfiguration of an energy system," in Conceptualizing Germany’s Energy Transition, ed: Springer, 2016, pp. 11-20.[4