construction decision mak- ing, sustainable design and construction, applications of machine learning and AI in construction, and engineering education. Dr. Uddin is also dedicated to serve his profession and the community. He is a member of ASEE, ASCE, TRB and CRC, and serves as the VP of the ASCE Tennessee Section and Sec- retary for the ASCE Holston branch. Dr. Uddin is active with ASEE engineering technology division and served as ETD program chair for CIEC in 2017 and 2018. Dr. Uddin also served as the Editor-in-Chief for Journal of Engineering Technology from 2019 to 2021. Dr. Uddin received outstanding researcher award, outstanding service award and sustainability leadership award from his college.Dr. Keith V
Numbers of Students and Its Effect on Engineering Design Self-efficacy,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Mar. 21, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-skills-focused-approach-to-teaching-design- fundamentals-to-large-numbers-of-students-and-its-effect-on-engineering-design-self- efficacy[4] T. P. Carpenter et al., “Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis,” Behav. Res. Methods, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 2194–2208, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3.[5] A. G. Greenwald, B. A. Nosek, and M. R. Banaji, “Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol
taught as separate classes but have some of theircomponents scattered and embedded into other classes to fulfill the minimum requirements. Also, noseparate labs are offered but rather many labs are partially embedded with the relevant lectures due to thehour’s limitations.Table 1 Enrollment and Graduation data for the ET program Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Enrolled 139 228 266 296 337 330 317 317 293 296 224 290 275 278 Graduated 0 1 11 11 32 26 27 34 38 26 18 34 28 24A close look at the mechanical ET concentration reveals that a total of 46 hours is
: https://bibliotecadigital.mineduc.cl/bitstream/handle/20.500.12365/4624/retencion_edsup _2014.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yS.[4] J. M. Braxton y S. A. McClendon, “The Fostering of Social Integration and Retention through Institutional Practice”, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 3, n.o 1, pp. 57-71, May 2001, doi: 10.2190/RGXJ-U08C-06VB-JK7D. [Online]. Available in: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2190/RGXJ-U08C-06VB- JK7D.[5] Russell & M. Zafonte, "Perception versus Reality: Skill Perceptions of First-year Engineering Students", in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, jun. 2019, p. 33168, doi: 10.18260/1-2--33168 [Online
the statusquo (Valverde & Dariotis 2019). Other groups (e.g., transfer students) possibly also faceimpediments to teamwork, although the extent of this is less studied. When confronted with thesechallenges, some students resist and disagree with their peers, while many choose to ignore oraccept the negative behaviors or disengage from the collaboration. Because disagreement canserve as an antidote to unfair treatment, not to mention as a catalyst for innovation (Song et al.2006), we explore in this study whether it is connected to a student’s engineering identity, andwhether it can be used to strengthen that identity.In this research initiation grant, we focused on the central question of how engineering identityshapes or is shaped by
Technology in Boston, Massachusetts. In this role, he over sees the Programs Industry Advisory Board collabora- tion and facilitates professional interaction and networking opportunities for Construction Management students. Mr. D’Agostino’s administrative work also focuses on faculty professional development and industry collaboration. Mr. D’Agostino is a member of the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Construction Management Association of America (CMAA), American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) and the International Facilities Management Association (IFMA). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
Education, Jun. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringvillage.com/share/document.url?mid=cpx_9cb441b17030ed7bdbM7 a4610178163146&database=cpx[15] N. J. Washuta and P. Bass, “A complementary approach to implementing entrepreneurship into a mechanical engineering senior capstone course sequence,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringvillage.com/share/document.url?mid=cpx_9cb441b17030ed7bdbM7 5ba10178163146&database=cpx[16] P. Golding, S. A. Starks, R. V. Gonzalez, M. R. Kendall, D. G. Novick, and C. H. Joslyn, “Leadership in Engineering Innovation and Entrepreneurship,” in ASEE Annual Conference and
). Many community colleges across the U.S. offer engineering courses whichtransfer to a four-year university, and 42.7% of engineering students are enrolled at a communitycollege at some point in their education (NSF, 2019). However, year-over-year retention ofstudents in community colleges is low – freshman-to-sophomore rates of retention hover around55% on average (Monaghan and Sommers, 2022). One reason for low retention is thatcommunity college students tend to have more commitments outside of school than theircounterparts at four-year universities. Many colleges offer programs intended to increaseretention and engagement among these students (such as research, scholarships, and formalmentorship). In this review, I sought to answer the
-development[18] L. H. Mayled et al., “Coaching and Feedback in a Faculty Professional Development Program that Integrates the Entrepreneurial Mindset and Pedagogical Best Practices into Capstone Design Courses,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/coaching-and-feedback-in-a-faculty-professional-development-program-that-inte grates-the-entrepreneurial-mindset-and-pedagogical-best-practices-into-capstone-design-courses[19] H. E. Dillon, L. Hamilton Mayled, M. L. Nagurka, M. I. Carnasciali, and D. E. Melton, “Intercollegiate Coaching in a Faculty Professional Development Program that Integrates Pedagogical Best Practices
. Starobin, D. J. Smith and F. S. Laanan, "Deconstructing the transfer student capital:Intersect between cultural and social capital among female transfer students in STEM fields,"Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1040-1057, 2016.[5] C. Mobley and C. E. Brawner, ""Life prepared me well for succeeding": The enactment ofcommunity cultural wealth, experiential capital, and transfer student capital by first-generationengineering transfer students," Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 43, no.5, pp. 353-369, 2019.[6] H. D. Budinoff and V. Subbian, “Asset-based Approaches to Engineering Design Education:A Scoping Review of Theory and Practice,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, July2021.[7
. Communicating Across Cultural and Epistemological Boundaries [Conference session] 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. https://peer.asee.org/30538[16] Rasoal, C., Danielsson, H., & Jungert, T. (2012). Empathy among students in engineering programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.708720[17] Jacobs, E. L., de Jongh Curry, A. L., Astorne-Figari, C., Deaton, R. J., Salem, W. M., Xu, Y. J., & Roberts, S. G. (2019, June 15). The Role of Empathy in Choosing Majors. Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1 [Conference session] 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa
active learning,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2015, vol. 2015-February, no. February. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044084.[14] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410 LP – 8415, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[15] M. T. H. Chi, “Active‐constructive‐interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities,” Top Cogn Sci, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–105, 2009.[16] M. C. Hatfield and D. Lewandoski, “Student-Led Aerospace Design Team Experiences,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[17] K. Krause and H
. Perez, and P.R. Hottinger, Complete evidence-based practice paper: The impact of information literacy instruction on the synthesis level of first-year engineering students. Presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/34316[2] J. M. Williamson, N. Rice, C. Tenopir, J. Kaufman, C. J. Faber, and R. M. Ellestad. (2019). Best practices for engineering information literacy instruction: Perspectives of academic librarians. Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/best-practices-for-engineering-information-literacy- instruction-perspectives-of-academic-librarians[3] R.A.M. Hensel, O. Brown
past years, she has taught several thousands of students of diverse backgrounds. She has a strong passion for teaching innovations, in particular, active learning strategies, engagement pedagogies, and open education. Dr. Yan strives to make sustained contributions to support holistic student success and wellbeing through her teaching practices and scholarship of teaching and learning. She is an active contributor to UBC, professional societies, and the broader communities through her K-12 outreach program and committee work within and beyond UBC. Dr. Yan is a registered P.Eng. with EGBC (Engineers and Geoscientists BC), and a member of CEEA (Canadian Engineering Education Association) and ASEE (American Society for
in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Are Project Teams Actually Developing Professional Skills?IntroductionProfessional skills have been praised throughout engineering education as vital for engineeringstudents to succeed in the professional world (Chaibate et al., 2019; Rao, 2014). Academia hasalso noted the importance of developing professional skills in ABET Student Outcomes (ABET,2021, pp. 8–9) and the Educating the Engineer of 2020 report from the National Academy ofEngineering (2004). Experiential learning is one way that academia has changed in response,which can take place inside and outside of the
Arduino in engineering education: Motivating students to grow from a hobbyist to a professional,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[29] I. Perenc, T. Jaworski, and P. Duch, “Teaching programming using dedicated Arduino educational board,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 943-954, 2019.[30] D. W. Russell, K. B. Lucas, and C. J. McRobbie, “Role of the microcomputer‐based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in thermal physics,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 165-185, 2004.[31] U. Sari, H. M. Pektaş, H. Çelik, and T. Kirindi, “The Effects of Virtual and Computer Based Real Laboratory Applications on the
, 2005.[7] S. R. Jones and M. K. McEwen, “A conceptual model of multiple dimensions of identity,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 405–414, 2000.[8] C. Mobley, J. B. Main, S. M. Lord, C. E. Brawner, and M. M. Camacho, “Institutional Agents’ Roles in Serving Student Veterans and Implications for Student Veterans in Engineering,” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[9] A. Minichiello and H. Wilkinson. "CAREER: ‘Support our Troops’: Re-storying student veteran and service member deficit in engineering through professional formation and community advocacy: YEAR 1." Proceedings of the 129th Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[10] H. Wilkinson and A
[NSF, 2023]. These findings fuel the potential for new innovations byleveraging individuals’ different backgrounds, experiences, and points of view [NSF, 2023]. Inresponse to a call from engineering education leaders [Leydens & Lucena, 2017; Baillie &Pawley, 2012; Riley, 2008], peers have adopted asset-based instructional strategies and makecontinuing strides to transform engineering education in the 21st Century [Budinoff & Subbian,2021; Gravel et al., 2021; Mejia et al., 2019]. As engineering educators continue to modernizeinstructional practices and engineering curricula across the nation, we find ourselvesencountering and challenging deep-seated systemic inequities entrenched in engineeringcurricula and in our own instructional
Online https://www.mathworks.com/help/ © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference supportpkg/raspberrypiio/ug/connect-to-raspberry-pi-hardware-board-in-MATLAB-online.html retrieved 11/14/2022.12 Raspberry Pi 4 Model B 2019 Quad Core 64 Bit WiFi Bluetooth ( 4GB) https://www.amazon.com /Raspberry-Model-2019-Quad-Blue- tooth/dp/B07TC2BK1X/ref=asc_df_B07TC2BK1X/?tag=&linkCode=df0&hvadid=3801 45854123&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=7479973512482872947&hvpone=&hvptwo=& hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9009666&hvtargid=pla- 818643320764&ref=&
Paper ID #39818Board 215: Applying Research Results in Instructor Development to ReduceStudent Resistance to Active Learning: Project UpdateMs. Lea K. Marlor, University of Michigan Lea Marlor is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Michigan, studying Engineering Education Research. She joined the University of Michigan in Sept 2019. Previously, she was the Associate Director for Education for the Center for Energy Efficient ElecDr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for
thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. We appreciateall faculty and student focus group and interview participants who helped us understand theirexperiences managing and engaging in IRES programs around the world.References[1] K. Davis, Y. Jalali, V. Lohani, D. Knight, and R. Müller, “Student learning in international research programs: A comparison across cultural contexts,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference proceedings, 2018.[2] K. A. Davis and D. B. Knight, “Becoming a researcher: A narrative analysis of US students’ experiences in Australia,” presented at the Proceedings of the 8th Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 2019.[3] L. M. Hatfield, C. T. Amelink, N. P. Sanderlin
science (although it is important to note thatcorrelation is not causation). Furthermore, for the purposes of this current article, it isimportant to note that advanced degrees (i.e., Master’s and PhD are not included in thecurrent study).A more granular analysis of the demographic data reported by the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) suggests that the apparent “success” of the campaign maybe limited primarily to growth in the diversity of sex within undergraduate enrollment.For example, the percentage of baccalaureate degrees awarded to female students in the“the big three” of electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and civil engineeringincreased from 2009 through 2019 (i.e., from 11.5% to 14.4% in mechanical engineering
of Clusters of Participation in Engineering Co- curricular Activities on Student Outcomes,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020, p. 35305. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 35305.[22] A. Walsh, E. Diehl, and C. Faber, “Studying the Resource Networks of First-year Engineering Students: Establishing a Data Collection Method,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 33321. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33321.Appendix 1. Example Survey QuestionsPlease describe the most significant learning experience you have had at [School]. (open)Please describe a satisfying learning experience while at [School]. Why was it satisfying?(open)Please describe a
of Kentucky.Dr. Uddin is a proponent of project-based learning and developed innovative teaching strategies to engage hisstudents in solving real-world problems and prepare them with skills and knowledge that industry requires. Hiscurrent research interest focuses on risk-based estimation, quality assurance and optimization in construction,sustainable design and construction, and applications of machine learning and AI in construction. Dr. Uddin is activewith ASEE and served as ETD program chair for CIEC and ASEE. Dr. Uddin also served as the Editor-in-Chief forJournal of Engineering Technology from 2019 to 2021. He is the recipient of the 2023 the Peter G. Hoadley Awardfor Outstanding Engineering Educator of the ASCE.KEITH V. JOHNSON is
-care.IntroductionResearch indicates that underrepresented students who participate in engineering education, likewomen, students of color, LBGTQIA+ students, and students with disabilities, may experience thecampus and classroom environments as alienating and hostile, which can cause feelings ofdisorientation and uncertainty and affect their mental well-being (Allen, 2017; Cech & Waidzunas, 2011;Godfrey, 2007; Harper, 2010; Haverkamp et al., 2019; Kimmerer, 2013; Lee, 2020; Liptow et al., 2016;Lord & Camacho, 2013; Rice & Alfred, 2014; Riley, 2008, 2013; Seron et al., 2015, 2018; Slaton, 2013;Stonyer, 2002; Tate & Linn, 2005). Further, the culture of engineering education has been identified as abarrier to increasing the participation of
in-person instructions, thanks to the declined infection rate afterthe development of different vaccines, online and hybrid class meetings are still an option forconducting a class, especially for those students who might contract COVID during the semester.In this work, we study the students’ performance in a linear control course across three differentcohorts: pre, during, and after the pandemic. Statistical analysis of students’ exam scores is usedto infer whether the online experience significantly affected the students learning or not. We usedata from the course offering in fall 2019, fall 2020, and fall 2021, where the taught modules andfinal exams were kept the same. In addition, while the homework assignments were not identical,they
and K. Wolff, "Developing employability in engineering education: a systematic review of the literature," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 165-180, 2020.[7] S. A. Male and R. R. King, "Enhancing learning outcomes from industry engagement in Australian engineering education," Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 101-117, 2019.[8] B. Roberts and C. Przestrzelski, "The Industry Scholars Mentorship Program: a professional industry connection experience for engineering undergraduate," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[9] L. Mann, R. Chang, S. Chandrasekaran, A. Coddington, S. Daniel, E. Cook and T. D. Smith, "From problem-based
eval- uation process and was recently (2016-2019), the accreditation coordinator for the school of Engineering. Her interest in engineering education emphasizes developing new classroom innovations and assessment techniques and supporting student engagement. Her research interests include broadening participation in STEM, equity and diversity, engineering ethics, online engineering pedagogy, program assessment so- lutions, transportation planning, transportation impact on quality of life issues, and bicycle access. She is a proud Morgan Alum (2011), having earned a Doctorate in Civil Engineering, with a focus on trans- portation. Dr. Petronella James earned her Doctor of Engineering (Transportation) and Masters of
solutions to their needs, whichin turn may help to improve graduate student mental health and aid in facultyadvisor mentoring and management responsibilities.2 Current State of Graduate Student Mental Well-BeingMental health needs among graduate students are likely 10% higher than therest of the population, potentially causing a mental health crisis within academia(Hyun et al. 2006, p. 256). Graduate students are also not as studied as theirundergraduate counterparts in terms of mental well-being (Cranford, Eisen-berg, and Serras 2009; Levecque et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2019; Nature Editorials2019; Paglis, Green, and Bauer 2006; Schlosser et al. 2011; Sverdlik et al. 2018;Waldeck et al. 1997). University counselors have reported an increase in
Education, vol. 34, no. 4, 2012.[40] J. E. Dowd et al., “Student learning dispositions: Multidimensional profiles highlight important differences among undergraduate stem honors thesis writers,” CBE Life Sci Educ, vol. 18, no. 2, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-07-0141.[41] M. Sumpter, D. Follman, and M. Hutchison, “2006-1812: WHAT AFFECTS STUDENT SELF-EFFICACY IN AN HONORS FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING COURSE? What Affects Student Self-Efficacy in an Honors First-Year Engineering Course?,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2006.[42] S. Conrad, S. S. Canetto, D. Macphee, and S. Farro, “What attracts high-achieving, socioeconomically-disadvantaged students to the physical sciences and engineering?,” Coll Stud