design: Observations from Mudd Design Workshop III. Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 92(1): p. 105-107.7.5. Jonassen, D. Design problems for secondary students. 2011, National Center for Engineering and Technology Education: Utah State University, Logan, UT.6. Maher, M. L., & Tang, H.-H. Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design. Research in Engineering Design, 2003. 14(1): p. 47-63.7. Douglas, E. P., McNeill, N., Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Therriault, D. J. Dealing with ambiguity in open- ended engineering problems. Research in Engineering Education Symposium. (2011, 4-7 October). Madrid, Spain.8. Borrego, M., Newswander, C.B., McNair, L.D., McGinnis, S., Paretti, M.C
,purified water for 600 orphans. The untreated underground water is pumped from a well with adepth of 150 feet and then goes through a 5-stage water filtration system to produce cleandrinking water at the flow rate of 2 gallons per minute. The system also needs to store, regulate,and distribute 1,200 gallons of water.As shown in Figure 1, the system is composed of five major components including the solarpanels, the submersible pump, the water filters, the storage tank, and the battery pack as analternative power source. The 4 135 watt solar panels provide power for the submersible pump,the UV filter, and slight lighting needs. The submersible solar pump can deliver up to 6 gallonsper minute and lift up to 200 feet maximum depth capability. The
from engineering and science revealed that almost two-thirds had a topic-phrase headlinesupported by a bulleted list of subtopics.1 Because slides are used so often by engineeringeducators to communicate research, to teach students, and to have students demonstrate whatthey have learned, the question arises how effective this topic-subtopic structure is, comparedwith other slide structures, for helping audiences understand and remember the information In a recent study, we found that presentation slides following an assertion-evidencestructure led to statistically significant increases in comprehension of complex concepts in Page
its applicability to higher education. There are several definitions and approaches toquality that were developed with a particular focus on industrial products and services. Amongthe various approaches, total quality management (TQM), ISO 9000, Quality FunctionDeployment (QFD), and six sigma are the most widely utilized [1-4]. Although using differentmeasures of a customer satisfaction index, these approaches have the commonality of definingquality as “meeting or exceeding customer requirements.” In addition, these methods also definequality as a repeatable process, thus reducing variation among products and services.There are fundamental differences and challenges associated with applying these industrial orbusiness-focused quality
. Universities must continue to take an active role tostrengthen and grow these partnerships which provide benefits to all involved. Thispaper will focus on models established at a medium size Master’s I Institution. GannonUniversity has established programs in collaboration with local industry that have provento achieve the following objectives: (1) to establish an academia-industry collaborativegraduate program and a Graduate Research Program (GRP), (2) to demonstrate theeffectiveness of programs as a strategy to build up a talent pool of engineeringprofessionals, and (3) to extend the pipeline for engineering professionals who enterexisting leadership programs at local industries.This paper presents general models by which universities approach these
should always be taken under consideration, (1) the screen must be able to holdoperator’s attention with maximum display clarity and (2) the design must allow a person withno training or little experience to be able to successfully operate a machine.In this paper we are focusing on a few fundamental factors critical to HMI touch-screen displaydesign. The objective here is to provide design guidelines to accomplish an effective HMI whichwill enable its operators to operate in a very user friendly way with maximum operationalsimplicity.Screen LayoutProper screen layout is very important for a good HMI display. Generally, a human operatorscans an HMI screen, as any other regular screens, starting from top left corner to right and thendown the
graduate students and young faculty members. Analysis of the awardees’dossiers revealed the challenges associated with evaluating the impact of innovations on teachingand learning as well as issues surrounding the dissemination of innovations in engineeringeducation.1. IntroductionIn this paper we report on preliminary results of a study undertaken to determine the impact ofthe Premier Award for Excellence in Engineering Education Courseware on the culture ofengineering education. NEEDS, the precursor to the Engineering Pathway(http://www.engineeringpathway.com/ep/about/index.jhtml) developed the Premier Award “torecognize high-quality, non-commercialcourseware designed to enhance Figure 1: Courseware Defined
method. It also serves as a qualitative evaluation of the iKNEER platform.Providing a better understanding of how this research tool influences novice researchers’decision-making process, results of this study could inform further development and futuredesign of such tools.1. IntroductionEngineering Education Research is a newly emerging and highly interdisciplinary field ofresearch1–5. Many researchers in this field come from an engineering background. They mayencounter difficulties of shifting mindset from solving specific engineering problems toconducting rigorous educational research using educational and sociological methodologies6.Novice researchers in a new field usually encounter intellectual and social challenges at the pointof maximum
written text in spatial proximity to the animation, andavoided the use of excess items distracting the learner from the point. The screenshot in Fig. 1describes a BJT in its forward-active mode.In addition, we developed a parallel learning unit engaged in the same contents as the learningunit described above, only it does not include computer animation but uses static diagrams drawnon the blackboard. The research compares the academic achievements and attitudes of studentswho studied the different units. Fig. 1: Screenshot describing the processes electrons (marked as blue balls) undergo in the transistor in forward- active mode. The holes are marked as hollow balls
AC 2012-3390: HOW MUCH PHYSICS THE FIRST-YEAR ENGINEER-ING STUDENTS REALLY NEED: A STUDY AND SURVEYDr. Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University Bala Maheswaran, College of Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115. Page 25.701.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 1 How much Physics the First Year Engineering Students really need: A Study and Survey AbstractFreshmen engineering courses are the eye opener for engineering students in
perceived the usefulness of their course towards anengineering degree. Even though there were differences between the two sites that extendedbeyond the pedagogies used in first-year courses that could influence student motivation, thedifferences in instructional methods appears to have played a key part in how studentsexperienced their first-year coursework and developed ideas about engineering work.Introduction and Purpose of the ResearchProblem-based learning (PBL) is a pedagogical practice that has been shown to be effective inscience and engineering courses for promoting student learning 1-11. This approach is alsogaining traction as a possible way to promote student motivation and retention in engineeringprograms 12-14, although research
% of schoolsresponding had one course.Course TimingThe most common timing for the first course in MEB within a program’s curriculum was at thestart of the sophomore year. The distribution of the timing of course offerings is given in Figure1 below. Table 1 reports the course timing on a historical basis. Term of First Course % of responding schools 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Second First term, Second First term, Third term term, First- Second-year term, Senior senior
efficiency race.1. Introduction History of human powered transportation goes back as far as 3500 BC when wheels wereused to pull carts in ancient civilizations. Advent of steam engine and internal combustion enginein the 17th century propelled development of modern transportation system on the wheels. Page 25.704.2Availability of inexpensive source of energy gave rise to mass transportation system in thefollowing centuries. In recent years, rise of energy cost, awareness on depleting fossil fuelreserve, and concern for environment has generated awareness in developing more eco-friendlyand sustainable technology in transportation across the globe
significantchanges was switching from programming in C to programming in MATLAB in the fall of 2009,since MATLAB has become the major language used in various engineering disciplines forproblem solving [1, 4, 5]. Following this, the course changed its meeting time from three times aweek to four times a week. It now uses a 2+2 format: two days of lecture per week, with eachlecture day followed by laboratory time to facilitate material understanding by hands-on practice. Page 25.705.2Approximately 120 students will attend one-hour lecture in an auditorium. The following day,students attend a small lab session, usually 26 students, to allow more contact with
instructor-directed environments. While generalized results, these findingsencouraged the Instructor’s hybrid/buffet approach to the course.In order to offer students a buffet of learning resources, a variety of course components wereutilized. The course components were categorized as: 1. Online Resources a. Instructor-Created Modules, consisting of Introduction videos with learning objectives, Lessons in both PowerPoint™ and video form, and Example problem videos. b. WileyPLUS3, the online learning environment associated with Principles of Engineering Economic Analysis 5e by White, Case and Pratt4, consisting of a digital copy of the text as well as Reading and graded Practice
worthwhile by the fifthgrade customers. The best designed robotic pets from each section of the first-year engineeringcourse, as voted on by their peers, were invited to attend a follow-on event at the intermediateschool where the fifth graders evaluated the designs. The fifth graders then completed anassignment to create an advertisement for their favorite pet. Figure 1, below, is an example of aPenguin Robot designed by a team of First-Year Engineering Students (right) and theadvertisement developed by a Fifth Grade student. Figure 1. Penguin: First-Year Design (right) & Fifth Grade Advertisement (left)For the Freewheeling Derby, the long term goal was to spur the thought process for science fairprojects for the fifth graders. The
final presentations. To build on an adjustment from 2010,engineering faculty were further encouraged to participate in the workshops for studentsinvolved in the competitions. As we highlight in Table 1 and in the next section, one of thetraining sessions was completely led by an engineering faculty member using engineeringfacilities. Also, engineering students were actively recruited and encouraged to participate in thechallenge, and this year students accepted the invitation. Some students used their entries into theIdeation Challenge as projects for their engineering classes. The engineering students whoparticipated in the Phase I challenge were sophomores and juniors. Two engineering seniorsfollowed the teams in Phase I of the program to be
skills.Recent work has focused on evaluation of problem solving skills in statics courses and areas ofdifficulty (Newcomer and Steif 1, Newcomer 2). Additionally, evaluations of conceptualunderstanding and problem solving skills have been studied and concept inventories have beendeveloped and pre-tests and multiple choice questions analyzed to highlight typical studentshortcomings (Douglas et al. 3, Steif and Dantzler 4, Steif and Hanson 5). Follow up studiesfocused on improving problem solving performance by assessing pre-post tests and written andverbal protocols (Steif, et al. 6). It was shown that problem solving could improve if studentsdevelop strategies for recognizing when and how to apply techniques.There has been significant educational
attracting and retaining a diversepool of engineering students,1 diversity is still limited throughout engineering. Data from the2000 census reported by the National Academy of Engineering, for example, reports that whileAfrican-Americans made up 12.1% of the U.S. population, they made up only 2.5% of the U.S.engineering workforce.2 Moreover, retention rates for African-American students are lowest(42.1%), and retention rates for Native Americans (52.9%) and Hispanics (62.5%) still remainbelow those of non-Hispanic whites (73.7%).2 Minority doctorate numbers and minority facultynumbers also remain low, especially in the leading research institutions. Data on science,engineering, and health (SEH) doctorate recipients show that Blacks, Hispanics, and
strength of qualitative research comes from threemain points 1) “exploration and discovery” in which it aims to learn about a specificgroup of people, 2) “context and depth” by providing an insight into people’s behaviorsand experiences, 3) “interpretation” where it gives an understanding of the reasoningbehind people’s behaviors12. Qualitative research includes several strategies for datacollection such as observations, content analysis of existing sources, interviews, andfocus groups. This study will employ focus groups as a strategy for collecting data to gaininsights into the STEM students’ experience at Virginia Commonwealth University(VCU) and identify participant characteristics that may prevent him/her from continuingin a STEM
betweenlevels and types of abstractions.1 Introduction With the development of concept inventories and other conceptual assessment tools,engineering educators have become increasingly aware of the importance of teaching studentsabout concepts and conceptual frameworks rather than rote skills or lists of facts1. Students whopossess a consistent core conceptual framework are better able to recall knowledge, applyknowledge, and learn new knowledge, because the framework helps students synthesize theirknowledge into a manageable cognitive unit. In the context of long-established disciplines such as physics and chemistry, instructorscommonly agree upon a core conceptual framework for the discipline (e.g., Newton’s three lawsfor mechanics; and
underpinnings of engineering. The problem is that in the early part of the programstudents don’t see any demonstration of what the practice of engineering is all about; thatengineers create the solutions that serve humanity and improve the quality of life. So they areleft with the impression that, “this is not what I signed up for” and they move to another major.The RWEP is intended to address this ‘first-year’ gap.It is widely known that we will need many more science, technology, engineering, andmathematics graduates in the coming years and there will be many job openings in these fields.As reported in the US News & World Report [1], there will be approximately 8M jobs in thesehigh technology disciplines within next 8 years. The shortage of
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 1 IIT Campus as a Sustainability Living Laboratory for Student Education and Research Abstract As one of its key initiatives, WISER has developed a collaborative program with IIT academic colleges and the Office of Campus Energy and Sustainability (OCES) to achieve its mission of making IIT the most sustainable urban campus in our nation and utilizing the IIT campus as a living laboratory for education and research for both graduate and undergraduate students. At IIT campus, we are committed to significantly
. These environments are generally automated, complex systems withcomponents such as conveyors, computer-numerically controlled (CNC) machine workstations,automated guided vehicles (AGVs), and robots. Industrial automation can be classified into threeclasses: (1) fixed automation, (2) programmable automation, and (3) flexible automation. Withfixed automation, specially designed equipment is utilized to produce a single product only.Programmable automation uses equipment to make batches of products at a time. Once a singlebatch is finished, the equipment can be reprogrammed to make another batch of products. Onthe other hand, flexible automation allows for the manufacture of different parts to be made atthe same time within the same manufacturing
employer of engineers in the country, predicts that by June 2012, the portionof their STEM workforce eligible to retire will more than double to 69.5 percent. Likewise,NASA is seeing similar trends in its workforce.5 The National Research Council’s 2007 reportentitled, “Building a Better NASA Workforce: Meeting the Workforce Needs for the NationalVision for Space Exploration,” reported that the NASA workforce has been steadily aging sincethe early 1990s.17 As of 2007, the average age of a NASA scientist or engineer was 45.8 years asshown in Figure 1. In contrast, during the Apollo years, when the nation was developing thevehicles needed to begin our initial lunar exploration campaign, the average age of a NASAscientist or engineer was 26.1 Locally
Huntsville (UAHuntsville) College of Engineering has established acapstone senior design sequence that provides real-world design experience. The concept ofusing a capstone design course as a summative activity within an engineering program is rootedin the constructivist theory of authentic learning. Authentic learning is a process of creatingknowledge through meaningful experiences, such as real-world problem-based activities.5Authentic learning experiences can be distilled down to 10 design elements: (1) real-worldrelevance, (2) use of an ill-defined problem that cannot be easily solved, (3) the need forsustained investigation, (4) the need for multiple sources and perspectives, (5) collaboration, (6)constant reflection, (7) interdisciplinary
. Page 25.718.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Impact of Self-Efficacy on Interest and Choice in Engineering Study and Careers for Undergraduate Women Engineering StudentsAbstractSelf-efficacy refers to the belief in a persons’ ability to perform a specific task. Starting inmiddle school, girls tend to underestimate their abilities in STEM. This confidence gap amonggirls persists through high school into college [1]. This gap is presumed to be partiallyresponsible for the gender gap in engineering and other STEM fields (e.g. computer science,physics). In 2006, women only earned 19.5% of the undergraduate BS engineering degrees in theU.S. Using the Life Course Expectancy Framework, this
creative thinking and keep students engagedin shipbuilding and repair processes. The teacher training component of these projects hasprovided training in using and implementing these modules. The paper presents the results fromcommunity college faculty workshops and from the survey of SBRCD events.Key wordsProject Based Learning; Workforce Development; STEM Education; Shipbuilding Industry.1. Introduction Old Dominion University in collaboration with three community colleges i.e. MountwestTechnical and Community College, South Lousiana Community College and Mid AtlanticMaritime Academy along with marine industry and local school systems are attempting toimprove STEM preparation using innovative experiences for students and teachers in
that engineering students are well preparedto navigate the new challenges that arise as a result of the changing dynamics in the growinglyinterconnected global community. In the book, Educating Engineers: Designing for the future ofthe field, Sheri D. Sheppard et al. (2008) 20 highlight that engineers cannot continue to functionas a “neutral problem-solver” because the work of engineers has a global impact. In a similarvein, Miller (2007) 14 makes an argument for engineers to be prepared beyond technology andtechnical skills. Twenty-first century prepared engineers will need competencies “in teamwork,communication, entrepreneurial thinking, creativity and design, and cross-disciplinary thinkingin a global context” (Miller, 2007, p. 1) .A range
‘Fundamentals of Nanoscience and Engineering.’The NUE project (2009-2010, NSF-EEC 0939344) refers this course as Nanotechnology-I.The Nanotechnology-I offered as aspecial topic course in the first year of 20project has now become a regular coursein the Department of MechanicalEngineering, with the aforementioned 15 No. of studentscourse title. This course is now plannedto be offered every fall semester in theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering. 10Fig. 1 shows a continuous increase in thenumber of student enrollment eachsemester with substantial increment in 5the student enrollment in the Fall-2011.It is not clear if